Thromboembolic and bleeding events in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19: results from a Brazilian tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of thromboembolic events in adult patients with severe COVID-19 and identify clinical and laboratory factors associated with these events. DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study of 243 adult patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) at a Brazilian tertiary hospital. RESULTS: The incidence of all thromboembolic events was 14.8%, in which 3.8% developed deep vein thrombosis, 7.8% pulmonary embolism, 2.5% acute myocardial infarction, 1.2% stroke, and 1.2% peripheral artery occlusion. Risk factors identified were D-dimer at admission >3000 ng/mL (P=<0.0013) and major bleeding (P=0.001). The cumulative risk of developing thromboembolic events at day 28 after ICU admission was 16.0%. The rate of major bleeding was 4.1%. After receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the D-dimer cut-off at admission correlating with thromboembolic events was 1140.5 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of thromboembolic events in our study was lower than previously described. High D-dimer level at admission was the leading risk factor; the optimal cut-off was 1140.5 ng/mL. The occurrence of thromboembolic events did not have an impact on the median overall survival rate. The optimal anticoagulant strategy in this context still needs to be established.

Uso de um método não invasivo no monitoramento da pressão intracraniana em unidade de terapia intensiva para melhorar a neuroproteção em pacientes no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca após circulação extracorpórea / The use of a noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring method in the intensive care unit to improve neuroprotection in postoperative cardiac surgery patients after extracorporeal circulation

RESUMO Desde a instituição da circulação extracorpórea, há cinco décadas, a lesão cerebral decorrente desse procedimento durante cirurgias cardiovasculares tem sido uma complicação frequente. Não existe uma causa única de lesão cerebral pelo uso de circulação extracorpórea, porém se sabe que acomete cerca de 70% dos pacientes submetidos a esse procedimento. A avaliação da pressão intracraniana é um dos métodos que podem orientar os cuidados com os pacientes submetidos a procedimentos associados com distúrbios neurológicos. Este artigo descreve dois casos de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia cardiovascular com circulação extracorpórea, para os quais os procedimentos de neuroproteção na fase pós-operatória foram guiados pelos achados relacionados ao formato das ondas de pressão intracraniana, obtidos por meio de um método não invasivo de monitoramento.

ABSTRACT Brain injury caused by extracorporeal circulation during cardiovascular surgical procedures has been a recurring complication since the implementation of extracorporeal circulation five decades ago. There is no unique cause of brain injury due to the use of extracorporeal circulation, but it is known that brain injury affects about 70% of patients who undergo this procedure. Intracranial pressure assessment is one method that can guide the management of patients undergoing procedures associated with neurological disturbances. This study describes two cases of patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with extracorporeal circulation in whom clinical protocols for neuroprotection in the postoperative phase were guided by intracranial pressure waveform findings obtained with a novel noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring method.

The use of a noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring method in the intensive care unit to improve neuroprotection in postoperative cardiac surgery patients after extracorporeal circulation. / Uso de um método não invasivo no monitoramento da pressão intracraniana em unidade de terapia intensiva para melhorar a neuroproteção em pacientes no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca após circulação extracorpórea.

Brain injury caused by extracorporeal circulation during cardiovascular surgical procedures has been a recurring complication since the implementation of extracorporeal circulation five decades ago. There is no unique cause of brain injury due to the use of extracorporeal circulation, but it is known that brain injury affects about 70% of patients who undergo this procedure. Intracranial pressure assessment is one method that can guide the management of patients undergoing procedures associated with neurological disturbances. This study describes two cases of patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with extracorporeal circulation in whom clinical protocols for neuroprotection in the postoperative phase were guided by intracranial pressure waveform findings obtained with a novel noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring method.

Desde a instituição da circulação extracorpórea, há cinco décadas, a lesão cerebral decorrente desse procedimento durante cirurgias cardiovasculares tem sido uma complicação frequente. Não existe uma causa única de lesão cerebral pelo uso de circulação extracorpórea, porém se sabe que acomete cerca de 70% dos pacientes submetidos a esse procedimento. A avaliação da pressão intracraniana é um dos métodos que podem orientar os cuidados com os pacientes submetidos a procedimentos associados com distúrbios neurológicos. Este artigo descreve dois casos de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia cardiovascular com circulação extracorpórea, para os quais os procedimentos de neuroproteção na fase pós-operatória foram guiados pelos achados relacionados ao formato das ondas de pressão intracraniana, obtidos por meio de um método não invasivo de monitoramento.

Hemorragia cerebral durante fase ativa de infecção por SARS-CoV-2 em paciente com angiopatia amiloide: relato de caso / Cerebral hemorrhage during the active phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with amyloid angiopathy: case report

RESUMO As alterações neurológicas associadas à COVID-19 têm sido frequentemente descritas, principalmente nos casos de maior severidade, e estão relacionadas a causas multifatoriais, como a disfunção endotelial, a liberação de mediadores inflamatórios (cytokine storm), a disfunção endotelial e a hipoxemia. Relatamos o caso de uma paciente do sexo feminino, 88 anos, com quadro de hemorragia cerebral associada à angiopatia amiloide, no contexto de infecção por SARS-CoV-2.

ABSTRACT The neurological changes associated with COVID-19 have been frequently described, especially in cases of greater severity, and are related to multifactorial causes, such as endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory mediator release (cytokine storm), endothelial dysfunction and hypoxemia. We report the case of a female patient, 88 years old, with cerebral hemorrhage associated with amyloid angiopathy in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cerebral hemorrhage during the active phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with amyloid angiopathy: case report. / Hemorragia cerebral durante fase ativa de infecção por SARS-CoV-2 em paciente com angiopatia amiloide: relato de caso.

The neurological changes associated with COVID-19 have been frequently described, especially in cases of greater severity, and are related to multifactorial causes, such as endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory mediator release (cytokine storm), endothelial dysfunction and hypoxemia. We report the case of a female patient, 88 years old, with cerebral hemorrhage associated with amyloid angiopathy in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

As alterações neurológicas associadas à COVID-19 têm sido frequentemente descritas, principalmente nos casos de maior severidade, e estão relacionadas a causas multifatoriais, como a disfunção endotelial, a liberação de mediadores inflamatórios (cytokine storm), a disfunção endotelial e a hipoxemia. Relatamos o caso de uma paciente do sexo feminino, 88 anos, com quadro de hemorragia cerebral associada à angiopatia amiloide, no contexto de infecção por SARS-CoV-2.

Fórum Vascular: inteligência coletiva na resolução de casos clínicos vasculares / Vascular Forum: collective intelligence in the resolution of vascular clinical cases

Contexto: A inteligência coletiva tem extrema importância em grupos coletivos de discussão de casos clínicos médicos, auxiliando tanto os profissionais na pronta tomada de decisão como seus pacientes. Objetivos: Avaliar a resolutividade e as características das discussões clínicas realizadas em grupo fechado de mensagens instantâneas e sua aplicabilidade clínica. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva de discussões clínicas e eventos no Fórum Vascular, grupo aberto para especialistas em dispositivos móveis. Resultados: No período de julho de 2015 a julho de 2017, foram discutidos 1.013 assuntos, com 680 membros. Desses assuntos, 26 (2,57%) foram curiosidades, 101 (9,97%) foram dúvidas de diagnóstico, 492 (48,57%) foram dúvidas de tratamento, 205 (20,24%) foram dúvidas gerais e 189 (17,5%) foram relatos de casos. O número médio de interações por evento foi de 16,599 (±1,366). O tempo médio para a primeira resposta foi de 42,14 min (±7,55). Os assuntos discutidos foram 358 casos com miscelânea, 336 casos venosos, 15 casos linfáticos e 304 casos arteriais, totalizando 15.985 respostas. Conclusões: A interação entre especialistas utilizando a tecnologia de troca de mensagens instantâneas mostrou-se capaz de levantar discussões e abordagens rapidamente. A resolutividade, considerada o tempo da primeira resposta correta, também foi alta. O Fórum Vascular evidenciou­se uma ferramenta de grande valia clínica para seus participantes, confirmando a importância da inteligência coletiva na área médica

Background: Collective intelligence is extremely important in collective groups that discuss clinical medical cases, assisting professionals in their decision-making processes, and consequently, helping their patients. Objectives: To evaluate the rate of resolution and characteristics of the clinical discussions carried out in a private instant messaging group and its clinical applicability. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical discussions and events on the Vascular Forum, an open group for specialists accessed with mobile devices. Results: From July 2015 to July 2017, 1013 subjects were discussed among 680 members. Twenty-six (2.57%) of these subjects were curiosities, 101 (9.97%) related to diagnostic doubts, 492 (48.57%) to treatment doubts, and 205 (20.24%) to general doubts, while 189 (17.5%) were case reports. The mean number of interactions per event was 16.599 (±1.366). The mean time from posting of a new subject to the first reply was 42.14 (±7.55) min. The subject discussed was miscellaneous in 358 cases, venous in 336 cases, lymphatic in 15 cases, and arterial in 304 cases and the total number of replies was 15985. Conclusions: Interaction between experts using instant messaging technology proved capable of raising subjects for discussion and eliciting management approaches quickly. The rate of resolution, defined as the time taken for the first correct answer to be posted, was also high. The Vascular Forum proved to be a tool of great clinical value for its participants, confirming the importance of collective intelligence in medicine

Vascular Forum: collective intelligence in the resolution of vascular clinical cases.

BACKGROUND: Collective intelligence is extremely important in collective groups that discuss clinical medical cases, assisting professionals in their decision-making processes, and consequently, helping their patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the rate of resolution and characteristics of the clinical discussions carried out in a private instant messaging group and its clinical applicability. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical discussions and events on the Vascular Forum, an open group for specialists accessed with mobile devices. RESULTS: From July 2015 to July 2017, 1013 subjects were discussed among 680 members. Twenty-six (2.57%) of these subjects were curiosities, 101 (9.97%) related to diagnostic doubts, 492 (48.57%) to treatment doubts, and 205 (20.24%) to general doubts, while 189 (17.5%) were case reports. The mean number of interactions per event was 16.599 (±1.366). The mean time from posting of a new subject to the first reply was 42.14 (±7.55) min. The subject discussed was miscellaneous in 358 cases, venous in 336 cases, lymphatic in 15 cases, and arterial in 304 cases and the total number of replies was 15985. CONCLUSIONS: Interaction between experts using instant messaging technology proved capable of raising subjects for discussion and eliciting management approaches quickly. The rate of resolution, defined as the time taken for the first correct answer to be posted, was also high. The Vascular Forum proved to be a tool of great clinical value for its participants, confirming the importance of collective intelligence in medicine.