The Steatosis-Associated Fibrosis Estimator (SAFE) score for assessing significant liver fibrosis in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for noninvasive tests to identify patients with psoriasis at risk of significant liver fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To externally validate the ability of the Steatosis-Associated Fibrosis Estimator (SAFE) score to detect significant liver fibrosis in patients with psoriasis using transient elastography (TE) as a reference. METHODS: We analysed data from 75 patients with psoriasis, including TE, SAFE score, Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score (NFS). Significant liver fibrosis was defined as TE values ≥ 7.1 kPa. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: Fifteen patients (20%) exhibited significant liver fibrosis. The AUROCs for the SAFE and FIB-4 scores were 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.97] and 0.62 (95% CI 0.45-0.79), respectively. The SAFE score outperformed the FIB-4 Index (P = 0.01) but was comparable with the NFS (P = 0.05) in predicting significant fibrosis. Using thresholds of < 0, 0 to < 100 and ≥ 100, the SAFE score categorized 36, 24 and 15 patients into low, intermediate and high-risk groups for significant fibrosis, respectively. The negative predictive value for excluding significant fibrosis with a SAFE score of < 0 was 94.4%, and the positive predictive value for diagnosing significant fibrosis with a SAFE score of > 100 was 53.3%. The duration of psoriasis, joint involvement and methotrexate treatment did not affect the diagnostic ability of the SAFE score whereas age of the patient did. CONCLUSIONS: The SAFE score demonstrated good accuracy in assessing clinically significant fibrosis among patients with psoriasis. This score should prove valuable for risk stratification and patient management in dermatology practice.

Blue Wheals and Blue Angioedema Induced by Blue Dyes: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Blue wheals and blue angioedema, the adverse reactions to blue dye injections with or without anaphylaxis, are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to review the characteristics (ie, sex and age at onset, interval between blue dye injection and symptom onset, clinical manifestations, duration of blue wheals or angioedema), natural courses, and treatments of blue dye adverse reactions. METHODS: A review of the articles published through July 2021 was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations. RESULTS: Across 523 patients (175 studies) with any adverse reactions to blue dye injections, wheals, angioedema, or both occurred in 193 patients (36.9%). Of these 193 patients, 68 patients (35.2%) developed blue wheals or angioedema, 118 (61.1%) had ordinary wheals or angioedema (nonbluish), and 7 had both (3.6%). We reviewed 169 patients with available data (99 with ordinary lesions and 70 with blue lesions). Patent blue violet had the highest rate of inducing blue wheals or angioedema (odds ratio 4.9). Almost half of the patients with blue wheals or angioedema developed systemic symptoms; and of those with systemic symptoms, all except 1 progressed to anaphylaxis. On-demand treatments with antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine were commonly used and effective. CONCLUSIONS: Using blue dyes can lead to blue wheals or angioedema and systemic reactions. In patients with a history of a severe allergic reaction to a blue dye, repeat administration of a blue dye should be used only after carefully weighing all the risks and benefits.

Food-Dependent Exercise-Induced Wheals/Angioedema, Anaphylaxis, or Both: A Systematic Review of Phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions can manifest with wheals, angioedema, and anaphylaxis, alone or in combination. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the clinical manifestation, culprit foods and exercise, augmenting factors, comorbidities, and treatment options of each phenotype. METHODS: Using predefined search terms, we assessed and analyzed the relevant literature until June 2021. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations were applied to this systematic review. RESULTS: A total of 231 studies with 722 patients were included. The most common phenotype was anaphylaxis with wheals, angioedema, or both, reported in 80% of patients. This was associated with a higher number of anaphylactic episodes, augmenting factors, and use of on-demand antihistamine compared with the least common phenotype, anaphylaxis without wheals or angioedema, reported in 4% of patients. Anaphylaxis with wheals/angioedema was also associated with distinct characteristics compared with stand-alone wheals, angioedema, or both, in 17% of patients. Patients with anaphylaxis were older at the time of disease onset, less often had a history of atopy, showed more positive results in response to food and exercise provocation tests, had a more restricted spectrum of culprit foods, and more often used on-demand epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: The three phenotypes of allergic reactions to food and exercise differ in clinical characteristics, triggers, and response to treatment. Knowledge of these differences may help with patient education and counseling as well as disease management.

The validity and reliability of a Thai version of the Angioedema Control Test: Which recall period is preferable?

BACKGROUND: The Angioedema Control Test (AECT) is a questionnaire that monitors disease control in patients with angioedema, with a recall period of 4 weeks (AECT-4wk) or 3 months (AECT-3mo). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the psychometric properties of a Thai version of the AECT. METHODS: Of 54 patients, 46, 5, 2, and 1 had recurrent angioedema with chronic spontaneous urticaria, hereditary angioedema, idiopathic histaminergic angioedema, and acquired angioedema due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency, respectively. The AECT, Angioedema Activity Score (AAS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL), and anchors for disease control (numeric rating scale [NRS] and patient global assessment-Likert scale [PatGA-LS]) were used. The patients rated the efficacy of their treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-four and 47 patients completed the AECT-4wk and AECT-3mo, respectively. Both AECT versions showed significant correlations with disease activity (AAS, r = 0.6-0.8), disease control (NRS and PatGA-LS, r = 0.7-0.9), and quality of life impairment (DLQI and AE-QoL, r = 0.6-0.8). Higher correlations were found for the AECT-4wk than for the AECT-3mo. Excellent internal consistency (alpha = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively) and intraclass correlation (0.96 and 0.94, respectively) were found. A cutoff ≥ 10 was confirmed to identify patients with well-controlled disease for both AECT versions (AUCs = 0.89 and 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The Thai version of the AECT is a valid and reliable tool for clinical practice. Due to the shorter recall period, the AECT-4wk may be more accurate than, and preferable to, the AECT-3mo. A cutoff ≥ 10 should be used to identify patients with well-controlled disease.

Herpes Zoster after COVID-19 Infection or Vaccination: A Prospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary Dermatology Clinic.

Background: Herpes zoster (HZ) has been observed to occur after COVID-19 infection and vaccination; however, knowledge regarding the demographic data, clinical presentations, and treatment outcomes of HZ is limited. Objective: To compare the demographic data, clinical manifestations, treatments, and outcomes of patients with and without HZ within 14 days of COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Methods: This prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with cutaneous HZ was conducted at a dermatology clinic from October 2021 to January 2023. Results: Among a total of 232 patients with HZ, the median age was 62.0 years and 59.1% were female. HZ developed in 23 (9.9%) and four (1.7%) patients after COVID-19 vaccination and infection, respectively. The mean duration from vaccination and the median duration from infection to HZ onset were 5.7 and 8.5 days, respectively. The proportion of female patients was significantly higher in the group of patients with COVID-19 vaccination or infection than in those without such a history (P = 0.035). Patients who developed HZ following the recent COVID-19 infection had a median age of 42.5 years, which was lower than that of the other groups. Dissemination occurred in 8.7% of the patients after COVID-19 vaccination. HZ recurrence was reported in five cases, of which 80% had been vaccinated or infected with COVID-19 during the previous 21 days. All patients had similar durations of antiviral treatment, crust-off time, and duration of neuralgia. Conclusions: HZ after COVID-19 vaccination is more frequently observed in females, while HZ after COVID-19 infection tends to occur in younger patients. Disseminated HZ is more common in patients recently vaccinated against COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccination or infection may trigger recurrent HZ infection.

Food-Dependent Exercise-Induced Wheals, Angioedema, and Anaphylaxis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Food-dependent exercise-induced wheals, angioedema, and anaphylaxis remain insufficiently characterized. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed the literature on clinical manifestations, laboratory investigations, culprit foods, triggering exercise, comorbidities, and treatment outcomes. METHODS: Using predefined search terms and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) recommendations, we searched 3 electronic databases to identify relevant literature published before July 2021. RESULTS: Of 722 patients (median age 25 years; 55.4% male) from 231 studies (43 cohort studies, 15 cases series, and 173 case reports), 79.6% and 3.7% had anaphylaxis with and without wheals and/or angioedema, respectively. The remaining 16.6% had wheals and/or angioedema without anaphylaxis. The duration from eating to exercising and from exercising to symptom onset ranged from 5 minutes to 6 hours (median 1 hour) and from 5 minutes to 5 hours (median 30 minutes), respectively, and virtually all patients exercised within 4 hours after eating and developed symptoms within 1 hour after exercising. Wheat was the most common culprit food. Running was the most common trigger exercise. Most patients were atopic, and 1 in 3 had a history of urticaria. Aspirin and wheat-based products were the most frequent augmenting factors. On-demand antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine were commonly used and reported to be effective. Patients who stopped eating culprit foods before exercise no longer developed food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions are heterogeneous in their clinical manifestations, triggers, and response to treatment. Patients benefit from avoidance of culprit foods before exercise, which highlights the need for allergological diagnostic workup and guidance.