Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(9): 2943-2951, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31243666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of two distinct patient populations treated within two neighboring UK cancer centers (A and B) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all new stages 3 and 4 EOC patients treated between January 2013 and December 2014 was performed. The Mayo Clinic surgical complexity score (SCS) was applied. Cox regression analysis identified the impact of treatment methods on survival. RESULTS: The study identified 249 patients (127 at center A and 122 in centre B) without significant differences in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (FIGO 4, 29.7% at centers A and B), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG < 2, 89.9% at centers A and B), or histology (serous type in 84.1% at centers A and B). The patients at center A were more likely to undergo surgery (87% vs 59.8%; p < 0.001). The types of chemotherapy and the patients receiving palliative treatment alone were equivalent between the two centers (3.6%). The median SCS was significantly higher at center A (9 vs 2; p < 0.001) with greater tumor burden (9 vs 6 abdominal fields involved; p < 0.001), longer median operation times (285 vs 155 min; p < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (9 vs 6 days; p < 0.001), but surgical morbidity and mortality were equivalent. The independent predictors of reduced overall survival (OS) were non-serous histology (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.61), ECOG higher than 2 (HR, 1.9; 95% CI 1.15-3.13), and palliation alone (HR, 3.43; 95% CI 1.51-7.81). Cytoreduction, of any timing, had an independent protective impact on OS compared with chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.31 for interval surgery and 0.39 for primary surgery), even after adjustment for other prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating surgery into the initial EOC management, even for those patients with a greater tumor burden and more disseminated disease, may require more complex procedures and more resources in terms of theater time and hospital stay, but seems to be associated with a significant prolongation of the patients overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/mortalidade , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patologia , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA