Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of interdental spaces and scanning the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using three intraoral scanners (IOSs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A virtual completely dentate maxillary cast without interdental spaces was obtained and modified to create 1, 2, and 3 mm of interdental spacing between the anterior teeth. These three files (reference standard tessellation language files) were used to print three reference casts. The reference casts were scanned using three IOSs: TRIOS4, iTero Element 5D, and Aoralscan2. Three groups were created based on the interdental spaces: 0, 1, 2, and 3 mm (n = 10). The groups were subdivided into two subgroups: no palate (NP subgroup) and palate (P subgroup). The reference STL files were used to measure the discrepancy with the experimental scans by calculating the root mean square (RMS) error. Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey pairwise comparison tests were used to analyze trueness. The Levene test was used to analyze precision (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Trueness ranged from 91 to 139 µm and precision ranged from 5 to 23 µm among the subgroups tested. A significant correlation was found between IOS*group (p<0.001) and IOS*subgroup ( p<0.001). Tukey test showed significant trueness differences among the interdental spaces tested (p<0.001). The 1- and 2-mm groups obtained better trueness than the 0- and 3-mm groups (p<0.001). An 11 µm mean trueness discrepancy was measured among the different interdental space groups tested. The P subgroups demonstrated significantly higher trueness when compared to the NP subgroups (p<0.001). The discrepancy between the maxillary scans with and without the palate was 4 µm. Significant precision discrepancies were found (p = 0.008), with the iTero group showing the lowest precision. CONCLUSION: Interdental spaces and incorporation of the palate on maxillary intraoral scans influenced trueness and precision of the three IOSs tested. However, the scanning discrepancy measured may be of no clinical relevance.

Influence of type of restorative materials and surface wetness conditions on intraoral scanning accuracy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of different restorative materials and surface wetness on intraoral scanning accuracy. METHODS: Reference casts with an extracted second premolar and first and second molar were digitized (L2). Four groups were established according to the material of the first molar: natural tooth (control), zirconia (Z), lithium disilicate (LD), and nanoceramic resin crown (NC). Four subgroups were developed: dry, low-, mild-, and high-wetness subgroups (n = 15). All the scans were completed by using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3). In the control-dry subgroup, the reference cast was dry. In the control-low subgroup, artificial saliva was sprayed with a 1 mL/min volumetric flow for 4 s. In the control-mild and control-high subgroups, the same procedures as in the control-low subgroup were performed, but with a volumetric flow of 4 and of 8 mL/min, respectively. In the Z, LD and NC groups, each crown was fabricated with its respective material. Trueness was analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests. The Levene and Bonferroni tests were used to assess precision (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Material (P < .001) and wetness (P < .001) significantly influenced trueness and precision. The mild and high subgroups revealed lower trueness and precision compared with the dry and low subgroups. The control, Z, and LD groups under dry and low wetness conditions showed better trueness compared with the NC group, but the materials tested had no significant precision discrepancies. Under mild wetness conditions, all the materials showed no significant trueness discrepancies. Under high wetness conditions, the LD group demonstrated the best trueness and precision. CONCLUSIONS: The restorative materials and surface wetness tested influenced scanning trueness and precision of the IOS assessed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dried surfaces are recommended to maximize the scanning accuracy values of the IOS tested. Overall, the presence of saliva and dental restorations can reduce the performance of the IOS tested.

Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.

PURPOSE: To measure the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A completely dentate volunteer was selected. Seven groups were generated: conventional procedure (control group), 3 IOSs: Trios4 (Trios4 group), Itero Element 5D Plus (Itero group), i700 (i700 group), and 3 groups with a jaw tracking system for each corresponding IOS system (Modjaw-Trios4, Modjaw-iTero, and Modjaw-i700 groups) (n = 10). In the control group, casts were mounted on an articulator (Panadent) using a face bow and a CR record captured with the Kois deprogrammer (KD). The casts were digitized by using a scanner (T710) (control files). In the Trios4 group, intraoral scans were obtained by using the corresponding IOS and duplicated 10 times. The KD was used to obtain a bilateral occlusal record at CR position. These same procedures were followed for the Itero and i700 groups. In the Modjaw-Trios 4 group, the intraoral scans acquired by using the corresponding IOS at MIP were imported into the jaw tracking program. The KD was used to record the CR relationship. For acquiring the specimens in the Modjaw-Itero and Modjaw-i700 groups, the same procedures were followed as in the Modjaw-Trios4 group, with the scans obtained with the Itero and i700 scanners respectively. The articulated virtual casts of each group were exported. Thirty-six inter-landmark linear measurements were used to calculate the discrepancies between the control and experimental scans. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed the pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Significant trueness and precision discrepancies were found among the groups tested (P<.001). The Modjaw-i700, Modjaw-iTero, Modjaw-Trios4, and i700 groups obtained the best trueness and precision among the groups tested, and the iTero and Trios4 groups obtained the worst trueness. The iTero group obtained the worst precision among the groups tested (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The maxillomandibular relationship recorded was influenced by the technique selected. Except for the i700 IOS system, the optical jaw tracking system tested improved the trueness value of the maxillomandibular relationship recorded at CR position when compared with the corresponding IOS.

Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Digital systems including intraoral scanners (IOSs) and optical jaw tracking systems can be used to acquire the maxillomandibular relationship at the centric relation (CR). However, the discrepancy of the maxillomandibular relationship recorded at the CR position when using digital methods remains uncertain. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship recorded at the CR position using a conventional procedure, 4 different IOSs, and an optical jaw tracking system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A completely dentate volunteer was selected. A Kois deprogrammer (KD) was fabricated. Six groups were created based on the technique used to obtain diagnostic casts and record the maxillomandibular relationship at the CR position: conventional procedures (CNV group), 4 IOS groups: TRIOS4 (TRIOS4 group), iTero Element 5D (iTero group), i700 wireless (i700 group), Primescan (Primescan group), and a jaw tracking system (Modjaw) (Modjaw group) (n=10). In the CNV group, conventional diagnostic stone casts were obtained. A facebow record was used to mount the maxillary cast on an articulator (Panadent). The KD was used to obtain a CR record for mounting the mandibular cast, and the mounted casts were digitized by using a scanner (T710) to acquire the reference scans. In the TRIOS group, intraoral scans were obtained and duplicated 10 times. The KD was used to obtain a bilateral virtual occlusal record at the CR position. To acquire the specimens of the iTero, i700, and Primescan groups, the procedures in the TRIOS4 group were followed, but with the corresponding IOS. In the Modjaw group, the KD was used to record and export the maxillomandibular relationship at the CR position. Articulated virtual casts of each group were exported. Thirty-six interlandmark linear measurements were computed on both the reference and experimental scans. The distances obtained on the reference scan were used to calculate the discrepancies with the distances obtained on each experimental scan. The data were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α=.05). RESULTS: The trueness and precision of the maxillomandibular relationship record were significantly affected by the technique used (P<.001). The maxillomandibular relationship trueness values from high to low were iTero (0.14 ±0.09 mm), followed by the Modjaw (0.20 ±0.04 mm) and the TRIOS4 (0.22 ±0.09 mm) groups. However, the iTero, Modjaw, and TRIOS4 groups were not significantly different from each other (P>.05). The i700 group obtained the lowest trueness and precision values (0.40 ±0.22 mm) of all groups tested, followed by the Primescan grop (0.26±0.13 mm); however, the i700 and Primescan groups had significantly lower trueness and precision than only the iTero group (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The trueness and precision of the maxillomandibular relationship recorded at the CR position were influenced by the different digital techniques tested.

An additively manufactured, magnetically retained, and stackable implant surgical guide: A dental technique.

The digital workflow for designing and fabricating a magnetically retained and stackable additively manufactured implant surgical guide is described. The technique should improve the stability of the stackable surgical guide and the accuracy of implant placement.

Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Different variables that decrease the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) have been identified. Ambient temperature changes can occur in the dental environment, but the impact of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy is unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the impact of ambient temperature changes on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an IOS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A complete arch maxillary dentate Type IV stone cast was obtained. Four 6-mm-diameter gauge balls were added to the maxillary cast to aid future evaluation measurements. The maxillary cast was digitized by using an industrial scanner (GOM Atos Q 3D 12M). The manufacturer's recommendations were followed in obtaining a reference scan. Then, the maxillary cast was digitized by using an IOS (TRIOS 4) according to the scanning protocol recommended by the manufacturer. Four groups were created depending on the ambient temperature change assessed: 24 °C or room temperature (24-D or control group), 19 °C or a 5-degree temperature drop (19-D group), 15 °C or a 9-degree temperature drop (15-D group), and 29 °C or a 5-degree temperature rise (29-D group). The Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests revealed that the data were not normally distributed (P<.05). For trueness, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparison tests were used. Precision analysis was obtained by using the Levene test based on the comparison of the standard deviations of the 4 groups with 95% Bonferroni confidence intervals for standard deviations (α=.05). RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences in the trueness values among all 4 groups (P<.001). Furthermore, significant differences between the linear discrepancy medians between the control and 19-D groups (P<.001), control and 15-D groups (P=.002), control and 29-D groups (P<.001), 19-D and 29-D groups (P=.003), and 15-D and 29-D groups (P<.001) were found. The Levene test for the comparison of the variances among the 4 groups did not detect a significant difference (P>.999), indicating that precision wise the 4 groups were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Ambient temperature changes had a detrimental effect on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the IOS tested. Ambient temperature changes significantly decreased the scanning accuracy of the IOS system tested. Increasing the ambient temperature has a greater influence on the intraoral scanning accuracy of the IOS selected when compared with decreasing the ambient temperature.

A reproducible and repeatable digital method for quantifying nasal and sinus airway changes following suture palatine expansion.

PURPOSE: The airway complex is modified by palatine expansion. Computer tomography has been used in the past to determine the change in volume, but there was a lack of a specific, reproducible method for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of an innovative digital measurement technique for analyzing the volume of maxillary and nasal sinus airways following suture palatine expansion performed with the Hyrax disyuntor appliance. METHODS: Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The datasets were subsequently uploaded into a digital treatment planning software to record the volume of the right and left maxillary sinus, as well as the nasal and maxillary sinus airway complex. The Gage Repeatability & Reproducibility statistical analysis methodology was used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of this measurement technique when measuring the volume of maxillary and nasal sinus airways following suture palatine expansion with the Hyrax disyuntor appliance. Additionally, comparative analysis between preoperative and postoperative measures was performed using Student's t-test for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In 5 patients, paired t-tests found statistically significant differences before and after treatment in the volumes of the left maxillary sinus (p = 0.002), right maxillary sinus (p = 0.001), and nasal and maxillary sinus airway complex (p = 0.005) after suture palatine expansion with the Hyrax disyuntor appliance. CONCLUSION: The proposed digital technique is an accurate, repeatable, and reproducible measurement technique for analyzing the volume of maxillary and nasal sinus airways following suture palatine expansion using the Hyrax disyuntor.

Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The accuracy of a maxillomandibular relationship acquired by intraoral scanners (IOSs) has been previously analyzed; however, the impact of the interocclusal space on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship remains unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of the interocclusal space (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 degrees of incisal opening in the articulator) on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an IOS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Markers were attached to the first molars and canines of maxillary and mandibular diagnostic casts, which were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator, and digital scans were acquired (TRIOS 4). Both digital scans were duplicated 100 times and distributed into 5 groups depending on the incisal pin opening in the articulator (n=20): 0 (Group 0), 1 (Group 1), 2 (Group 2), 3 (Group 3), and 4 degrees (Group 4). In Group 0 (control), the casts were maintained in maximum intercuspation (MIP) with the incisal pin of the articulator set at 0 degrees. Then, a bilateral virtual occlusal record was acquired and automatically processed by using the IOS software program. A laboratory scanner (Medit T500) was used to digitize the mounted casts. The same procedures were completed in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 but with the incisal pin set at 1, 2, 3, and 4 degrees respectively. The interlandmark distances were used to calculate the discrepancies between the control and groups tested. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison Tukey HSD tests were used to inspect the data (α=.05). RESULTS: The interocclusal space available when capturing the occlusal records affected the trueness of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured (P<.001). Group 0 (135 µm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 3 (73 µm) and Group 4 (71 µm) showed the lowest distortion. Additionally, the interocclusal space available (P<.001) impacted the precision of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured. Group 0 (111 µm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 4 (precision mean value of 59 µm) had the lowest distortion among the groups tested. CONCLUSIONS: The interocclusal space available when acquiring virtual bilateral occlusal records using the IOS tested impacted the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. The smallest available interocclusal space tested (maximum intercuspation) showed the worst trueness and precision mean values, while the group with the largest interocclusal space available had the highest trueness and precision mean values among the groups studied.

