Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 161(2): 54-58, 2023 07 21.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37055252

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cryptogenic stroke constitutes 25% of all ischemic strokes, of which 20-30% are due to atrial fibrillation (AF). With the aim of increasing the detection rate, implantable long-term monitoring devices have emerged. The study of the profile of the ideal candidate subsidiary to such monitoring would provide a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying this subtype of stroke. OBJECTIVE: To determine which variables are related and can predict the detection of silent AF in patients with cryptogenic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort with recruitment from March 2017 to May 2022. They are patients with an implantable monitoring device and cryptogenic stroke with a minimum monitoring of one year. RESULTS: The total number of patients included was 73, with a mean age of 58.8 years, 56.2% were male. AF was detected in 21 patients (28.8%). The most frequent cardiovascular risk factors were hypertension (47.9%) and dyslipidemia (45.2%). The most frequent topography was cortical (52%). Regarding the echocardiographic parameters, 22% had a dilated left atrium, 19% had a patent foramen ovale, and 22% had high-density supraventricular tachycardia (>1%) on Holter monitoring. In the multivariate analysis, the only variable that predicts AF is the presence of high-density supraventricular tachycardia, with an area under the curve of 0.726 (CI 0.57-0.87, p=0.04), sensitivity of 47.6%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value of 90.9%, negative predictive value of 78.8%, and accuracy of 80.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of high-density supraventricular tachycardia can be indicative for predicting silent AF. No other variables have been observed that allow us to predict detection of AF in these patients.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial/efeitos adversos , Causalidade
2.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 3(6Part A): 656-664, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36589911

RESUMO

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation strategy is associated with a non-negligible risk of complications and often requires repeat procedures (AF ablation track), implying repetitive exposure to procedural risk. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a model to estimate individualized cumulative risk of complications in patients undergoing the AF ablation track (Atrial Fibrillation TRAck Complication risK [AF-TRACK] calculator). Methods: The model was derived from a multicenter cohort including 3762 AF ablation procedures in 2943 patients. A first regression model was fitted to predict the propensity for repeat ablation. The AF-TRACK calculator computed the risk of AF ablation track complications, considering the propensity for repeat ablation. Internal (cross-validation) and external (independent cohort) validation were assessed for discrimination capacity (area under the curve [AUC]) and goodness of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow [HL] test). Results: Complications (N = 111) occurred in 3.7% of patients (2.9% of procedures). Predictors included female sex, heart failure, sleep apnea syndrome, and repeat procedures. The model showed fair discrimination capacity to predict complications (AUC 0.61 [0.55-0.67]) and likelihood of repeat procedure (AUC 0.62 [0.60-0.64]), with good calibration (HL χ2 12.5; P = .13). The model maintained adequate discrimination capacity (AUC 0.67 [0.57-0.77]) and calibration (HL χ2 5.6; P = .23) in the external validation cohort. The validated model was used to create the Web-based AF-TRACK calculator. Conclusion: The proposed risk model provides individualized estimates of the cumulative risk of complications of undergoing the AF ablation track. The AF-TRACK calculator is a validated, easy-to-use, Web-based clinical tool to calibrate the risk-to-benefit ratio of this treatment strategy.

3.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 75(9): 709-716, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34896031

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: HeartLogic is a multiparametric algorithm incorporated into implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). The associated alerts predict impending heart failure (HF) decompensations. Our objective was to analyze the association between alerts and clinical events and to describe the implementation of a protocol for remote management in a multicenter registry. METHODS: We evaluated study phase 1 (the investigators were blinded to the alert state) and phases 2 and 3 (after HeartLogic activation, managed as per local practice and with a standardized protocol, respectively). RESULTS: We included 288 patients from 15 centers. In phase 1, the median observation period was 10 months and there were 73 alerts (0.72 alerts/patient-y), with 8 hospitalizations and 2 emergency room admissions for HF (0.10 events/patient-y). There were no HF hospitalizations outside the alert period. In the active phases, the median follow-up was 16 (95%CI, 15-22) months and there were 277 alerts (0.89 alerts/patient-y); 33 were associated with HF hospitalizations or HF death (n=6), 46 with minor decompensations, and 78 with other events. The unexplained alert rate was 0.39 alerts/patient-y. Outside the alert state, there was only 1 HF hospitalization and 1 minor HF decompensation. Most alerts (82% in phase 2 and 81% in phase 3; P=.861) were remotely managed. The median NT-proBNP value was higher within than outside the alert state (7378 vs 1210 pg/mL; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The HeartLogic index was frequently associated with HF-related events and other clinically relevant situations, with a low rate of unexplained events. A standardized protocol allowed alerts to be safely and remotely detected and appropriate action to be taken on them.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Algoritmos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Sistema de Registros
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA