Neonatal herpes: case series in two obstetric centres over a 10-year period (2013-2023), France.

Neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection (HSV infection in infants less than 6 weeks of age) is rare but mortality and morbidity rates are high after disseminated disease and encephalitis. In France, the epidemiology is poorly described, and two decades ago, incidence was estimated to be 3 per 100,000 live births a year. We describe determinants, epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of neonatal HSV infection in a managed-care population attending in two major obstetric and paediatric centres, Paris, France, over a 10-year period. This retrospective case series study was conducted from 2013 to 2023, in infants less than 42 days of age who had virologically confirmed HSV infection. We report an overall rate of neonatal herpes of 5.5 per 100,000 live births a year and an incidence of symptomatic cases of 1.2 per 100,000 live births a year. HSV-1 was the major serotype involved (84.2%) and post-natal acquisition through the orolabial route reached 63.2%. All neonates who had neonatal HSV PCR screening (owing to clinical signs in parents) and who received prompt acyclovir treatment remained asymptomatic. Symptomatic forms accounted for 21.1% cases of the total and mortality was high (62.5% of symptomatic forms).   Conclusion: This case series confirms that neonates at risk for HSV disease and poor outcome are those born to HSV-seronegative mothers, preterm infants, and those who received acyclovir after onset of symptoms (mainly because mothers did not present evidence of acute HSV infection). Our study confirms the major role of HSV-1 and the frequency of its early post-natal acquisition. What is known: • Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection is rare but motality and morbidity rates are high after disseminted disease and encephalitis. National recommendations exist worldwide but mangement of this disease is not always easy. What is new: • As in France epidemiology of neonatal herpes is poorly described, our report is potentially an important addition to the existing literature. Moreover, we describe local practice that may be useful to physicians.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of French prospective multicenter cohort study COVIPREG during the first two COVID-19 waves.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women was the subject of many questions since the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We aim to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection contracted during 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy during the first two COVID-19 waves across a prospective French multicenter cohort study. Patients were included between April 2020 and January 2021 in 10 maternity hospitals in Paris area with two groups (i) pregnant women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR between [14WG; 37WG[(symptomatic infection), (ii) pregnant women with a negative serology (or equivocal) at delivery and without a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR at any time during pregnancy (G2 group) MAIN FINDINGS: 2410 pregnant women were included, of whom 310 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR and 217 between [14WG; 37WG[. Most infections occurred between 28 and 37 weeks of gestation (56 %). Most patients could be managed as outpatients, while 23 % had to be hospitalized. Among women with a positive RT-PCR, multiparous women were over-represented (OR = 2.45[1.52;3.87]); were more likely to deliver before 37 weeks of gestation (OR = 2.19[1.44;3.24]) and overall cesarean deliveries were significantly increased (OR = 1.53[1.09;2.13]). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal burden associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections during the first two pandemic waves before availability of vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04355234 (registration date: 21/04/2020).

A Human Immunodeficiency Virus Superinfection Diagnosed in a Patient on Intramuscular Long-acting Combination of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine.

A case of a male with human immunodeficiency virus with plasma genotyping detecting no resistance and a CRF02_AG subtype had a controlled HIV RNA on antiretroviral therapy since 2010. We introduced intramuscular therapy with cabotegravir and rilpivirine. One month later, his HIV RNA was 1500 copies/mL; genotyping found a subtype B with many mutations.

Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Prevention of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.

Cytomegalovirus infection is the most common congenital infection, affecting about 1% of births worldwide. Several primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies are already available during the prenatal period to help mitigate the immediate and long-term consequences of this infection. In this review, we aim to present and assess the efficacy of these strategies, including educating pregnant women and women of childbearing age on their knowledge of hygiene measures, development of vaccines, screening for cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy (systematic versus targeted), prenatal diagnosis and prognostic assessments, and preventive and curative treatments in utero.

Cytomegalovirus Specific Serological and Molecular Markers in a Series of Pregnant Women With Cytomegalovirus Non Primary Infection.

(1) Background: In a period where systematic screening of CMV during pregnancy is still debated, diagnosis of non primary infection (NPI) remains challenging and an obstacle to systematic screening. Our aim is to report kinetics of serological and molecular CMV markers of NPI. (2) Methods: We identified immunocompetent pregnant women with CMV NPI as women known to be seropositive for CMV before pregnancy who gave birth to cCMV infected infants. We performed CMV-IgG, CMV-IgM, CMV-IgG avidity and CMV PCR retrospectively on sequential serum samples collected during pregnancy. (3) Results: We collected 195 serum samples from 53 pregnant women with NPI during pregnancy. For 29/53 (55%) patients, no markers of active infection were observed (stable IgG titers, negative IgM and negative PCR). CMV PCR was positive in at least one serum for 18/53 (34%) patients and median viral load was 46 copies/mL, IQR (21-65). (4) Conclusions: For more than half of patients with confirmed CMV NPI during pregnancy, available diagnostic tools are liable to fail in detecting an active infection. These should therefore not be used and universal neonatal screening for CMV remains the only way to detect all cCMV infections.

Contribution of Serum Cytomegalovirus PCR to Diagnosis of Early CMV Primary Infection in Pregnant Women.

(1) Background: What is the role of serum CMV PCR in the diagnosis of recent primary infection (PI) in pregnant women when IgG avidity is uninformative? (2) Methods: Retrospective cohort study to compare serum versus whole blood CMV PCR. (a) Qualitative assessment: CMV PCR was performed on 123 serum samples and 74 whole blood samples collected from 132 pregnant women with recent CMV PI. PCR positivity rate was used to calculate sensitivity in serum and whole blood. (b) Quantitative assessment: CMV PCR was performed on 72 paired samples of serum and whole blood collected on the same day from 57 patients. (3) Results: In pregnant women, PCR positivity rate was 89% for serum samples versus 100% in whole blood in the case of very recent PI (<15 days), but only 27% in serum versus 68% in whole blood for PI occurring from 6 weeks to 3 months before. Comparing CMV viral loads between serum and whole blood, we determined the limit of CMV DNA detection in serum as 3 log copies/mL (whole blood equivalent). (4) Conclusions: Serum CMV PCR is reliable in confirming PI in cases when only IgM is detected. It is therefore a valuable tool in introducing valaciclovir treatment as early as possible to prevent mother-to-child CMV transmission.

When EBV serology needs a blot to conclude: a case report / Quand un immunoblot EBV est nécessaire pour conclure une sérologie anti-EBV : cas clinique

A 14-year-old patient underwent liver transplant. Three months after transplantation, EBV associated lymphoma was suspected. EBV serologies before and after transplantation were particularly discrepant. Eighteen months before transplantation, the serological profile suggested a recent EBV primary-infection, four months before transplantation, we had isolated anti-EBNA IgG and five days after transplantation, the serological profile suggested a past infection. All EBV PCR performed on whole blood were negative. Retrospectively, immunoblots anti-EBV IgG were performed. Blots showed no anti-EBV IgG before and until the day of liver transplantation. Five days after transplantation, slight bands of both IgG anti-p18 (VCA) and anti-EBNA-1 were found, without any other serological marker. These were probably due to passive transfers of IgG during surgery. There was therefore no argument for an immunization against EBV before or after liver transplant for this patient.

Un patient de 14 ans a subi une transplantation hépatique. Trois mois après la transplantation, un lymphome associé à l'EBV a été suspecté. Les sérologies anti-EBV (IgG anti-VCA et anti-EBNA, IgM anti-VCA) montraient des résultats particulièrement discordants et ininterprétables : profil de primo-infection EBV récente 18 mois avant la greffe, IgG anti-EBNA isolées 4 mois avant la greffe et profil d'infection ancienne 5 jours après la greffe. Les PCR EBV réalisées sur sang total étaient toujours indétectables. Rétrospectivement, des immunoblots IgG anti-EBV ont été réalisés. Les blots ne montraient pas d'IgG anti-EBV en pré-greffe jusqu'au jour de la transplantation. Cinq jours après la greffe, le blot montrait la présence d'anti-p18 (VCA) et anti-EBNA-1 présents sous forme de traces, sans autre marqueur sérologique d'infection EBV, très probablement dues à des transferts passifs d'anticorps pendant la transplantation. Aucun argument sérologique ni moléculaire n'a été retenu pour une immunisation anti-EBV avant ou après la transplantation hépatique pour ce patient.

Current practices of management of maternal and congenital Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy after a maternal primary infection occurring in first trimester of pregnancy: Systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital CMV infection is the first worldwide cause of congenital viral infection but systematic screening of pregnant women and newborns for CMV is still debated in many countries. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to provide the state of the art on current practices concerning management of maternal and congenital CMV infection during pregnancy, after maternal primary infection (PI) in first trimester of pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: Electronically searches on databases and hand searches in grey literature. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND PARTICIPANTS: Primary outcome was listing biological, imaging, and therapeutic management interventions in two distinct populations: population 1 are pregnant women with PI, before or without amniocentesis; population 2 are pregnant women with congenitally infected fetuses (after positive amniocentesis). Secondary outcome was pregnancy outcome in population 2. RESULTS: Out of 4,134 studies identified, a total of 31 studies were analyzed, with 3,325 pregnant women in population 1 and 1,021 pregnant women in population 2, from 7 countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Spain and USA). In population 1, ultrasound (US) examination frequency was 0.75/month, amniocentesis in 82% cases, maternal viremia in 14% and preventive treatment with hyperimmune globulins (HIG) or valaciclovir in respectively 14% and 4% women. In population 2, US examination frequency was 1.5/month, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 44% cases at 32 weeks gestation (WG), fetal blood sampling (FBS) in 24% at 28 WG, and curative treatment with HIG or valaciclovir in respectively 9% and 8% patients. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review illustrates management of maternal and congenital CMV during pregnancy in published and non-published literature, in absence of international consensus. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019124342.

A prospective study evaluating congenital CMV infection in Mayotte and La Reunion Islands (France).

OBJECTIVES Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) affects around 3400 newborns each year in France, of whom 700 will develop sequelae, primarily sensorineural hearing loss. Our objectives were (1) to evaluate incidence of cCMV in two French departments located in the Indian Ocean: Mayotte and La Reunion, and (2) evaluate interest and feasibility/acceptability of universal screening of cCMV at birth. MATERIAL AND METHODS We implemented a universal neonatal CMV screening in Mayotte during 7 months in 2019 and in La Reunion during one month in March 2020. Saliva swabs were collected in the first three days of life, and tested for CMV DNA by PCR. A short survey allowed evaluating whether this screening is acceptable and feasible. RESULTS: A total of 1026 newborns were screened: 854 in Mayotte and 172 in La Reunion. In Mayotte, cCMV incidence was evaluated at a minimum of 1.6 % (95 % CI 0.94-2.81). In La Reunion, cCMV incidence was evaluated at a minimum of 1.2 % (95 % CI -0.20-4.57). All cCMV infants were born to mothers with non-primary CMV infection. Only 0.7 % parents refused the screening. CONCLUSIONS cCMV incidence in Mayotte and La Reunion is higher than in metropolitan France. This diagnosis should not be overlooked, especially since the time dedicated to screening and its feeling by the parents seem to be acceptable.

Performance of 30 commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assays in testing symptomatic COVID-19 patients.

We report evaluation of 30 assays' (17 rapid tests (RDTs) and 13 automated/manual ELISA/CLIA assay (IAs)) clinical performances with 2594 sera collected from symptomatic patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR on a respiratory sample, and 1996 pre-epidemic serum samples expected to be negative. Only 4 RDT and 3 IAs fitted both specificity (> 98%) and sensitivity (> 90%) criteria according to French recommendations. Serology may offer valuable information during COVID-19 pandemic, but inconsistent performances observed among the 30 commercial assays evaluated, which underlines the importance of independent evaluation before clinical implementation.

Positive predictive values of CMV-IgM and importance of CMV-IgG avidity testing in detecting primary infection in three different clinical settings. A French retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary infection during pregnancy or in immunocompetent patients relies on serology with detection of specific CMV-IgG and IgM. In case of positive CMV-IgM in pregnant women, CMV-IgG avidity is now widely recommended, but in general population it is not currently performed. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to determine CMV-IgM positive predictive values (PPV) in different clinical settings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on positive CMV-IgM in our virology laboratory from 2013 to 2019, in three clinical groups: screening in non-symptomatic pregnant women (group 1), pregnant women with ultrasound (US) abnormalities (group 2) and patients (general population) with clinical signs suggestive of CMV primary infection (group 3). CMV-IgG avidity had been performed in all cases allowing to evaluate PPV of positive CMV-IgM to diagnose CMV primary-infection in each group. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2019, 6859 serum samples were found positive for CMV-IgM and had been tested for CMV-IgG avidity, with 6560 sera for group 1, 30 for group 2 and 269 for group 3. Overall, low avidity confirming primary infection was observed respectively in 16.4 % for group 1, 36.7 % for group 2, and 35.3 % for group 3. CMV-IgM PPV was significantly lower in group 1 compared to groups 2 (p = 0.01) and 3 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Our observations highlight the major importance of including CMV-IgG avidity in the diagnostic algorithm, whatever the clinical situation (for immunocompetent patients), to confirm or exclude a recent CMV primary infection in case of positive CMV-IgM.

Performance of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on MHR-SIR agar directly on urine specimens.

The standard method for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections is urine culture that requires 18-48 h for the identification of the bacteria and an additional 24 h until the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are available. We evaluated here a rapid AST method by disc diffusion performed directly on urine samples with a delay of 8 h. A total of 245 urine samples with monobacterial Gram negative observed on microscopy were tested in parallel by two AST methods. Rapid AST method was performed directly on urine samples using Rapid Mueller-Hinton (MHR-SIR) with 8-h incubation before reading and standard method was performed as usual. We compared the categorical agreement and the correlation between the diameters obtained by standard method and by MHR-SIR directly on urine samples. Over the 5285 tested combinations, we observed 5172 (97.9%) categorical agreement, 82 (1.5%) minor errors, 17 (0.3%) major errors, and 14 (0.3%) very major errors. Our results showed an excellent categorical agreement and correlations between diameters for MHR-SIR and standard methods. MHR-SIR performed directly on urine samples with monomicrobial Enterobacteriacae can predict the result of overall AST profile in 8 h with reliable results. The main advantage of MHR-SIR is that it offers the possibility of obtaining results 40 h earlier than conventional AST. The cost is estimated for less than 6 USD for 16 antibiotics, chosen by the microbiologist.