Analysis of treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer using the national cancer database: Factors associated with receipt of aggressive therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the treatments received by muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients, analyze their use according to sociodemographic, clinical, pathologic, and facility variables, and identify possibilities for improvement in care, with the understanding that patients with MIBC face a potentially lethal disease, yet often do not receive guideline-concordant potentially curative therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we analyzed 102,119 patients with MIBC diagnosed from 2009 to 2018. Treatments included cystectomy, radiation, chemotherapy (CT), or observation. Treatments including cystectomy or radiotherapy (RT) ≥50 Gy were considered aggressive therapy (AT). A multivariable generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the impact of the independent variables with receiving AT, using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: The median age was 73 years, with 72.9% male, 84.3% White, and 7.1% Black. Stage distribution was 59.4% stage II, 23.0% stage III, and 17.6% stage IV. Overall, 55.2% of patients received AT, while 41.1% did not, with 26.6% receiving observation alone after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. 45.4% received cystectomy, 9.8% received RT, and 12.8% received CT as primary treatment. Notably, over 30% of patients ages 50 to 70 did not receive aggressive therapy. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with nonreceipt of AT included age >70 (OR < 0.79, P < 0.0001), Black race (OR 0.70, P < 0.0001), underinsured status (OR 0.62, P < 0.0001), high comorbidity (OR 0.74, P < 0.0001), and treatment at low volume (OR 0.72 P < 0.0001) or nonacademic cancer program (OR 0.54, P < 0.0001). Long-term trends included increases in utilization of perioperative CT (17.5% in 2009 to 46.7% in 2018, P < 0.001), and chemoradiation (5.4% in 2009 to 8.8% in 2018, P < 0.001). Using Cox regression analysis to control for confounding variables, receipt of aggressive therapy was associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Over a third of patients did not receive AT for MIBC, with many of these patients seemingly eligible by age and comorbidity status. Prospective studies are needed to determine why these patients do not receive AT. A better understanding of patient vs. access to care vs. provider factors will help to focus efforts to improve care for MIBC patients.

Pain and functional recovery from chronic low back pain over 12 months: implications for osteopathic medicine.

CONTEXT: Although low back pain is a common medical condition that often progresses to become a chronic problem, little is known about the likelihood of recovery from chronic low back pain (CLBP). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to measure the risk of recovery from CLBP based on low back pain intensity and back-related functioning measures reported by participants within a pain research registry over 12 months of observation and to consider the implications for osteopathic medicine. METHODS: A total of 740 participants with CLBP in the Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation in the United States were studied between April 2016 and October 2021. Inception cohorts for pain recovery and functional recovery were assembled from the participants who did not meet the recovery criteria at registry enrollment. The pain recovery criterion was having a score of ≤1/10 on a numerical rating scale for low back pain intensity, and the functional recovery criterion was having a score of ≤4/24 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. A total of 737 and 692 participants were included in the inception cohorts for pain recovery and functional recovery, respectively. Participants provided follow-up data at quarterly encounters over 12 months to determine if they achieved and maintained a pain or functional recovery from CLBP over the entire period of observation. Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with recovery. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants at baseline was 52.9 years (SD, 13.1 years) and 551 (74.5%) were female. No participant reported a pain recovery that was maintained over all four quarterly encounters, whereas 16 participants (2.3%; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4%) maintained a functional recovery. Having high levels of pain self-efficacy (OR, 17.50; 95% CI, 2.30-133.23; p=0.006) and being Hispanic (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.11-11.37; p=0.03) were associated with functional recovery, and high levels of pain catastrophizing (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.65; p=0.01) and having chronic widespread pain (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.66; p=0.007) were inversely associated with functional recovery. The findings for pain self-efficacy and Hispanic ethnicity remained significant in the multivariate analysis that adjusted for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of pain recovery and the low likelihood of functional recovery observed in our study suggests that osteopathic physicians should embrace a biopsychosocial approach to CLBP management and work with patients to set realistic expectations based on more pragmatic outcome measures, such as those that address health-related quality of life. The findings also suggest the potential importance of patient education and counseling to enhance pain self-efficacy.

Attitudes toward telemedicine among urban and rural residents.

INTRODUCTION: Adoption of telemedicine by healthcare facilities has dramatically increased since the start of coronavirus pandemic; yet, major differences exist in universal acceptance of telemedicine across different population groups. The goal of this study was to examine population-based factors associated with current and/or future use of telemedicine in Alabama. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 532 participants online or by phone, in four urban and eight rural counties in Alabama. Data were collected on: demographics, health insurance coverage, medical history, access to technology, and its use in accessing healthcare services. Generalized logit regression models were used to estimate the odds of choosing "virtual visit" and "phone communication" compared to "in-person visit" for the preferred choice of visit with the healthcare provider; as well as odds for willingness to participate in "virtual visit" in the future. RESULTS: Our study sample had a mean age of 43 (±15) years, 72.9% women, 45.9% Black or African American; 59.4% population living in an urban county. The odds of "phone communication" were higher compared to the odds of "in-person visit", with a unit increase in age (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.03), after adjusting for other covariates. Among participants with past experience of virtual communications, the odds for choosing "virtual visit" were significantly higher compared to choice of in-person visit (odds ratio for virtual visit: 3.23, 95% confidence interval: 2.01-5.18), adjusted for other covariates. Further, people with college or more education were 71% less likely to choose "No" compared to those with high school or lower general education development education for future virtual visit [odds ratio for college or more: 0.29, 95% confodence interval: 0.10-0.87). Likewise, participants residing in rural counties were 57% less likely to choose "No" compared to urban counties for future virtual visit (odds ratio for rural participants: 0.43, 95% confidence interval:0.19-0.97). DISCUSSION: Our study found notable differences in age, education, and rurality for use and/or preference for telemedicine. Medical institutions and healthcare providers will need to account for these differences to ensure that the implementation of telemedicine does not exacerbate existing health disparities.

Factors Associated with Perceived Susceptibility to COVID-19 Among Urban and Rural Adults in Alabama.

We examined factors associated with and reasons for perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 among urban and rural adults in Alabama. We surveyed 575 eligible participants' engagement in preventive behaviors, concern about COVID-19 in their communities, perceived susceptibility to the virus, and reasons for susceptibility across three response options (Yes, No, and Don't Know/Not Sure). Bivariate analyses compared characteristics by level of perceived susceptibility to COVID-19. A multinomial logistic regression model evaluated the association of demographics, health insurance coverage, and chronic illness status with perceived susceptibility. Participants' race, gender, and educational attainment were significantly associated with perceived susceptibility to COVID-19. African Americans and males had higher odds of responding 'No', compared to 'Yes' and 'Don't Know/Not Sure' than Whites and females. Participants with a high school education and lower had higher odds of responding 'Don't Know/Not Sure' versus 'Yes' compared to those with college or higher education. Those unconcerned about COVID-19 in their community had higher odds of responding 'No' (OR = 2.51, CI 1.35-4.68) and 'Don't Know/Not Sure' (OR = 2.51, CI 1.26-4.99) versus 'Yes', as compared to those who were concerned. Possibility of exposure at work was the most frequent reasons for perceiving themselves susceptible to COVID-19, engagement in recommended preventive measures was the most frequent reason among respondents who indicated 'No', and uncertainty/perception that everyone is at risk was the most frequent reason among the ones who indicated 'Don't Know/Not Sure'. Results indicate that tailored efforts to heighten perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 among specific demographics are needed.

Feasibility Trial of an eHealth Intervention for Health-Related Quality of Life: Implications for Managing Patients with Chronic Pain during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the feasibility of providing an eHealth intervention for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to facilitate patient self-management. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2019-2020 within the Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation. Eligible patients included those with chronic low back pain and a SPADE (sleep disturbance, pain interference with activities, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue) cluster score ≥ 55 based on the relevant scales from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instrument with 29 items (PROMIS-29). Patients were randomized to the eHealth treatment group, which received a tailored HRQOL report and interpretation guide, or to a wait-list control group. The primary outcome was change in the SPADE cluster score, including its five component scales, over 3 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in low back pain intensity and back-related disability. Treatment effects were measured using the standardized mean difference (SMD) in change scores between groups. The eHealth intervention was also assessed by a survey of the experimental treatment group 1 month following randomization. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were randomized, including 52 in the eHealth treatment group and 50 in the wait-list control group, and 100 (98%) completed the trial. A majority of patients agreed that the HRQOL report was easy to understand (86%), provided new information (79%), and took actions to read or learn more about self-management approaches to improve their HRQOL (77%). Although the eHealth intervention met the criteria for a small treatment effect in improving the overall SPADE cluster score (SMD = 0.24; p= 0.23) and anxiety (SMD = 0.24; p = 0.23), and for a small-to-medium treatment effect in improving depression (SMD = 0.37; p = 0.06) and back-related disability (SMD = 0.36; p = 0.07), none of these results achieved statistical significance because of limited sample size. CONCLUSION: Given the feasibility of rapid online deployment, low cost, and low risk of adverse events, this eHealth intervention for HRQOL may be useful for patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prevalence and Impact of Comorbid Widespread Pain in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Registry-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Widespread pain (WP) is emerging as a key comorbid condition in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study measured the prevalence of comorbid WP in adults with CLBP, WP predictors, and impact on patients. METHODS: Patients with CLBP were recruited from the Pain Registry for Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation from 2016 through 2019. They were followed over 12 months to measure annual WP period prevalence rates using an item from the minimum dataset recommended by the National Institutes of Health Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain. Patients were classified as not having WP, having nonpersistent WP, or having persistent WP. Pain intensity, back-related disability, and quality of life were measured using a numerical rating scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the PROMIS-29 instrument, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients were studied, including 56 (16%) without WP, 272 (76%) with nonpersistent WP, and 30 (8%) with persistent WP. There were no significant differences among the WP groups with regard to age, sex, or CLBP duration. However, being non-White and having moderate or high levels of pain catastrophizing remained significant predictors of nonpersistent or persistent WP after adjusting for potential confounders. Patients reported greater pain intensity and back-related disability and poorer quality of life over 12 months with increasing levels of WP persistence (P < .001 for each measure). CONCLUSION: Greater efforts are needed in primary care to help close these gaps in pain intensity, back-related disability, and quality-of-life outcomes associated with WP.

Use of Complementary Health Approaches for Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Pain Research Registry-Based Study.

Objectives: To measure the use of complementary health approaches (CHAs) recommended in recent clinical practice guidelines relating to low-back pain, multivariate factors associated with their use, and clinical outcomes of CHA users and nonusers. Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Settings/Location: The Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation. Subjects: A total of 568 patients with chronic low-back pain. Interventions: Massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, and acupuncture. Outcome measures: The numerical rating scale for low-back pain intensity, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for back-related disability, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System with 29 items for quality-of-life deficits relating to sleep disturbance, pain interference with activities, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue. Results: The distribution of the number of different CHAs used by patients for low-back pain was as follows: 0, 179 (31.5%); 1, 139 (24.5%); 2, 160 (28.2%); 3, 70 (12.3%); and 4, 20 (3.5%). The numbers of patients using the specific CHAs were as follows: massage therapy, 271 (47.7%); spinal manipulation, 238 (41.9%); yoga, 144 (25.4%); and acupuncture, 96 (16.9%). Opioids had been used for low-back pain by 415 (73.1%) patients. Higher levels of education and higher pain self-efficacy scores were associated with greater use of any CHA, whereas increasing age and being Black were associated with lesser use of any CHA. Any CHA use was associated with lesser low-back pain intensity and lesser back-related disability. Patients who used massage therapy reported better clinical outcomes across all three dimensions. Patient pain self-efficacy also enhanced the effect of CHA use. Conclusions: The use of CHAs relative to opioids for low-back pain was inconsistent with recommendations from recent clinical practice guidelines despite clinical benefits with CHA use in this study. More research is needed on ways to improve the uptake of CHAs recommended for low-back pain, particularly among older and Black patients.

Major sites of cancer occurrence among men and women in gandhinagar district, India.

BACKGROUND: This study examines major cancer sites among the population of Gandhinagar district, India during the year 2009-2011. OBJECTIVE: To study leading cancer incidents and mortality and their age distribution in both sexes in Gandhinagar district. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary data were collected from various sources and entered in computer and analyzed. Quality checks were done, and duplicate cases were eliminated. For mortality data, death registration units were contacted. RESULTS: Total 2360 incident cases (1374 males and 986 females) and 736 mortality cases (464 males and 272 females) were recorded during the year 2009-2011 in Gandhinagar district. Among males, the leadings sites were mouth, tongue, lung, esophagus, hypopharynx, and larynx, whereas in females they were breast, cervix, ovary, mouth, tongue and myeloid leukemia. Majority of cases were found in the age group of 35-64 years and the proportion in male and female in this age group was 62.51% and 71.05%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study helps to understand the possible cancer patterns in Gandhinagar district. Foremost causes of cancer in leading sites in males were tobacco related, and the proportion of cancers associated with tobacco was 53% in our study. It highlights the possibility of easy and early detection of cancers, especially by oral cancer screening in the population. Further, the findings highlight the need of cancer cervix and breast screening among the women at regular intervals through camp approach in the community, as these are the most common sites (40% of female cancers).