ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hydronephrosis on Prior Imaging-Unknown Cause.

Initial imaging evaluation of hydronephrosis of unknown etiology is a complex subject and is dependent on clinical context. In asymptomatic patients, it is often best conducted via CT urography (CTU) without and with contrast, MR urography (MRU) without and with contrast, or scintigraphic evaluation with mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) imaging. For symptomatic patients, CTU without and with contrast, MRU without and with contrast, MAG3 scintigraphy, or ultrasound of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging are all viable initial imaging studies. In asymptomatic pregnant patients, nonionizing imaging with US of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging is preferred. Similarly, in symptomatic pregnant patients, US of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging or MRU without contrast is the imaging study of choice, as both ionizing radiation and gadolinium contrast are avoided in pregnancy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Implementation of a high-resolution, high-contrast magnetic resonance imaging protocol with extended delayed phases for peritoneal mesothelioma.

Background: Imaging of peritoneal malignancies using conventional cross-sectional imaging is challenging, but accurate assessment of peritoneal disease burden could guide better selection for definitive surgery. Here we demonstrate feasibility of high-resolution, high-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of peritoneal mesothelioma and explore optimal timing for delayed post-contrast imaging. Methods: Prospective data from inpatients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM), imaged with a novel MRI protocol, were analyzed. The new sequences augmenting the clinical protocol were (I) pre-contrast coronal high-resolution T2-weighted single-shot fast spin echo (COR hr T2w SSH FSE) of abdomen and pelvis; and (II) post-contrast coronal high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted modified Dixon (COR hr T1w mDIXON) of abdomen, acquired at five delay times, up to 20 min after administration of a double dose of contrast agent. Quantitative analysis of contrast enhancement was performed using linear regression applied to normalized signal in lesion regions of interest (ROIs). Qualitative analysis was performed by three blinded radiologists. Results: MRI exams from 14 participants (age: mean ± standard deviation, 60±12 years; 71% male) were analyzed. The rate of lesion contrast enhancement was strongly correlated with tumor grade (cumulative nuclear score) (r=-0.65, P<0.02), with 'early' delayed phase (12 min post-contrast) and 'late' delayed phase (19 min post-contrast) performing better for higher grade and lower grade tumors, respectively, in agreement with qualitative scoring of image contrast. Conclusions: High-resolution, high-contrast MRI with extended post-contrast imaging is a viable modality for imaging peritoneal mesothelioma. Multiple, extended (up to 20 min post-contrast) delayed phases are necessary for optimal imaging of peritoneal mesothelioma, depending on the grade of disease.

Self-supervised multicontrast super-resolution for diffusion-weighted prostate MRI.

PURPOSE: This study addresses the challenge of low resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diffusion-weighted images (DWI), which are pivotal for cancer detection. Traditional methods increase SNR at high b-values through multiple acquisitions, but this results in diminished image resolution due to motion-induced variations. Our research aims to enhance spatial resolution by exploiting the global structure within multicontrast DWI scans and millimetric motion between acquisitions. METHODS: We introduce a novel approach employing a "Perturbation Network" to learn subvoxel-size motions between scans, trained jointly with an implicit neural representation (INR) network. INR encodes the DWI as a continuous volumetric function, treating voxel intensities of low-resolution acquisitions as discrete samples. By evaluating this function with a finer grid, our model predicts higher-resolution signal intensities for intermediate voxel locations. The Perturbation Network's motion-correction efficacy was validated through experiments on biological phantoms and in vivo prostate scans. RESULTS: Quantitative analyses revealed significantly higher structural similarity measures of super-resolution images to ground truth high-resolution images compared to high-order interpolation (p < $$ < $$ 0.005). In blind qualitative experiments, 96 . 1 % $$ 96.1\% $$ of super-resolution images were assessed to have superior diagnostic quality compared to interpolated images. CONCLUSION: High-resolution details in DWI can be obtained without the need for high-resolution training data. One notable advantage of the proposed method is that it does not require a super-resolution training set. This is important in clinical practice because the proposed method can easily be adapted to images with different scanner settings or body parts, whereas the supervised methods do not offer such an option.

