Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Vet Sci ; 11: 1301667, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379925

RESUMO

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is the aetiological agent of paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in both domestic and wild ruminants. In the present study, using a whole-genome sequence (WGS) approach, we investigated the genetic diversity of 15 Mycobacterium avium field strains isolated in the last 10 years from red deer inhabiting the Stelvio National Park and affected by paratuberculosis. Combining de novo assembly and a reference-based method, followed by a pangenome analysis, we highlight a very close relationship among 13 MAP field isolates, suggesting that a single infecting event occurred in this population. Moreover, two isolates have been classified as Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis, distinct from the other MAPs under comparison but close to each other. This is the first time that this subspecies has been found in Italy in samples without evident epidemiological correlations, having been isolated in two different locations of the Stelvio National Park and in different years. Our study highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach incorporating molecular epidemiology and ecology into traditional infectious disease knowledge in order to investigate the nature of infectious disease in wildlife populations.

2.
J Microbiol Methods ; 213: 106825, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37739126

RESUMO

Paratuberculosis is an enteric disease caused by Mycobacterium avium subs. Paratuberculosis (MAP). Quantifying the load of MAP in faeces samples offers the advantage of determining the stage of infection and planning control measures. Currently, detection of MAP in faecal specimens relies on cultural assays and quantitative PCR (qPCR), but both methods have limitations such as prolonged isolation times for cultural assay and the absence of nucleic acid standards for qPCR. Digital PCR (dPCR) represents an advancement over qPCR as it allows direct quantification of nucleic acid in a sample without the need for a standard curve. The present paper reports about the validation process, following ISO 20395:2019 guidelines, of a F57 digital PCR assay for quantifying MAP cells in faecal samples. Based on our validation, the Limit Of Detection (LOD) corresponds to 7.85 104 MAP cells/g, and the Limit Of Quantification (LOQ) to 7.85 105 MAP cells, with an efficiency of recovery at LOQ estimated about 4.5%. To assess precision, we evaluated the same faecal sample extracted by two different operators at different times. The standard deviation under repeatability conditions (S Repeatability) and intersession variability conditions (S Intermediate) were calculated, resulting in values of 0.43 and 0.26, respectively. Trueness was determined at LOQ and a value ten times higher, yielding percentages of 3.35% and 5.16%, respectively. Linearity showed a R2 value of 0.998, indicating strong linear correlation. Measurement uncertainty was 26% in absolute value and 3% on a logarithmic base 10 scale. Overall, the assay exhibits good specificity and robustness. Our validation underlines the good performance of the quantification method and allow the laboratory to provide quantitative results of MAP/cells on faecal samples.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Bovinos , Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis , Paratuberculose , Bovinos , Animais , Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis/genética , Paratuberculose/diagnóstico , Paratuberculose/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , DNA Bacteriano , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Doenças dos Bovinos/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Bovinos/microbiologia
3.
J Microbiol Methods ; 212: 106796, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37544431

RESUMO

In order to counter the antibiotic resistance phenomenon, a prudent and rational use of antimicrobials should be driven by an accurate clinical diagnosis and, when possible, by the isolation of the etiological agent followed by susceptibility testing, with the aim to select the most suitable molecule for therapy. Cow mastitis is considered the main cause of antibiotic use in the cattle breeding sector. The purpose of this study was to compare the broth microdilution (BMD) method performed with Sensititre Custom Plates and the agar disk diffusion (ADD) method in determining antimicrobial susceptibility of 215 isolates from bovine mastitis, including contagious pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae) and environmental (Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae). We compared results of the following antimicrobials: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, cefazolin, ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, kanamycin, oxacillin, penicillin, pirlimycin, rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulphonamides. We applied MIC breakpoints and zone diameter breakpoints as recommended by CLSI and EUCAST. MIC and disk diffusion diameters were compared for 1839 microorganism/antimicrobial combination and discrepancies between the two methods were classified as very major discrepancy (VMD), major discrepancy (MD) and minor discrepancy (MiD). The overall agreement between the two methods was found to be 80.7% with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.397, thus indicating a fair concordance. BMD method and ADD method demonstrated a satisfactory agreement (89 to 100%) for S. aureus and S. marcescens and all antimicrobial agents tested. Low agreement was observed for S. uberis and rifampicin (20%), enrofloxacin (49%), penicillin (51%) and pirlimycin (52%), E. coli and ampicillin (20%), S. dysgalactiae and enrofloxacin (44%), S. agalactiae and rifampicin (25%). A possible explanation for the discrepancies detected could be found in the breakpoints used which, sometimes, are not specific for the tissue-matrix of isolation/animal species/pathogen agent. The majority of the discrepancies found were MiD and MD, revealing a higher restrictiveness of the BMD method, while VMD represented only 0.2% of the total observations, a comforting fact since this type of error may result in treatment failure.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Mastite Bovina , Feminino , Animais , Bovinos , Ágar , Staphylococcus aureus , Escherichia coli , Enrofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Rifampina , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Penicilinas , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Ampicilina , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA