Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(6): 630-634, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281684

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Operating room (OR) traffic disrupts airflow and increases particle count, which predisposes patients to surgical site infections, particularly in longer surgeries with hardware placement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of traffic during neurosurgical procedures, as well as reasons for and perceptions of OR traffic. METHODS: This is a single-center, multimethod study monitoring neurosurgical OR traffic through direct observation, automated monitoring, and interviews. Traffic was observed between the skin incision and closure. Personal interviews with OR teams including surgeons, anesthesia, and nurses were conducted to evaluate their perceptions of the frequency of OR traffic and reasons for OR traffic. RESULTS: Direct observation reported OR door opening an average of 18 times, with 20 people entering or exiting per hour. The exact reason for traffic was not verified in all traffic cases and was able to be confirmed in only a third of the cases. Automated monitoring resulted in an average of 31 people entering or exiting the OR per hour. The procedure length was significantly associated with the number of people entering or exiting the OR per hour (P < .0001). Interviews highlighted that OR teams reported traffic to be significantly lower than observed and automated monitoring results, with approximately <6 people entering or exiting per hour. CONCLUSIONS: OR traffic is higher than staff expected, and updated processes are required to reduce the number of times the OR door opens. Implementing automated observation of OR traffic could reduce the OR traffic and the risk for surgical site infection.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(7): 846-849, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30661909

RESUMO

In this report, we summarize the results of surveillance, on-site assessments, and molecular analysis conducted as part of a group A Streptococcus outbreak investigation in 2 skilled nursing facilities. We identified cases in 24 individuals (6 deaths) and infection prevention deficiencies. Isolates from 14 individuals represented the globally emergent clade 3 emm89 strain. Molecular analysis suggests that the 2 outbreaks were related. Wound care practices and 1 symptomatic shared employee may have facilitated transmission. Strict adherence to infection prevention practices is needed to prevent group A Streptococcus transmission.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/ética , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Streptococcus pyogenes/patogenicidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Células Clonais , Busca de Comunicante , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Humanos , Masculino , Epidemiologia Molecular , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/mortalidade , Infecções Estreptocócicas/transmissão , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Streptococcus pyogenes/fisiologia , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA