DRug-coated Balloon for Endovascular treatment of sYmptOmatic intracraNial stenotic Disease (DR. BEYOND): the protocol of a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Although endovascular stenting is considered an effective and safe therapeutic option for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD), an elevated rate of restenosis remains an important issue for the conventional bare-metal stent (BMS). Recent evidence from observational studies suggests that applying drug-coated balloons (DCB) in sICAD may decrease restenosis occurrence. Additional large randomised studies are warranted to provide firmer evidence and to determine which patients would benefit most from DCB. AIM: To design a randomised trial to examine DCB angioplasty (Taijieweiye intracranial paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter) versus BMS stenting (Wingspan intracranial stent system) in patients with sICAD. DESIGN: This is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point study to assess whether DCB angioplasty reduces the risk of restenosis compared with BMS stenting in sICAD patients with high-grade stenosis (≥70%-99%). Our goal is to randomly assign 198 eligible individuals at a 1:1 ratio to undergo DCB angioplasty (intervention group) or BMS stenting (control group). OUTCOME: The primary efficacy outcome is restenosis at 6 months post treatment, that is, >50% stenosis in or within 5 mm of the treated segment and >20% absolute luminal loss. The primary safety outcome is stroke or death within 30 days post treatment. DISCUSSION: The DRug-coated Balloon for Endovascular treatment of sYmptOmatic intracraNial stenotic Disease trial aims to produce strong evidence on the efficacy and safety of DCB angioplasty as a promising therapeutic option for sICAD cases with high-grade stenosis.

Association of Mismatch Profiles and Clinical Outcome from Endovascular Therapy in Large Infarct: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether patients with large infarct and the presence or absence of perfusion mismatch are associated with endovascular treatment benefit. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the Endovascular Therapy in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion with a Large Infarct (ANGEL-ASPECT) randomized trial, which enrolled patients within 24 hours of onset with ASPECTS 3 to 5 or ASPECTS 0 to 2 with an infarct core 70 to 100 ml. Mismatch ratio was defined as time-to-maximum (Tmax) >6 s cerebral volume/ischemic core volume, and mismatch volume was defined as Tmax >6 s volume minus ischemic core volume. We divided patients into mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml, and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml groups. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal distribution. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: There were 425 patients included. In both the mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml (mismatch+, n = 395; mismatch-, n = 31) and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml groups (mismatch+, n = 346; mismatch-, n = 80), better 90-day modified Rankin Scale outcomes were found in the endovascular treatment group compared with the MM group (4 [2-5] vs 4 [3-5], common odds ratio [cOR], 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.7, p = 0.001; 4 [2-5] vs 4 [3-5], cOR, 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8, p = 0.001, respectively), but not in patients without mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml (5 [3-6] vs 5 [4-6], cOR, 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.1, p = 0.83), and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml (4 [3-6] vs 5 [3-6], cOR, 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.7, p = 0.60). However, no interaction effect was found in both subgroups (p interaction >0.10). CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment was more efficacious than MM in patients with mismatch profiles, but no treatment effect or interaction was noted in the no mismatch profile patients. However, the small sample size of patients with no mismatch may have underpowered our analysis. A pooled analysis of large core trials stratified by mismatch is warranted. ANN NEUROL 2024.

Bailout intracranial angioplasty or stenting following thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion in China (ANGEL-REBOOT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Unsuccessful recanalisation or reocclusion after thrombectomy is associated with poor outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischaemic stroke (LVO-AIS). Bailout angioplasty or stenting (BAOS) could represent a promising treatment for these patients. We conducted a randomised controlled trial with the aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of BAOS following thrombectomy in patients with LVO. METHODS: ANGEL-REBOOT was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial conducted at 36 tertiary hospitals in 19 provinces in China. Participants with LVO-AIS 24 h after symptom onset were eligible if they had unsuccessful recanalisation (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of 0-2a) or risk of reocclusion (residual stenosis >70%) after thrombectomy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned by the minimisation method in a 1:1 ratio to undergo BAOS as the intervention treatment, or to receive standard therapy (continue or terminate the thrombectomy procedure) as a control group, both open-label. In both treatment groups, tirofiban could be recommended for use during and after the procedure. The primary outcome was the change in modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were compared between groups. This trial was completed and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05122286). FINDINGS: From Dec 19, 2021, to March 17, 2023, 706 patients were screened, and 348 were enrolled, with 176 assigned to the intervention group and 172 to the control group. No patients withdrew from the trial or were lost to follow-up for the primary outcome. The median age of patients was 63 years (IQR 55-69), 258 patients (74%) were male, and 90 patients (26%) were female; all participants were Chinese. After random allocation, tirofiban was administered either intra-arterially, intravenously, or both in 334 [96%] of 348 participants. No between-group differences were observed in the primary outcome (common odds ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·59-1·24], p=0·41). Mortality was similar between the two groups (19 [11%] of 176 vs 17 [10%] of 172), but the intervention group showed a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (eight [5%] of 175 vs one [1%] of 169), parenchymal haemorrhage type 2 (six [3%] of 175 vs none in the control group), and procedure-related arterial dissection (24 [14%] of 176 vs five [3%] of 172). INTERPRETATION: Among Chinese patients with unsuccessful recanalisation or who are at risk of reocclusion after thrombectomy, BAOS did not improve clinical outcome at 90 days, and incurred more complications compared with standard therapy. The off-label use of tirofiban might have affected our results and their generalisability, but our findings do not support the addition of BAOS for such patients with LVO-AIS. FUNDING: Beijing Natural Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Program Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program, Shanghai HeartCare Medical Technology, HeMo (China) Bioengineering, Sino Medical Sciences Technology.

Tenecteplase for Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours without Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase is an effective thrombolytic agent for eligible patients with stroke who are treated within 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke. However, data regarding the effectiveness of tenecteplase beyond 4.5 hours are limited. METHODS: In a trial conducted in China, we randomly assigned patients with large-vessel occlusion of the middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery who had salvageable brain tissue as identified on perfusion imaging and who did not have access to endovascular thrombectomy to receive tenecteplase (at a dose of 0.25 mg per kilogram of body weight; maximum dose, 25 mg) or standard medical treatment 4.5 to 24 hours after the time that the patient was last known to be well (including after stroke on awakening and unwitnessed stroke). The primary outcome was the absence of disability, which was defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability), at day 90. The key safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients were enrolled; 264 were randomly assigned to receive tenecteplase and 252 to receive standard medical treatment. Less than 2% of the patients (4 in the tenecteplase group and 5 in the standard-treatment group) underwent rescue endovascular thrombectomy. Treatment with tenecteplase resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days than standard medical treatment (33.0% vs. 24.2%; relative rate, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.81; P = 0.03). Mortality at 90 days was 13.3% with tenecteplase and 13.1% with standard medical treatment, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after treatment was 3.0% and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving Chinese patients with ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion, most of whom did not undergo endovascular thrombectomy, treatment with tenecteplase administered 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke onset resulted in less disability and similar survival as compared with standard medical treatment, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage appeared to be higher. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and others; TRACE-III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05141305.).

Associations of life's essential 8 with extent of multi-territorial atherosclerotic plaques and stenosis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Life's Essential 8 (LE8), the recently updated construct for quantifying cardiovascular health, is related to the risks of cardiovascular events. The present study aimed to evaluate associations of LE8 score with the multi-territorial extent of atherosclerosis in a community-dwelling population. METHODS: Data were derived from the baseline cross-sectional survey of the PolyvasculaR Evaluation for Cognitive Impairment and vaScular Events (PRECISE) study in Lishui City. The LE8 included overall, medical and behavior LE8 scores, and were categorized as low (< 60), moderate (60-<80), and high (≥ 80) groups. Vascular magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate intracranial and extracranial arteries; thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography to evaluate coronary, subclavian, aorta, renal, ilio-femoral arteries; and ankle-brachial index to evaluate peripheral arteries. The presence of atherosclerotic plaque or stenosis in any territory was defined as plaque or vascular stenosis with 1 territory affected or more in these arteries. The extent of atherosclerotic plaques or stenosis was assessed according to the number of these 8 vascular sites affected, and graded as four grades (none, single territory, 2-3 territories, 4-8 territories). RESULTS: Of 3065 included participants, the average age was 61.2 ± 6.7 years, and 53.5% were women (n = 1639). The moderate and high overall LE8 groups were associated with lower extent of multi-territorial plaques [common odds ratio (cOR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-0.55; cOR 0.16, 95%CI, 0.12-0.21; respectively] and stenosis (cOR 0.51, 95%CI, 0.42-0.62; cOR 0.16, 95%CI, 0.12-0.21; respectively) after adjustment for potential covariates. Similar results were observed for medical LE8 score with the extent of multi-territorial plaques and stenosis (P < 0.05). We also found the association between behavior LE8 score and the extent of multi-territorial stenosis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The higher LE8 scores, indicating healthier lifestyle, were associated with lower presence and extent of atherosclerotic plaque and stenosis in southern Chinese adults. Prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is associated with the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaques and plaque burden.

OBJECTIVE: Atherosclerosis is closely related to cardiovascular disease risk. The present study aims to evaluate the association between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaques and plaques burden, as detected by computed tomography angiography (CTA), and further test the screening value of MAFLD on the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaques and plaques burden. METHODS: We used data from the PolyvasculaR Evaluation for Cognitive Impairment and vaScular Events study, a community-based cohort. Hepatic steatosis was assessed using the fatty liver index. Coronary atherosclerotic plaques and burden were detected by CTA. The association of MAFLD with the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaques and burden was assessed by binary and ordinal logistic regression models, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 3029 participants (mean age 61.2 ± 6.7 years), 47.9% (1452) presented with MAFLD. MAFLD was associated with an increased odds of the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaques (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 1.03-1.56), segment involvement score [cOR (common odds ratio), 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.51], and segment stenosis score (cOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.06-1.57). Participants with severe fibrosis or diagnosed as DM-MAFLD subtypes had with higher odds for the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaques and plaques burden. In addition, MAFLD demonstrated a higher sensitivity for detecting the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaques and plaque burden (54%-64%) than conventional CVD risk factors (such as diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia). CONCLUSION: MAFLD is associated with higher odds of having coronary atherosclerotic plaques and plaque burden. Moreover, MAFLD may offer better screening potential for coronary atherosclerosis than established CVD risk factors.

Colchicine in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (CHANCE-3): multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of colchicine versus placebo on reducing the risk of subsequent stroke after high risk non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack within the first three months of symptom onset (CHANCE-3). DESIGN: Multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 244 hospitals in China between 11 August 2022 and 13 April 2023. PARTICIPANTS: 8343 patients aged 40 years of age or older with a minor-to-moderate ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and a high sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/L were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 within 24 h of symptom onset to receive colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily on days 1-3, followed by 0.5 mg daily thereafter) or placebo for 90 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was any new stroke within 90 days after randomisation. The primary safety outcome was any serious adverse event during the treatment period. All efficacy and safety analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS: 4176 patients were assigned to the colchicine group and 4167 were assigned to the placebo group. Stroke occurred within 90 days in 264 patients (6.3%) in the colchicine group and 270 patients (6.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.16); P=0.79). Any serious adverse event was observed in 91 (2.2%) patients in the colchicine group and 88 (2.1%) in the placebo group (P=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The study did not provide evidence that low-dose colchicine could reduce the risk of subsequent stroke within 90 days as compared with placebo among patients with acute non-cardioembolic minor-to-moderate ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and a high sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/L. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05439356.

Survival outcome and predictors of WHO grade 2 and 3 insular gliomas: A classification based on the tumor spread.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to identify if clinical features and survival outcomes of insular glioma patients are associated with our classification based on the tumor spread. METHODS: Our study included 283 consecutive patients diagnosed with histological grade 2 and 3 insular gliomas. A new classification was proposed, and tumors restricted to the paralimbic system were defined as type 1. When tumors invaded the limbic system (referred to as the hippocampus and its surrounding structures in this study) simultaneously, they were defined as type 2. Tumors with additional internal capsule involvement were defined as type 3. RESULTS: Tumors defined as type 3 had a higher age at diagnosis (p = 0.002) and a higher preoperative volume (p < 0.001). Furthermore, type 3 was more likely to be diagnosed as IDH wild type (p < 0.001), with a higher rate of Ki-67 index (p = 0.015) and a lower rate of gross total resection (p < 0.001). Type 1 had a slower tumor growth rate than type 2 (mean 3.3%/month vs. 19.8%/month; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed the extent of resection (HR 0.259, p = 0.004), IDH status (HR 3.694, p = 0.012), and tumor spread type (HR = 1.874, p = 0.012) as independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Tumor grade (HR 2.609, p = 0.008), the extent of resection (HR 0.488, p = 0.038), IDH status (HR 2.225, p = 0.025), and tumor spread type (HR 1.531, p = 0.038) were significant in predicting progression-free survival (PFS). CONCLUSION: The current study proposes a classification of the insular glioma according to the tumor spread. It indicates that the tumors defined as type 1 have a relatively better nature and biological characteristics, and those defined as type 3 can be more aggressive and refractory. Besides its predictive value for prognosis, the classification has potential value in formulating surgical strategies for patients with insular gliomas.

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly patients: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefit-risk profile of tenecteplase in the elderly patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is uncertain. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase compared with alteplase for AIS patients aged ≥80 years. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-2 Trial, a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial. Disabling AIS patients aged ≥80 years who initiated intravenous thrombolytics within 4.5 hours of symptom onset were enrolled from June 2021 to May 2022 across 53 centres in China and were randomly allocated to receive 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase or 0.9 mg/kg alteplase. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of participants with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours was the safety outcome. RESULTS: Of 137 participants, mRS 0-1 at 90 days occurred in 37 (49.3%) of 75 in the tenecteplase group vs 20 (33.9%) of 59 in the alteplase group (risk ratio (RR) 1.47, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.23). sICH within 36 hours was observed in 3 (4.0%) of 76 in the tenecteplase group and two (3.3%) of 61 in the alteplase group (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.20 to 8.41). CONCLUSIONS: The risk-benefit profile of tenecteplase thrombolysis was preserved in the elderly patients, which lends further support to intravenous 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase as an alternative to alteplase in these patients.

Impact of first pass effect in endovascular treatment of large core stroke: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial.

BACKGROUND: The first-pass effect (FPE) is linked to better safety and efficacy prognosis in patients with small- to- moderate sized ischemic infarctions. We evaluated the incidence, prognosis, and predictors of FPE in patients with large core infarctions (LCIs). METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the Trial of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core (ANGEL-ASPECT). The FPE was defined as a successful recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2 c/3, and eTICI 2b-3 as modified FPE (mFPE)) after one pass. The primary outcome was clinical functional independence, and the secondary outcomes were independent ambulation, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) defined by the Heidelberg bleeding classification, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and death within 90 days of stroke onset. RESULTS: Of the 226 patients in the study, FPE and mFPE were achieved in 33 (14.6%) and 82 (36.3%) patients, respectively. Patients with FPE exhibited shorter onset-to-puncture times (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 0.996), and patients with mFPE were older (OR 1.039; 95% CI: 1.005 to 1.075). mFPE was significantly associated with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin score [mRS] 0-2: OR 2.64; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.07; mRS 0-3: OR 3.31; 95% CI: 1.73 to 6.33). FPE tended to improve outcomes (mRS 0-3: OR 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92 to 4.97; p=0.08). ICH rates (OR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.05; p=0.07) and 90-day deaths (OR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.09; p=0.09) tended to decrease in patients who achieved mFPE but not in patients who achieved FPE. CONCLUSIONS: In the ANGEL-ASPECT trial, patients who achieved mFPE had a higher rate of independent ambulation and functional independence, and the rates of any ICH and 90-day death tended to decrease.

Insulin Resistance and White Matter Microstructural Abnormalities in Nondiabetic Adult: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is of growing concern yet its association with white matter integrity remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between IR and white matter integrity in nondiabetic adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis was conducted based on the PolyvasculaR Evaluation for Cognitive Impairment and vaScular Events (PRECISE) study. A total of 1709 Nondiabetic community-dwelling adults with available diffusion weighted imaging based on brain magnetic resonance imaging and completed oral glucose tolerance test were included. IR was measured non-invasively by insulin sensitivity indices (ISI), including ISIcomposite and ISI0,120, as well as homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). White matter microstructure abnormalities were identified by diffusion weighted imaging along with tract-based spatial statistics analysis to compare diffusion metrics between groups. The multivariable linear regression models were applied to measure the association between white matter microstructure abnormalities and IR. RESULTS: A total of 1709 nondiabetic individuals with a mean age of 60.8±6.4 years and 53.5% female were included. We found that IR was associated with a significant increase in mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity extensively in cerebral white matter in regions such as the anterior corona radiata, superior corona radiata, anterior limb of internal capsule, external capsule, and body of corpus callosum. The pattern of associations was more marked for ISIcomposite and ISI0,120. However, the effect of insulin resistance on white matter integrity was attenuated after additionally adjustment for history of hypertension and cardiovascular disease and antihypertensive medication use. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a significant association between IR and white matter microstructural abnormalities in nondiabetic middle-aged community residents, while these associations were greatly influenced by the history of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, and antihypertensive medication use. Further investigation is needed to clarify the role of IR in white matter integrity, whereas prophylactic strategies of maintaining a low IR status may ameliorate disturbances in white matter integrity.

Effectiveness and safety of bridging therapy and endovascular therapy in patients with large cerebral infarctions: from ANGEL-ASPECT.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The benefits of thrombolytic therapy before endovascular thrombectomy in cases of acute ischaemic stroke, with a large infarction volume, remain unclear. This analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bridging therapy and endovascular therapy among patients with large cerebral infarctions. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of the multicentre prospective study of ANGEL-ASPECT (Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core), participants were divided into two groups: an endovascular therapy group and a bridging therapy group. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to compare the primary endpoint between the two groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted to further explore potential risk factors associated with the outcomes. RESULTS: 122 patients were included, of whom 77 (63%) underwent endovascular therapy and 45 (37%) underwent bridging therapy. The median scores on mRS at 90 days of the bridging therapy group and the endovascular therapy group were 3 (2-5) and 4 (2-6), with no significant differences (common OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.71 to 2.61). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was reported in three patients who were in the endovascular and bridging therapy groups (relative risk (RR) 1.71; 95% CI 0.36 to 8.12). The mortality between two groups did not differ (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that endovascular therapy alone might be a viable option for patients with large cerebral infarctions, displaying no noticeable disparity in outcomes compared with bridging therapy.

Association of blood pressure and outcomes differs upon cerebral perfusion post-thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) blood pressure (BP) and outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains contentious. We aimed to explore whether this association differs with different cerebral perfusion statuses post-EVT. METHODS: In a multicenter observational study of patients with AIS with large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT, we enrolled those who accepted CT perfusion (CTP) imaging within 24 hours post-EVT. We recorded post-EVT systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP. Patients were stratified into favorable perfusion and unfavorable perfusion groups based on the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) on CTP. The primary outcome was good functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score of ≤3). Secondary outcomes included early neurological deterioration, infarct size growth, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: Of the 415 patients studied (mean age 62 years, 75% male), 233 (56%) achieved good functional outcomes. Logistic regression showed that post-EVT HIR and 24-hour mean SBP were significantly associated with functional outcomes. Among the 326 (79%) patients with favorable perfusion, SBP <140 mmHg was associated with a higher percentage of good functional outcomes compared with SBP ≥140 mmHg (68% vs 52%; aOR 1.70 (95% CI 1.00 to 2.89), P=0.04). However, no significant difference was observed between SBP and functional outcomes in the unfavorable perfusion group. There was also no discernible difference between SBP and secondary outcomes across the different perfusion groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with favorable perfusion post-EVT, SBP <140 mmHg was associated with good functional outcomes, which underscores the need for further investigations with larger sample sizes or a more individualized BP management strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900022154.

Renal function affects the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke poses a significant health threat, and thrombectomy has become a routine treatment. Tirofiban has emerged as a promising adjunct therapy to minimize reocclusion after thrombectomy. We aimed to investigate whether renal function influences the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in patients undergoing endovascular therapy. METHODS: Patients' clinical data collected from the stroke unit were analyzed. The modified Rankin scale score and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) were used as outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 409 patients (mean age: 66.5 years, 292 males [71.4%]) were included. Tirofiban significantly improved 3-month functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.408, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.120-5.175), reduced 3-month mortality (aOR = 0.364, 95% CI 0.155-0.856), and decreased the incidence of sICH (aOR = 0.339, 95% CI 0.149-0.767) in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m². However, no significant improvement in prognosis was observed with tirofiban in patients with eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m². Interaction analysis suggested a potential influence of renal function on tirofiban efficacy. CONCLUSION: Renal function may impact the efficacy of tirofiban. Administration of tirofiban in direct thrombectomy patients with normal renal function is safe and improves prognosis. However, the prognostic benefits of tirofiban are limited in patients with impaired renal function.

Comparison of Dual Antiplatelet Therapies for Minor, Nondisabling, Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) appears to be an effective treatment option for minor (nondisabling) acute ischemic stroke. This conclusion is based on trials that include both transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke; however, these 2 conditions may differ. Objective: To compare DAPT regimens specifically for minor stroke. Data Sources: PubMed was searched for randomized clinical trials published up to November 4, 2023. Search terms strategy included TIA, transient ischemic attack, minor stroke, or moderate stroke, with the filter randomized controlled trial. Unpublished data on minor stroke were sourced from authors and/or institutions. Study Selection: Trials testing DAPT within the first 24 hours of a minor stroke (defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5) were included by consensus. Of 1508 studies screened, 6 (0.3%) initially met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The study was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by multiple observers. Bayesian fixed-effect network meta-analysis was conducted. Secondary analysis performed for high-risk TIA alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatments were ranked using a probability measure called surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA). The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included major hemorrhage, mortality, and hemorrhagic stroke. The number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) were obtained. Results: Five trials were included that described 28 148 patients, of whom 22 203 (78.9%) had a minor stroke. Of these, 13 995 (63.0%) were in DAPT groups and 8208 (37.0%) in aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) groups. Aspirin and ticagrelor had a 94% probability of being the superior treatment for minor stroke (SUCRA, 0.94) for the primary outcome. Both aspirin and ticagrelor (NNT, 40; 95% CI, 31-64) and aspirin and clopidogrel (NNT, 58; 95% CI, 39-136) were superior to aspirin alone in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke at 90 days. Both treatments had higher rates of major hemorrhage than aspirin alone (NNH for aspirin and ticagrelor, 284; 95% CI, 108-1715 vs NNH for aspirin and clopidogrel, 330; 95% CI, 118-3430), but neither had increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke or death. For high-risk TIA, ticagrelor and aspirin had a 60% probability (SUCRA, 0.60) and clopidogrel and aspirin had a 40% probability (SUCRA 0.40) of being a superior treatment; neither was optimum, but both were superior to aspirin alone for the primary outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor has higher probability of being the superior treatment among patients with minor stroke when presence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles has not been excluded. For patients with TIA, the superiority of aspirin and ticagrelor vs aspirin and clopidogrel was not demonstrated.

Efficacy and safety of Ferrous iron on the prevention of Vascular cOgnitive impaiRment among patients with cerebral Infarction/TIA (FAVORITE): rationale and design of a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is high in patients suffering from ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or with vascular risk factors. Effective prevention strategies for VCI remain limited. Anaemia or low haemoglobin was found as an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after acute stroke. Anaemia or low haemoglobin was possibly associated with an increased risk of poststroke cognitive impairment. Whether supplement of ferrous iron to correct anaemia reduces the risk of VCI and improves adverse outcomes in patients with ischaemic cerebrovascular disease remains uncertain. AIM: We aim to introduce the design and rationale of the safety and efficacy of Ferrous iron on the prevention of Vascular cOgnitive impaiRment in patients with cerebral Infarction or TIA (FAVORITE) trial. DESIGN: FAVORITE is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial that compares supplement of ferrous iron with placebo for recent minor stroke/TIA patients complicated with mild anaemia or iron deficiency: Ferrous succinate sustained-release tablet 0.2 g (corresponding to 70 mg of elemental iron) once daily after or during breakfast for 12 weeks or placebo with much the same colour, smell and size as ferrous iron once daily during or after breakfast for 12 weeks. All paticipants will be followed within the next year. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary effective outcome is the incidence of VCI at 3 months after randomisation and the primary safety outcome includes any gastrointestinal adverse event during 3 months. DISCUSSION: The FAVORITE trial will clarify whether supplement of ferrous iron to correct low haemoglobin reduces the risk of VCI in patients with recent ischaemic stroke or TIA complicated with mild anaemia or iron deficiency compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03891277.

Immediate- or Delayed-Intensive Statin in Acute Cerebral Ischemia: The INSPIRES Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Comparisons are limited for immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin for secondary stroke prevention and neuroprotection in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) from atherosclerosis. Objective: To estimate whether immediate-intensive statin therapy is safe and can lower the risk of recurrent stroke compared with delayed-intensive statin in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from atherosclerosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis (INSPIRES) trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from September 2018 to October 2022. The trial was conducted at 222 hospitals in China. Patients aged 35 to 80 years with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerosis within 72 hours of symptom onset were assessed. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive immediate-intensive atorvastatin (80 mg daily on days 1-21; 40 mg daily on days 22-90) or 3-day delayed treatment (placebo for days 1-3, followed by placebo and atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 4-21, and then atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 22-90). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke within 90 days, and a secondary efficacy outcome was poor functional outcome. Moderate to severe bleeding was the primary safety outcome. Results: A total of 11 431 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 6100 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-71] years; 3915 men [64.2%]) were enrolled, with 3050 assigned to each treatment group. Within 90 days, new stroke occurred in 245 patients (8.1%) in the immediate-intensive statin group and 256 patients (8.4%) in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.13). Poor functional outcome occurred in 299 patients (9.8%) and 348 patients (11.4%) in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98). Moderate to severe bleeding occurred in 23 of 3050 patients (0.8%) and 17 of 3050 patients (0.6%), in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Immediate-intensive statin initiated within 72 hours did not reduce the risk of stroke within 90 days and may be associated with improved functional outcomes without significant difference in moderate to severe bleeding, compared with 3-day delayed-intensive statin in Chinese patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or TIA from atherosclerosis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635749.

Endovascular therapy in acute ischaemic stroke with large infarction with matched or mismatched clinical-radiological severities: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial.

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) was demonstrated effective in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) with large infarction. Revealing subgroups of patients who would or would not benefit from EVT will further inform patient selection for EVT. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial, a randomised controlled trial of 456 adult patients with acute anterior-circulation LVO and large infarction, defined by ASPECTS 3-5 or infarct core volume 70-100 mL, enrolled from 46 centres across China, between October 2, 2020 and May 18, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receiving EVT and medical management or medical management alone. One patient withdrew consent, 455 patients were included in this post-hoc analysis and categorised into 4 subgroups by lower or higher NIHSS (< or ≥16) and smaller or larger infarct core (< or ≥70 mL). Those with lower NIHSS & smaller core, and higher NIHSS & larger core were considered clinical-radiological matched subgroups; otherwise clinical-radiological mismatched subgroups. Primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). ANGEL-ASPECT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04551664. Findings: Overall, 139 (30.5%) patients had lower NIHSS & smaller core, 106 (23.3%) higher NIHSS & larger core, 130 (28.6%) higher NIHSS & smaller core, and 80 (17.6%) lower NIHSS & larger core. There was significant ordinal shift in the 90-day mRS toward a better outcome with EVT in clinical-radiological matched subgroups: lower NIHSS & smaller core (generalised OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.18-2.62; p = 0.01) and higher NIHSS & larger core (1.64; 1.06-2.54; 0.01); but not in the two clinical-radiological mismatched subgroups. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that in patients with anterior-circulation LVO and large infarction, EVT was associated with improved 90-day functional outcomes in those with matched clinical and radiological severities, but not in those with mismatched clinical and radiological severities. Simultaneous consideration of stroke severity and infarct core volume may inform patient selection for EVT. Funding: Unrestricted grants from industry [Covidien Healthcare International Trading (Shanghai), Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Genesis MedTech (Shanghai), and Shanghai HeartCare Medical Technology].

Exploring the link between brain topological resilience and cognitive performance in the context of aging and vascular risk factors: A cross-ethnicity population-based study.

Brain aging is typically associated with a significant decline in cognitive performance. Vascular risk factors (VRF) and subsequent atherosclerosis (AS) play a major role in this process. Brain resilience reflects the brain's ability to withstand external perturbations, but the relationship of brain resilience with cognition during the aging process remains unclear. Here, we investigated how brain topological resilience (BTR) is associated with cognitive performance in the face of aging and vascular risk factors. We used data from two cross-ethnicity community cohorts, PolyvasculaR Evaluation for Cognitive Impairment and Vascular Events (PRECISE, n = 2220) and Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (MAS, n = 246). We conducted an attack simulation on brain structural networks based on k-shell decomposition and node degree centrality. BTR was defined based on changes in the size of the largest subgroup of the network during the simulation process. Subsequently, we explored the negative correlations of BTR with age, VRF, and AS, and its positive correlation with cognitive performance. Furthermore, using structural equation modeling (SEM), we constructed path models to analyze the directional dependencies among these variables, demonstrating that aging, AS, and VRF affect cognition by disrupting BTR. Our results also indicated the specificity of this metric, independent of brain volume. Overall, these findings underscore the supportive role of BTR on cognition during aging and highlight its potential application as an imaging marker for objective assessment of brain cognitive performance.

Ninety-Day Stroke Recurrence in Minor Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Trials and Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: Risk of recurrence after minor ischemic stroke is usually reported with transient ischemic attack. No previous meta-analysis has focused on minor ischemic stroke alone. The objective was to evaluate the pooled proportion of 90-day stroke recurrence for minor ischemic stroke, defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale severity score of ≤5. METHODS AND RESULTS: Published papers found on PubMed from 2000 to January 12, 2021, reference lists of relevant articles, and experts in the field were involved in identifying relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies describing minor stroke cohort with reported 90-day stroke recurrence were selected by 2 independent reviewers. Altogether 14 of 432 (3.2%) studies met inclusion criteria. Multilevel random-effects meta-analysis was performed. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials and 8 observational studies totaling 45 462 patients were included. The pooled 90-day stroke recurrence was 8.6% (95% CI, 6.5-10.7), reducing by 0.60% (95% CI, 0.09-1.1; P=0.02) with each subsequent year of publication. Recurrence was lowest in dual antiplatelet trial arms (6.3%, 95% CI, 4.5-8.0) when compared with non-dual antiplatelet trial arms (7.2%, 95% CI, 4.7-9.6) and observational studies 10.6% (95% CI, 7.0-14.2). Age, hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, or known atrial fibrillation had no significant association with outcome. Defining minor stroke with a lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale threshold made no difference - score ≤3: 8.6% (95% CI, 6.0-11.1), score ≤4: 8.4% (95% CI, 6.1-10.6), as did excluding studies with n<500%-7.3% (95% CI, 5.5-9.0). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence after minor ischemic stroke is declining over time but remains important.