RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' satisfaction with opioid versus opioid-sparing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing outpatient head and neck surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: Tertiary care academic hospital. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing outpatient head and neck surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 analgesic regimens. First- and second-line medications were the following by group (1) Hydrocodone-acetaminophen with ibuprofen, (2) ibuprofen with hydrocodone-acetaminophen, and (3) ibuprofen with acetaminophen. Preoperative counseling was provided to patients regarding expected pain and proper medication use. Postoperative questionnaires were administered to assess satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred three patients were enrolled in the study (mean age, 56.5 years; women, 75 [73%]). The mean satisfaction score with the pain regimen assigned was similar between the 3 groups (scale 0-10, [7.7, 8.3, 8.5, P = .46]). A similar percentage of patients in each group reported that surgery was more painful than anticipated (25%, 32%, 26%, P = .978), and a similar percentage of patients reported willingness to utilize the same analgesic regimen following future surgeries (75%, 83%, 76%, P = .682). Additional questions evaluating the side effect profile, maximum and minimum pain scores, and difficulty of recovery were not statistically different between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In the postoperative population for outpatient head and neck surgeries, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction and pain control between the opioid and nonopioid arms. Providers should discuss opioid-sparing regimens preoperatively with patients and describe them as effective in providing adequate pain control without a significant impact on patient's perception of care.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen , Analgésicos não Narcóticos , Ibuprofeno , Dor Pós-Operatória , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Feminino , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Hidrocodona/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor , Idoso , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Adulto , Combinação de Medicamentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos AmbulatóriosRESUMO
On the basis of their training, medical students are considered "the best case scenario" among university students in knowledge of the human papillomavirus (HPV). We evaluated differences in knowledge of HPV, HPV vaccine, and head and neck cancer (HNC) among medical students. A previously validated questionnaire was completed by 247 medical students at a Midwestern university. Outcomes of interest were knowledge score for HPV and HPV vaccine, and HNC, derived from combining questionnaire items to form HPV knowledge and HNC scores, and analyzed using multivariate linear regression. Mean scores for HPV knowledge were 19.4 out of 26, and 7.2 out of 12 for HNC knowledge. In the final multivariate linear regression model, sex, race, and year of study were independently associated with HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge. Males had significantly lower HPV vaccine knowledge than females (ß = -1.53; 95% CI: -2.53, -0.52), as did nonwhite students (ß = -1.05; 95% CI: -2.07, -0.03). There was a gradient in HPV vaccine knowledge based on the year of study, highest among fourth year students (ß = 6.75; 95% CI: 5.17, 8.33). Results were similar for factors associated with HNC knowledge, except for sex. HNC knowledge similarly increased based on year of study, highest for fourth year students (ß = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.72, 3.29). Among medical students, gaps remain in knowledge of HPV, HPV vaccine, and HPV-linked HNC. Male medical students have significantly lower knowledge of HPV. This highlights the need to increase medical student knowledge of HPV and HPV-linked HNC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Estudantes de Medicina , Feminino , Masculino , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Papillomavirus Humano , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To explore recent advances in therapeutic interventions for nonflaccid facial paralysis (NFFP), including new evidence for surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Timing of treatment is also discussed, along with possible future treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: NFFP remains a difficult disease to treat. Chemodenervation with botulinum toxin remains a first-line treatment to suppress aberrant and antagonistic movements during voluntary use of muscles. More permanent treatments such as selective neurectomy, myectomy, and nerve and muscle transfers have been shown to offer promising results for the nonflaccidly paralyzed face. SUMMARY: NFFP is commonly seen in patients who have incomplete recovery from facial paralysis, and carries high psychosocial morbidity. A large array of treatments have been described in the literature, both procedural and nonprocedural. Both treatment type and timing are important in optimal patient recovery.
Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas , Paralisia Facial , Face , Músculos Faciais , Nervo Facial , Paralisia Facial/cirurgia , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Privately insured patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) typically have better outcomes; however, differential outcome among Medicaid versus the uninsured is unclear. We aimed to describe outcome disparities among HNC patients uninsured versus on Medicaid. METHODS: A cohort of 18-64-year-old adults (n = 57 920) with index HNC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database (2007-2015) was analyzed using Fine and Gray multivariable competing risks proportional hazards models for HNC-specific mortality. RESULTS: Medicaid (sdHR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.58, 1.72) and uninsured patients (sdHR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.46, 1.65) had significantly greater mortality hazard than non-Medicaid patients. Medicaid patients had increased HNC mortality hazard than those uninsured. CONCLUSION: Compared with those uninsured, HNC patients on Medicaid did not have superior survival, suggesting that there may be underlying mechanisms/factors inherent in this patient population that could undermine access to care benefits from being on Medicaid.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Medicaid , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Adenoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/cirurgia , Enfisema Subcutâneo/patologia , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Adenoidectomia/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Face/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Ilustração Médica , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Enfisema Subcutâneo/etiologia , Tonsilectomia/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of discharge order sets on prescribing patterns of opioids after pediatric tonsillectomy. Secondary outcomes included encounters for postoperative pain, dehydration, and bleeding. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of pre- and post-intervention in pediatric post-tonsillectomy patients, 0-18 years old (n = 1486). Order sets were installed with age-specific analgesic medication defaults and recommendation of concurrent alternating scheduled ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Time-balanced pre- and post-intervention cohorts were established. Opioid outcomes calculated in morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram (MME/kg) per dosage and total prescribed. RESULTS: Discharge order set intervention resulted in 17% reduction of opioid dose prescribed (0.095 MME/kg [95% CI, 0.092-0.099] vs. 0.079 [95% CI, 0.076-0.083], P < .001). Total number of opioid doses prescribed was reduced after order set implementation (46.4 [95% CI, 43.6-49.1] to 20.3 [95% CI, 19.1-21.5], P < .001). Patients <7 years old prescribed opioids remained rare in pre- and post-intervention groups (1.6% and 1.8%, respectively, P = .86). Admissions and emergency department visits for postoperative dehydration and pain were significantly reduced. Post-intervention group showed an increase in readmissions for post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (9.2% vs. 5.2%, P = .003) which was isolated to an increase in the older post-intervention group after stratification by age. CONCLUSION: Utilization of order sets with standardized analgesic medication regimen of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and opioid helped effectively reduce opioid amount per dose, total opioid amount dispensed, and variability in the total opioid amount dispensed while maintaining pain control. An increase in post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage was recognized following this implementation which did not persist after the study period despite continuation of intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1386-1391, 2021.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To describe sociodemographic factors associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) survival among patients with distant metastatic disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed national data for 2889 adult patients with metastatic HNC (2007-2015). We used Fine and Gray competing risks proportional hazard models, stratified by oropharyngeal cancer status, controlled for sociodemographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and insurance status), and accounted for multiple testing. RESULTS: Median survival time was 11 months (15 months for patients married/partnered; 13 months for patients with non-Medicaid insurance; P < .01). Among patients with oropharyngeal cancer, being married/partnered was associated with lower mortality hazard (sdHRdivorced/separated = 1.37, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07, 1.75; and sdHRnever married = 1.43, 97.5% CI = 1.14, 1.80), as was having non-Medicaid insurance (sdHRuninsured = 1.44, 97.5% CI = 1.02, 2.04). CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance and marital status are sociodemographic factors associated with survival among HNC patients with distant metastatic disease, especially in oropharyngeal cases.