Surveying the Directional Transport of Water Droplets upon Impact on Metallic Topographic Gradients.

Drop impact phenomena on raw, polished, and topography-altered gradient surfaces are investigated and presented. The main aim of this study is to demonstrate that in using a one-step industrial patterning process, it is possible to obtain metal topographical wetting gradients that can produce various desired outcomes after droplet impact. The findings could be applied to improving wind or steam turbine blades. The ranges of Weber (We) and Reynolds (Re) numbers in the study are 3-300 and 650-6500, respectively. It is demonstrated that for a fixed We, the droplet transport outcomes change from bouncing-off to side-flipping to deposition depending on the impact location and the gradient strength. The effect of We in combination with the gradient strength was also considered to demonstrate droplet behavior similar to that observed on a uniform water repellent surface and on biphilic systems. In addition, full bouncing-off and directional control have been demonstrated. For the condition We = 95 ± 3, it was possible to achieve a maximum droplet recoil height of ∼6 mm and a side motion of almost 8 mm. A combination of different outcomes (e.g., splashing on one side of a droplet and passive horizontal translation on another) was observed on the studied gradients at We > 200 due to different wetting regimes across the droplet's three-phase line.

Influence of rheology and micropatterns on spreading, retraction and fingering of an impacting drop.

Rheology and surface microstructure affect many drop impact processes, including in emerging printing and patterning applications. This study reports on experiments systematically addressing the influence of these parameters on drop impacts. The experiments involved drop impacts of water, glycerol, and shear-thinning carbopol solutions on ten different microstructured surfaces, captured using high-speed photography. The impact Weber number (We) was varied from 70 to 350, and the microstructures consisted of 20 µm wide pillars with circular and square cross sections arranged in square arrays. The data focus on maximum spreading, retraction rates, threshold conditions for asymmetric (non-circular) spreading, and fingers protruding from the spreading rim. The extent of spreading was reduced by the presence of micropillars, and was well-explained using a hybrid scaling model. The drop retraction rate () showed moderate agreement with the inertial regime scaling  ∝ We-0.50, but did decrease with effective viscosity. Retraction was slower when the contact line was pinned on surfaces that were flat or had relatively tall or closely-spaced pillars, and was disrupted by drop break-up at We ≳ 250 for low-viscosity fluids. Impact velocities at the onset of asymmetric spreading had weak dependence on viscosity. Fingers were more numerous for greater We, lower effective viscosity, lower pillar height, and for pillars with square cross-sections. Fingers were favoured in directions parallel to the rows of the pillar array, especially near the onset of finger formation. Consistent comparisons between Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids were enabled by calculating an effective Reynolds number.