Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Spinal Fusion Procedures for Spinal Infections in a Nationwide Hospital Network in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical spine care is difficult to assess due to a lack in nationwide evidence from more recent phases of the pandemic. We aimed to describe changes in in-hospital processes associated with spinal fusion procedures in the treatment of spinal infections (SI) during different phases of the pandemic. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we examined the in-hospital prevalence and outcomes of spinal fusion procedures for SI (along with patient characteristics, rates of transfer to intensive care units, and mortality rates) during the first four waves of the pandemic compared with the corresponding prepandemic periods in 2019. We used administrative data from a nationwide network of 76 hospitals managing 7% of all in-hospital cases in Germany. RESULTS: We observed no significant change in the prevalence of SI fusion procedures during the pandemic, neither in total numbers (349 vs. 373) nor for each wave separately. On a patient level, we found no differences in age, sex, and the prevalence of paresis, and no relevant differences in associated comorbidities. The rate of mechanical ventilation did not change during any of the examined pandemic waves: it ranged between 9.5 and 18.6% during the pandemic and 3.1 and 16.0% during the corresponding prepandemic control periods. The rate of transfer to intensive care changed only during wave 4 (from 70.4 to 54.8%; p = 0.046) but not in any other pandemic phases. We observed no changes in in-hospital mortality rates (range: 2.9-9.7% vs. 6.2-11.3%) or in duration of hospital stay (range: 26.2-30.8 days vs. 20.8-29.2 days). CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of our study is that within this nationwide network of spine care centers in Germany, the delivery of surgical treatment of SI by means of spinal fusion procedures was maintained throughout the first four waves of the pandemic. Furthermore, there were no relevant changes in patient demographics, in-hospital processes, and mortality rates.

Spontaneous ankylosis of the sacroiliac joint: prevalence and risk factors.

PURPOSE: Evidence on spontaneous sacroiliac joint (SIJ) ankylosis is lacking. The aim of this analysis was to assess the prevalence of spontaneous SIJ ankylosis and examined different ankylosis patterns and risk factors for spontaneous SIJ ankylosis. METHODS: Pelvic computed tomography (CT) data of 102 consecutive patients with spinal pathologies were compared to CT of a control group consisting of 102 consecutive patients without spinal pathologies. SIJ ankylosis patterns and risk factors for SIJ ankylosis, such as age, sex, and previous spinal fusion surgery were examined. RESULTS: Overall, 117 men and 86 women were examined between 2019 and 2020. Non-spinal patients were significantly older (mean age 70.5 years, standard deviation [SD] 11.4) than those in the spinal group (mean age 65.3 years, SD 14.3; p = 0.005). The prevalence of SIJ ankylosis was 24.5% in the non-spinal group and 23.5% in the spinal group. The anterior ankylosis type prevalence was 91.7% in the spinal group, compared to 48.0% in the non-spinal group. Factors associated with SIJ ankylosis were older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, p = 0.004) and male sex (OR 5.14, 95% CI 2.29-11.55, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Spontaneous ankylosis of the SIJ was a frequent phenomenon in patients with and without spinal pathologies and more likely with older age and male sex. Anterior type SIJ ankylosis was substantially more frequent in patients with spinal pathologies. This may be due to strain exerted on the anterior SIJ aspects in patients with compromised posture due to spine degeneration.