Widespread genomic influences on phenotype in Dravet syndrome, a 'monogenic' condition.

Dravet syndrome is an archetypal rare severe epilepsy, considered 'monogenic', typically caused by loss-of-function SCN1A variants. Despite a recognizable core phenotype, its marked phenotypic heterogeneity is incompletely explained by differences in the causal SCN1A variant or clinical factors. In 34 adults with SCN1A-related Dravet syndrome, we show additional genomic variation beyond SCN1A contributes to phenotype and its diversity, with an excess of rare variants in epilepsy-related genes as a set and examples of blended phenotypes, including one individual with an ultra-rare DEPDC5 variant and focal cortical dysplasia. The polygenic risk score for intelligence was lower, and for longevity, higher, in Dravet syndrome than in epilepsy controls. The causal, major-effect, SCN1A variant may need to act against a broadly compromised genomic background to generate the full Dravet syndrome phenotype, whilst genomic resilience may help to ameliorate the risk of premature mortality in adult Dravet syndrome survivors.

SCN1A: bioinformatically informed revised boundaries for promoter and enhancer regions.

Pathogenic variations in the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 1 (SCN1A) gene are responsible for multiple epilepsy phenotypes, including Dravet syndrome, febrile seizures (FS) and genetic epilepsy with FS plus. Phenotypic heterogeneity is a hallmark of SCN1A-related epilepsies, the causes of which are yet to be clarified. Genetic variation in the non-coding regulatory regions of SCN1A could be one potential causal factor. However, a comprehensive understanding of the SCN1A regulatory landscape is currently lacking. Here, we summarized the current state of knowledge of SCN1A regulation, providing details on its promoter and enhancer regions. We then integrated currently available data on SCN1A promoters by extracting information related to the SCN1A locus from genome-wide repositories and clearly defined the promoter and enhancer regions of SCN1A. Further, we explored the cellular specificity of differential SCN1A promoter usage. We also reviewed and integrated the available human brain-derived enhancer databases and mouse-derived data to provide a comprehensive computationally developed summary of SCN1A brain-active enhancers. By querying genome-wide data repositories, extracting SCN1A-specific data and integrating the different types of independent evidence, we created a comprehensive catalogue that better defines the regulatory landscape of SCN1A, which could be used to explore the role of SCN1A regulatory regions in disease.

SCN1A overexpression, associated with a genomic region marked by a risk variant for a common epilepsy, raises seizure susceptibility.

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis and a history of febrile seizures is associated with common variation at rs7587026, located in the promoter region of SCN1A. We sought to explore possible underlying mechanisms. SCN1A expression was analysed in hippocampal biopsy specimens of individuals with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis who underwent surgical treatment, and hippocampal neuronal cell loss was quantitatively assessed using immunohistochemistry. In healthy individuals, hippocampal volume was measured using MRI. Analyses were performed stratified by rs7587026 type. To study the functional consequences of increased SCN1A expression, we generated, using transposon-mediated bacterial artificial chromosome transgenesis, a zebrafish line expressing exogenous scn1a, and performed EEG analysis on larval optic tecta at 4 day post-fertilization. Finally, we used an in vitro promoter analysis to study whether the genetic motif containing rs7587026 influences promoter activity. Hippocampal SCN1A expression differed by rs7587026 genotype (Kruskal-Wallis test P = 0.004). Individuals homozygous for the minor allele showed significantly increased expression compared to those homozygous for the major allele (Dunn's test P = 0.003), and to heterozygotes (Dunn's test P = 0.035). No statistically significant differences in hippocampal neuronal cell loss were observed between the three genotypes. Among 597 healthy participants, individuals homozygous for the minor allele at rs7587026 displayed significantly reduced mean hippocampal volume compared to major allele homozygotes (Cohen's D = - 0.28, P = 0.02), and to heterozygotes (Cohen's D = - 0.36, P = 0.009). Compared to wild type, scn1lab-overexpressing zebrafish larvae exhibited more frequent spontaneous seizures [one-way ANOVA F(4,54) = 6.95 (P < 0.001)]. The number of EEG discharges correlated with the level of scn1lab overexpression [one-way ANOVA F(4,15) = 10.75 (P < 0.001]. Finally, we showed that a 50 bp promoter motif containing rs7587026 exerts a strong regulatory role on SCN1A expression, though we could not directly link this to rs7587026 itself. Our results develop the mechanistic link between rs7587026 and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis and a history of febrile seizures. Furthermore, we propose that quantitative precision may be important when increasing SCN1A expression in current strategies aiming to treat seizures in conditions involving SCN1A haploinsufficiency, such as Dravet syndrome.

Non-coding regulatory elements: Potential roles in disease and the case of epilepsy.

Non-coding DNA (ncDNA) refers to the portion of the genome that does not code for proteins and accounts for the greatest physical proportion of the human genome. ncDNA includes sequences that are transcribed into RNA molecules, such as ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and un-transcribed sequences that have regulatory functions, including gene promoters and enhancers. Variation in non-coding regions of the genome have an established role in human disease, with growing evidence from many areas, including several cancers, Parkinson's disease and autism. Here, we review the features and functions of the regulatory elements that are present in the non-coding genome and the role that these regions have in human disease. We then review the existing research in epilepsy and emphasise the potential value of further exploring non-coding regulatory elements in epilepsy. In addition, we outline the most widely used techniques for recognising regulatory elements throughout the genome, current methodologies for investigating variation and the main challenges associated with research in the field of non-coding DNA.