Awareness and knowledge of integrated counselling and testing centres (ICTC) counsellors about depression among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): A descriptive study from Karnataka.

Background: Depression among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) is highly prevalent and it is associated with increased morbidity, poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy, and poor psychosocial outcomes. To address this, integrated counselling and testing centres (ICTC) counsellors provide psychosocial support to PLHIV. Materials and Methods: This descriptive study aims to assess the awareness and knowledge of ICTC counsellors about depression and its management. A total of 338 (n = 452) ICTC counsellors participated in the study. A demographic data sheet and a semi-structured questionnaire were used to collect data. Results: More than half of the participants reported that biochemical imbalances cause depression. 71.60% and 79.59% of participants reported that depression was common among PLHIV and required immediate attention. 92.60% of counsellors reported that a combination of counselling and medication would be effective to treat depression. 86.98% and 81.95% of counsellors were confident and actively screened for depression among PLHIV, and 78.11% of counsellors had access to a psychiatrist. In contrast. One-third of participants had difficulties working with PLHIV, and 55.56% of participants expressed that addressing issues of PLHIVs' depression to be left to mental health professionals. Conclusion: ICTC counsellors had adequate knowledge about depression and its symptoms. However, lack of knowledge on intervention strategies, time constraints and work targets are significant barriers. These findings suggest that training on mental illness screening; brief intervention strategies may help counsellors to assist PLHIV in overcoming depression complications.

Determinants of family functioning in caregivers of persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is known to cause significant burden to patients and their caregivers. However, there is limited data on its impact on family functioning, especially from families with an adult member having OCD. METHODS: Four hundred subjects, which included treatment-seeking adult OCD patients (n = 200) and their caregivers (n = 200) were recruited. Patients were evaluated using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). Caregivers were evaluated using the MINI, the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Socio-Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), the Family Accommodation Scale (FAS) and the Connor-David Resilience scale (CD-RISC) in a cross-sectional interview. Family functioning was measured using the OCD Family Functioning (OFF) Scale. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was carried out to evaluate the relationships between the patient and caregiver variables to predict family functioning. RESULTS: From the best-fitting path model, we ascertained that OCD symptoms did not have a direct relationship with family dysfunction. Their effects were in turn was mediated by family accommodation, anxiety, caregiver stress/burden and depression. "Contamination & washing" was the only significant symptom dimension within the model. Caregiver resilience was found to predict only their individual functioning, and not family functioning. LIMITATIONS: Study sample included patients from a tertiary care OCD service, only one caregiver from each patient's family was interviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating family functioning, addressing it as part of interventional modules for patients and caregivers may help improving treatment outcomes.

A randomized controlled study of brief family-based intervention in obsessive compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is therapist-intensive and prolonged making it less accessible to patients, particularly in resource-constrained situations. We examined the efficacy of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention as an adjunct to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) in OCD. METHOD: We randomized 64 adult OCD patients stabilized on SRIs to either the 6-session brief family-based intervention (BFBI; n = 30) that included psychoeducation, exposure and response prevention and family intervention or to a control arm of relaxation exercises (RE). Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 1- and 3- months post-intervention. Primary outcome measure was response to treatment defined as ≥ 35% reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale total score relative to baseline score plus a Clinical Global Impression- Improvement rating of very much improved or much improved. Family accommodation and expressed emotions were also assessed. RESULTS: At 3- month follow-up, the BFBI group responded better than the RE group (53% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Illness severity, family accommodation and expressed emotion declined significantly over time in the BFBI group compared to the RE group. The BFBI (OR = 13.17, p < 0.001) and baseline illness severity (OR = 0.746, p < 0.011) predicted treatment response. LIMITATIONS: Sample size was small and follow-up duration was short. Control group had less time with the therapist although number of sessions was identical in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Briefer intervention is effective in treating OCD. Briefer and inclusive format of intervention has important implications for clinical practice in resource-constrained circumstances.