Hidradenitis suppurativa and psychosocial well-being: a cross-sectional survey analysis from the All of Us research program.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease that often leads to decreased quality of life. Prior research assessing stress and discrimination related to stigmatization of those with HS is limited. The aim of this study was to examine the association between HS and the following factors related to psychosocial well-being: stress, discrimination, and loneliness. We performed secondary analysis of participants 18 years and older registered in the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program in March 2024. The study sample was limited to individuals who had completed ≥ 1 of 4 psychosocial well-being surveys. Among 1,352 individuals with HS, 135 were included in the sample. Among 208,290 individuals without HS, 56,902 were included. The following surveys assessed loneliness, stress, perceived discrimination in everyday settings, and perceived discrimination in medical settings, respectively: the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, Everyday Discrimination Scale, and Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale. The association between HS and survey scores was modeled using multivariable linear regression adjusted for self-reported sex, self-reported race and ethnicity, age, and income. In an unadjusted model, those with HS reported a significantly higher degree of stress (MeanHS (SD) = 21.5 (4.74); Meannon-HS (SD) = 19.8 (3.98); p < 0.001), discrimination in everyday settings (MeanHS (SD) = 18.9 (8.16); Meannon-HS (SD) = 16.0 (7.06); p < 0.0001), and discrimination in healthcare settings (MeanHS (SD) = 1.77 (0.64); Meannon-HS (SD) = 1.56 (0.62); p < 0.001). After adjusting for sex, race, age, and income, the association between HS and discrimination in healthcare settings was non-significant; however, associations between HS and increased levels of perceived stress and everyday discrimination remained significant. Low survey completion rates and demographic differences between those who did and did not complete the study surveys may limit generalizability of results. Findings suggest that those with HS may benefit from regular screening for psychosocial well-being and provision of support resources.

Factors Affecting Treatment Selection Among Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Importance: Despite the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of adalimumab for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), prescription rates remain low, indicating a critical gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice. Understanding the medical decision-making process that these patients use when considering biologic agents and other HS therapies may uncover opportunities for improved patient-physician communication and HS disease control. Objective: To elucidate factors that affect the medical decision-making process for patients with HS, with an emphasis on biologic therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-ended semistructured interviews were conducted with English-speaking adults with HS (aged ≥18 years) recruited from 2 dermatology clinics that are part of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. All participants had an average 7-day pain score of 1 or higher on a 0- to 10-point numeric rating scale. Surveys were conducted between November 2019 and March 2020, and data were analyzed from December 2021 to August 2022. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached at 21 interviews. Results: A total of 21 participants (median [IQR] age, 38.5 [27.9-43.4] years; 16 females [76%]) were included in the analysis. Almost all participants (96%) had Hurley stage II or III disease, and 15 (71%) had a history of adalimumab use. Suffering threshold, perceptions of treatment risk, treatment fatigue, disease understanding, and sources of information (included dermatologists, the internet, advertisements, and friends and loved ones) were identified as factors affecting participants' decisions to initiate new treatments for HS. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this qualitative study suggest that mitigating misconceptions about treatment risk, identifying gaps in disease knowledge, and emphasizing early treatment to prevent scarring and disease progression may empower patients with HS to engage in treatment planning and to try new therapies.

Correlation between PainDETECT Questionnaire and Quantitative Sensory Testing for the Detection of Neuropathic Pain in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is often severely painful due to nociceptive mechanisms (i.e., stimulation of cutaneous nociceptors). However, patient-reported pain character suggests that neuropathy may also drive HS pain in a subset of patients. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) can help identify neuropathic pain by testing for heightened and paradoxical pain responses in patients, but it is less feasible for routine clinical use compared with brief questionnaires. We therefore tested the suitability of a standardized neuropathic questionnaire (PainDETECT; PD-Q) for use as a surrogate clinical measure by directly comparing it with QST-identified neuropathic pain in HS. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study included 22 adults with painful HS lesions who completed the PD-Q and underwent QST. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and Cohen's Kappa, sensitivity, and specificity were examined at three scoring thresholds. RESULTS: Of the 22 participants, 14 (64%) exhibited dynamic mechanical allodynia and/or paradoxical thermal sensations in QST, which are characteristically found in neuropathic pain. According to the PD-Q, 8 participants (36%) were unlikely, 8 (36%) were possible, and 6 (27%) were likely to have neuropathic pain. A PD-Q Score indicating possible or likely neuropathic pain (i.e., ≥13) demonstrated 82% agreement with QST-determined neuropathic pain (Cohen's Kappa = 0.61 [p = 0.004]; sensitivity = 86%; specificity = 75%). CONCLUSION: The PD-Q demonstrates moderate agreement with QST in screening for neuropathic pain in HS and may be a helpful clinical tool.

The Influence of Pain on Reduced Quality of Life in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Pain and itch are impactful and burdensome symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Elucidating factors associated with pain and itch severity may identify groups disproportionally affected by HS-related pain and itch and further our understanding of how pain and itch impact quality of life (QoL) in patients with HS. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine factors associated with pain severity, itch severity, and reduced QoL in patients with HS. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 257 adults with HS who received care in an HS Specialty Clinic from January 2019 to August 2021. Multivariable mixed-effects linear regression was used to determine the relationships between clinical and demographic patient factors and the outcomes of pain severity, itch severity, and skin-specific QoL. RESULTS: Factors associated with reduced QoL were Hurley stage II (ß = 19.66, 95% CI: 1.40-37.93) and III (ß = 21.98, 95% CI: 1.57-42.39) disease as well as severity of pain (ß = 13.74, 95% CI: 11.93-15.55), itch (ß = 4.57, 95% CI: 2.59-6.55), anxiety (ß = 2.55 95% CI: 1.29-3.81), and depression (ß = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.30-2.56). Increasing HS pain severity was associated with Hurley stage III disease (ß = 2.04, 95% Cl: 0.99-3.09), black race (ß = 1.23, 95% Cl: 0.40, 2.06), depression severity (ß = 0.08, 95% Cl: 0.02, 0.14), and anxiety severity (ß = 0.10 95% Cl: 0.04, 0.17). Factors associated with HS itch severity were Hurley stage III disease (ß = 2.23, 95% Cl: 1.19, 3.27), black race (ß = 0.92, 95% Cl: 0.07, 1.78), depression severity (ß = 0.09, 95% Cl: 0.04, 0.14), and anxiety severity (ß = 0.07, 95% Cl: 0.01, 0.13). CONCLUSION: Pain is one of the largest contributors to QoL in patients with HS; on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, a 2-point increase in HS pain had a similar independent effect on QoL as having Hurley stage III disease compared to Hurley stage I.

Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Sensory Changes in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Skin Lesions.

Importance: Pain is the most impactful symptom in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Characterization of sensory profiles may improve understanding of pain mechanisms in HS and facilitate identification of effective pain management strategies. Objective: To characterize somatosensory profiles in patients with HS at clinically affected and nonaffected sites compared with pain-free reference data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Emory University Dermatology Clinic. It was hypothesized (1) that patients with HS would demonstrate hypersensitivity to pain in HS lesions and (2) that some patients would have sensory profiles consistent with complex pain mechanisms. Therefore, adults with dermatologist-diagnosed HS and at least 1 painful HS lesion at the time of testing were enrolled between September 10, 2020, and March 21, 2022. Patients with other diagnoses contributing to pain or neuropathy were excluded. Data analysis was conducted between March and April 2022. Exposure: Quantitative sensory testing was performed on HS lesions and control skin according to a standardized protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quantitative sensory testing outcomes included innocuous thermal and mechanical sensitivity (cold, warmth, and light touch detection thresholds), noxious thermal and mechanical sensitivity (cold, heat, pinprick, and deep pressure pain thresholds and suprathreshold pinprick sensitivity), temporal summation of pinprick, paradoxical thermal sensations, and dynamic mechanical allodynia (pain upon light stroking of the skin). Sensitivity in HS lesions was compared with sensitivity in a control location (the hand) and in pain-free controls using t tests. Results: This study included 20 participants with a median age of 35.5 (IQR, 30.0-46.5) years, the majority of whom were women (15 [75%]). In terms of race and ethnicity, 2 participants (10%) self-identified as Asian, 11 (55%) as Black, 6 (30%) as White, and 1 (5%) as more than 1 race or ethnicity. Compared with site-specific reference values from healthy, pain-free control participants, HS lesions were insensitive to innocuous cold and warmth, noxious heat, and light touch (t = -5.69, -10.20, -3.84, and 4.46, respectively; all P < .001). In contrast, HS lesions also demonstrated significant hypersensitivity to deep pressure pain (t = 8.36; P < .001) and cutaneous pinprick (t = 2.07; P = .046). Hypersensitivity to deep pressure pain was also observed in the control site (t = 5.85; P < .001). A subset of patients with HS displayed changes in pain processing that are often seen in neuropathic and nociplastic pain conditions, including hypersensitivity to repetitive pinprick (5 [26%]), paradoxical thermal sensations (3 [15%]), and pain upon light stroking of the skin (10 [50%]). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that HS involves local changes in the skin or its free nerve endings, possibly leading to peripheral neuropathy and alterations in the transduction of innocuous and noxious thermal and mechanical stimuli. For some patients, central nervous system changes in somatosensory processing may also occur, but confirmatory evidence is needed. Better understanding of neuropathic and nociplastic mechanisms in HS pain could lead to individually tailored treatments.

Outcome Measures for the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Hidradenitis Suppurativa for Clinical Practice: A HiSTORIC Consensus Statement.

Importance: Although several clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures have been developed for trials in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), there is currently no consensus on which measures are best suited for use in clinical practice. Identifying validated and feasible measures applicable to the practice setting has the potential to optimize treatment strategies and generate generalizable evidence that may inform treatment guidelines. Objective: To establish consensus on a core set of clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures recommended for use in clinical practice and to establish the appropriate interval within which these measures should be applied. Evidence Review: Clinician- and patient-reported HS measures and studies describing their psychometric properties were identified through literature reviews. Identified measures comprised an item reduction survey and subsequent electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) consensus rounds. In each consensus round, a summary of outcome measure components and scoring methods was provided to participants. Experts were provided with feasibility characteristics of clinician measures to aid selection. Consensus was achieved if at least 67% of respondents agreed with use of a measure in clinical practice. Findings: Among HS experts, response rates for item reduction, e-Delphi round 1, and e-Delphi round 2 surveys were 76.4% (42 of 55), 90.5% (38 of 42), and 92.9% (39 of 42), respectively; among patient research partners (PRPs), response rates were 70.8% (17 of 24), 100% (17 of 17), and 82.4% (14 of 17), respectively. The majority of experts across rounds were practicing dermatologists with 18 to 19 years of clinical experience. In the final e-Delphi round, most PRPs were female (12 [85.7%] vs 2 males [11.8%]) and aged 30 to 49 years. In the final e-Delphi round, HS experts and PRPs agreed with the use of the HS Investigator Global Assessment (28 [71.8%]) and HS Quality of Life score (13 [92.9%]), respectively. The most expert-preferred assessment interval in which to apply these measures was 3 months (27 [69.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: An international group of HS experts and PRPs achieved consensus on a core set of HS measures suitable for use in clinical practice. Consistent use of these measures may lead to more accurate assessments of HS disease activity and life outcomes, facilitating shared treatment decision-making in the practice setting.

Ambulatory palliative care among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A qualitative study.

Background: Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) experience high physical and emotional symptom burden and may benefit from palliative care interventions, though no studies have explored the unmet palliative care needs in this population. Objective: This case series aimed to qualitatively evaluate unmet needs and palliative care interventions among patients with HS who were referred to palliative care. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients with HS who were referred from an HS specialty clinic and seen in an interprofessional palliative care ambulatory clinic. Palliative care notes were qualitatively analyzed inductively and deductively to identify themes characterizing unmet needs and palliative care interventions. Results: Thirteen patients with HS (median [IQR] age, 38 [31-45] years; 11 [85%] women; 11 [85%] Black) were referred and seen in a palliative care specialty clinic. Topics discussed included uncontrolled HS pain, housing insecurity, and emotional distress. Palliative care interventions included a thorough assessment of pain, multimodal pain management approaches, social worker weekly check-ins, and management of psychotropic medications. Limitations: Small study at a single tertiary center. Conclusions: Care models integrating palliative care approaches with multidisciplinary support services may reduce disease burden in a subset of patients with HS.

Pain experiences among those living with hidradenitis suppurativa: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is rated by patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) as the disease's most impactful symptom. HS therapies are often insufficient to control inflammatory disease activity and pain. A better understanding of patient experiences with pain may improve patient-provider relationships and help identify strategies for addressing HS pain. OBJECTIVES: This qualitative study sought to characterize lived pain experiences of those with HS. METHODS: English-speaking patients ≥ 18 years old with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of HS and an average numerical rating scale pain score of ≥ 1 over the preceding week were recruited from a single academic medical centre in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Semistructured interviews were conducted from November 2019 to March 2020 to explore participants' HS pain experiences and the subsequent impact on their lives. Thematic saturation was reached after interviewing 21 participants. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Among 21 study participants, the median 7-day average pain score was 6 (interquartile range 3-7; scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 10 being most pain). Participants' descriptions of pain were consistent with nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain and itch. Pain impacted multiple life domains, including physical limitations (decreased mobility and impaired sleep), decreased psychological wellbeing (irritability, depression, loss of control, and difficulty communicating pain experiences) and impaired social relationships (social isolation, intimacy problems and difficulty fulfilling social responsibilities). Although participants reported chronic discomfort, acutely painful and unpredictable HS disease flares caused more distress and quality-of-life (QoL) burden. Participants frequently treated their pain without input from the medical team, sometimes with unsafe medication doses or combinations. Factors contributing to self-management of pain included difficulty accessing timely outpatient care during disease flares and fear of stigma from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: When present, HS-related pain may impact not only physical wellbeing but also mental health and relationships. In addition to therapies that target the inflammatory disease burden, treating the symptom of pain may improve patients' QoL and wellbeing. Because patients with HS have difficulty explaining their pain, proactively asking them about pain may identify unmet needs, facilitate better pain control and improve QoL. Further, the influence of HS-related pain on numerous aspects of QoL suggests the need for multidisciplinary, patient-centred approaches to HS pain management.

Comparison of Work Relative Value Units for Outpatient Pediatric and Adult Dermatology Encounters.

Importance: Dermatologists with specialty training in pediatric dermatology are scarce, which can mean extended wait times and reduced access to care for patients. Lower compensation for pediatric dermatology visits compared with adult visits may affect physician career choice and contribute to workforce shortages. Objective: To evaluate differences in work relative value units (wRVUs) generated by pediatric and adult outpatient dermatology encounters. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from outpatient dermatology encounters at a single-site academic center in Atlanta, Georgia, from September 1, 2016, to March 31, 2020. Encounters with patients younger than 18 years were classified as pediatric, and encounters with those 18 years or older were classified as adult. Encounters with missing data were excluded as were those generating 0 wRVUs, inpatient visits, nursing visits, postoperative encounters, cosmetic procedures, phototherapy visits, and Mohs surgery encounters. Main Outcomes and Measures: Work relative value units generated per encounter type were assessed through multivariable linear regression models adjusted for the potential confounder of sex. Results: The study included 12 989 pediatric dermatology encounters (mean [SD] age, 7.3 [5.2] years; 7586 [58.4%] girls) and 78 057 adult dermatology encounters (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [18.9] years; 45 724 [58.6%] women). Pediatric encounters were associated with 0.23 (95% CI, 0.21-0.25; P < .001) fewer wRVUs than adult encounters after adjusting for sex. In a mediation analysis, biopsies and destruction of premalignant lesions explained 74.1% (95% CI, 69.6%-77.9%; P < .001) of the wRVU difference between pediatric and adult encounters. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found significant differences in wRVUs generated between adult and pediatric dermatology encounters that were largely attributable to biopsies and destruction of premalignant lesions. Policies that increase the value of cognitive services to be on par with procedural care may mitigate wRVU differences and improve reimbursement for pediatric dermatologists.

Pain measurement in painful skin conditions and rheumatoid arthritis randomized controlled trials: a scoping review to inform pain measurement in hidradenitis suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Pain is the most common and bothersome symptom experienced by people with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and has been prioritized as an outcome domain by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). OBJECTIVES: To perform a scoping review of pain measurement in randomized control trials (RCTs) of painful skin conditions (PSCs) and use of the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in rheumatoid arthritis RCTs, to inform the efforts of HISTORIC to reach consensus on how to measure pain intensity in HS trials. METHODS: A search was conducted on several publication databases. Inclusion criteria were RCTs with a minimum of 10 participants that measured pain intensity. RESULTS: Pain NRS and VAS were used in 68% of PSC trials. Respectively, 77% and 87% of PSC and rheumatoid arthritis RCTs did not specify the recall window. The commonest recall window in PSCs when specified was 24 h. In total, 33% of PSC trials assessed maximum pain intensity and 3% average pain intensity, while 87% of rheumatoid arthritis trials did not provide details. Pain data were reported as mean difference by 76% of PSC trials and 75% of rheumatoid arthritis trials. Respectively, 10% and 11% of PSC and rheumatoid arthritis studies reported pain as the percentage of patients reaching a desirable state and only 1% and 2% reported number needed to treat. CONCLUSIONS: While pain NRS and VAS are standard methods to measure pain intensity in PSCs, key details such as the recall window are often omitted and there is no consensus on how to report pain NRS data. What is already known about this topic? Pain is the most burdensome symptom experienced by patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and has been prioritized as an outcome domain by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). What does this study add? Our review shows substantial variation in how pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analogue scale are utilized in clinical trials. This variation restricts meta-analysis of pain intensity results. There is a need for consensus regarding the recall window for pain NRS and maximum vs. average pain, and whether current pain should be measured.

Pain management modalities for hidradenitis suppurativa: a patient survey.

BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify pain management therapies used in HS and assess patient-perceived effectiveness. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was posted to Facebook HS support groups. Participants selected all that applied from a list of 20 therapies to indicate which ones they have tried for HS pain. For each therapy used, participants were asked to rate effectiveness on a 5-point scale: not successful (1), mildly successful (2), moderately successful (3), very successful (4), and extremely successful (5). Mean effectiveness ratings were calculated by averaging the corresponding numbers. RESULTS: Of the 438 participants, 93.8% were female. Participants classified themselves as Hurley stage I (8.2%), II (53.4%), and III (38.4%). Warm compresses were the most commonly used therapy (82.4%), followed by ibuprofen/naproxen (74.7%), Epsom salt baths (57.8%), cold compresses (45.4%), and acetaminophen (44.7%). Marijuana smoking received the highest mean effectiveness rating (2.92 ± 1.10), followed by marijuana edibles (2.87 ± 1.10), and opioids (2.83 ± 0.98). Mean effectiveness ratings were lowest for bleach baths (1.52 ± 0.80), sitz baths (1.53 ± 0.56), massage (1.61 ± 0.92), gabapentin (1.64 ± 0.73), and acetaminophen (1.71 ± 0.75). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Even the highest-rated pain management modalities are considered only moderately effective by HS patients.

Cost-effectiveness of infant respiratory syncytial virus preventive interventions in Mali: A modeling study to inform policy and investment decisions.

IMPORTANCE: Low- and middle-income countries have a high burden of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections. A monoclonal antibody administered monthly is licensed to prevent these infections, but it is cost-prohibitive for most low- and middle-income countries. Long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus are under development. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the likelihood of respiratory syncytial virus preventive interventions (current monoclonal antibody, long-acting monoclonal antibody, and maternal vaccine) being cost-effective in Mali. DESIGN: We modeled age-specific and season-specific risks of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections within monthly cohorts of infants from birth to six months. We parameterized with respiratory syncytial virus data from Malian cohort studies, as well as product efficacy from clinical trials. Integrating parameter uncertainty, we simulated health and economic outcomes for status quo without prevention, intra-seasonal monthly administration of licensed monoclonal antibody, pre-seasonal birth dose administration of a long-acting monoclonal antibody, and maternal vaccination. We then calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of each intervention compared to status quo from the perspectives of the government, donor, and society. RESULTS: At a price of $3 per dose and from the societal perspective, current monoclonal antibody, long-acting monoclonal antibody, and maternal vaccine would have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $4280 (95% CI $1892 to $122,434), $1656 (95% CI $734 to $9091), and $8020 (95% CI $3501 to $47,047) per disability-adjusted life-year averted, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In Mali, long-acting monoclonal antibody is likely to be cost-effective from both the government and donor perspectives at $3 per dose. Maternal vaccine would need higher efficacy over that measured by a recent trial in order to be considered cost-effective.

Differences in Outpatient Dermatology Encounter Work Relative Value Units and Net Payments by Patient Race, Sex, and Age.

Importance: Clinical productivity measures may be factors in financial incentives for providing care to specific patient populations and thus may perpetuate inequitable health care. Objective: To identify the association of patient race, age, and sex with work relative value units (wRVUs) generated by outpatient dermatology encounters. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study obtained demographic and billing data for outpatient dermatology encounters (ie, an encounter performed within a department of dermatology) from September 1, 2016, to March 31, 2020, at the Emory Clinic, an academic dermatologic practice in Atlanta, Georgia. Participants included adults aged 18 years or older with available age, race, and sex data in the electronic health record system. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was wRVUs generated per encounter. Results: A total of 66 463 encounters among 30 036 unique patients were included. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 55.9 (18.5) years and were predominantly White (46 575 [70.1%]) and female (39 598 [59.6%]) individuals. In the general dermatologic practice, the mean (SD) wRVUs per encounter was 1.40 (0.71). In adjusted analysis, Black, Asian, and other races (eg, American Indian or Native American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and multiple races); female sex; and younger age were associated with fewer wRVUs per outpatient dermatology encounter. Compared with general dermatologic visits with White patients, visits with Black patients generated 0.27 (95% CI, 0.25-0.28) fewer wRVUs per encounter, visits with Asian patients generated 0.22 (95% CI, 0.20-0.25) fewer wRVUs per encounter, and visits with patients of other race generated 0.19 (95% CI, 0.14-0.24) fewer wRVUs per encounter. Female sex was also associated with 0.11 (95% CI, 0.10-0.12) fewer wRVUs per encounter, and wRVUs per encounter increased by 0.006 (95% CI, 0.006-0.006) with each 1-year increase in age. In the general dermatologic practice excluding Mohs surgeons, destruction of premalignant lesions and biopsies were mediators for the observed differences in race (56.2% [95% CI, 53.1%-59.3%] for Black race, 53.2% [95% CI, 45.6%-63.8%] for Asian race, and 53.6% [95% CI, 40.4%-77.4%] for other races), age (65.6%; 95% CI, 60.5%-71.4%), and sex (82.3%; 95% CI, 72.7%-93.1%). In a data set including encounters with Mohs surgeons, the race, age, and sex differences in wRVUs per encounter were greater than in the general dermatologic data set. Mohs surgery for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas was a mediator for the observed differences in race (46.0% [95% CI, 42.6%-49.4%] for Black race, 41.9% [95% CI, 35.5%-49.2%] for Asian race, and 34.6% [95% CI, 13.8%-51.5%] for other races), age (49.2%; 95% CI, 44.9%-53.7%), and sex (47.9%; 95% CI, 42.0%-54.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that dermatology encounters with racial minority groups, women, and younger patients generated fewer wRVUs than encounters with older White male patients. This finding suggests that physician compensation based on wRVUs may encourage the provision of services that exacerbate disparities in access to dermatologic care.

Pain management in hidradenitis suppurativa and a proposed treatment algorithm.

Pain contributes substantially to reduced quality of life in individuals living with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although improved understanding of HS pathogenesis and treatment has resulted in improved evidence-based HS management guidelines, comprehensive pain management guidelines have yet to be developed. Few HS-specific data exist to guide pharmacologic analgesia; however, recognizing HS pain as either acute or chronic and predominantly nociceptive (aching and gnawing pain due to tissue damage) versus neuropathic (burning-type pain due to somatosensory nervous system dysfunction) provides a conceptual framework for applying outside pain management practices to HS management. This article incorporates the best available evidence from the HS and pain literature to propose an HS pain algorithm that integrates psychological, pharmacologic, and complementary and alternative treatment modalities.