RESUMO
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative technology with potential applications in various plastic surgery procedures and plastic surgery education. This article examines the views of plastic surgeons and residents on the role of AI in the field of plastic surgery. Methods: A 34-question survey on AI's role in plastic surgery was distributed to 564 plastic surgeons worldwide, and we received responses from 153 (26.77%) with the majority from Latin America. The survey explored various aspects such as current AI experience, attitudes toward AI, data sources, ethical considerations, and future prospects of AI in plastic surgery and education. Predictions from AI using ChatGPT for each question were compared with the actual survey responses. Results: The study found that most participants had little or no prior AI experience. Although some believed AI could enhance accuracy and visualization, opinions on its impact on surgical time, patient recovery, and satisfaction were mixed. Concerns included patient privacy, data security, costs, and informed consent. Valuable AI training data sources were identified, and there was agreement on the importance of standards and transparency. Respondents expected AI's increasing role in reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, suggesting its integration into residency programs, addressing administrative challenges, and patient complications. Confidence in the enduring importance of human professionals was expressed, with interest in further AI research. Conclusion: The survey's findings underscore the need to harness AI's potential while preserving human professionals' roles through informed consent, standardization, and AI education in plastic surgery.
RESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to marked changes in surgical training, including that of plastic surgery residents. We performed a survey to gain an insight into the self-reported current and future impact of COVID-19 on plastic surgery residents. METHODS: A 20-point questionnaire was designed by a panel of surgical trainees and trainers, which was filled in by Belgian plastic surgery residents and their international network of peers between 19 and 26 April 2020-week 6 of stringent Belgian lockdown measures. Questions covered the impact of COVID-19 on surgical activity, surgical training, and the future of training. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 38 plastic surgery residents in Belgium filled in the questionnaire, as did 51 of their international peers from 9 other countries. Decreased surgical activity of >75% was reported by 86% of Belgian trainees and by 73% of international colleagues. All consultations were stopped for 26% of Belgian trainees and 37% of international peers. Forty-six percents of Belgian trainees and 27% of international peers were reassigned to different departments. Eighty-five percent of all trainees felt surgical training had suffered, yet 54% of Belgian residents and 39% of international peers felt training should not be prolonged. Anxiety regarding the pandemic was present in 54% of Belgian residents and 69% of international colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report, expressing the voice of a representative group of plastic surgery residents, showing a significant impact of COVID-19 on training and activity. A joint effort is needed to provide continued forms of education by virtual education and skills-based learning.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lipofilling for breast reconstruction has become increasingly common. Creation of a well-defined inframammary fold (IMF) is integral to achieving symmetrical aesthetic results. This has traditionally been done under direct vision through an open incision. OBJECTIVES: The authors present their experience in reconstructive breast surgery with a novel percutaneous technique for IMF creation and improvement of projection without the need for large incisions. METHODS: From June 2011 to January 2015, 180 patients underwent a percutaneous purse-string suture (PPSS) to enhance their IMF and improve breast projection. After completion of lipofilling, a curved cannula is tunneled subcutaneously. The suture is placed into the cannula and passed around the circumference of the breast footprint. After the completion of two passes in different anatomic levels around the footprint, the suture is tightened at the breast's tail zone to achieve the desired IMF definition and breast projection. Surgical technique, results, and follow up are presented. RESULTS: The PPSS technique was combined either with lipofilling only or as part of flap breast reconstruction in 30 and 150 patients, respectively. The average follow-up time was 34 months (range, 11-48 months). PPSS was redone in 25 patients to further improve breast projection. One patient complained of postoperative pain. No other PPSS-related complication was reported. CONCLUSIONS: PPSS is an innovative technique designed to complement the emerging field of lipofilling for breast reconstruction. The technique is safe, easily reproduced, and provides excellent results. Breast IMF and projection are immediately improved without the need for open incisions.