The Biological Significance of Multi-copy Regions and Their Impact on Variant Discovery.

Identification of genetic variants via high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies has been essential for both fundamental and clinical studies. However, to what extent the genome sequence composition affects variant calling remains unclear. In this study, we identified 63,897 multi-copy sequences (MCSs) with a minimum length of 300 bp, each of which occurs at least twice in the human genome. The 151,749 genomic loci (multi-copy regions, or MCRs) harboring these MCSs account for 1.98% of the genome and are distributed unevenly across chromosomes. MCRs containing the same MCS tend to be located on the same chromosome. Gene Ontology (GO) analyses revealed that 3800 genes whose UTRs or exons overlap with MCRs are enriched for Golgi-related cellular component terms and various enzymatic activities in the GO biological function category. MCRs are also enriched for loci that are sensitive to neocarzinostatin-induced double-strand breaks. Moreover, genetic variants discovered by genome-wide association studies and recorded in dbSNP are significantly underrepresented in MCRs. Using simulated HTS datasets, we show that false variant discovery rates are significantly higher in MCRs than in other genomic regions. These results suggest that extra caution must be taken when identifying genetic variants in the MCRs via HTS technologies.

Tools for fundamental analysis functions of TCR repertoires: a systematic comparison.

The full set of T cell receptors (TCRs) in an individual is known as his or her TCR repertoire. Defining TCR repertoires under physiological conditions and in response to a disease or vaccine may lead to a better understanding of adaptive immunity and thus has great biological and clinical value. In the past decade, several high-throughput sequencing-based tools have been developed to assign TCRs to germline genes and to extract complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) sequences using different algorithms. Although these tools claim to be able to perform the full range of fundamental TCR repertoire analyses, there is no clear consensus of which tool is best suited to particular projects. Here, we present a systematic analysis of 12 available TCR repertoire analysis tools using simulated data, with an emphasis on fundamental analysis functions. Our results shed light on the detailed functions of TCR repertoire analysis tools and may therefore help researchers in the field to choose the right tools for their particular experimental design.