Low Socioeconomic Status and Female Sex are Associated With Worse Functional Status in Axial Spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We determined whether socioeconomic status (SES) and sex are associated with functional status (FS) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of patients with axSpA in the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry. We performed cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of FS through the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) using generalized estimating equation models. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used as an SES proxy. The cross-sectional analysis tested for a linear trend across ADI quintiles for MDHAQ. The longitudinal analysis' outcome was functional decline. We reported predictive margins and assessed for interaction with sex. In the longitudinal analysis, we reported odds of functional decline. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analysis (N = 5,658), the mean ± SD age was 53.8 ± 15.2 years, 55.8% were female, and 71.4% were non-Hispanic White. The mean ± SD MDHAQ scores were 1.6 ± 2.0 in men versus 2.1 ± 2.2 in women. Predicted mean MDHAQ scores were 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.7) for the lowest ADI quintile and 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.1) for the highest. Women had lower FSs compared to men across quintiles. In the longitudinal analysis (n = 2,341), the proportion with FS decline was 14.3% (95% CI 7.6-25.5%) for the lowest SES quintile compared to 9.6% (95% CI 5.2-17.1%) for the highest. Women had 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.2) times higher odds of functional decline compared to men. There was no interaction with sex. CONCLUSION: In this large sample of patients with axSpA, those with lower SES had worse FS and functional decline. Women had worse FS than men, initially and over time.

Initiation of glucocorticoids before entering rheumatology care associates with long-term glucocorticoid use in older adults with early rheumatoid arthritis: A joint analysis of Medicare and the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) data.

OBJECTIVE: To assess relationships between the timing of glucocorticoid (GC) initiation, entrance into rheumatology care, and the duration of GC use in older adults with early rheumatoid arthritis (eRA) in the U.S. METHODS: Data from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry and Medicare (2016-2018) were linked. Patients with ≥2 RA ICD codes in RISE were included; the first being the index date which signaled entrance into rheumatology care. GC initiation (between 3 months before to 6 months after the index date) and continuous GC use up to 12 months after the index date were captured using Medicare claims. Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for confounders assessed differences in the duration of GC use for patients initiating GCs before versus after the index date. Average daily GC doses were estimated. RESULTS: 1,733 patients (67 % female; mean age 76 ± 6 years) were included. 41 % initiated GCs, on average 16 ± 58 days before entering rheumatologic care. The mean duration of GC use was 157 days (95 %-CI 143 to 170). GC initiation before rheumatologic care was associated with longer GC use, even after adjustment for confounders (hazard ratio 0.61; 95 %-CI [0.51 to 0.74]). For patients using GCs for ≥3 months, average daily GC doses were <5 mg/d prednisone equivalent. CONCLUSION: GCs are regularly used in eRA and most often initiated before patients enter rheumatology care. Long-term, low-dose GC use is common and associated with initiation before rheumatology care. Earlier referral to rheumatology might reduce GC exposure among U.S. patients with eRA.

Elevated uric acid is associated with a low bone mineral density in pre- but not post-menopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The role of uric acid (UA) on bone metabolism is controversially discussed. Higher UA levels have been associated with higher T-scores and a reduced incidence of fractures in postmenopausal women. However, in the context of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the role of UA remains unclear. This pilot study aimed to investigate the association of UA levels with bone mineral density in RA female and male patients. METHODS: This pilot study analyzed patients with RA to explore preliminary associations. We utilized data from the Rh-GIOP cohort, a prospective monocentric observational study focusing on bone health in chronic rheumatic diseases. To assess the association between UA levels and the lowest T-scores measured at the lumbar spine, hip, or femur, we used linear regression with adjustment for various confounders. An interaction term was included to evaluate differential associations in pre- and postmenopausal women. RESULTS: Data on dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements and serum UA levels were analyzed in a total of 206 patients. Among the 167 women 16 were premenopausal (age 40 ± 8 years) and 149 postmenopausal (age 65 ± 10 years). As expected, postmenopausal had lower T-scores than premenopausal patients (-1.53 ± 1.01 versus - 0.41 ± 1.29, respectively). No association of UA levels with T-scores was found when analyzing the whole cohort (Slope ß: -0.04; p = 0.45). However, a significant negative correlation of UA with T-scores in premenopausal (Slope ß: -0.98; p = 0.014), but not postmenopausal (Slope ß: -0.04; p > 0.05) women was found. CONCLUSION: Uric acid appears to be negatively associated with bone mineral density in premenopausal but not in postmenopausal women with RA. Thus, the impact of UA on bone health seems to depend on the hormonal status of women. Further investigations are required to validate these results in a larger cohort of patients and to investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Osteoporosis and fracture risk are multifactorial in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue diseases, vasculitides and spondyloarthropathies are at a higher risk of osteoporosis and fractures than are individuals without iRMDs. Research and management recommendations for osteoporosis in iRMDs often focus on glucocorticoids as the most relevant risk factor, but they largely ignore disease-related and general risk factors. However, the aetiopathogenesis of osteoporosis in iRMDs has many facets, including the negative effects on bone health of local and systemic inflammation owing to disease activity, other iRMD-specific risk factors such as disability or malnutrition (for example, malabsorption in systemic sclerosis), and general risk factors such as older age and hormonal loss resulting from menopause. Moreover, factors that can reduce fracture risk, such as physical activity, healthy nutrition, vitamin D supplementation and adequate treatment of inflammation, are variably present in patients with iRMDs. Evidence relating to general and iRMD-specific protective and risk factors for osteoporosis indicate that the established and very often used term 'glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis' oversimplifies the complex inter-relationships encountered in patients with iRMDs. Osteoporosis in these patients should instead be described as 'multifactorial'. Consequently, a multimodal approach to the management of osteoporosis is required. This approach should include optimal control of disease activity, minimization of glucocorticoids, anti-osteoporotic drug treatment, advice on physical activity and nutrition, and prevention of falls, as well as the management of other risk and protective factors, thereby improving the bone health of these patients.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Bone Health in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microarchitecture as measured by the trabecular bone score (TBS) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs). METHODS: Cross-sectional data from a prospective single-center cohort (2015 to 2022) of patients with iRMDs were used to evaluate 3 co-primary outcomes: BMD of the left femoral neck and the lumbar spine (as T-scores) and the TBS. Inverse probability weighting adjusted for numerous confounders including age, sex, body mass index, current and cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) dose, C-reactive protein levels, disability, and others. Analyses were based on general linear models, following a prespecified statistical analysis plan. RESULTS: The study included 1495 patients (75% women; mean age, 62.6±13.1 years; 49% and 63% with regular PPI and GC use, respectively). The PPI users had lower BMD at both spine (adjusted contrast -0.25; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.04; P=.02) and femoral neck (-0.17 [-0.35 to 0.01]; P=.07). Differences between PPI users and nonusers were statistically significant only in patients concurrently using GCs at more than 7.5 mg/d prednisone equivalent. The TBS was similar in PPI users and nonusers (adjusted contrast, 0.00 [-0.04 to 0.04]; P=.97). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PPIs lead to a loss of BMD rather than an impairment of bone microarchitecture in patients with iRMDs. The negative association between PPI use and BMD appears to be dependent on concurrent GC use. Clinicians should carefully review the indication for PPI use in patients with iRMDs, especially in those receiving higher dose GCs.

Incidence Rate and Factors Associated With Fractures Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the incidence rate and factors associated with fractures among adults with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study with data from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry linked to Medicare claims from 2016 to 2018. Patients were required to have two AS International Classification of Diseases codes 30 or more days apart and a subsequent Medicare claim. Then, 1 year of baseline characteristics were included, after which patients were observed for fractures. First, we calculated the incidence rate of fractures. Second, we constructed logistic regression models to identify factors associated with the fracture, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, body mass index, Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibility, area deprivation index, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking status, osteoporosis, historical fracture, and use of osteoporosis treatment, glucocorticoids, and opioids. RESULTS: We identified 1,426 adults with prevalent AS. Mean ± SD age was 69.4 ± 9.8 years, 44.3% were female, and 77.3% were non-Hispanic White. Fractures occurred in 197 adults with AS. The overall incidence rate of fractures was 76.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.4-88.6) per 1,000 person-years. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.39-5.65), historical fracture (OR 5.24, 95% CI 3.44-7.99), and use of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.08-3.19) conferred increased odds of fracture. CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample of Medicare beneficiaries with AS, increasing age, historical fracture, and use of opioids had higher odds of fracture. Men and women were equally likely to have a fracture. Because opioid use was associated with fracture in AS, this high-risk population should be considered for interventions to mitigate risk.

Identification of gene expression biomarkers to predict clinical response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To identify biomarkers at the gene expression level to predict response to methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: MTX-naïve patients with RA were started on MTX and followed up over three months. The disease activity score 28 (DAS28) was used to classify patients into responders and non-responders. Genome-wide gene expression analysis was performed in CD4 + and CD14 + mononuclear cells sampled from whole blood at baseline to identify differentially expressed genes in responders versus non-responders. Gene selection methods and prediction modelling obtained the most relevant differentially expressed genes. A logistic regression prediction model was subsequently constructed and validated via bootstrapping. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was calculated to judge model quality. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients with RA (53.4 ± 13.9 years, 74.7% females) were enrolled, and 70 finished the study with a documented treatment EULAR response (77.1% responders). Forty-six differentially expressed genes were found. The most promising genes were KRTAP4-11, LOC101927584, and PECAM1 in CD4 + cells and PSMD5 and ID1 in CD14 + cells. The final prediction model using these genes reached an AUC of 90%; the validation set's AUC was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: Our prediction model constructed via genome-wide gene expression analysis in CD4 + and CD14 + mononuclear cells yielded excellent predictions. Our findings necessitate confirmation in other cohorts of MTX-naïve RA patients. Especially if used in conjunction with previously identified clinical and laboratory (bio)markers, our results could help predict response to MTX in RA to guide treatment decisions. Key Points • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis may or may not respond to treatment with methotrexate, which is the recommended first-line drug in guidelines around the world. • In non-responders, valuable time is lost until second-line treatments are started. • This study aimed at predicting response to methotrexate by identifying differentially expressed genes from peripheral blood samples. • The final prediction model yielded excellent prognostic values, but validation in other cohorts is necessary to corroborate these findings.

Continuing versus tapering low-dose glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus in states of low disease activity or remission: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

OBJECTIVES: To study the benefit and harm associated with continuing versus tapering low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who have achieved low disease activity/remission. METHODS: A protocolised (PROSPEROCRD42022325175) systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials was performed. Trials compared, in patients with low disease activity/remission and GCs at baseline, continued low-dose GCs (≤7.5 mg/d prednisone equivalent) with a taper. Co-primary outcomes were time to flare and adverse events (AEs), accompanied by secondary benefit and harm outcomes. We performed meta-analyses and evaluated risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE). Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients with RA. RESULTS: Four trials (three: RA; one: SLE; study duration 24-104 weeks) with 472 participants were included. Tapering GCs resulted in a shorter time to flare (hazard ratio 3.41 [95 %-CI 1.96-5.93]; p<0.01; very low QoE). The risks of AEs, serious AEs, and withdrawal due to AEs were similar in both groups (very low to low QoE). There were more withdrawals due to lack of efficacy with tapered GCs (risk ratio 3.02 [1.56-5.87]; low QoE). In RA, the disease activity score-28 was lower with continued GCs (mean difference 0.49 [0.07-0.91]; low QoE). One of 238 patients in the tapering groups experienced adrenal insufficiency. Subgroup analyses yielded consistent results. CONCLUSION: In RA and SLE with low disease activity, continuing low-dose GCs may provide better sustained disease control, but QoE is insufficient. Adrenal insufficiency is very rare when tapering low-dose GCs. Longer-term safety concerns for GCs remain.

Consensus of the definitions of the OMERACT glucocorticoid impact core domain set for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

BACKGROUND: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Glucocorticoid (GC) Impact Working Group has been working to develop a core domain set to measure the impact of GCs on patients living with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. The mandatory domains previously identified for inclusion in all clinical trials measuring the GC effects include infection, bone fragility, mood disturbance, hypertension, diabetes, weight, fatigue, and mortality. Before progressing to instrument selection, the Working Group sought to establish precise definitions of all mandatory domains within the core domain set. METHODS: OMERACT methodology was applied with the use of evidence and consensus-based decision making of all stakeholder groups (patient research partners, health care professionals, clinician researchers, industry members and methodologists) to develop detailed definitions for the broad domain, target domain and domain components, taking into consideration sources of variability that could affect measurement of the domain.  The working group synthesized prior qualitative studies, quantitative work, and results from Delphi rounds, to develop a rich definition of 'what' is to be measured. RESULTS: Between 2021 and 2023, the OMERACT Working Group on GC Impact conducted virtual meetings to establish domain definitions. First, we mapped each domain onto an OMERACT Core Area. All domains were primarily represented within the Pathophysiological Manifestations Core Area, except from Fatigue which was primarily Life Impact and Weight which spanned both Core Areas. Sources of variability included cultural factors, age, gender, education level, socioeconomic status, personal experiences, emotional state, and language barriers. The domain definitions will form the foundation for instrument selection and the initial step of domain / concept match and content validity in the OMERACT pillar of 'truth' before moving on to feasibility and discrimination. CONCLUSION: The OMERACT GC Impact Working Group has developed and agreed upon detailed domain definitions for core domains. Future steps of the working group are to select instruments and develop the core outcome measurement set for clinical trials measuring the impact of GC on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

The Effect of Low-Dose Glucocorticoids Over Two Years on Weight and Blood Pressure in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Individual Patient Data From Five Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain and hypertension are well known adverse effects of treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of 2 years of low-dose glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DESIGN: Pooled analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials with 2-year interventions allowing concomitant treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. SETTING: 12 countries in Europe. PATIENTS: Early and established RA. INTERVENTION: Glucocorticoids at 7.5 mg or less prednisone equivalent per day. MEASUREMENTS: Coprimary end points were differences in change from baseline in body weight and mean arterial pressure after 2 years in intention-to-treat analyses. Difference in the change of number of antihypertensive drugs after 2 years was a secondary end point. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done to assess the robustness of primary findings. RESULTS: A total of 1112 participants were included (mean age, 61.4 years [SD, 14.5]; 68% women). Both groups gained weight in 2 years, but glucocorticoids led, on average, to 1.1 kg (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.8 kg; P < 0.001) more weight gain than the control treatment. Mean arterial pressure increased by about 2 mm Hg in both groups, with a between-group difference of -0.4 mm Hg (CI, -3.0 to 2.2 mm Hg; P = 0.187). These results were consistent in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Most patients did not change the number of antihypertensive drugs, and there was no evidence of differences between groups. LIMITATION: Body composition was not assessed, and generalizability to non-European regions may be limited. CONCLUSION: This study provides robust evidence that low-dose glucocorticoids, received over 2 years for the treatment of RA, increase weight by about 1 kg but do not increase blood pressure. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

[Trabecular bone score in rheumatology : Are there benefits in comparison to bone densitometry alone?] / Trabecular Bone Score in der Rheumatologie : Gibt es einen Nutzen im Vergleich zur alleinigen Osteodensitometrie?

Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of fractures due to the inflammatory potential of the disease and also because of the treatment with glucocorticoids that is often necessary. According to the current guidelines of the Governing Body on Osteology (DVO), the fracture risk can be assessed using dual energy X­ray absorptiometry and can also be supplemented by measuring the trabecular bone score (TBS). The assessment of the TBS offers additional advantages, for example in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and in patients with osteoproliferative changes of the spine (spondylarthritis) and thus optimizes the fracture risk assessment in the rheumatological patient population.

Sex and age do not modify the association between glucocorticoids and bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether sex or age modify the association of glucocorticoid (GC) use with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We studied cross-sectional data of RA patients with current or previous GC treatment in a single center cohort study (Rh-GIOP cohort). Our primary outcome was the minimum T-score (measured by DXA) of either lumbar spine, total femur, or femoral neck. Current GC dose was the main exposure; cumulative GC dose and cumulative duration of GC use were also assessed. Following a predefined statistical analysis plan, linear regression analyses with adjustment for confounders assessed whether the association of GC use with BMD was modified by sex (men versus women) or age (≥ 65 versus < 65 years). RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-three patients with RA (mean age 64 ± 12 years, 80% women) were included. 33% were not currently taking GCs, 32% were treated with a dose of 5 mg/d prednisone equivalent and 11% with more than 7.5 mg/d. 23% of patients had osteoporosis by DXA (minimum T-score ≤ -2.5). The slope, i.e., the association between changes in minimum T-scores with 1 mg/d change in current GC dose, was similar in men and women (-0.07 and -0.04, respectively; difference -0.03 [-0.11 to 0.04]; p for interaction = 0.41). Slopes were also similar for elderly and non-elderly patients (-0.03 and -0.04, respectively; difference -0.01 [-0.06 to 0.05]; p for interaction = 0.77). Using cumulative dose and duration of use as exposures did not lead to substantial changes of these results. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, the association of GC use with reduced BMD in RA was not modified by sex or age.

No association between methotrexate and impaired bone mineral density in a cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica, giant cell arteritis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis and other vasculitides-a cross-sectional analysis with dose-response analyses.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether methotrexate (MTX) use is associated with bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and various forms of vasculitis. METHODS: Rh-GIOP is a cohort study designed to evaluate bone health in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This cross-sectional analysis assessed the baseline visits of all patients with PMR or any kind of vasculitis. Following univariable analysis, multivariable linear regression analysis was performed. The lowest T-score of either the lumbar spine or the femur was chosen as the dependent variable to examine the relationship between MTX use and BMD. These analyses were adjusted for a variety of potential confounders, including age, sex, and glucocorticoid (GC) intake. RESULTS: Of 198 patients with PMR or vasculitis, 10 patients were excluded for very high GC dose (n = 6) or short disease duration (n = 4). The remaining 188 patients had the following diseases: PMR 37.2%, giant cell arteritis 25.0%, granulomatosis with polyangiitis 16.5%, followed by rarer diseases. The mean age was 68.0 ± 11.1 years, mean disease duration was 5.58 ± 6.39 years, and 19.7% had osteoporosis by dual x-ray absorptiometry (T-score ≤ -2.5). 23.4% were taking MTX at baseline with a mean dose of 13.2 mg/week (median: 15 mg/week). 38.6% of those used a subcutaneous preparation. MTX users had similar BMD compared to non-users (minimum T-scores -1.70 (± 0.86) versus -1.75 (± 0.91), respectively; p = 0.75). There was no statistically significant dose-response relationship: neither current nor cumulative dose were associated with BMD in unadjusted or adjusted models (current dose: slope -0.02; -0.14 to 0.09; p = 0.69; cumulative dose: slope -0.12; -0.28 to 0.05; p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: In the Rh-GIOP cohort, MTX is used in about a quarter of patients with PMR or vasculitis. It is not associated with BMD levels.

Safety and efficacy associated with long-term low-dose glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of long-term low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in RA. METHODS: A protocolised systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO No. CRD42021252528) of double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trials (RCTs) comparing a low dose of GCs (≤ 7.5mg/day prednisone) to placebo over at least 2 years was performed. The primary outcome investigated was adverse events (AEs). We performed random-effects meta-analyses and used the Cochrane RoB tool and GRADE to assess risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE). RESULTS: Six trials with 1078 participants were included. There was no evidence of an increased risk of AEs (incidence rate ratio 1.08; 95% CI 0.86, 1.34; P = 0.52); however, the QoE was low. The risks of death, serious AEs, withdrawals due to AEs, and AEs of special interest did not differ from placebo (very low to moderate QoE). Infections occurred more frequently with GCs (risk ratio 1.4; 1.19-1.65; moderate QoE). Concerning benefit, we found moderate to high quality evidence of improvement in disease activity (DAS28: -0.23; -0.43 to -0.03), function (HAQ -0.09; -0.18 to 0.00), and Larsen scores (-4.61; -7.52 to -1.69). In other efficacy outcomes, including Sharp van der Heijde scores, there was no evidence of benefits with GCs. CONCLUSION: There is very low to moderate QoE for no harm with long-term low dose GCs in RA, except for an increased risk of infections in GC users. The benefit-risk ratio might be reasonable forusing low-dose long-term GCs considering the moderate to high quality evidence for disease-modifying properties.

Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis.

Getting access to specialists for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) can be challenging. Therefore, an increasing number of patients and healthcare professionals are seeking information on AID via the Internet, using the video platform YouTube, for example. However, the quality of such videos has not yet been evaluated. A YouTube search was conducted to assess videos about AID to evaluate the quality and usefulness from both the patient's and healthcare professional´s perspectives. Video duration, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and uploading source on various AID were extracted. Video quality was evaluated by the modified global quality scale (GQS). The reliability was assessed by the modified five-point DISCERN score. In total, 140 videos were screened of which 105 videos met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Based on the GQS, the overall quality of videos for patients was found to be low in 64.8%, intermediate in 27.6%, and high in 7.6% of videos. The quality of videos for professionals was similar (54.3% low, 23.8% intermediate, and 21.9% of high quality). Videos were more often targeting medical professionals (65.7%) and less often patients (34.3%). This analysis demonstrates that the majority of videos regarding AIDs are of limited quality. Available videos more often address users with a professional medical background. Only a small proportion of existing videos provide understandable and useful information for AID patients. Thus, there is a strong need to develop high-quality and audience-oriented videos in the context of educational campaigns for these rare disease groups.

Optimising both disease control and glucocorticoid dosing is essential for bone protection in patients with rheumatic disease.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) are associated with increased systemic bone loss that is mediated by chronic inflammation, treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) and other factors. Our objective was to analyse the impact of variables that influence osteoporosis (OP) in patients with iRMD treated with GC. METHODS: Rh-GIOP (acronyme) is a prospective observational cohort study investigating bone health in consecutive patients with iRMD and current or prior GC treatment. We present an analysis of the patients' baseline data here. Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry was the primary outcome. Multivariable linear regression models were performed to identify variables associated with BMD. RESULTS: Data from 1066 patients with iRMD were analysed. GC doses of <5 mg prednisone equivalent per day, cumulative dose and duration of GC therapy were not associated with negative effects on BMD. Dosages of ≥5 mg/day lost their negative association with BMD after adjustment for confounders. When subanalysing patients with exactly 5 mg/day, no negative effect was seen. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), GC doses of >7.5 mg/day showed a negative association with BMD overall, but this effect seemed to be specific only to patients with moderate or high disease activity (Disease Activity Score 28-C reactive protein >3.2). CONCLUSIONS: GCs of ≤5 mg/day did not seem to be associated with a reduction of BMD in patients with iRMD and current or prior exposure to GC. This is most likely due to the dampening of inflammation by GC, which exerts a mitigating effect on the risk of OP. In RA, current GC doses of >7.5 mg/day were negatively associated with BMD, but only in patients with moderate to high disease activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02719314.

Systematic literature review of observational cohorts and clinical trials into the success rate of glucocorticoid discontinuation after their use as bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success rate of glucocorticoid (GC) discontinuation during follow-up in observational cohorts and clinical trials using temporary GC as part of initial therapy ('bridging') in newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted to identify observational cohorts and clinical trials including patients with RA treated with initial GC bridging therapy, defined as discontinuation of GC within 1 year. Patient percentages still using GC were considered the reverse of successful discontinuation. Random effects meta-analyses were performed stratified by time point. RESULTS: The scoping literature search for observational cohort studies could not identify studies answering the research question. The literature search for clinical trials identified 7160 abstracts, resulting in 10 included studies, with varying type and dose of GC and varying tapering schedules, of which 4 reported sufficient data on GC discontinuation or use after the bridging phase. The pooled proportion of patients who were still or again using GC was 22% (95% CI 8% to 37%, based on four trials) at 12 months and 10% at 24 months (95% CI -1 to 22, based on two trials). Heterogeneity was substantial (I²≥65%). CONCLUSION: The success rate of GC discontinuation after bridging as part of initial treatment of RA has been described in a limited number of studies. Reports on observational cohorts did not answer the research question. In clinical trials, protocolised discontinuation was mostly successful, although 22% of the patients who started GC bridging therapy still or again used GC at 12 months, and 10% at 24 months.