Virtual learning in maxillofacial surgery in the post-COVID world: where are we now?

During the COVID-19 pandemic we developed a post-graduate virtual learning environment (PGVLE) in the West Midlands region for higher trainees in oral and maxillofacial surgery. We continued to develop this following the pandemic and sought to examine the trainee experience with this resource as restrictions eased. The PGVLE comprises a total of nine semesters mapping General Medical Council (GMC) learning objectives in the specialty across a total of 63 events using BigBlueButton™. Webinars are delivered on a weekly basis by subspecialty experts. Trainee feedback was sought using SurveyMonkey™ examining self-assessed confidence levels using visual analogue scores (VAS) and Likert items regarding trainers and content. A focus group was convened and the transcript analysed using grounded theory analysis (GTA). Likert items revealed overwhelmingly positive responses, with 96.2% (n = 281) of responses being positive regarding content and 97.5% (n = 475) agreeing with positive comments regarding faculty. VAS scores improved by an average of 39.0% and improvements were statistically significant for most sessions. The focus group highlighted the relevance of teaching to GMC learning objectives, the achievement of consistently high standards, the potential for conflict with clinical commitments and issues surrounding peer interaction. Satisfaction scores remain high with the PGVLE programme, which is very much here to stay in the post-graduate education of our trainees. With the easing of restrictions, we have moved to a hybrid method of learning with the potential for 'flipped classroom' methodology moving forwards.

The Unfavourable Split: a novel classification and an 11-year retrospective study looking at alternative methods for management of this well-known complication.

An unfavourable split is a well-known complication following a sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) of the mandible. Our aim was to analyse all unfavourable mandibular splits that had occurred when carrying out a SSO with the aim to design a classification which can facilitate management. We carried out a retrospective study analysing all orthognathic surgery from January 2010 until April 2021. Data surrounding unfavourable splits during this period were specifically analysed. Orthognathic surgery during this period was performed by a single OMFS unit with osteotomies performed by a single surgeon and their trainee. The dataset included 311 patients who underwent either a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or a bimaxillary osteotomy. There were 225 bimaxillary osteotomies and 86 BSSOs. Twenty-one patients had unfavourable splits following their BSSO with a total of 22 out of 622 sagittal split osteotomies over this 11-year period. Bilateral unfavourable splits occurred in one patient. These results correlate to an incidence rate of 6.8% of unfavourable splits following SSO's in an 11-year period. The results reveal common patterns of unfavourable splits to suggest a simple classification based on our results. This can be applied to any unfavourable splits in SSO which then allows the clinician to proceed with surgery and prevent abandonment of the procedure. It is classified as follows: Type 1 fractures where the mandibular condyle is attached to the proximal fragment; Type 2 fractures whereby the mandibular condyle is attached to the tooth-bearing segment; Type 3 fractures are lingual cortex fractures. Each of these fracture types has a specific management protocol, which we recommend is used in all unfavourable splits.

Interruptive Versus Noninterruptive Clinical Decision Support: Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) has been shown to improve compliance with evidence-based care, but its impact is often diminished because of issues such as poor usability, insufficient integration into workflow, and alert fatigue. Noninterruptive CDS may be less subject to alert fatigue, but there has been little assessment of its usability. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the usability of interruptive and noninterruptive versions of a CDS. METHODS: We conducted a usability study of a CDS tool that recommended prescribing an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for inpatients with heart failure. We developed 2 versions of the CDS: an interruptive alert triggered at order entry and a noninterruptive alert listed in the sidebar of the electronic health record screen. Inpatient providers were recruited and randomly assigned to use the interruptive alert followed by the noninterruptive alert or vice versa in a laboratory setting. We asked providers to "think aloud" while using the CDS and then conducted a brief semistructured interview about usability. We used a constant comparative analysis informed by the CDS Five Rights framework to analyze usability testing. RESULTS: A total of 12 providers participated in usability testing. Providers noted that the interruptive alert was readily noticed but generally impeded workflow. The noninterruptive alert was felt to be less annoying but had lower visibility, which might reduce engagement. Provider role seemed to influence preferences; for instance, some providers who had more global responsibility for patients seemed to prefer the noninterruptive alert, whereas more task-oriented providers generally preferred the interruptive alert. CONCLUSIONS: Providers expressed trade-offs between impeding workflow and improving visibility with interruptive and noninterruptive versions of a CDS. In addition, 2 potential approaches to effective CDS may include targeting alerts by provider role or supplementing a noninterruptive alert with an occasional, well-timed interruptive alert.

Randomized Controlled Ethanol Cookstove Intervention and Blood Pressure in Pregnant Nigerian Women.

RATIONALE: Hypertension during pregnancy is a leading cause of maternal mortality. Exposure to household air pollution elevates blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the ability of a clean cookstove intervention to lower BP during pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Nigeria. Pregnant women cooking with kerosene or firewood were randomly assigned to an ethanol arm (n = 162) or a control arm (n = 162). BP measurements were taken during six antenatal visits. In the primary analysis, we compared ethanol users with control subjects. In subgroup analyses, we compared baseline kerosene users assigned to the intervention with kerosene control subjects and compared baseline firewood users assigned to ethanol with firewood control subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) over time was significantly different between ethanol users and control subjects (P = 0.040); systolic blood pressure (SBP) did not differ (P = 0.86). In subgroup analyses, there was no significant intervention effect for SBP; a significant difference for DBP (P = 0.031) existed among preintervention kerosene users. At the last visit, mean DBP was 2.8 mm Hg higher in control subjects than in ethanol users (3.6 mm Hg greater in control subjects than in ethanol users among preintervention kerosene users), and 6.4% of control subjects were hypertensive (SBP ≥140 and/or DBP ≥90 mm Hg) versus 1.9% of ethanol users (P = 0.051). Among preintervention kerosene users, 8.8% of control subjects were hypertensive compared with 1.8% of ethanol users (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first cookstove randomized controlled trial examining prenatal BP. Ethanol cookstoves have potential to reduce DBP and hypertension during pregnancy. Accordingly, clean cooking fuels may reduce adverse health impacts associated with household air pollution. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02394574).