Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur Radiol ; 33(2): 925-935, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36066734

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify and evaluate predictive lung imaging markers and their pathways of change during progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) from sequential data of an IPF cohort. To test if these imaging markers predict outcome. METHODS: We studied radiological disease progression in 76 patients with IPF, including overall 190 computed tomography (CT) examinations of the chest. An algorithm identified candidates for imaging patterns marking progression by computationally clustering visual CT features. A classification algorithm selected clusters associated with radiological disease progression by testing their value for recognizing the temporal sequence of examinations. This resulted in radiological disease progression signatures, and pathways of lung tissue change accompanying progression observed across the cohort. Finally, we tested if the dynamics of marker patterns predict outcome, and performed an external validation study on a cohort from a different center. RESULTS: Progression marker patterns were identified and exhibited high stability in a repeatability experiment with 20 random sub-cohorts of the overall cohort. The 4 top-ranked progression markers were consistently selected as most informative for progression across all random sub-cohorts. After spatial image registration, local tracking of lung pattern transitions revealed a network of tissue transition pathways from healthy to a sequence of disease tissues. The progression markers were predictive for outcome, and the model achieved comparable results on a replication cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised learning can identify radiological disease progression markers that predict outcome. Local tracking of pattern transitions reveals pathways of radiological disease progression from healthy lung tissue through a sequence of diseased tissue types. KEY POINTS: • Unsupervised learning can identify radiological disease progression markers that predict outcome in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. • Local tracking of pattern transitions reveals pathways of radiological disease progression from healthy lung tissue through a sequence of diseased tissue types. • The progression markers achieved comparable results on a replication cohort.


Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Aprendizado de Máquina não Supervisionado , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Progressão da Doença
2.
Methods ; 188: 98-104, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891727

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the intra- and inter-scanner repeatability and reproducibility of CT radiomics features (RF) of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD). METHODS: For this prospective, IRB-approved test-retest study, CT data of sixty fILD patients were acquired. Group A (n = 30) underwent one repeated CT scan on a single scanner. Group B (n = 30) was scanned using two different CT scanners. All CT data were reconstructed using different reconstruction kernels (soft, intermediate, sharp) and slice thicknesses (one and three millimeters), resulting in twelve datasets per patient. Following ROI placement in fibrotic lung tissue, 86 RF were extracted. Intra- and inter-scanner RF repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for corresponding kernels and slice thicknesses, and between lung-specific and non-lung-specific reconstruction parameters. Furthermore, test-retest lung volumes were compared. RESULTS: Test-retest demonstrated a majority of RF is highly repeatable for all reconstruction parameter combinations. Intra-scanner reproducibility was negatively affected by reconstruction kernel changes, and further reduced by slice thickness alterations. Inter-scanner reproducibility was highly variable, reconstruction parameter-specific, and greatest if either soft kernels and three-millimeter slice thickness, or lung-specific reconstruction parameters were used for both scans. Test-retest lung volumes showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: CT RF of fILD are highly repeatable for constant reconstruction parameters in a single scanner. Intra- and inter-scanner reproducibility are severely impacted by alterations in slice thickness more than reconstruction kernel, and are reconstruction parameter-specific. These findings may facilitate CT data and RF selection and assessment in future fILD radiomics studies collecting data across scanners.


Assuntos
Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomógrafos Computadorizados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Pulmão/patologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/instrumentação
3.
Eur Radiol Exp ; 4(1): 50, 2020 08 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32814998

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Automated segmentation of anatomical structures is a crucial step in image analysis. For lung segmentation in computed tomography, a variety of approaches exists, involving sophisticated pipelines trained and validated on different datasets. However, the clinical applicability of these approaches across diseases remains limited. METHODS: We compared four generic deep learning approaches trained on various datasets and two readily available lung segmentation algorithms. We performed evaluation on routine imaging data with more than six different disease patterns and three published data sets. RESULTS: Using different deep learning approaches, mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) on test datasets varied not over 0.02. When trained on a diverse routine dataset (n = 36), a standard approach (U-net) yields a higher DSC (0.97 ± 0.05) compared to training on public datasets such as the Lung Tissue Research Consortium (0.94 ± 0.13, p = 0.024) or Anatomy 3 (0.92 ± 0.15, p = 0.001). Trained on routine data (n = 231) covering multiple diseases, U-net compared to reference methods yields a DSC of 0.98 ± 0.03 versus 0.94 ± 0.12 (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and reliability of lung segmentation algorithms on demanding cases primarily relies on the diversity of the training data, highlighting the importance of data diversity compared to model choice. Efforts in developing new datasets and providing trained models to the public are critical. By releasing the trained model under General Public License 3.0, we aim to foster research on lung diseases by providing a readily available tool for segmentation of pathological lungs.


Assuntos
Aprendizado Profundo , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA