Race, age at diagnosis and histological characteristics of lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS) and ever-smokers in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: We previously demonstrated in a meta-analysis there was no difference in risk ratio (RR) of lung cancer detected by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening among female never-smokers (NS) and male ever-smokers (ES) in Asia. LDCT screening significantly decreased lung cancer death among Asian NS compared to Asian ES (RR =0.27, P<0.001). Methods: We investigated if race, age at diagnosis, and histology further differentiate lung cancer diagnosed by LDCT among in NS and ES using the 14 studies from our previous meta-analysis. Results: Twelve publications reported relevant data utilized in this study. From five Asian and one international studies, Asian ES had similar risk of lung cancer diagnosed at baseline screening as Asian NS [RR =0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.24] but among non-Asian ES had a 4.56 times significantly higher risk than non-Asian NS (RR =4.56; 95% CI: 2.85-7.28). The baseline incidence of lung cancer in never-smoker (LCINS) was approximately 2.3 times higher among Asian NS than non-Asian NS (0.62% vs. 0.27%, P=0.001). Asian ES had about half the baseline incidence of lung cancer diagnosed as non-Asian ES (0.65% vs. 1.26%). LCINS was diagnosed at 1.98 years younger than ES (95% CI: -3.38 to -0.58) (four studies) and exhibited a higher proportion of adenocarcinoma (ADC) (96.58% vs. 70.37%). Conclusions: Among normal-risk individuals, LCINS had a significantly higher likelihood of being diagnosed among Asians than non-Asians, predominantly manifesting as ADC and diagnosed approximately 2 years younger than ES suggesting that the age limit to initiate lung cancer screening in NS may be set lower compared to LDCT lung cancer screening among ES.

Amivantamab plus Lazertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab-lazertinib) has shown clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in patients with previously untreated or osimertinib-pretreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In a phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab-lazertinib (in an open-label fashion), osimertinib (in a blinded fashion), or lazertinib (in a blinded fashion, to assess the contribution of treatment components). The primary end point was progression-free survival in the amivantamab-lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group, as assessed by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: Overall, 1074 patients underwent randomization (429 to amivantamab-lazertinib, 429 to osimertinib, and 216 to lazertinib). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-lazertinib group than in the osimertinib group (23.7 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.85; P<0.001). An objective response was observed in 86% of the patients (95% CI, 83 to 89) in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and in 85% of those (95% CI, 81 to 88) in the osimertinib group; among patients with a confirmed response (336 in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and 314 in the osimertinib group), the median response duration was 25.8 months (95% CI, 20.1 to could not be estimated) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 18.5), respectively. In a planned interim overall survival analysis of amivantamab-lazertinib as compared with osimertinib, the hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05). Predominant adverse events were EGFR-related toxic effects. The incidence of discontinuation of all agents due to treatment-related adverse events was 10% with amivantamab-lazertinib and 3% with osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab-lazertinib showed superior efficacy to osimertinib as first-line treatment in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARIPOSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04487080.).

Top 20 EGFR+ NSCLC Clinical and Translational Science Papers That Shaped the 20 Years Since the Discovery of Activating EGFR Mutations in NSCLC. An Editor-in-Chief Expert Panel Consensus Survey.

The year 2024 is the 20th anniversary of the discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since then, tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of NSCLC based on this discovery. Some of these studies have led to seismic changes in the concept of oncology research and spurred treatment advances beyond NSCLC, leading to a current true era of precision oncology for all solid tumors. We now routinely molecularly profile all tumor types and even plasma samples of patients with NSCLC for multiple actionable driver mutations, independent of patient clinical characteristics nor is profiling limited to the advanced incurable stage. We are increasingly monitoring treatment responses and detecting resistance to targeted therapy by using plasma genotyping. Furthermore, we are now profiling early-stage NSCLC for appropriate adjuvant targeted treatment leading to an eventual potential "cure" in early-stage EGFR+ NSCLC which have societal implication on implementing lung cancer screening in never-smokers as most EGFR+ NSCLC patients are never-smokers. All these advances were unfathomable in 2004 when the five papers that described "discoveries" of activating EGFR mutations (del19, L858R, exon 20 insertions, and "uncommon" mutations) were published. To commemorate this 20th anniversary, we assembled a global panel of thoracic medical oncology experts to select the top 20 papers (publications or congress presentation) from the 20 years since this seminal discovery with December 31, 2023 as the cutoff date for inclusion of papers to be voted on. Papers ranked 21 to 30 were considered "honorable mention" and also annotated. Our objective is that these 30 papers with their annotations about their impact and even all the ranked papers will serve as "syllabus" for the education of future thoracic oncology trainees. Finally, we mentioned potential practice-changing clinical trials to be reported. One of them, LAURA was published online on June 2, 2024 was not included in the list of papers to be voted on but will surely be highly ranked if this consensus survery is performed again on the 25th anniversay of the discovery EGFR mutations (i.e. top 25 papers on the 25 years since the discovery of activating EGFR mutations).

LIBRETTO-431: Confirming the Superiority of Selpercatinib to Chemotherapy and the Lack of Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced RET Fusion-Positive (RET+) NSCLC, Another Unique Never-Smoker Predominant Molecular Subtype of NSCLC.

Selpercatinib, a potent and highly selective RET kinase inhibitor with significant CNS activity, has recently gained US approval for the treatment of NSCLC harboring RET fusions (RET+) based on a large-scale single-arm study. The LIBRETTO-431 trial was the global pivotal registration phase 3 trial comparing selpercatinib to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RET+ NSCLC. Never-smokers constituted 67.4% of the RET+ NSCLC patients enrolled. KIF5B-RET made up the vast majority (77%) of the RET+ fusion variant with known fusion partner. The results of this study demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) benefit as well as impressive intracranial disease response in participants treated with selpercatinib as compared to those treated with chemotherapy, with a HR [hazard ratio] of 0.46 (95% CI 0.33-0.70; P < 0.001) for the intention-to-treat (ITT)-pembrolizumab group and HR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.31-0.70, P < 0.001) for the overall ITT-group of patients. The addition of pembrolizumab to platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy resulted in numerically identical PFS (11.2 months). These results point to selpercatinib's superiority to traditional chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of NSCLC harboring RET fusions and add to literature on the salience of targeted precision oncology and lack of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor in NSCLC patients with never-smoker predominant actionable driver mutations. RET+ NSCLC should be added to the list of molecular subtypes (EGFR+, ALK+, ROS1+) of NSCLC to be excluded in chemoimmunotherapy trial.

"ACHILLES" Heel No More? Afatinib at 40 Mg Once Daily is Superior to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in EGFR Uncommon (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) Mutations (ACHILLES/TORG1834).

Afatinib, a second-generation covalent EGFR TKI, has been approved for the treatment of the three "uncommon" EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) based on one pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective trials (LUX-Lung 2, 3 and 6). The confirmed overall response rate, as assessed by independent radiology review, was 66% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). Among the 21 responders, the proportion of patients with response duration of ≥12 months was 52% and the proportion with response durations of ≥18 months was 33%. Of note, all patients received afatinib at 40 or 50 mg once daily which is higher than the approved dose of 40 mg once daily and the usual 30 mg once daily starting dose by most thoracic oncologists. Given the approval of afatinib for "uncommon" EGFR mutations was based on the limited number of patients analyzed, the retrospective nature of the analysis, lack of randomized phase 2 or 3 trial, there remains uncertainty as to whether afatinib, chemotherapy or other next-generation EGFR TKIs is the optimal treatment. This uncertainty also hinders the development of future treatment of these "uncommon" mutations because of the uncertainty that afatinib is the optimal treatment and hence should be the standard of care control arm in future randomized trials. Finally, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 provided us with the first randomized trial result that afatinib achieved superior progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy (10.6 months vs 5.7 months, HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.256-0.694; P = 0.0007). However, ACHILLES should mostly be considered as phase 2 trial given the limited number (N = 109) of patients enrolled. Furthermore, the PFS benefit seemed to be with the 40 mg daily dose (HR = 0.128; 95% CI: 0.050-0.327) and not with the 30 mg daily dose (HR = 0.704; 95% CI: 0.352-1.406). Further investigation of the 30 once daily dosing for the treatment of uncommon EGFR mutations is needed.

ATTLAS, IMpower151 and ORIENT-31: Dusting off IMpower150 for Post-Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC?

Treatment strategies for post-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an ongoing challenge. Previously, the IMPRESS trial comparing platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without EGFR-TKI did not demonstrate any progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. The retrospective subgroup analysis of IMpower150 indicated that the quad regimen (carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, atezolizumab) improved PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who progressed on first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Given the retrospective nature of the analysis, the IMpower150 regimen is not approved in the US for post-EGFR-TKI treatment. Currently, osimertinib or other third-generation (3G) EGFR-TKIs is the first-line standard of care for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. MARIPOSA-2 provided the first randomized trial post-osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with another quad regimen (platinum, pemetrexed, lazertinib, amivantamab). The IMpower150 and MARIPOSA-2 quad regimens differ in the principle of whether to continue or even "double-down" on EGFR inhibition. Recently, three prospective randomized trials conducted in Asia offered promising results, showing that a quad regimen of doublet platinum chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis agent and ICI may be as efficacious as MARIPOSA-2 with a lower rate of toxicities and accounting for the PFS difference if 1L chemotherapy plus osimertinib instead of osimertinib monotherapy. In particular, the median PFS achieved by the quad regimens of ATTLAS and IMpower151 is 8.5 months. However, only 8.2% and 17.9% of the EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who received the quad regimens progressed on 3G EGFR-TKI, respectively. Here, we discuss how the results of IMpower151 and ATTLAS may rejuvenate interest in a non-EGFR containing quad regimen as a potential post-osimertinib monotherapy treatment. Randomized trials comparing the results of these studies, including the quad regimen of MARIPOSA-2 versus the quad regimen of IMpower151/Impower150/ATTLAS in post-osimertinib (or other 3G EGFR-TKI) progression, are urgently needed.

Overcoming Central ß-Sheet #6 (Cß6) ALK Mutation (L1256F), TP53 Mutations and Short Forms of EML4-ALK v3/b and v5a/b Splice Variants are the Unmet Need That a Re-Imagined 5th-Generation (5G) ALK TKI Must Deliver.

Despite the development and approval of seven anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) spanning over three "generations" since the discovery of ALK fusion positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there remains intrinsic and acquired resistances to these approved TKIs. Currently, a fourth-generation (4G) ALK TKI, NVL-655, is being developed to attack some of the unmet needs such as compound resistance mutations in cis. However, EML4-ALK variant 3 and TP53 mutations are intrinsic genomic alterations that negatively modulate efficacy of ALK TKIs. Potentially, in the shifting landscape where lorlatinib should be the first-line ALK TKI of choice based on the CROWN trial, the central ß-sheet #6 (Cß6) mutation ALK L1256F will be the potential acquired resistance mutation to lorlatinib which may be resistant to current ALK TKIs. Here we opine on what additional capacities a putative fifth-generation (5G) ALK TKI will need to possess if it can be achieved in one single molecule. We propose randomized trial schemas targeting some of the intrinsic resistance mechanisms that will lead to approval of a prototypic fifth-generation (5G) ALK TKI and actually be beneficial to ALK+ NSCLC patients rather than just design a positive pivotal superiority trial for the sole purpose of drug approval.

A pragmatic guide for management of adverse events associated with lorlatinib.

Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In clinical trials, lorlatinib has shown durable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in treatment-naive patients and in those who have experienced progression while receiving first- and/or second-generation ALK TKIs. Lorlatinib has a distinct safety profile from other ALK TKIs, including hyperlipidemia and central nervous system effects. Clinical trial data showed that most adverse events (AEs) can be managed effectively or reversed with dose modifications (such as dose interruptions or reductions) or with concomitant medications without compromising clinical efficacy or quality of life for patients. A pragmatic approach to managing AEs related to lorlatinib is required. We present patient-focused recommendations for the evaluation and management of select AEs associated with lorlatinib developed by clinicians and nurses with extensive lorlatinib expertise in routine clinical practice. The recommendations follow the general framework of "prepare, monitor, manage, reassess" to streamline AE management and assist in practical, actionable, and personalized patient care.

MARIPOSA-2: Is the treatment worse than the disease?

Passaro et al.1 demonstrated in EGFR+ NSCLC post-1L osimertinib both "quad" (lazertinib [L] + amivantamab [A] + chemotherapy [CP]) and "triplet" (ACP) regimens achieved improved median progression-free survival over CP. Nonetheless, a high incidence of adverse events requiring dose modifications may limit adaptation of the triplet and quad MARIPOSA-2 regimens.

Taletrectinib for the treatment of ROS-1 positive non-small cell lung cancer: a drug evaluation of phase I and II data.

INTRODUCTION: While crizotinib and entrectinib have been approved to treat ROS1 fusion-positive (ROS1+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), unmet needs remain. These unmet needs include treatment options for patients with resistance mutations and efficacious options even in the presence of brain metastasis while simultaneously avoiding unwanted neurological side effects. AREAS COVERED: Taletrectinib was designed to: improve efficacy; overcome resistance to first-generation ROS1 inhibitors; and address central nervous system penetration while conferring fewer neurological adverse events. All of these features are demonstrated and supported by data from the phase I and the regional phase II TRUST-I clinical trial. Here, we describe the preclinical and clinical characteristics of taletrectinib and evaluate the data from phase I and II studies and review the rationale and design of TRUST-II, a global phase II study of taletrectinib, which is enrolling patients in North America, Europe, and Asia. EXPERT OPINION: Taltrectinib has the potential to improve PFS based on its greater potency against ROS1+ tumors and high CNS penetration. By selectively inhibiting ROS1 wild-type and its resistant mutations over TRKB, taltrectinib has a better safety profile with minimal CNS-related AEs compared to other ROS1+ inhibitors.

Evaluation of the Effect of Lorlatinib on CYP2B6, CYP2C9, UGT, and P-Glycoprotein Substrates in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lorlatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This study assessed the effect of steady-state lorlatinib on the metabolic enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6, CYP2C9, and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) and the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter. METHODS: Thirty-two patients received a single oral dose of a probe drug on Day - 2 to determine the pharmacokinetics of the probe drug alone. Starting on Day 1, patients received 100 mg oral lorlatinib daily. On Day 15, a single oral dose of the probe drug was administered concurrently with lorlatinib. Pharmacokinetic parameters for these probe substrates were assessed. RESULTS: Plasma exposures of all probe substrates were reduced by lorlatinib compared with the probe alone. The greatest reduction in area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) and maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration (Cmax) (67% and 63% decrease, respectively) was observed with the P-gp probe substrate fexofenadine. Lorlatinib coadministration also decreased the AUC∞ and Cmax of bupropion (CYP2B6 probe substrate) by 25% and 27%, tolbutamide (CYP2C9 probe substrate) by 43% and 15%, and acetaminophen (UGT probe substrate) by 45% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lorlatinib is a net moderate inducer of P-gp and a weak inducer of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and UGT after steady state is achieved with daily dosing. Medications that are P-gp substrates with a narrow therapeutic window should be avoided in patients taking lorlatinib; no dose modifications are needed with substrates of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, or UGT. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT01970865.

Divarasib plus cetuximab in KRAS G12C-positive colorectal cancer: a phase 1b trial.

KRAS G12C mutation is prevalent in ~4% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Divarasib, a KRAS G12C inhibitor, has shown modest activity as a single agent in KRAS G12C-positive CRC at 400 mg. Epidermal growth factor receptor has been recognized as a major upstream activator of RAS-MAPK signaling, a proposed key mechanism of resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition in CRC. Here, we report on divarasib plus cetuximab (epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor) in patients with KRAS G12C-positive CRC (n = 29) from arm C of an ongoing phase 1b trial. The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Secondary objectives included preliminary antitumor activity. The safety profile of this combination was consistent with those of single-agent divarasib and cetuximab. Treatment-related adverse events led to divarasib dose reductions in four patients (13.8%); there were no treatment withdrawals. The objective response rate was 62.5% (95% confidence interval: 40.6%, 81.2%) in KRAS G12C inhibitor-naive patients (n = 24). The median duration of response was 6.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval: 5.5, 12.3). As an exploratory objective, we observed a decline in KRAS G12C variant allele frequency associated with response and identified acquired genomic alterations at disease progression that may be associated with resistance. The manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity of divarasib plus cetuximab support the further investigation of this combination in KRAS G12C-positive CRC.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04449874.

Efficacy of Mobocertinib and Amivantamab in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertions Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: An Indirect Treatment Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) mutations of the EGFR gene account for 1% to 2% of all non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Targeted therapies have been developed to treat this cancer type but have not been studied in head-to-head trials. Our objective was to use a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to assess the efficacy of mobocertinib and amivantamab in patients with NSCLC EGFR ex20ins mutations who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An unanchored MAIC was conducted to estimate the treatment effects of mobocertinib and amivantamab using individual-level data from the mobocertinib phase I/II single-arm trial (NCT02716116) and published data from the amivantamab single-arm CHRYSALIS trial (NCT02609776). Confirmed overall response rate (cORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR) were assessed. RESULTS: Both trials were comparable in terms of study population, study design, and outcome definitions and included 114 patients who received mobocertinib and 114 patients who received amivantamab. After MAIC weighting, all reported baseline characteristics were balanced between mobocertinib and amivantamab. The weighted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.56 (0.30-1.04) for independent review committee (IRC)-assessed cORR and 0.98 (0.53-1.82) for investigator (INV)-assessed cORR. The weighted hazard ratio (HR) comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.74 (0.51-1.07) for IRC-assessed PFS, 0.92 (0.57-1.48) for OS, and 0.59 (0.30-1.18) for INV-assessed DoR. CONCLUSION: MAIC analysis showed that mobocertinib and amivantamab had similar efficacy in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations whose disease progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings may benefit patients by supporting future treatment options.

Comprehensive Review of ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors-Classified by Structural Designs and Mutation Spectrum (Solvent Front Mutation [G2032R] and Central ß-Sheet 6 [Cß6] Mutation [L2086F]).

Despite ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC accounting for approximately 1% to 2% of NSCLC, there is a long list of ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) being developed in addition to three approved ROS1 TKIs, crizotinib, entrectinib and repotrectinib. Here, we categorized ROS1 TKIs by their structures (cyclic versus noncyclic) and inhibitory abilities (active against solvent front mutation G2032R or central ß-sheet #6 [Cß6] mutation L2086F) and summarized their reported clinical activity in order to provide a dashboard on how to use these ROS1 TKIs in various clinical situations. In addition, the less known Cß6 mutation ROS1 L2086F confer resistances to next-generation ROS1 TKIs (repotrectinib, taletrectinib, and potentially NVL-520) that can be overcome by cabozantinib as documented in published patient reports and potentially by certain L-shaped type I ROS1 TKIs including ceritinib and gilteritinib, which is approved as a FLT3 inhibitor for relapsed refractory FLT3+ acute myeloid leukemia but have published preclinical activites against ROS1 (and ALK). Future clinical trials should investigate cabozantinib and gilteritinib to repurpose them as ROS1 TKIs that can target ROS1 L2086F Cß6 mutation.

Osimertinib tolerance in a patient with Stevens Johnson syndrome during osimertinib therapy after treatment with pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib has emerged as an important tool in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with certain activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, Osimertinib may cause adverse effects, including severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The risk of certain adverse effects may be increased in the setting of recent use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, although it is unclear whether recent use of ICI therapy is a risk factor for Osimertinib-induced SJS specifically. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a patient with EGFR L858R mutation-positive metastatic NSCLC who developed Osimertinib-induced SJS after recent administration of eight cycles of a pembrolizumab-containing chemotherapy regimen. Osimertinib, which was the best treatment targeting his lung cancer, was avoided due to history of SJS. Four years later, because of unresponsiveness or side effects of alternative treatments, he underwent Osimertinib challenge and tolerated it. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of multi-disciplinary care and supports the hypothesis that the risk of SJS to Osimertinib is significantly higher in the context of recent administration of ICI therapy and, patients may tolerate Osimertinib after certain time has elapsed after the last dose of ICI.