A clinical evaluation of gelastic and dacrystic seizures: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Gelastic seizures are extremely rare, short-lasting, unprovoked, and uncontrollable laughing attacks. We conducted this retrospective evaluation to determine whether these symptoms, manifesting in different forms, such as cheerful laughter, laughing, smiling, and sobbing had any value in terms of etiology or localization. METHODS: A total of 31 patients who exhibited bouts of laughing or crying and who were under follow-up between 2000 and 2019 at tertiary epilepsy centers were included in the study. Laughing seizures were divided into three groups in terms of semiology (i.e., laughter with mirth, laughter without mirth, and smile). Dacrystic seizures were accompanied by some gelastic seizures and were divided into two groups in terms of semiology (i.e., weeping loudly [motor and voice-sobbing] and crying). RESULTS: Of the 27 patients with laughing seizures, 12 had seizures that manifested with smiling, 7 had seizures that manifested with laughing and mirth, and 8 had seizures that manifested with laughter without mirth. Dacrystic-gelastic seizures were observed in four patients, among whom 2 patients had crying and laughter without mirth and 2 patients had weeping loudly and laughter without mirth episodes. CONCLUSION: Gelastic and dacrystic seizures often suggest hypothalamic hamartomas, in the literature. This rare ictal behavior can originate from different cortical locations and lesions of a different nature. However, we found that gelastic seizures with smiling were a more homogenous group with regard to location in the temporal lobe, which we aimed to show by evaluating the patients included in this study.

ANTECEDENTES: Crises gelásticas são ataques de riso extremamente raros, de curta duração, não provocados e incontroláveis. Realizamos esta avaliação retrospectiva para determinar se esses sintomas, manifestando-se de diferentes formas, como riso alegre, riso, sorriso e soluço, tinham algum valor em termos de etiologia ou localização. MéTODOS: Foram incluídos no estudo 31 pacientes que apresentavam crises de riso ou choro e que estavam em acompanhamento entre 2000 e 2019 em centros terciários de epilepsia. As crises de riso foram divididas em três grupos em termos de semiologia (ou seja, riso com alegria, riso sem alegria e sorriso). As crises dacrísticas foram acompanhadas por algumas crises gelásticas e foram divididas em dois grupos em termos de semiologia (ou seja, choro alto [motor e soluçar a voz] e choro). RESULTADOS: Dos 27 pacientes com crises de riso, 12 tiveram crises que se manifestaram com sorriso, 7 tiveram crises que se manifestaram com riso e alegria e 8 tiveram crises que se manifestaram com riso sem alegria. Crises dácristico-gelásticas foram observadas em quatro pacientes, sendo 2 pacientes com choro e riso sem alegria e 2 pacientes com choro alto e riso sem alegria. CONCLUSãO: Crises gelásticas e dacrísticas frequentemente sugerem hamartomas hipotalâmicos, na literatura. Este comportamento ictal raro pode ter origem em diferentes localizações corticais e lesões de natureza diversa. No entanto, verificamos que as crises gelásticas com sorriso foram um grupo mais homogêneo quanto à localização no lobo temporal, o que buscamos evidenciar avaliando os pacientes incluídos neste estudo.

Factors Affecting Seizure Outcomes After Surgery for Cavernoma Related Epilepsy.

AIM: To present one of the largest retrospective cavernoma related epilepsy (CRE) studies which include divergent supratentorial locations operated and followed up at least 2 years. We also investigated the factors affecting the seizure outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study includes a total of 56 patients with drug-responsive (n=40) and drug-resistant (n=16) CRE who underwent resective surgery. Age at seizure onset, age at surgery, gender, duration of epilepsy, seizure frequencies/type before and after treatment, EEG and brain MRI findings, prescribed AEDs, preoperative and post-operative neurological status, histopathological diagnosis, post-operative seizure outcomes and surgical information were documented. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 69.6 months (range 24-216 months). The seizure outcome was assessed according to Engel?s classification at the last follow-up. Engel class I was achieved in 53 patients (95%); there was one patient at class II and two patients at class III. All patients in the drug-responsive group were at Engel class I after the surgery, while all patients at Engel classes II and III were in the drug-resistant patient group. This clearly shows that there were better outcomes in DRP group (p < 0.01). Neither the locations of cavernomas nor the duration of epilepsy had any impact on seizure outcome (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: An earlier surgical intervention may prevent the patients from becoming drug-resistant such that their chances of being seizure free after surgery increase.