A safety signal of somnambulism with the use of antipsychotics and lithium: A pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis.

AIMS: Antipsychotics and lithium are widely used in psychiatry, particularly in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Recently, some cases of somnambulism or sleep-related eating disorder (SRED) have been reported in patients treated with these drugs. This study investigated the risk of reporting somnambulism or SRED associated with the use of antipsychotics and lithium. METHODS: The World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase), comprising >18 million adverse events, was queried. All somnambulism or SRED reports related to antipsychotics or lithium were identified. The association between antipsychotics or lithium and somnambulism or SRED was computed using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and information component. RESULTS: Among the 5784 cases reporting somnambulism or SRED, 508 suspected at least 1 antipsychotic or lithium. Most patients were aged 18-64 years (62.0%), and 37.0% were men. In most cases (77.6%), antipsychotic or lithium were the only drug class involved, and 53.3% of cases suspected quetiapine. Somnambulism was reported in 88.6% of cases and SRED in 18.1%. A significant association was found for second-generation antipsychotics (PRR 3.44, 95% confidence interval 3.13) and lithium (PRR 2.03, [1.22; 3.37]), but not for first-generation antipsychotics (PRR 0.99, [0.68; 1.44]). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant signal of somnambulism or SRED related to second-generation antipsychotics and lithium. While case reports mentioned mostly quetiapine and olanzapine, almost all second-generation antipsychotics were associated with somnambulism or SRED.

[Completeness of pharmacovigilance reporting in general medicine in France.] / Informativité des déclarations de pharmacovigilance en médecine générale en France.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous reporting remains one of the cornerstones of post-marketing drug safety surveillance. One of its main limitations is a lack of completeness.The main aim of this study was to assess the completeness of pharmacovigilance reports sent by general practitioners (GPs) to regional pharmacovigilance centers (RPC) reported in the French pharmacovigilance database (FPVD). Secondary aim was to identify factors associated with complete reports. METHOD: All adverse drugs reactions (ADRs) sent by GPs in France in 2015 were analyzed. According to information provided in ADR reports (ADR, date of occurrence, clinical description, drugs suspected, etc.), completeness was analyzed from “mandatory” criteria (age, gender, ADR and suspected drug(s)) and “non-mandatory” criteria (medical history, concomitant drugs, symptoms evolution and complementary exams) and classified as “well-documented”, “slightly-documented” or “poorly-documented”. RESULTS: In 2015, the FPVD contained 3,020 ADR reports realized by GPs. Only 16.4% of these reports were classified as “well-documented”, in accordance with study criteria. The most poorly documented items were concomitant drugs (41.4%) and complementary exams (37.4%). An association between a “well-documented” ADR report and its “seriousness” (OR = 3,02 [95% CI 2,44; 3,23], P < 10–3) and elderly compared to adults (OR = 1,76 [95% CI 1,42; 2,18], P < 10–3) or children (OR = 4,59 [95% CI 2,51; 8,39], P < 10–3). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that only one out of six ADR reports was “well-documented”. It appears to be important to promote pharmacovigilance to improve completeness of ADR reports.

Coronary Toxicities of Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Immunotherapies: a Case Report and Review of the Literature and International Registries.

Immunotherapy medications that target programmed death 1 protein (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, are currently used in the first- or second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancers, among other indications. However, these agents are associated with immune-related side effects, the most common of which are endocrinopathies, colitis, hepatitis, and interstitial pneumonitis. In contrast, coronary toxicities are rarely reported and remain poorly understood. Here, we describe the case of a patient who developed an acute coronary syndrome when treated with nivolumab as second-line therapy for metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. A review of the literature, the French pharmacovigilance registry, and the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database led to the identification of four cases of patients with coronary manifestations attributable to anti-PD1 immunotherapy (with no reported cases of patients undergoing anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy), which we describe herein. The potential mechanisms causing adverse coronary reactions to this type of therapy, which is used to treat lung cancer as well as other solid and hematological neoplastic diseases, are also discussed.

Impact of pioglitazone regulatory withdrawal on antidiabetic drug use and health in diabetic patients.

PURPOSE: In 2011, pioglitazone was withdrawn from the French market owing to a potential risk of bladder cancer. This study aimed at assessing the impact of this pioglitazone withdrawal (PW) considering (i) trends in antidiabetic uses and (ii) changes in hospitalization/death rates in diabetic patients following PW. METHODS: We first considered the general population of the Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (EGB), a 1/97th representative sample of the French healthcare insurance system beneficiaries, for the 2010-2014 period. In this, for each non-insulinic antidiabetic drug class, changes within the numbers of monthly supplied drug units for 1000 subjects were studied through times series and Unobserved Component Models. Second, we identified from the EGB a cohort of patients who were delivered a non-insulinic antidiabetic between 01 April 2011 and 01 August 2011 (date of PW). In this, post-withdrawal incidences of all-cause hospitalization and death were compared amongst pioglitazone users and non-users using proportional subdistribution hazards models. RESULTS: PW was accompanied by an increase in metformin (+ 11.7; 95% CI 1.1-22.3) and glinide (+ 11.0; 95% CI 1.2-20.8) numbers of monthly supplied units for 1000 subjects. No significant change was found for GLP-1 agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, sulphonylureas or alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. In the cohort of non-insulinic antidiabetic users at the time of PW (1093 pioglitazone users, 17,900 non-users), being a pioglitazone user at PW was not associated with a subsequently higher rate of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: If PW was accompanied with significant changes in the use of some antidiabetics, no adverse impact of PW on hospitalization or death rates of diabetic type 2 patients was found.

Impact of Medicine Withdrawal on Reporting of Adverse Events Involving Therapeutic Alternatives: A Study from the French Spontaneous Reporting Database.

INTRODUCTION: The consequences of the withdrawal of marketing authorisation of drugs have mostly been studied considering drug prescription patterns for the therapeutic alternatives of the withdrawn drugs. The potential concomitant changes in the reporting of adverse reactions concerning these alternatives have been studied less often. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the changes in the reporting of adverse events (AEs) for therapeutic alternatives after the withdrawal of three medicines (dextropropoxyphene, pioglitazone and tetrazepam) from the market for safety reasons. METHODS: This study was performed using both the French pharmacovigilance database and the Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (a random sample of French health insurance affiliates). For dextropropoxyphene, pioglitazone and tetrazepam alternatives, the number and types of case reports were studied for both the year preceding the first official safety warning and the year following the withdrawal. Reporting rates expressed per 10,000 reimbursements (RRReimb) and per 10,000 treated patients (RRPat) were also compared for the two periods. RESULTS: After dextropropoxyphene withdrawal, case reports and reimbursements increased for tramadol (case reports: +23%, reimbursements: +13%) and codeine (case reports: +74%, reimbursements: +47%), RRPat being significantly increased for tramadol (0.92 vs. 1.06, p = 0.02). After pioglitazone withdrawal, case reports increased for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glinides, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogues (+84%, +22% and +5%, respectively) and reimbursements (+55, +11 and +50%, respectively); both decreased for sulfonylureas (case reports: -6%, reimbursements: -2%). RRPat increased for DPP-4 inhibitors (1.63 vs. 2.26, p = 0.008). After tetrazepam withdrawal, case reports increased for diazepam, methocarbamol and thiocolchicoside (+110, +86 and +157%, respectively), as lesser did reimbursements. RRPat increased for diazepam (1.78 vs. 2.41, p = 0.054) and thiocolchicoside (0.14 vs. 0.24, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: For the three drug withdrawals investigated, the number of case reports involving alternatives increased to a larger extent than the numbers of prescriptions. This could relate to a higher occurrence of AEs in new users of alternatives who switched from the withdrawn medicines or to an increased awareness of possible AEs.