Four-quadrant vector mapping of hybrid multidimensional MRI data for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The interpretation of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is subjective in nature, and there is large inter-observer variability among radiologists and up to 30% of clinically significant cancers are missed. This has motivated the development of new MRI techniques and sequences, especially quantitative approaches to improve prostate cancer diagnosis. Using hybrid multidimensional MRI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 have been shown to change as a function of echo time (TE) and b-values, and that this dependence is different for cancer and benign tissue, which can be exploited for prostate cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether four-quadrant vector mapping of hybrid multidimensional MRI (HM-MRI) data can be used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa) and determine cancer aggressiveness. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with confirmed PCa underwent preoperative MRI prior to radical prostatectomy. Axial HM-MRI were acquired with all combinations of TE = 47, 75, 100 ms and b-values of 0, 750, 1500 s/mm2 , resulting in a 3 × 3 data matrix associated with each voxel. Prostate Quadrant (PQ) mapping analysis represents HM-MRI data for each voxel as a color-coded vector in the four-quadrant space of HM-MRI parameters (a 2D matrix of signal values for each combination of b-value and TE) with associated amplitude and angle information representing the change in T2 and ADC as a function of b-value and TE, respectively. RESULTS: Cancers have a higher PQ4 (22.50% ± 21.27%) and lower PQ2 (69.86% ± 28.24%) compared to benign tissue: peripheral, transition, and central zone (PQ4 = 0.13% ± 0.56%, 5.73% ± 15.07%, 2.66% ± 4.05%, and PQ2 = 98.51% ± 3.05%, 86.18% ± 21.75%, 93.38% ± 9.88%, respectively). Cancers have a higher vector angle (206.5 ± 41.8°) and amplitude (0.017 ± 0.013) compared to benign tissue. PQ metrics showed moderate correlation with Gleason score (|ρ| = 0.388-0.609), with more aggressive cancers being associated with increased PQ4 and angle and reduced PQ2 and amplitude. A combination of four-quadrant analysis metrics provided an area under the curve of 0.904 (p < 0.001) for the differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Four-quadrant vector mapping of HM-MRI data provides effective cancer markers, with cancers associated with high PQ4 and high vector angle and lower PQ2 and vector amplitude.

Prostate Cancers Invisible on Multiparametric MRI: Pathologic Features in Correlation with Whole-Mount Prostatectomy.

We investigated why some prostate cancers (PCas) are not identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) by using ground truth reference from whole-mount prostatectomy specimens. A total of 61 patients with biopsy-confirmed PCa underwent 3T mpMRI followed by prostatectomy. Lesions visible on MRI prospectively or retrospectively identified after correlating with histology were considered "identified cancers" (ICs). Lesions that could not be identified on mpMRI were considered "unidentified cancers" (UCs). Pathologists marked the Gleason score, stage, size, and density of the cancer glands and performed quantitative histology to calculate the tissue composition. Out of 115 cancers, 19 were unidentified on MRI. The UCs were significantly smaller and had lower Gleason scores and clinical stage lesions compared with the ICs. The UCs had significantly (p < 0.05) higher ADC (1.34 ± 0.38 vs. 1.02 ± 0.30 µm2/ms) and T2 (117.0 ± 31.1 vs. 97.1 ± 25.1 ms) compared with the ICs. The density of the cancer glands was significantly (p = 0.04) lower in the UCs. The percentage of the Gleason 4 component in Gleason 3 + 4 lesions was nominally (p = 0.15) higher in the ICs (20 ± 12%) compared with the UCs (15 ± 8%). The UCs had a significantly lower epithelium (32.9 ± 21.5 vs. 47.6 ± 13.1%, p = 0.034) and higher lumen volume (20.4 ± 10.0 vs. 13.3 ± 4.1%, p = 0.021) compared with the ICs. Independent from size and Gleason score, the tissue composition differences, specifically, the higher lumen and lower epithelium in UCs, can explain why some of the prostate cancers cannot be identified on mpMRI.

Multi-model sequential analysis of MRI data for microstructure prediction in heterogeneous tissue.

We propose a general method for combining multiple models to predict tissue microstructure, with an exemplar using in vivo diffusion-relaxation MRI data. The proposed method obviates the need to select a single 'optimum' structure model for data analysis in heterogeneous tissues where the best model varies according to local environment. We break signal interpretation into a three-stage sequence: (1) application of multiple semi-phenomenological models to predict the physical properties of tissue water pools contributing to the observed signal; (2) from each Stage-1 semi-phenomenological model, application of a tissue microstructure model to predict the relative volumes of tissue structure components that make up each water pool; and (3) aggregation of the predictions of tissue structure, with weightings based on model likelihood and fractional volumes of the water pools from Stage-1. The multiple model approach is expected to reduce prediction variance in tissue regions where a complex model is overparameterised, and bias where a model is underparameterised. The separation of signal characterisation (Stage-1) from biological assignment (Stage-2) enables alternative biological interpretations of the observed physical properties of the system, by application of different tissue structure models. The proposed method is exemplified with human prostate diffusion-relaxation MRI data, but has potential application to a wide range of analyses where a single model may not be optimal throughout the sampled domain.

Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

The spatial two-tissue compartment model (2TCM) was used to analyze prostate dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI data and compared with the standard Tofts model. A total of 29 patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer were included in this IRB-approved study. MRI data were acquired on a Philips Achieva 3T-TX scanner. After T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging, DCE data using 3D T1-FFE mDIXON sequence were acquired pre- and post-contrast media injection (0.1 mmol/kg Multihance) for 60 dynamic scans with temporal resolution of 8.3 s/image. The 2TCM has one fast ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) and one slow ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) exchanging compartment, compared with the standard Tofts model parameters (Ktrans and kep). On average, prostate cancer had significantly higher values (p < 0.01) than normal prostate tissue for all calculated parameters. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) between Ktrans and [Formula: see text] for cancer, but weak correlation (r = 0.28, p < 0.05) between kep and [Formula: see text]. Average root-mean-square error (RMSE) in fits from the 2TCM was significantly smaller (p < 0.001) than the RMSE in fits from the Tofts model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that fast [Formula: see text] had the highest area under the curve (AUC) than any other individual parameter. The combined four parameters from the 2TCM had a considerably higher AUC value than the combined two parameters from the Tofts model. The 2TCM is useful for quantitative analysis of prostate DCE-MRI data and provides new information in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Improving reader accuracy and specificity with the addition of hybrid multidimensional-MRI to multiparametric-MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers.

PURPOSE: Compare reader performance when adding the Hybrid Multidimensional-MRI (HM-MRI) map to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI+HM-MRI) versus mpMRI alone and inter-reader agreement in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers (CSPCa). METHODS: All 61 patients who underwent mpMRI (T2-, diffusion-weighted (DWI), and contrast-enhanced scans) and HM-MRI (with multiple TE/b-value combinations) before prostatectomy or MRI-fused-transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy between August, 2012 and February, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Two experienced readers (R1, R2) and two less-experienced readers (less than 6-year MRI prostate experience) (R3, R4) interpreted mpMRI without/with HM-MRI in the same sitting. Readers recorded the PI-RADS 3-5 score, lesion location, and change in score after adding HM-MRI. Each radiologist's mpMRI+HM-MRI and mpMRI performance measures (AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy) based on pathology, and Fleiss' kappa inter-reader agreement was calculated and compared. RESULTS: Per-sextant R3 and R4 mpMRI+HM-MRI accuracy (82% 81% vs. 77%, 71%; p=.006, <.001) and specificity (89%, 88% vs. 84%, 75%; p=.009, <.001) were higher than with mpMRI. Per-patient R4 mpMRI+HM-MRI specificity improved (48% from 7%; p<.001). R1 and R2 mpMRI+HM-MRI specificity per-sextant (80%, 93% vs. 81%, 93%; p=.51,>.99) and per-patient (37%, 41% vs. 48%, 37%; p=.16, .57) remained similar to mpMRI. R1 and R2 per-patient AUC with mpMRI+HM-MRI (0.63, 0.64 vs. 0.67, 0.61; p=.33, .36) remained similar to mpMRI, but R3 and R4 mpMRI+HM-MRI AUC (0.73, 0.62) approached R1 and R2 AUC. Per-patient inter-reader agreement, mpMRI+HM-MRI Fleiss Kappa, was higher than mpMRI (0.36 [95% CI 0.26, 0.46] vs. 0.17 [95% CI 0.07, 0.27]); p=.009). CONCLUSION: Adding HM-MRI to mpMRI (mpMRI+HM-MRI) improved specificity and accuracy for less-experienced readers, improving overall inter-reader agreement.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update.

Prostate cancer has a wide spectrum ranging between low-grade localized disease and castrate-resistant metastatic disease. Although whole gland and systematic therapies result in cure in the majority of patients, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer can still occur. Imaging approaches including anatomic, functional, and molecular modalities are continuously expanding. Currently, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer is grouped in three major categories: 1) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy, 2) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and 3) Metastatic prostate cancer treated by systemic therapy (androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy). This document is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Detection, Surveillance, and Staging of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update.

Prostate cancer is second leading cause of death from malignancy after lung cancer in American men. The primary goal during pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer is disease detection, localization, establishing disease extent (both local and distant), and evaluating aggressiveness, which are the driving factors of patient outcomes such as recurrence and survival. Prostate cancer is typically diagnosed after the recognizing elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level or abnormal digital rectal examination. Tissue diagnosis is obtained by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy or MRI-targeted biopsy, commonly with multiparametric MRI without or with intravenous contrast, which has recently been established as standard of care for detecting, localizing, and assessing local extent of prostate cancer. Although bone scintigraphy and CT are still typically used to detect bone and nodal metastases in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer, novel advanced imaging modalities including prostatespecific membrane antigen PET/CT and whole-body MRI are being more frequently utilized for this purpose with improved detection rates. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

An Interactive App with Multi-parametric MRI - Whole-Mount Histology Correlation for Enhanced Prostate MRI Training of Radiology Residents.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To validate the educational value of a newly created learning application in enhancing prostate MRI training of radiologists for detecting prostate cancer using an observer study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An interactive learning app, LearnRadiology, was developed using a web-based framework to display multi-parametric prostate MRI images with whole-mount histology for 20 cases curated for unique pathology and teaching points. Twenty new prostate MRI cases, different from the ones used in the web app, were uploaded on 3D Slicer. Three radiologists (R1: radiologist; R2, R3: residents) blinded to pathology results were asked to mark areas suspected of cancer and provide a confidence score (1-5, with 5 being high confidence level). Then after a minimum memory washout period of 1 month, the same radiologists used the learning app and then repeated the same observer study. The diagnostic performance for detecting cancers before and after accessing the learning app was measured by correlating MRI with whole-mount pathology by an independent reviewer. RESULTS: The 20 subjects included in the observer study had 39 cancer lesions (13 Gleason 3 + 3, 17 Gleason 3 + 4, 7 Gleason 4 + 3, and 2 Gleason 4 + 5 lesions). The sensitivity (R1: 54% â†’ 64%, P = 0.08; R2: 44% â†’ 59%, P = 0.03; R3: 62% â†’ 72%, P = 0.04) and positive predictive value (R1: 68% â†’ 76%, P = 0.23; R2: 52% â†’ 79%, P = 0.01; R3: 48% â†’ 65%, P = 0.04) for all 3 radiologists improved after using the teaching app. The confidence score for true positive cancer lesion also improved significantly (R1: 4.0 ± 1.0 â†’ 4.3 ± 0.8; R2: 3.1 ± 0.8 â†’ 4.0 ± 1.1; R3: 2.8 ± 1.2 â†’ 4.1 ± 1.1; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The web-based and interactive LearnRadiology app learning resource can support medical student and postgraduate education by improving diagnostic performance of trainees for detecting prostate cancer.

Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard Tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

The spatial two-tissue compartment model (2TCM) was used to analyze prostate dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI data and compared with the standard Tofts model. A total of 29 patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer were included in this IRB-approved study. MRI data were acquired on a Philips Achieva 3T-TX scanner. After T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging, DCE data using 3D T1-FFE mDIXON sequence were acquired pre- and post-contrast media injection (0.1 mmol/kg Multihance) for 60 dynamic scans with temporal resolution of 8.3 s/image. The 2TCM has one fast (K 1 trans and k 1 ep ) and one slow (K 2 trans and k 2 ep ) exchanging compartment, compared with the standard Tofts model parameters (K trans and k ep ). On average, prostate cancer had significantly higher values (p < 0.007) than normal prostate tissue for all calculated parameters. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001) between K trans and K 1 trans for cancer, but weak correlation (r = 0.28, p < 0.05) between k ep and k 1 ep . Average root-mean-square error (RMSE) in fits from the 2TCM was significantly smaller (p < 0.001) than the RMSE in fits from the Tofts model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that fast K 1 trans had the highest area under the curve (AUC) than any other individual parameter. The combined four parameters from the 2TCM had a considerably higher AUC value than the combined two parameters from the Tofts model. The 2TCM may be useful for quantitative analysis of prostate DCE-MRI data and may provide new information in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Comparing Radiologist Performance in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer with Multiparametric versus Hybrid Multidimensional MRI.

Background Variability of acquisition and interpretation of prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) persists despite implementation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 due to the range of reader experience and subjectivity of lesion characterization. A quantitative method, hybrid multidimensional MRI (HM-MRI), may introduce objectivity. Purpose To compare performance, interobserver agreement, and interpretation time of radiologists using mpMRI versus HM-MRI to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this retrospective analysis, men with prostatectomy or MRI-fused transrectal US biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer underwent mpMRI (triplanar T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging) and HM-MRI (with multiple echo times and b value combinations) from August 2012 to February 2020. Four readers with 1-20 years of experience interpreted mpMRI and HM-MRI examinations independently, with a 4-week washout period between interpretations. PI-RADS score, lesion location, and interpretation time were recorded. mpMRI and HM-MRI interpretation time, interobserver agreement (Cronbach alpha), and performance of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis were compared for each radiologist with use of bootstrap analysis. Results Sixty-one men (mean age, 61 years ± 8 [SD]) were evaluated. Per-patient AUC was higher for HM-MRI for reader 4 compared with mpMRI (AUCs for readers 1-4: 0.61, 0.71, 0.59, and 0.64 vs 0.66, 0.60, 0.50, and 0.46; P = .57, .20, .32, and .04, respectively). Per-patient specificity was higher for HM-MRI for readers 2-4 compared with mpMRI (specificity for readers 1-4: 48%, 78%, 48%, and 46% vs 37%, 26%, 0%, and 7%; P = .34, P < .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). Diagnostic performance improved for the reader least experienced with HM-MRI, reader 4 (AUC, 0.64 vs 0.46; P = .04). HM-MRI interobserver agreement (Cronbach alpha = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.82, 0.92]) was higher than that of mpMRI (Cronbach alpha = 0.26 [95% CI: 0.10, 0.52]; α > .60 indicates reliability; P = .03). HM-MRI mean interpretation time (73 seconds ± 43 [SD]) was shorter than that of mpMRI (254 seconds ± 133; P = .03). Conclusion Radiologists had similar or improved diagnostic performance, higher interobserver agreement, and lower interpretation time for clinically significant prostate cancer with hybrid multidimensional MRI than multiparametric MRI. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Turkbey in this issue.

Directional and inter-acquisition variability in diffusion-weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify inter-directional and inter-acquisition variation in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and emphasize signals that report restricted diffusion to enhance cancer conspicuity, while reducing the effects of local microscopic motion and magnetic field fluctuations. METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer were studied under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Individual acquisitions of DWI signal intensities were reconstructed to calculate inter-acquisition distributions and their statistics, which were compared for healthy versus cancer tissue. A method was proposed to detect and filter the acquisitions affected by motion-induced signal loss. First, signals that reflect restricted diffusion were separated from the acquisitions that suffer from signal loss, likely due to microscopic motion, by imposing a cutoff value. Furthermore, corrected apparent diffusion coefficient maps were calculated by employing a weighted sum of the multiple acquisitions, instead of conventional averaging. These weights were calculated by applying a soft-max function to the set of acquisitions per-voxel, making the analysis immune to acquisitions with significant signal loss, even if the number of such acquisitions is high. RESULTS: Inter-acquisition variation is much larger than the Rician noise variance, local spatial variations, and the estimates of diffusion anisotropy based on the current data, as well as the published values of anisotropy. The proposed method increases the contrast for cancers and yields a sensitivity of 98 . 8 % $$ 98.8\% $$ with a false positive rate of 3 . 9 % $$ 3.9\% $$ . CONCLUSION: Motion-induced signal loss makes conventional signal-averaging suboptimal and can obscure signals from areas with restricted diffusion. Filtering or weighting individual acquisitions prior to image analysis can overcome this problem.

Physically implausible signals as a quantitative quality assessment metric in prostate diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To provide a quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR images of the prostate through identification of PIDS which clearly represents artifacts in the data. We calculated the percentage and distribution of PIDS in prostate DWI and compare the amount of PIDS between mpMRI images obtained with and without an endorectal coil. METHODS: This IRB approved retrospective study (from 03/03/2014 to 03/10/2020), included 40 patients scanned with endorectal coil (ERC) and 40 without ER coil (NERC). PIDS contains any voxel where: (1) the diffusion signal increases despite an increase in b-value; and/or (2) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is more than 3.0 µm2/ms (the ADC of pure water at 37 °C and it is physically implausible for any material to have a higher ADC). PIDS for transition zone (TZ) and peripheral zone (PZ) was calculated using an in-house MATLAB program. DWI images were quantitatively inspected for noise, motion, and distortion. T-test was used to compare the difference between PIDS levels in ERC versus NERC and ANOVA to compare the PIDS levels in the anatomic zones. The images were evaluated by a fellowship-trained radiologist in Abdominal Imaging with more than 10 years of experience in reading prostate MRI. This was tested only in prostate in this study. RESULTS: 80 patients (58 ± 8 years old, 80 men) were evaluated. The percentage of voxels exhibiting PIDS was 17.1 ± 8.1% for the ERC cohort and 22.2 ± 15.5% for the NERC cohort. PIDS for NERC versus ERC were not significantly different (p = 0.14). The apex and base showed similar percentages of PIDS in ERC (p = 0.30) and NERC (p = 0.86). The mid (13.8 ± 8.6%) in ERC showed lower values (p = 0.02) of PIDS compared to apex (19.9 ± 11.1%) and base (17.5 ± 8.3%). CONCLUSION: PIDS maps provide a spatially resolved quantitative quality assessment for prostate DWI. Average PIDS over the entire prostate were similar for the ERC and NERC cohorts, and did not differ significantly across prostate zones. However, for many of the patients, PIDS was focally much higher in specific prostate zones. PIDS assessment can guide Radiologist's evaluation of images and the development of improved DWI sequences.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Surveillance of Testicular Cancer: 2021 Update.

The staging and surveillance of testicular cancer is a complex topic, which integrates clinical, biochemical, and imaging components. The use of imaging for staging and surveillance of testicular cancer is individually tailored to each patient by considering tumor histology and prognosis. This document discusses the rationale for use of imaging by imaging modality during the initial staging of testicular seminoma and nonseminoma tumors and during the planned surveillance of stage IA and IB testicular cancer by histological subtype integrating clinical suspicion for disease recurrence in surveillance protocols. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Real-Time MRI-Guided Prostate Interventions.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cause of cancer death in males. Targeting MRI-visible lesions has led to an overall increase in the detection of clinically significant PCa compared to the prior practice of random ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Additionally, advances in MRI-guided minimally invasive focal treatments are providing new options for patients with PCa. This review summarizes the currently utilized real-time MRI-guided interventions for PCa diagnosis and treatment.

Prostate MRI: Is Endorectal Coil Necessary?-A Review.

To assess the necessity of endorectal coil use in 3 Tesla (T) prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a literature review comparing the image quality and diagnostic performance with an endorectal coil (ERC) and a without endorectal coil (NERC), with a phased array coil or a wearable perineal coil (WPC), was performed. A PubMed search of 3T prostate MRI using an endorectal coil for studies published until 31 July 2021 was performed. A total of 14 studies comparing 3T prostate MRI with and without endorectal coil use were identified. The quality scores and diagnostic performances were recorded for each study. In total, five studies compared image quality; five studies compared quality and performance; and four studies compared performance of detection, size of detected lesions, accuracy of cancer localization, and aggressiveness/staging. The use of an endorectal coil improved image quality with a higher overall signal to noise ratio, posterior and peripheral zone signal to noise ratio, high b-value attenuation diffusion coefficient (ADC) signal to noise ratio, and contrast to noise ratio. Endorectal coil use improved subjective image quality for anatomic detail on T2 weighted images (T2WI) and diffusion weighted images (DWI). Endorectal coil use had less motion artifact on DWI than non-endorectal coil use, but produced a higher occurrence of other artifacts on DWI. Endorectal coils had higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) in the detection of overall and index lesions, as well as smaller and less aggressive lesions, missing fewer and smaller lesions than non-endorectal coils. Endorectal coils had higher sensitivity than non-endorectal coils in localizing and staging lesions. Endorectal coils improved quantitative and qualitative image quality and diagnostic performance in the detection of smaller and less aggressive cancers in 3T prostate MRI.

Histological validation of prostate tissue composition measurement using hybrid multi-dimensional MRI: agreement with pathologists' measures.

PURPOSE: To validate prostate tissue composition measured using hybrid multi-dimensional MRI (HM-MRI) by comparing with reference standard (ground truth) results from pathologists' interpretation of clinical histopathology slides following whole mount prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 prospective participants with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer underwent 3 T MRI prior to radical prostatectomy. Axial HM-MRI was acquired with all combinations of echo times of 57, 70, 150, 200 ms and b-values of 0, 150, 750, 1500 s/mm2 and data were fitted using a 3-compartment signal model using custom software to generate volumes for each tissue component (stroma, epithelium, lumen). Three experienced genitourinary pathologists independently as well as in consensus reviewed each histology image and provide an estimate of percentage of epithelium and lumen for regions-of-interest corresponding to MRI (n = 165; 64 prostate cancers and 101 benign tissue). Agreement statistics using total deviation index (TDI0.9) was performed for tissue composition measured using HM-MRI and reference standard results from pathologists' consensus. RESULTS: Based on the initial results showing typical variation among pathologists TDI0.9 = 25%, we determined we will declare acceptable agreement if the 95% one-sided upper confident limit of TDI0.9 is less than 30%. The results of tissue composition measurement from HM-MRI compared to ground truth results from the consensus of 3 pathologists, reveal that ninety percent of absolute paired differences (TDI0.9) were within 18.8% and 22.4% in measuring epithelium and lumen, respectively. We are 95% confident that 90% of absolute paired differences were within 20.6% and 24.2% in measuring epithelium and lumen, respectively. These were less than our criterion of 30% and inter-pathologists' agreement (22.3% for epithelium and 24.2% for lumen) and therefore we accept the agreement performance of HM-MRI. The results revealed excellent area under the ROC curve for differentiating cancer from benign tissue based on epithelium (HM-MRI: 0.87, pathologists: 0.97) and lumen volume (HM-MRI: 0.85, pathologists: 0.77). CONCLUSION: The agreement in tissue composition measurement using hybrid multidimensional MRI and consensus of pathologists is on par with the inter-raters (pathologists) agreement.