A toxicological comparison between two uranium compounds in Artemia salina: Artificial seawater containing CaCO3.

Uranium (U) mining is an aquatic environmental concern because most of these harmful compounds are discharged into freshwater, reaching the saline environment as the final destination of this contaminated water. Carbonates are present in ocean waters and are essential for benthic organisms, however they may influence the U-induced toxicity. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the toxicity of uranium nitrate (UN) and uranium acetate (UA) in Artemia salina (AS), which is one of the leading representatives of the marine biota. The cultures of AS (instar II) maintained in artificial seawater containing CaCO3 were exposed for 24 h to different concentrations of U compounds. The results showed that AS were more sensitive to UN (LC50 ≈ 15 µM) when compared with UA (LC50 ≈ 245 µM) indicating higher toxicity of this U compound. Calculated U speciation indicated that Ca2UO2(CO3)3 and (UO2)2CO3(OH)3- complexes predominated under our experimental conditions. The immobilization/lethality was observed after 9 h of exposure for both U compounds. However, only UN caused a significant decrease (≈40%) in the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity when compared with control. In order to observe preliminary toxicity effects, we evaluated oxidative stress parameters, such as catalase (CAT) activity, TBARS formation, radical species (RS) generation and cell membrane injury and/or apoptosis (CMI). In this study, we demonstrate that U compounds caused a significant decrease in CAT activity. Similarly, we also observed that UN increased TBARS levels in AS at concentrations 5 times lower than AU (10 µM and 50 µM, respectively). Furthermore, RS generation and CMI were enhanced only on AS treated with UN. Overall, the effects observed here were remarkably significant in AS exposed to UN when compared with AU. In this study, we showed different profiles of toxicity for both U compounds, contributing significantly to the current and scarce understanding of the aquatic ecotoxicity of this heavy metal.

Atorvastatin inhibits osteoclastogenesis and arrests tooth movement.

INTRODUCTION: In addition to their cholesterol-lowering effects, the statin class of drugs appears to enhance osteogenesis and suppress bone resorption, which could be a clinical concern during orthodontic treatment. In this animal study, we aimed to determine whether atorvastatin (ATV) affects orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) through osteoclast inhibition. Furthermore, we analyzed the potential adverse effects of ATV on long-bone turnover and endochondral ossification. METHODS: Rats were administered ATV (15 mg/kg) or saline solution via gavage (n = 12 animals/group), starting 2 weeks before initial OTM. Tooth displacement was measured after 7, 14, and 21 days. Histologic sections of the maxilla and femur were obtained after 14 and 21 days of OTM and stained (hematoxylin and eosin; TRAP assay) for histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: ATV was associated with significant (P <0.05) reductions in OTM and osteoclast counts. Independently of drug administration, OTM increased the number of osteoclasts and reduced the bone-volume ratio compared with the control maxillae without OTM. Long-term statin administration did not appear to affect femoral endochondral ossification. CONCLUSIONS: This experimental study showed that the long-term use of ATV can significantly promote osteoclast inhibition and slow the OTM in the first week in rats. Under physiologic conditions, the drug did not affect bone turnover and endochondral ossification.

Atorvastatin-induced osteoclast inhibition reduces orthodontic relapse.

INTRODUCTION: The statin class of drugs enhances osteogenesis and suppresses bone resorption, which could be a plausible biologic mechanism for mitigation of orthodontic relapse. We aimed to determine whether atorvastatin (ATV) might affect orthodontic relapse and osteoclastogenesis by modulating expression of RANKL and osteoprotegerin (OPG), crucial molecules involved in bone turnover. Furthermore, we analyzed the adverse effects of ATV on femur turnover and endochondral ossification. METHODS: Wistar rats were subjected to orthodontic tooth movement for 21 days, followed by removal of the appliance and ATV or saline solution administration. Up to 7, 14, and 21 days of ATV administration, tooth relapse was measured, and maxilla and femur sections were obtained and prepared for hematoxylin and eosin, TRAP, and immunohistochemical (RANKL and OPG) staining. RESULTS: ATV decreased tooth relapse (P = 0.03) and osteoclast counts (P = 0.04), which were positively correlated (P = 0.006). Statin administration increased periodontal expression of OPG (P = 0.008), but not of RANKL protein. ATV administration also enhanced growth plate cartilage thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Statin-induced OPG overexpression reduces relapse after orthodontic tooth movement, in a phenomenon correlated with decreased osteoclast counts. This phenomenon sheds light on OPG as a molecular target that modulates maxillary bone metabolism and orthodontic relapse.

A new device for step-down inhibitory avoidance task--effects of low and high frequency in a novel device for passive inhibitory avoidance task that avoids bioimpedance variations.

BACKGROUND: Step-down inhibitory avoidance task has been widely used to evaluate aversive memory, but crucial parameters inherent to traditional devices that may influence the behavior analysis (as stimulus frequency, animal's bioimpedance) are frequently neglected. NEW METHOD: We developed a new device for step-down inhibitory avoidance task by modifying the shape and distribution of the stainless steel bars in the box floor where the stimuli are applied. The bars are 2 mm wide, with rectangular shape, arranged in pairs at intervals of 1cm from the next pairs. Each pair makes an electrical dipole where the polarity inverts after each pulse. This device also presents a component that acquires and records the exact current received by the animal foot and precisely controls the frequency of stimulus applied during the entire experiment. RESULT: Different from conventional devices, this new apparatus increases the contact surface with bars and animal's paws, allowing the electric current pass through the animal's paws only, drastically reducing the influence of animal's bioimpedance. The analysis of recorded data showed that the current received by the animal was practically the same as applied, independent of the animal's body composition. Importantly, the aversive memory was observed at specific stimuli intensity and frequency (0.35 or 0.5 mA at 62 and 125 Hz but not at 0.20 mA or 20 Hz). Moreover, with this device it was possible to observe the well-known step-down inhibitory avoidance task memory impairment induced by guanosine. CONCLUSION: This new device offers a substantial improvement for behavioral analysis in step-down inhibitory avoidance task and allows us to precisely compare data from different animals with distinct body composition.