Facial scanning accuracy depending on the alignment algorithm and digitized surface area location: An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the accuracy (trueness and precision) of a facial scanner depending on the alignment method and the digitized surface area location. METHODS: Fourteen markers were adhered on a head mannequin and digitized using an industrial scanner (GOM Atos Q 3D 12 M; Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH). A control mesh was acquired. Subsequently, the mannequin was digitized using a facial scanner (Arc4; Bellus3D) (n = 30). The control mesh was delineated into 10 areas. Based on the alignment procedures, two groups were created: reference best fit (RBF group) and landmark-based best fit (LA group). The root mean square was used to calculate the discrepancy between the control mesh and each facial scan. A 2-way ANOVA and Tukey pairwise comparison tests were used to compare trueness and precision between the 2 groups across 10 areas (α = .05). RESULTS: Both alignment algorithms (P = .007) and digitized area (P < .001) were significant predictors of trueness with a significant interaction between the two predictors (F (9, 580) =25.13, P < .001). Tukey pairwise comparison showed that there was a significant difference between mean trueness values of RBF (mean=0.53 mm) and LA (mean=0.55 mm) groups. Moreover, a significant difference was detected among the trueness values across surface areas. The A9-area (left tragus area) had the highest and A5-area (right cheek area) had the lowest mean trueness. Both alignment algorithm (P < .001) and digitized surface area (P < .001) were significant predictors of precision with a significant interaction between the two predictors (F (9, 580) =14.34, P < .001). Tukey pairwise comparison showed that there was a significant difference between mean precision values of RBF (mean=0.38 mm) and LA (mean=0.35 mm) groups. Moreover, a significant difference was detected among the precision values across surface areas. Comparing the surface areas, A9-area had the highest and A10-area (forehead area) had the lowest mean precision. CONCLUSIONS: Alignment procedures influenced on the scanning trueness and precision mean values, but the facial scanner accuracy values obtained were within the clinically acceptable accuracy threshold of less or equal than 2 mm. Furthermore, the scanning accuracy (for both trueness and precision) depended on the location of the scanned surface area, being more accurate on the middle of the face than on the sides of the face.

Digital protocol for creating a virtual gingiva adjacent to teeth with subgingival dental preparations.

PURPOSE: This article describes a digital technique used to record gingival emergence profiles modeled for the prosthetic restoration of teeth prepared using biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The description of the technique of intraoral recording, manipulation of digital files, and chairside protocol of prosthetic restorations is developed in the present manuscript on two anterior teeth treated with vertical and subgingival dental preparations for restoration with ceramic crowns. The manipulation of the digital files registered with an intraoral scanner with software that allows its alignment (best-fit) and the performance boolean of operation manages to create a virtual gingival emergency like the one it presents when it is adapted on the cervical part of the interim prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The technique allows the dentist and laboratory technician to obtain a digital reproduction of the subgingival soft tissues around the prosthetic crown, unaffected by the collapse of the gingival sulcus when the provisional crown is removed, as well as an exact copy of the provisional restoration, making it possible to fabricate a definitive prosthesis that ensures precise anatomy, and so good compatibility with periodontal tissues.

Bonding to silicate ceramics: Conventional technique compared with a simplified technique.

BACKGROUND: Silicate ceramic bonding is carried out by acid-etching with hydrofluoric acid (HF) followed by an application of silane. By replacing HF with ammonium polyfluoride, contained in the same flask as the silane, the number of steps in this clinical procedure, can be reduced, while maintaining bond strength values, and reducing toxicity. A shear bond test was performed to compare the conventional and the simplified surface treatment techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty ceramic samples were fabricated from IPS emax CAD® ceramic (Ivoclar Vivadent) and divided into two groups (G1 and G2) (n=10). The conventional technique was applied to G1 samples, and the simplified technique to G2 samples. A resin cement cylinder was bonded to each sample. Afterwards, samples underwent shear bond strength testing in a universal test machine. RESULTS: G1 obtained 26.53±6.33 MPa and G2 23.52±8.41 MPa, without statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Monobond Etch&Prime appears to obtain equivalent results in terms of bond strength while simplifying the technique. Further investigation is required to corroborate these preliminary findings. Key words:Shear bond strength, surface treatment, bonding to ceramic, hydrofluoric acid, ammonium polyfluoride.