Predictive factors for persistent and late radiation complications in breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: With improved diagnostic techniques and treatments of breast cancer, overall survival times are longer, giving more opportunity for normal tissue complications of treatment to manifest. Radiation late effects (RLEs) could have profound long-term impacts on the quality of life of the survivors. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors influencing timing and types of complications in patients referred to the Adult Radiation Late Effects Clinic (ARLEC). METHODS: In a period of 16 years, 296 breast cancer patients were referred to the ARLEC. The clinical records were retrospectively studied to collect epidemiologic, medical and treatment data. Associations were sought between candidate predictive factors and time to the first complication after radiation treatment (RT) completion (primary outcome), and pain or swelling (secondary outcomes) using univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses. All analyses were performed in SAS, version 9.4. RESULTS: All patients were female with a mean age of 56.3 years. The first treatment-related complication occurred after a median of 3 months. Patients were followed at ARLEC for a median of 18 months. Older age and delay from surgery to RT (S-RT delay) were associated with earlier onset of complications (both p < 0.001). The most common complications were breast pain (62.1%) and swelling (45.9%). Histology and RT boost were associated with pain (p = 0.035 and 0.013). RT boost and S-RT delay on the other hand were associated with swelling (p = 0.013 and 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical factors identified could help recognize the patients at high risk for developing RLEs and alert physicians to initiate earlier diagnostic and therapeutic measures.

Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer.

Background: Improved treatments resulting in a rising number of survivors of breast cancer (bca) calls for optimization of current specialist-based follow-up care. In the present study, we evaluated well survivors of bca with respect to their supportive care needs and attitudes toward follow-up with various care providers, in varying settings, or mediated by technology (for example, videoconference or e-mail). Methods: A cross-sectional paper survey of well survivors of early-stage pT1-2N0 bca undergoing posttreatment follow-up was completed. Descriptive and univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations between survivor characteristics, supportive care needs, and perceived satisfaction with follow-up options. Qualitative responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: The 190 well survivors of bca who participated (79% response rate) had an average age of 63 ± 10 years. Median time since first follow-up was 21 months. Most had high perceived satisfaction with in-person specialist care (96%, 177 of 185). The second most accepted model was shared care involving specialist and primary care provider follow-up (54%, 102 of 190). Other models received less than 50% perceived satisfaction. Factors associated with higher perceived satisfaction with non-specialist care or virtual follow-up by a specialist included less formal education (p < 0.01) and more met supportive care needs (p < 0.05). Concerns with virtual follow-up included the perceived impersonal nature of virtual care, potential for inadequate care, and confidentiality. Conclusions: Well survivors of bca want specialists involved in their follow-up care. Compared with virtual follow-up, in-person follow-up is perceived as more reassuring. Certain survivor characteristics (for example, met supportive care needs) might signal survivor readiness for virtual or non-specialist follow-up. Future work should examine multi-stakeholder perspectives about barriers to and facilitators of shared multimodal follow-up care.

Afatinib in advanced pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer- a Canadian experience.

Background: Afatinib, an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (egfr tki), is approved for first-line therapy in advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) and has previously demonstrated activity after failure of chemotherapy and reversible egfr tkis, with improved response and progression-free survival, compared with placebo. Outcomes in pretreated patients with advanced nsclc receiving afatinib through a Canadian special access program (sap) are reported here. Methods: Patients with nsclc progressing after at least 1 line of chemotherapy and an egfr tki were eligible to enrol in the sap. Characteristics of patients from the two largest accruing Canadian centres were retrospectively reviewed, including demographics, disease and treatment data, and patient outcomes. Results: The 53 patients who received afatinib (57% women, 51% never-smokers, 26% of East Asian ethnicity, and 66% with adenocarcinoma) had a median age of 59 years. EGFR mutations were documented in 25%, and EGFR wild-type in 8%. All patients had received prior egfr tki treatment, with 42% achieving a response. Patients took afatinib for a median of 2 months (range: 0-26 months); 17% required 1 or more dose reductions. Of 47 evaluable patients receiving afatinib, 10 experienced tumour shrinkage, and 11, stable disease. Median survival from afatinib initiation was 5 months (95% confidence interval: 2 months to 8 months). Grade 3 or greater diarrhea, rash, paronychia, and stomatitis were seen in 9%, 11%, 6%, and 4% of patients respectively. Conclusions: In an unselected population of pretreated patients with advanced nsclc after tki failure, median survival with afatinib therapy was 5 months. Through a sap, afatinib demonstrated activity in clinical practice, with manageable toxicity.

Outcomes in Patients Treated with Post-mastectomy Chest Wall Radiotherapy without the Routine Use of Bolus.

AIMS: The use of bolus in post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) varies significantly between institutions. We report on chest wall recurrence and acute toxicity rates for PMRT patients treated with selective use of bolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed PMRT patients who received adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2009. Patient, tumour and cancer outcomes were collected from a prospective database, with additional radiotherapy and acute toxicity details supplemented retrospectively. Chest wall bolus was reserved for patients considered at high risk of local recurrence. RESULTS: There were 314 patients suitable for analysis: 52 received bolus, 262 did not. The mean age was 53.2 years. The median follow-up was 4.2 years. The most common T stage was T2 (37%), followed by T3/T4 (33%). There were 229 patients (73%) who had N+ disease; 213 (68%) patients had grade 3 cancer. Oestrogen receptor was positive in 176 (56%) cases, progesterone receptor was positive in 134 (43%) and HER2 receptor was positive in 24 (8%). Lymphovascular space invasion was present in 146 patients (46%), dermal invasion in 30 patients (10%) and positive margin in 14 patients (4%). The 4 year chest wall recurrence rate was 14% (95% confidence interval 5.4-26.8%) in the bolus group and only 3.5% (95% confidence interval 1.6-6.4%) in the non-bolus group. On univariate analysis, use of bolus was associated with a significant difference in chest wall recurrence (hazard ratio 3.09; 1.15-8.33; P = 0.025). However, when taking into account margin status, this significance was lost (hazard ratio = 2.45; 95% confidence interval 0.80-7.50, P = 0.12). There was a higher rate of acute grade 2 skin toxicity in patients receiving bolus compared with those without, 40% versus 21% (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The selective use of bolus resulted in a small risk of chest wall recurrence rates for low-risk patients. This suggests that the routine use of bolus in PMRT patients may be unnecessary.

Outcome of patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma referred for autologous stem-cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of potentially eligible patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma who undergo autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown. There are limited data describing their outcome in the rituximab era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 105 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven transformation referred to Princess Margaret Hospital for consideration of ASCT during 1996-2009. Patients received anthracycline or platinum-based chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Responders proceeded to stem-cell mobilization and ASCT. RESULTS: The median age at transformation was 54 (range 30-65) years. Patients received a median of two chemotherapy regimens for transformation, including rituximab in 39%. Fifty patients (48%) proceeded with ASCT and 55 (52%) did not, mainly due to progressive disease (n = 42). Three-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) post-ASCT were 54% and 42%, respectively. Patients receiving rituximab with chemotherapy before transplant had a 3-year post-ASCT OS of 71% versus 47% in those who received chemotherapy alone (P = 0.046). Patients transplanted after 2004 had a 3-year post-ASCT OS of 69% versus 39% in those receiving ASCT earlier (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: About half of transplant-eligible patients with transformation are able to undergo ASCT. Outcomes following ASCT appear to have improved over recent years, although the role of rituximab in this patient population requires further evaluation.

Large granular lymphocytosis and its impact on long-term clinical outcomes following allo-SCT.

A total of 418 patients receiving hematopoietic SCT and surviving beyond day 100 were examined for the occurrence of large granular lymphocytes (LGLs). LGL lymphocytosis was defined as the presence of at least two of the following criteria: (1) sustained lymphocytosis above 3.0 × 10(9)/L observed in at least three consecutive determinations over a time frame of 2-3 months, (2) predominance (>30%) of LGLs in peripheral blood, (3) confirmation of monoclonality by T-cell receptor analysis using PCR 77 patients developed LGL lymphocytosis during their post-transplant course with a median onset of 312 days from transplant. The cumulative incidence at 1-, 2- and 3-years was 12.3±1.8, 20.8±2.4 and 23.6±2.7%. Patients with LGL lymphocytosis showed an OS advantage (86.2 vs 53.8%, P<0.001), lower non-relapse mortality (NRM; 3.2 vs 27.3%, P<0.001) and lower relapse incidence (9.6 vs 29.4%, P<0.001). Three clinical factors were associated with the development of LGL lymphocytosis: (1) CMV seropositive recipients (CMV-R(+)) compared with CMV seronegative recipients (CMV-R(-); P<0.001) regardless of CMV serostatus of donor; (2) CMV reactivation (P<0.001); (3) chronic GVHD (P=0.007). In conclusion, the incidence of LGL lymphocytosis following allogeneic hematopoietic SCT was detected in ~20% of recipients and is associated with favorable outcomes.

Lymph node growth rate in testicular germ cell tumours: implications for computed tomography surveillance frequency.

AIM: To estimate the growth rate of lymph nodes in patients on surveillance for testicular cancer who developed recurrent disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 7-year period, 318 patients at our institution were managed by surveillance and 39 relapsed (12.3%). The computed tomography scans of 28 patients (median age 32 years; range 19-51 years) who met our inclusion criteria and who developed recurrent disease in the abdomen/pelvis were retrospectively reviewed. Thirteen patients had non-seminoma and 15 had seminoma. To estimate the lymph node growth rate, the slope of lymph node size over time was calculated. RESULTS: The median length of time from orchiectomy to the recurrence computed tomography was 131 days (range 49-520) or about 4.4 months for non-seminoma patients and 373 days (range 129-675) or about 12.3 months for seminoma patients. The median size of the involved lymph node at final computed tomography for seminoma patients was 12 mm (range 9-31 mm) and for non-seminoma patients was 15 mm (range 10-56 mm). The median lymph node growth rate for patients with seminoma was 1.35 mm/month (range 0.62-4.56) and for patients with non-seminoma 2.99 mm/month (range 0.77-7.06); the difference in growth rates was statistically significant (P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant faster growth rate of lymph nodes in patients with recurrent non-seminoma compared with patients with seminoma. This finding supports a more frequent computed tomography schedule during the first 2 years of surveillance in non-seminoma patients compared with seminoma patients.

Feasibility and safety of autotransplants with noncryopreserved marrow or peripheral blood stem cells: a systematic review.

The objective of this systematic review is to examine the feasibility and safety of autologous noncryopreserved stem-cell transplants. This technique avoids the cost of establishing and maintaining a cryopreservation facility and may be of value for transplant centers in regions with limited economic resources. The primary outcome was the graft failure rate. In addition, a detailed description of the high-dose therapy regimens employed was undertaken. Secondary outcomes were transplant-related mortality and neutrophil and platelet engraftments times. Sixteen well-conducted nonrandomized studies met the eligibility criteria. Only two cases of graft failure (0.36%) occurred among 560 assessable patients receiving high-dose therapy and autotransplant for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, germ-cell tumors and acute leukemias. The most traditional high-dose schedules were used, although often modified to shorter regimens. High-dose melphalan appeared especially useful given its short half-life and was used to treat multiple myeloma by most groups. Secondary outcomes were comparable to those reported in the most relevant studies addressing standard (cryopreserved) autotransplant. According to this study, the use of autologous noncryopreserved hematopoietic progenitors to support patients undergoing high-dose therapy is feasible and safe.

Prognostic factors and the effect of treatment with radioactive iodine and external beam radiation on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer seen at a single institution over 40 years.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic factors and the role of radioactive iodine (RAI) and external beam radiotherapy (RT) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 729 patients treated between 1958 and 1998. The median follow-up was 11.3 years (range 0.3-39.8 years). Primary outcomes included time to cause-specific survival and time to local-regional relapse. Baseline and treatment variables were assessed for statistical significance using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 10-year cause-specific survival (CSS) was 87.3% and the 10-year local-regional relapse-free rate (LRFR) was 84.9%. In multivariate analysis there was no statistically significant improvement in CSS with more aggressive treatment (i.e. more extensive surgery, the administration of RAI and/or RT). By multivariate analysis the use of RAI resulted in a statistically significant improvement in LRFR (hazard ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.8; P = 0.007). In low-risk patients at AJCC stage I < or = 45 years, there was no apparent benefit from RAI. For patients over 60, with extrathyroid extension but no gross residual disease (n = 70), adjuvant external RT resulted in statistically significantly higher CSS (10-year CSS 81.0%vs. 64.6%, P = 0.04) and LRFR (10-year LRFR 86.4%vs. 65.7%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of RAI was associated with improved LRFR but not in low-risk patients. External beam RT improved LRFR and CSS in high-risk patients.

Busulfan and cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen for allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

This study reports on overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS) of 37 consecutive patients with low- and intermediate-grade NHL receiving a related donor allogeneic BMT using a nonradiation-containing preparative regimen. In addition, transplant-related toxicity and factors influencing outcome are discussed. The preparative regimen consisted of busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Median patient age was 44 years (range 20-55). In all, 18 were female. Median follow-up of surviving patients from BMT was 4.2 years. A total of 25 patients had low-grade, and 12 intermediate grade NHL. Most patients (89%) were treated with at least two different chemotherapy regimens prior to BMT. In all, 22 patients (59%) were transplanted in partial remission, 15 (41%) in complete remission. OS at 12 months was 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) of 79-99%) and 79% (64-93%) at 60 months. RFS at 12 months was 86% (75-97%) and at 5 years 70% (54-86%). Four patients (11%) relapsed. Seven patients (19%) died, six because of treatment-related toxicity and one with relapse. Univariate analysis showed improved OS for younger patients and patients of female gender, suggesting that allogeneic BMT using busulfan-cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen can achieve disease control and possibly cure patients with NHL particularly younger ones.

Surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma - risk of late relapse.

INTRODUCTION: Surveillance is an alternative to adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I testicular seminoma. We present the long-term results of seminoma surveillance, with emphasis on quantifying the risk of late relapse beyond 5 years. METHODS: From 1981 to 1993, of 431 men with stage I testicular seminoma, 203 were managed by surveillance following radical orchidectomy. The surveillance protocol comprised a combination of clinical examination, CT scans of abdomen and pelvis, chest x-rays and serum markers, at defined intervals. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 35 men have relapsed. Five of the relapses occurred more than 5 years after orchidectomy (at 5.1, 6.9, 7.3, 7.3, and 9.0 years). The actuarial risk of relapse at 5 and 10 years was 15% (standard error [SE] 1.1%) and 18% (SE 1.8%) respectively. One hundred sixty one men were free of relapse at 5 years, and have been followed beyond this point for a median of 4.3 years. The actuarial risk of relapse between 5 and 10 years was 4% (SE 0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that there is a small but clinically significant risk of relapse more than 5 years after orchidectomy for stage I seminoma. These data support the need for long term surveillance.

The prognostic significance of the tumour infiltrating lymphocyte count in stage I testicular seminoma managed by surveillance.

The degree of lymphocytic infiltration is a significant determinant of outcome for a variety of malignancies, but its role in seminoma is unknown. 150 men with stage I testicular seminoma presenting between 1981 and 1993 were managed by surveillance following orchidectomy. The presence of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in each case was classified as high, intermediate or low. At a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 30 of the 150 men developed recurrent seminoma. On univariate analysis, the risk of relapse was associated with age < or =33 years (P=0.002), tumour diameter >6 cm (P=0.03), lymphatic or vascular invasion (P=0.04), tumour invasion of rete testis (P=0.05), and lower TIL count (P=0.02). On multivariate analysis, statistically significant predictors of risk of relapse were age < or =33 years (hazard ratio (HR) 4.6 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.7-12.2)) and tumour diameter >6 cm (HR 2.8 (CI: 1.2-6.5)). Lower TIL count was of borderline statistical significance (HR 1.8 (CI: 0.96-3.44)). The functional role of the lymphocytic infiltrate in testicular seminoma warrants further study.

A Phase II trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: A Phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin, in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Nine patients (median age 39 years) with NPC were enrolled, none had prior chemotherapy for their recurrent or metastatic disease. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) on day 1; cisplatin was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, immediately after docetaxel. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate and the secondary endpoints were duration of response, time to progression, and overall survival. A total of 45 chemotherapy cycles were administered. In an intention-to-treat analysis two patients (22%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3-60%) achieved a partial response. The median duration of response was 4.1 months, the median time to progression 8.4 months and the overall survival at 1 year from start of treatment was 76%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in all (100%) patients over 93% of the treatment cycles, and in three cases this was complicated by fever. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin has manageable toxicity but little efficacy as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic NPC. In view of the low response rate, accrual was terminated and the trial was aborted.

Symptom response after palliative radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases.

Whole brain radiotherapy (RT) is frequently used to palliate symptoms in patients with brain metastases, but the palliative benefit to patients has not been well documented. We conducted a longitudinal observational prospective study of patients receiving standard RT (20 Gray (Gy)/5 fractions) for symptomatic brain metastases. End-points were observer rating of neurological symptoms, patient-rated symptoms, performance status, neurological functional status, cognitive function and quality of life (QOL). Median survival for the 75 patients was 86 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 65-101 days). At 1 month, 19% of patients showed an improvement or resolution of presenting symptoms, 23% were stable and 55% had progressed or died. Patient-rated symptoms were increased at 1 month in comparison to baseline data. Only 4 patients had an improved performance status and 22 were stable. Many patients with brain metastases have a short life expectancy and may not benefit from even short duration radiation schedules. Further effort is needed to optimise patient selection and tailor treatment appropriately.

Radiotherapy for brain metastases: defining palliative response.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most patients with brain metastases are treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). There is no established definition of palliative response. The aim of this study was to develop and test clinically useful criteria for response following palliative WBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of patients with symptomatic brain metastases treated with WBRT (20 Gy/5 fractions) and standardised steroid tapering. Assessments included observer rating of neurological symptoms, patient-completed symptom checklist and performance status (PS). Response criteria were operationally defined based on a combination of neurological symptoms, PS and steroid dose. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were accrued. At 1 month, presenting neurological symptoms were improved in 14 patients, stable in 17, and worse in 21; 23 patients were not assessed, mainly due to death or frailty. Using response criteria defined a priori, 15% (95% CI 7-23%) of patients were classified as having a response to RT, 25% no response, and 29% progression; 27% were deceased at or soon after 1 month. A revised set of criteria was tested, with less emphasis on complete tapering of steroids: they increased the proportion of patients responding to 39% (95% CI 27-50%) but didn't change the large proportion who did not benefit (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical response to RT of patients with brain metastases is multifactorial, comprising symptoms, PS and other factors. Assessment of degree of palliation depend on the exact definition used. More research is needed in this important area, to help validate criteria for assessing palliation after WBRT.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus treated with radiation and 5-fluorouracil, with and without mitomycin C.

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus without evidence of distant metastases, who were treated with radical intent. Between 1981 and 1984, and 1989 and 1991, 98 patients were treated with radiation, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C; and between 1984 and 1989, 133 patients were treated with radiation and 5-FU without mitomycin C. Actuarial survival and local control were assessed, and prognostic factors were identified for both endpoints. The standard dose of radiation prescribed was 52 Gy to the 95% isodose in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. 5-FU was given by continuous infusion as 1 g/m2 (maximum 1.5 g)/day, for 4 days. Patients who received mitomycin C were given 10 mg/m2 (maximum 18 mg) on day 1. Survival and local relapse-free rates were estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate possible prognostic factors, including the effect of mitomycin C administration. The median survival was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval 12.7-17.2) with 31% 2-year survival (standard error (SE) 3%), and 13% 5-year survival (SE 2%). In the multivariate analysis, lower radiation dose and younger age were the only statistically significant prognostic factors for reduced overall survival and reduced relapse-free rate respectively. There was no difference in survival (chi(2) = 0.07, 1 degree of freedom (df), P=0.79) or local relapse-free rate (chi2 = 0.39, 1 df, P = 0.53) between patients treated with or without mitomycin C. The treatment was well tolerated. Further studies are required to determine the most effective combination of radiation and chemotherapy or other radiation sensitizers for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.

A retrospective analysis of the relationship between changes in serum PSA, palliative response and survival following systemic treatment in a Canadian randomized trial for symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship between changes in serum PSA, palliative response and survival following systemic treatment for symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 161 patients, treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone (M + P) (n = 80), or prednisone alone (P) (n = 81) from a Canadian randomized phase III clinical trial. PSA response was defined by > or =50% decline compared to baseline. Palliative response was defined by the primary and secondary endpoints of the trial. All responses were required to be maintained on two visits at least three weeks apart. The Cox proportional hazards model and a landmark analysis (at nine weeks) were used to evaluate survival differences between PSA responders and non-responders. RESULTS: Using an intent-to-treat analysis in which patients with missing PSA data are considered non-responders, 34% of M + P and 11% of P patients achieved a PSA response (P = 0.0001). Nineteen of thirty-six (53%) patients with PSA response and twenty-six of ninety (29%) patients without PSA response achieved a palliative response (P = 0.001 Chi-square test, phi coefficient = 0.28). From the landmark analysis. PSA responders had longer survival than non-responders (P = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, better performance status, higher hemoglobin and PSA response (P < 0.001) predicted for survival, but palliative response did not (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant but imperfect statistical association between PSA response and palliative response. PSA response was associated with longer survival. Patients treated with M + P were more likely to achieve a PSA response and a palliative response than those treated with P.

Analysis of the prognostic effects of inclusion in a clinical trial and of myelosuppression on survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment-related factors that might influence survival after adjuvant treatment for breast carcinoma include treatment as part of a clinical trial, toxicity of treatment, the regimen and schedule used, and dose intensity. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 680 patients with breast carcinoma who received adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) at Princess Margaret Hospital between 1980-1990. They analyzed the effects on survival of inclusion in a clinical trial (n = 160) and of experiencing Grade 3/4 myelosuppression (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) (n = 227, with available data for 584 patients). In an exploratory analysis, the authors examined the effects of the CMF regimen ("classic" CMF [n = 417] vs. intravenous CMF [n = 243]) and of relative dose intensity. Each of these factors was tested in a Cox proportional hazards model with the known prognostic factors of N classification, T classification, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, and use of adjuvant hormonal therapy to determine whether they provided additional prognostic information. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, inclusion in a clinical trial was associated with better survival (P = 0.02) with a nonsignificant trend when corrected for other prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.04). There was a similar trend for patients experiencing myelosuppression (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00). In exploratory analysis the use of classic CMF, with higher absolute dose intensity, also was associated with a trend toward improved survival (HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suffer from the inherent problems of retrospective analysis, but, similar to findings for other disease sites, they suggest that patients included in clinical trials have better outcome. Classic CMF should be used when this regimen is selected for adjuvant treatment, and dose adjustment resulting in moderate myelosuppression should be explored in future clinical trials.

Adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localized prostate cancer using conventional clinical end-points, and the biochemical relapse-free rate (bRFR). METHODS: Between 1987 and 1994, 113 node negative, hormonally naïve men received RT 1 month to 12 years after RP. Adjuvant RT was given for positive resection margins and/or pT3 disease. Salvage RT was given for a persistently elevated prostatic specific antigen (PSA), a rising PSA, or palpable recurrence post RP. Clinical and biochemical endpoints determined outcome. Log-rank testing and the Cox proportional hazards model identified factors predictive for biochemical relapse free rate. RESULTS: Median follow-up after RT was 3.7 years (range 0.2-9 years). Five-year clinical local control was 95% for patients with no palpable evidence of disease and 59% for those with palpable recurrence (P < 0.0001). 5-year bRFR was 81% for adjuvant RT, 19% for salvage of biochemical recurrence, 0% for patients with palpable disease (P < 0.0001). Improved bRFR for adjuvant and salvage RT was predicted by a Gleason score < 7 vs. 7 vs. > 7 (hazard ratio 1.53; 95% CI 0.99-2.35) and an undetectable pre-RT PSA vs. PSA < 2.0 ng/ml vs. PSA > 2.0 ng/ml (hazard ratio 3.81; 95% CI 2.47-5.87). Seminal vesicle involvement was not a statistically significant independent predictor of bRFR. CONCLUSIONS: The most favourable bRFR was observed for adjuvant therapy. Salvage was most successful with a pre-RT PSA < 2.0 ng/ml, or Gleason score < 7. Few patients with a pre-RT PSA > 2.0 ng/ml were salvaged, and none with palpable recurrence. These patients require investigation of alternative salvage strategies.

Long term outcome and cost in the management of stage I testicular seminoma.

PURPOSE: To validate the use of surveillance as an alternative to adjuvant RT in clinical stage I seminoma, we analyzed our experience with the two approaches in terms of long term outcome and cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1981 and December 1994, 471 patients with stage I testicular seminoma were treated at our institution. Of these, 245 patients received post-operative RT (25 Gy) to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and 226 have been managed with surveillance following orchidectomy. Two patients were included in this series twice; both had RT previously for seminoma, were placed on surveillance for a contralateral seminoma and were analyzed for outcome of both primary tumors. The costs associated with both approaches were estimated in 1994 Canadian dollars (C$). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 7.7 years in the surveillance patients, and 9.7 years in the adjuvant RT cohort, the 5 year actuarial survival for all patients was 97% and the cause-specific survival (CSS) was 99.8%. Of the 226 patients on surveillance 37 patients have relapsed to date; five of those developed a second relapse. One patient has died of disease. Of the 245 patients treated with adjuvant RT, 14 patients have relapsed and none had a second relapse. The CSS was 100%. Thirteen patients on surveillance (5.7%) and 10 patients treated with post-operative RT (4.1%) have received chemotherapy as part of their management. One hundred and eighty-nine patients on surveillance have received no post-orchidectomy treatment to date. Surveillance was more expensive with an average additional cost per patient per year of Can$2620 over 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Both adjuvant RT and surveillance give excellent results in stage I seminoma. The documented increased risk of second malignant tumors following RT must be taken into account when considering the additional cost of surveillance. The routine use of post-operative RT in stage I seminoma should be reconsidered and a surveillance program offered to all patients as an alternative management option.