Pharmacokinetics and cardiac safety of clofazimine in children with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.

Clofazimine is recommended for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB), but there is currently no verified dosing guideline for its use in children. There is only limited safety and no pharmacokinetic (PK) data available for children. We aimed to characterize clofazimine PK and its relationship with QT-interval prolongation in children. An observational cohort study of South African children <18 years old routinely treated for RR-TB with a clofazimine-containing regimen was analyzed. Clofazimine 100 mg gelatin capsules were given orally once daily (≥20 kg body weight), every second day (10 to <20 kg), or thrice weekly (<10 kg). PK sampling and electrocardiograms were completed pre-dose and at 1, 4, and 10 hours post-dose, and the population PK and Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) interval prolongation were characterized. Fifty-four children contributed both PK and QTcF data, with a median age (2.5th-97.5th centiles) of 3.3 (0.5-15.6) years; five children were living with HIV. Weekly area under the time-concentration curve at steady state was 79.1 (15.0-271) mg.h/L compared to an adult target of 60.9 (56.0-66.6) mg.h/L. Children living with HIV had four times higher clearance compared to those without. No child had a QTcF ≥500 ms. A linear concentration-QTcF relationship was found, with a drug effect of 0.05 (0.027, 0.075) ms/µg/L. In some of the first PK data in children, we found clofazimine exposure using an off-label dosing strategy was higher in children versus adults. Clofazimine concentrations were associated with an increase in QTcF, but severe prolongation was not observed. More data are required to inform dosing strategies in children.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Volasertib Administered in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia as a Single Agent or in Combination with Cytarabine.

BACKGROUND: Volasertib, a potent and selective polo-like kinase inhibitor, has shown to increase response rates and improve survival with a clinically manageable safety profile, administered alone and in combination with cytarabine in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this analysis were to describe the pharmacokinetics of volasertib and cytarabine, administered as single agents or in combination. METHODS: Three thousand, six hundred and six plasma volasertib concentrations from 501 patients receiving either volasertib alone, or in combination with cytarabine, and 826 plasma cytarabine concentrations from 650 patients receiving cytarabine as multiple subcutaneous injections per cycle either alone, or in combination with volasertib, were analysed using NONMEM Version 7.3. Covariates evaluated included demographic and disease-related parameters. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of volasertib were found to be dose independent from 150 to 550 mg. Body surface area and ethnicity showed significant effects in all the patients. This is reflected as an increase in drug exposure for Japanese patients, although this finding has to be interpreted with caution because only 7% of patients were part of that population group. Volasertib showed low-to-mild inter-individual variability in total clearance. For the case of cytarabine, its pharmacokinetics was affected by body surface area. Finally, volasertib and cytarabine did not influence the pharmacokinetic characteristics of each other. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of volasertib in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia alone or in combination with cytarabine is predictable and associated with low-to-mild patient variability with the exception of the high variability associated with the volume of distribution of the central compartment, having no effect on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve.