Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit-Lesion-Only PCI in STEMI Patients With Diabetes and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the COMPLETE Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the COMPLETE trial (Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization to Treat Multivessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI), a strategy of complete revascularization reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events compared with culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. Patients with diabetes have a worse prognosis following STEMI. We evaluated the consistency of the effects of complete revascularization in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: The COMPLETE trial randomized a strategy of complete revascularization, consisting of angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention of all suitable nonculprit lesions, versus a strategy of culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (guideline-directed medical therapy alone). In prespecified analyses, treatment effects were determined in patients with and without diabetes on the first coprimary outcome of cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction and the second coprimary outcome of cardiovascular death, new myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. Interaction P values were calculated to evaluate whether there was a differential treatment effect in patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS: Of the 4041 patients enrolled in the COMPLETE trial, 787 patients (19.5%) had diabetes. The median HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) was 7.7% in the diabetes group and 5.7% in the nondiabetes group. Complete revascularization consistently reduced the first coprimary outcome in patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.59-1.29]) and without diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.90]), with no evidence of a differential treatment effect (interaction P=0.36). Similarly, for the second coprimary outcome, no differential treatment effect (interaction P=0.27) of complete revascularization was found in patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43-0.87]) and without diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.39-0.60]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel disease, the benefit of complete revascularization over a culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention strategy was consistent regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes.

Association Between Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-term Risks of Stroke and Death in Noncardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently reported as a complication of noncardiac surgery. It is unknown whether new-onset perioperative AF is associated with an increased risk of stroke and death beyond the perioperative period. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the long-term risks of stroke and mortality associated with new-onset perioperative AF after noncardiac surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2020 for studies reporting on the association between perioperative AF and the risk of stroke and death occurring beyond 30 days after noncardiac surgery. Reference screening, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. Data were pooled using inverse variance-weighted random-effects models and presented as risk ratios (RRs). RESULTS: From 7344 citations, we included 31 studies (3,529,493 patients). The weighted mean incidence of perioperative AF was 0.7%. During a mean follow-up of 28.1 ± 9.4 months, perioperative AF was associated with an increased risk of stroke (1.5 vs 0.9 strokes per 100 patient-years; RR: 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-3.9, I2 = 78%). Perioperative AF was also associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (21.0 vs 7.6 deaths per 100 patient-years; RR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5-2.2, I2 = 94%). The pooled adjusted hazard ratios for stroke and all-cause mortality were 1.9 (95% CI: 1.6-2.2, I2 = 31%) and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3-1.7, I2 = 20%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had perioperative AF after noncardiac surgery had a higher long-term risk of stroke and mortality compared with patients who did not. Whether this risk is modifiable with oral anticoagulation therapy should be investigated.

CONTEXTE: La fibrillation atriale (FA) est une arythmie fréquemment attribuée à une complication d'une chirurgie non cardiaque. On ne sait toutefois pas si l'apparition d'une FA périopératoire est associée à un risque accru d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès au-delà de la période périopératoire. Nous avons donc procédé à un examen et à une méta-analyse systématiques dans le but d'évaluer les risques à long terme d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès associés à l'apparition d'une FA périopératoire à la suite d'une chirurgie non cardiaque. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans MEDLINE et EMBASE depuis leur création jusqu'à mars 2020 pour y relever les études signalant l'association entre la FA périopératoire et le risque d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès survenant au-delà de 30 jours à la suite d'une chirurgie non cardiaque. Le tri des références, la sélection des études, l'extraction des données et l'évaluation de la qualité ont été effectués en double. Les données ont été regroupées à l'aide de modèles à effets aléatoires pondérés par l'inverse de la variance et présentées sous forme de rapports de risques relatifs (RR). RÉSULTATS: Parmi 7 344 références, nous avons inclus 31 études (3 529 493 patients). L'incidence moyenne pondérée de FA périopératoire était de 0,7 %. Dans le cadre d'un suivi moyen de 28,1 ± 9,4 mois, la FA périopératoire était associée à un risque accru d'accident vasculaire cérébral (1,5 vs 0,9 accident vasculaire cérébral par 100 années-patients; RR de 2,9; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %; de 2,1 à 3,9; I2 = 78 %). La FA périopératoire était également associée à un risque considérablement plus élevé de décès toutes causes confondues (21,0 vs 7,6 décès par 100 années-patients; RR de 1,8; IC à 95 %; de 1,5 à 2,2; I2 = 94 %). Les rapports de risques instantanés ajustés regroupés d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès toutes causes confondues étaient de 1,9 (IC à 95 %; de 1,6 à 2,2; I2 = 31 %) et de 1,5 (IC à 95 %; de 1,3 à 1,7; I2 = 20 %), respectivement. CONCLUSIONS: Les patients qui souffraient de FA périopératoire à la suite d'une chirurgie non cardiaque présentaient un risque accru à long terme d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès par rapport aux patients qui n'en souffraient pas. Il serait approprié d'examiner la possibilité de modifier ce risque par une anticoagulothérapie orale.

What is the Impact of Frailty on Prescription of Anticoagulation in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are both associated with advanced age. Oral anticoagulants (OAC) effectively prevent strokes in AF patients but are underutilized in the elderly, possibly due to misperception of frailty. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review to determine the prevalence of frailty in patients with AF, and whether frailty was associated with reduced prescription of OAC. METHODS: We systematically searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Search terms combined relevant words and MeSH headings: 1) atrial fibrillation, 2) frail elderly, and 3) geriatric assessments. Studies that measured frailty using a validated instrument, and involved OAC for AF in frail and non-frail patients were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 166 reviewed titles, only 3 studies (1204 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Two used the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale (total 509 patients), and one used the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale (682 patients). All 3 studies involved hospitalized patients with an average age of 85 ± 6 and 45% were male. The weighted mean prevalence of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation was 39% (95%CI 36-42). The weighted mean rate of OAC use was 57±11%. Frailty was associated with non-prescription of OAC compared to non-frail (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.74, I2 =45%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with AF is high, and the use of OAC is low in these patients. Frail elderly are significantly less likely to receive OAC.

Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients presenting with syncope. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common clinical presentation and establishing an etiology is often challenging. Pulmonary embolism (PE) has been thought to be an uncommon cause but a recent report suggested otherwise. OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of PE in patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department (ED) and in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS and Web of Science with relevant keywords and MeSH headings for syncope and PE. Inclusion criteria were patients presenting with syncope to ED or hospitalized due to syncope, and etiologies including PE. RESULTS: Of 1329 titles and abstracts, 12 (other than Prandoni et al.) met inclusion criteria. Nine studies included 6608 ED patients and 3 included 975 hospitalized patients. The mean age was 62 (95% CI 54-69) for ED patients and 67 (95% CI 64-70) for hospitalized. The pooled estimate of PE prevalence in ED syncope patients was 0.8% (95% CI 0.5-1.3%, I2=0%). The pooled estimate of PE prevalence in hospitalized patients was 1.0% (95% CI 0.5-1.9%, I2=0). In contrast, the prevalence of PE in Prandoni et al. were 3.8% and 17.3% for ED and hospitalized patients respectively, both significantly higher than in other relevant studies (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of PE in patients presenting with syncope is low. The Prandoni et al. estimates are significantly higher, suggesting a possible site effect, accrual bias, or investigation strategy. These and the prognostic impact of higher PE prevalence require understanding before changes in practice.

Diagnostic Value of Neurological Studies in Diagnosing Syncope: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is common and approaches to establishing etiology remain a matter of clinical and financial importance. Patients often undergo comprehensive neurologic investigations despite a lack of compelling indications. The aim was to determine the prevalence of use and diagnostic yield of electroencephalography (EEG), head computed tomography (CT), head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and carotid Doppler ultrasound (CUS) examinations. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane from 1970 to 2015 for studies reporting on the use of EEG, CT, MRI, and CUS in diagnosing the cause of syncope. The inclusion criteria were: (1) observational and randomized trials; (2) frequency of use of investigations; and (3) diagnostic yield. Diagnostic studies of the more general transient loss of consciousness were excluded. RESULTS: Of 149 screened studies, 15 studies having 6944 patients met the criteria. No studies met all 6 prespecified quality descriptors. The mean prevalence of test use were: EEG, 17.0%; CT, 57.3%; MRI, 10.5%; and CUS, 17.8%. The articles reported the likelihoods of a test providing diagnostic information for syncope etiology were: EEG, 1.35%; CT, 1.18%; MRI, 3.74%; and CUS, 2.4%. Only 2 new and informative results were noted in 6334 tests. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic investigations for assessment of patients deemed to have syncope are used widely and are widely ineffective. Neurologic investigations should be obtained only with a very high degree of clinical suspicion.

How do family medicine residents choose an anticoagulation regimen for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

Aim To examine the choices Canadian family medicine residents make for oral anticoagulation (OAC) for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: AF increases the risk of strokes. An important consideration in AF management is risk stratification for stroke and prescription of appropriate OAC. Family physicians provide the vast majority of OAC prescriptions. METHODS: We administered a survey to residents in multiple Canadian family medicine training programmes. Questions explored the experiences and attitudes towards risk stratification and choices of OAC when presented with standardized clinical scenarios. In each scenario, a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) would be the preferred treatment according to the contemporary Canadian and European guidelines. Findings A total of 247 residents participated in the survey. Most used the congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75, diabetes mellitus, stroke or TIA (2 points) (81%) and congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 (2 points) or age 65-74 (1 point), diabetes mellitus, stroke or TIA, vascular disease including peripheral arterial disease, myocardial infarction, or aortic plaque, sex (female) (67%) risk stratification schemes while the preferred bleeding risk stratification scheme was hypertension, abnormal liver or renal function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly (age ≥ 65), drugs or alcohol (84%). In the clinical scenarios, residents generally preferred warfarin in favour of NOACs, independent of training level. Residents ranked the risk of adverse events and the cost to the patient as their most and least important consideration when prescribing OAC, respectively. Therefore in patients with nonvalvular AF, Canadian family medicine residents prefer warfarin in comparison with NOACs despite the latest Canadian and European guideline recommendations. This knowledge gap may be enhanced by multiple factors, including a sometimes magnified fear of adverse events and a rapidly changing landscape in stroke prophylaxis.

The anticoagulation choices of internal medicine residents for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To explore the oral anticoagulation (OAC) prescribing choices of Canadian internal medicine residents, at different training levels, in comparison with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, web-based survey, involving clinical scenarios designed to favour the use of non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) as per the 2014 CCS NVAF guidelines. Additional questions were also designed to determine resident attitudes towards OAC prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 518 internal medicine responses were analysed, with 196 postgraduate year (PGY)-1s, 169 PGY-2s and 153 PGY-3s. The majority of residents (81%) reported feeling comfortable choosing OAC, with 95% having started OAC in the past 3 months. In the initial clinical scenario involving an uncomplicated patient with a CHADS2 score of 3, warfarin was favoured over any of the NOACs by PGY-1s (81.6% vs 73.9%), but NOACs were favoured by PGY-3s (88.3% vs 83.7%). This was the only scenario where OAC choices varied by PGY year, as each of the subsequent clinical scenarios residents generally favoured warfarin over NOACs irrespective of level of training. The majority of residents stated that they would no longer prescribe warfarin once NOAC reversal agents are available, and residents felt risk of adverse events was the most important factor when choosing OAC. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian internal medicine residents favoured warfarin over NOACs for patients with NVAF, which is in discordance with the evidence-based CCS guidelines. This finding persisted throughout the 3 years of core internal medicine training.

Which Factors Influence Resident Physicians to Prescribe NOACs to Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation?

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society and the European Society of Cardiology recommend the use of non-vitamin K antagonists (NOAC) in preference to warfarin for stroke prevention in most patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to identify factors that predict selection of a NOAC by resident physicians when faced with patients with non-valvular AF. A web-based survey was distributed to residents across Canada to learn the attitudes and behaviours regarding stroke, bleeding risk and choices of therapy in different clinical scenarios involving the same patient and one additional co-morbidity. There were a total of 1014 respondents. In an uncomplicated patient with a new diagnosis of AF, self-reported comfort level was the strongest positive predictor for selecting a NOAC (odds ratio (OR) 2.51; 95% confident interval (CI) 1.79-3.54). Residents' desire for the availability of a reversal agent was a negative predictor (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.39-0.77). In a patient with a prior gastrointestinal bleed, each additional year of training was associated with a choosing a NOAC (OR 1.3; 95%CI 1.1-1.5). In the same patient, the desire for the availability of a reversal agent was a negative predictor of selecting a NOAC (OR 0.42; 95%CI 0.32-0.56). The most consistent predictor for prescribing a NOAC in all clinical scenarios was self-reported comfort level. Fear of adverse events, cost of agents and dosing convenience were not significant predictors. This study found that resident physicians' adherence to guideline-preferred management of AF with regards to stroke prevention is strongly associated with self-reported comfort level, training year and the desire for the presence of a reversal agent.

Resident Physicians Choices of Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to identify practice patterns of Canadian resident physicians pertaining to stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines. A Web-based survey consisting of 16 multiple-choice questions was distributed to 11 academic centres. Questions involved identification of risks of stroke, bleeding, and selection of appropriate therapy in clinical scenarios that involve a patient with AF with a Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (CHADS2) score of 3 and no absolute contraindications to anticoagulation. There were 1014 total respondents, of whom 570 were internal, 247 family, 137 emergency medicine, and 60 adult cardiology residents. For a patient with a new diagnosis of AF, warfarin was chosen by 80.3%, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) by 60.3%, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) by 7.2% of residents. To a patient with a history of gastrointestinal bleed during ASA treatment, warfarin was recommended by 75.1%, NOACs by 36.1%, ASA by 12.1%, and 4% were unsure. For a patient with a history of an intracranial bleed, warfarin was recommended by 38.8%, NOACs by 23%, ASA by 24.8%, and 18.2% were unsure. For a patient taking warfarin who had a labile international normalized ratio, 89% would switch to a NOAC and 29.5% would continue warfarin. This study revealed that, across a wide sampling of disciplines and centres, resident physician choices of anticoagulation in nonvalvular AF differ significantly from contemporary Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines.