Decreased platelet activation predicts hepatic decompensation and mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with cirrhosis show alterations in primary hemostasis, yet prognostic implications of changes in platelet activation remain controversial, and assay validity is often limited by thrombocytopenia. We aimed to study the prognostic role of platelet activation in cirrhosis, focusing on bleeding/thromboembolic events, decompensation, and mortality. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We prospectively included 107 patients with cirrhosis undergoing a same-day hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and platelet activation measurement. Platelet activation was assessed using flow cytometry after protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1, PAR-4, or epinephrine stimulation. Over a follow-up of 25.3 (IQR: 15.7-31.2) months, first/further decompensation occurred in 29 patients and 17 died. More pronounced platelet activation was associated with an improved prognosis, even after adjusting for systemic inflammation, HVPG, and disease severity. Specifically, higher PAR-4-inducible platelet activation was independently linked to a lower decompensation risk [adjusted HR per 100 MFI (median fluorescence intensity): 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99); p =0.036] and higher PAR-1-inducible platelet activation was independently linked to longer survival [adjusted HR per 100 MFI: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99); p =0.040]. Thromboembolic events occurred in eight patients (75% nontumoral portal vein thrombosis [PVT]). Higher epinephrine-inducible platelet activation was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis [HR per 10 MFI: 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02-1.12); p =0.007] and PVT [HR per 10 MFI: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.02-1.14); p =0.004]. In contrast, of the 11 major bleedings that occurred, 9 were portal hypertension related, and HVPG thus emerged as the primary risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Preserved PAR-1- and PAR-4-inducible platelet activation was linked to a lower risk of decompensation and death. In contrast, higher epinephrine-inducible platelet activation was a risk factor for thromboembolism and PVT.

Platelet Function Decreases with Increasing Severity of Liver Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension-A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhotic patients display an increased risk for both bleeding and thrombosis. We investigated platelet activation across Child-Pugh stages (CPSs) and portal hypertension (PH) severity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 110 cirrhotic patients were prospectively included. CPS and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were determined. Platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa were measured by flow cytometry before/after stimulation with protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 (thrombin receptor activating peptide, TRAP) and PAR-4 (AYPGKF) agonists, epinephrine, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). RESULTS: Platelet count was similar across CPS but lower with increasing PH severity. Expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to TRAP and AYPGKF was significantly reduced in platelets of CPS-B/C versus CPS-A patients (all p < 0.05). Platelet P-selectin expression upon epinephrine and LPS stimulation was reduced in CPS-C patients, while activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to these agonists was lower in CPS-B/C (all p < 0.05). Regarding PH severity, P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to AYPGKF were lower in HVPG ≥20 mmHg patients (both p < 0.001 vs. HVPG < 10 mmHg). Similarly, activated GPIIb/IIIa was lower in HVPG ≥20 mmHg patients after TRAP stimulation (p < 0.01 vs. HVPG < 10 mmHg). The lower platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa upon stimulation of thrombin receptors (PAR-1/PAR-4) in CPS-B/C and HVPG ≥20 mmHg patients was paralleled by reduced antithrombin-III levels in those patients (all p < 0.05). Overall, PAR-1- and PAR-4-mediated platelet activation correlated with antithrombin-III levels (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Platelet responsiveness decreases with increasing severity of liver cirrhosis and PH but is potentially counterbalanced by lower antithrombin-III levels.

Microvascular Thrombosis as a Critical Factor in Severe COVID-19.

Platelet-endothelial interactions have a critical role in microcirculatory function, which maintains tissue homeostasis. The subtle equilibrium between platelets and the vessel wall is disturbed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which affects all three components of Virchow's triad (endothelial injury, stasis and a hypercoagulable state). Endotheliitis, vasculitis, glycocalyx degradation, alterations in blood flow and viscosity, neutrophil extracellular trap formation and microparticle shedding are only few pathomechanisms contributing to endothelial damage and microthrombosis resulting in capillary plugging and tissue ischemia. In the following opinion paper, we discuss major pathological processes leading to microvascular endothelial activation and thrombosis formation as a possible major adverse factor driving the deterioration of patient disease course in severe COVID-19.

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Is Associated with Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are a risk factor for adverse outcomes, including mortality. We investigated the association of growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, an established predictor of bleeding complications, with on-treatment platelet reactivity in ACS patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP, a protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) agonist), AYPGKF (a PAR-4 agonist) and collagen (COL). GDF-15 levels were measured using a commercially available assay. GDF-15 correlated inversely with MEA ADP (r = -0.202, p = 0.004), MEA AA (r = -0.139, p = 0.048) and MEA TRAP (r = -0.190, p = 0.007). After adjustment, GDF-15 was significantly associated with MEA TRAP (ß = -0.150, p = 0.044), whereas no significant associations were detectable for the other agonists. Patients with low platelet reactivity in response to ADP had significantly higher GDF-15 levels (p = 0.005). In conclusion, GDF-15 is inversely associated with TRAP-inducible platelet aggregation in ACS patients treated with state-of-the-art antiplatelet therapy and significantly elevated in patients with low platelet reactivity in response to ADP.

Impact of ABO Blood Group on Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The ABO blood group system is linked to hemostasis via its relationship with von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII). In the current study, we investigated the association of the ABO system with clinical outcomes as well as VWF and platelet function in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). METHODS: Bleeding and thromboembolic complications were assessed in 111 patients during 1 year after LVAD implantation. In 67 LVAD patients, VWF antigen, VWF activity, VWF ristocetin cofactor, VWF collagen-binding, and FVIII activity were assessed. Platelet surface P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa were determined by flow cytometry, and soluble P-selectin was measured with an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission and impedance aggregometry. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (32.4%) experienced a bleeding and 22 patients (19.8%) a thromboembolic event. In univariate analyses, patients with blood group O had numerically more bleeding complications and less thromboembolic events as compared to patients with blood group non-O (both p ≥ 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, blood group O was significantly associated with a higher risk of bleeding (hazard ratio 2.42 [95% confidence interval 1.03-5.70], p = 0.044) but not linked to thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSION: Patients with blood group O had significantly lower levels of VWF and FVIII (all p < 0.05), whereas P-selectin expression in response to thrombin-receptor activating peptide and soluble P-selectin were higher as compared to patients with blood group non-O (both p < 0.05). LVAD patients with blood group O are at an increased bleeding risk, potentially due to lower VWF and FVIII levels.

Impact of body size on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndrome on dual antiplatelet therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention receive dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. Recurrent myocardial infarction or bleedings are possibly due to under- or overdosing of antiplatelet therapy in relation to body size. METHODS: We correlated residual platelet aggregation with body mass index, body surface area, lean body mass and blood volume in 220 patients on prasugrel (n = 121) or ticagrelor (n = 99). RESULTS: Platelet aggregation outside the recommended window was recorded in 85 patients, but not correlated with any of the body indices. CONCLUSION: Body size does not affect platelet response to prasugrel or ticagrelor at the guideline-recommended fixed dosages.

Protease-activated receptor-mediated platelet aggregation in patients with type 2 diabetes on potent P2Y12 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in the secondary prevention of ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The new P2Y12 receptor inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor have been shown to improve patients' outcomes. Whether or not these drugs have equal efficacy in individuals with or without diabetes is disputed. Furthermore, platelets can be activated by thrombin, which is, at least in part, independent of P2Y12 -mediated platelet activation. Protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and -4 are thrombin receptors on human platelets. We sought to compare the in vitro efficacy of prasugrel (n = 121) and ticagrelor (n = 99) to inhibit PAR-mediated platelet aggregation in individuals with type 2 diabetes (prasugrel n = 26, ticagrelor n = 29). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared P2Y12 -, PAR-1- and PAR-4-mediated platelet aggregation as assessed by multiple electrode platelet aggregometry between prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients without and with type 2 diabetes who underwent acute PCI. RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences of P2Y12 -, PAR-1- and PAR-4-mediated platelet aggregation between prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. However, both drugs inhibited P2Y12 -mediated platelet aggregation stronger, and thereby to a similar extent in patients with type 2 diabetes than in those without diabetes. There was no correlation between either P2Y12 -, or PAR-1- or PAR-4-mediated platelet aggregation and levels of HbA1c or the body mass index (BMI). However, we observed patients with high residual platelet reactivity in response to PAR-1 and PAR-4 stimulation in all cohorts. CONCLUSION: Prasugrel and ticagrelor inhibit P2Y12 - and PAR-mediated platelet aggregation in individuals with diabetes to a similar extent, irrespective of HbA1c levels and BMI.

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Correlates Inversely with Protease-Activated Receptor-1-Mediated Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 inhibits platelet activation, prevents thrombus formation, and has been linked to bleeding events. This was a prospective study including 51 left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients on aspirin and phenprocoumon. Platelet surface expression of activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa was assessed by flow cytometry, and platelet aggregation was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in response to arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), a protease-activated-receptor-1 (PAR-1) agonist. GDF-15 was determined with a commercially-available assay. There was a trend towards an inverse correlation of GDF-15 with activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to TRAP (r = -0.275, p = 0.0532) but not in response to AA and ADP. Moreover, GDF-15 correlated with MEA TRAP (r = -0.326, p = 0.0194), whereas it did not correlate with MEA ADP and MEA AA. In a second step, GDF-15 levels in the fourth quartile were defined as high GDF-15. Patients with high GDF-15 showed significantly lower TRAP-inducible platelet aggregation by MEA compared to patients in the first quartile (63 AU vs. 113 AU, p = 0.0065). In conclusion, in LVAD patients receiving state-of-the-art antithrombotic therapy, GDF-15 correlates inversely with residual platelet reactivity via PAR-1.

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Marker of Platelet Activation in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors.

A high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has recently been associated with ischemic outcomes in cardiovascular disease. Increased platelet reactivity and leukocyte-platelet aggregate formation are directly involved in the progress of atherosclerosis and have been linked to ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In order to understand the relation of PLR with platelet reactivity, we assessed PLR as well as agonist-inducible platelet aggregation and neutrophil-platelet aggregate (NPA) formation in 182 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel (n = 96) or ticagrelor (n = 86) 3 days after PCI. PLR was calculated from the blood count. Platelet aggregation was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry and NPA formation was determined by flow cytometry, both in response to ADP and SFLLRN. A PLR ≥91 was considered as high PLR based on previous data showing an association of this threshold with adverse ischemic outcomes. In the overall cohort and in prasugrel-treated patients, high PLR was associated with higher SFLLRN-inducible platelet aggregation (67 AU [50-85 AU] vs 59.5 AU [44.3-71.3 AU], P = .01, and 73 AU [50-85 AU] vs 61.5 AU [46-69 AU], P = .02, respectively). Further, prasugrel-treated patients with high PLR exhibited higher ADP- (15% [11%-23%] vs 10.9% [7.6%-15.9%], P = .007) and SFLLRN-inducible NPA formation (64.3% [55.4%-73.8%] vs 53.8% [44.1%-70.1%], P = .01) as compared to patients with low PLR. These differences were not seen in ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, high PLR is associated with increased on-treatment platelet reactivity in prasugrel-treated patients, but not in patients on ticagrelor.

Cardiac remodeling in ambitious endurance-trained amateur athletes older than 50 years-an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Data on cardiac remodeling in veteran athletes are conflicting but of clinical importance. METHODS: Sixty-nine clinically stable and healthy individuals >50 years were identified (median 55 (IQR 52-64), 26% female). Echocardiographic features were identified in individuals, who have performed endurance sports at 70% of their maximum heart rate for at least 1 hour 3 times/ week over the previous 5 years. RESULTS: Median training time in all participants was 6 hours per week. Therefore, based on these 6 hours of weekly training, participants were grouped into 45 ambitious endurance-trained amateur athletes (EAA) and 24 recreationally active endurance-trained athletes (RAP) training ≥6 hours (6-10) and <6 hours (3.5-5), respectively. Left ventricular (LV) diameters were slightly larger in EAA than in RAP (27 mm/m2 (25-28) vs. 25 mm/m2 (24-27), p = 0.023) and EAA showed preserved diastolic function (p = 0.028) with lower E/E' ratio (7 (6-9) vs. 9 (7-10), p = 0.039). Interventricular septal thickness and relative wall thickness ratio were similar. Global right ventricular and LV strain were similar, but left atrial (LA) reservoir strain was higher in EAA than in RAP (27% (22-34) vs. 20% (15-29), p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Endurance training in healthy athletes >50 years is not associated with chamber dilatation or LV hypertrophy. A weekly training duration of ≥6 hours seems beneficial to preserve diastolic function associated with an increased LA reservoir function.

Peripheral versus central venous blood sampling does not influence the assessment of platelet activation in cirrhosis.

Cirrhotic patients have an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events, with platelets being involved as key players in both situations. The impact of peripheral versus central blood sampling on platelet activation remains unclear. In 33 cirrhotic patients, we thus analyzed platelet function in peripheral (P) and central (C) blood samples. Platelet surface expression of P-selectin, activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, and leukocyte-platelet aggregate formation were measured by flow cytometry in response to different agonists: thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6, adenosine diphosphate, collagen-related peptide (CrP), epinephrine, AYPGKF, Pam3CSK4, and lipopolysaccharide. Unstimulated platelet surface expression of P-selectin (p = .850) and activated GPIIb/IIIa (p = .625) were similar in peripheral and central blood samples. Stimulation with various agonists yielded similar results of platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa in peripheral and central samples, except for CrP-inducible expression of activated GPIIb/IIIa (median fluorescence intensity, MFI in P: 7.61 [0.00-24.66] vs. C: 4.12 [0.00-19.04], p < .001). The formation of leukocyte-platelet aggregate was similar in central and peripheral blood samples, both unstimulated and after stimulation with all above-mentioned agonists. In conclusion, peripheral vs. central venous blood sampling does not influence the assessment of platelet activation by flow cytometry in cirrhosis.Abbreviations: ACLD: advanced chronic liver disease; ADP: adenosine diphosphate; ALD: alcoholic liver disease; AYPGKF: PAR-4 agonist AYPGKF; CrP: collagen related protein; EPI: epinephrine; FACS: fluorescence-activated cell sorting; GP: glycoprotein; HVPG: hepatic venous pressure gradient; IQR: interquartile range; LPS: lipopolysaccharide; LSM: liver stiffness measurement; MFI: median fluorescence intensity; NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PAM: lipopeptide Pam3CSK4; PAR: protease-activated receptor; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; PH: portal hypertension; TIPS: transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt; TLR: toll-like receptor; TRAP-6: thrombin receptor-activator peptide-6; vWF: von Willebrand factor.

Platelet activation and aggregation in different centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve outcomes in end-stage heart failure patients. Two centrifugal-flow LVAD systems are currently approved, HeartMate 3 (HM3) and Medtronic/Heartware HVAD (HVAD). Clinical findings suggest differences in thrombogenicity between both systems. We compared markers of platelet activation and aggregation between HM3 and HVAD. We prospectively included 59 LVAD patients (40 HM3, 19 HVAD). Platelet P-selectin expression, activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa and monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPA) were assessed by flow-cytometry. Platelet aggregation was measured by light-transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple-electrode aggregometry (MEA). Von-Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity (VWF:Ac), and VWF multimer pattern analysis were determined. Soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) was measured with an enzyme-linked immunoassay. P-selectin, GPIIb/IIIa and MPA levels in vivo and in response to arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, and thrombin receptor activating peptide were similar between HM3 and HVAD (all p > .05). Likewise, agonist-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not differ between HM3 and HVAD (all p > .05). VWF:Ag levels and FVIII:C were similar between both systems (both p > .05), but patients with HVAD had significantly lower VWF:Ac (p = .011) and reduced large VWF multimers (p = .013). Finally, sP-selectin levels were similar in patients with HVAD and HM3 (p = .845). In conclusion, on-treatment platelet activation and aggregation are similar in HM3 and HVAD patients. Potential clinical implications of observed differences in VWF profiles between both LVAD systems need to be addressed in future clinical trials.

Sex-specific platelet activation through protease-activated receptor-1 in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1-mediated platelet activation may vary according to sex and clinical situation. In order to investigate sex-specific platelet activation through PAR-1, we assessed platelet response to thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) in 562 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization without (Group 1A) and with (Group 1B) acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Subsequently, we sought to confirm our findings in 287 patients undergoing elective (Group 2A) or acute (Group 2B) percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: TRAP-stimulated platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) were measured by flow cytometry in Group 1. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in response to TRAP were assessed in Group 2. RESULTS: In Group 1A, platelet activation in response to TRAP was significantly higher in women compared to men (P-selectin: 511 MFI [443-597 MFI] vs. 471 MFI [393-552 MFI]; GPIIb/IIIa: 84 MFI [58-119 MFI] vs. 70 MFI [47-103 MFI]; both p ≤ 0.002). In contrast, in Group 1B, TRAP-stimulated P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa were similar in men and women (both p ≥ 0.3). Likewise, TRAP-stimulated platelet aggregation was significantly higher in female patients in Group 2A (LTA: 66% [54-76%] vs. 51% [41-65%]; MEA: 78 AU [66-107 AU] vs. 62 AU [52-88 AU]; both p ≤ 0.02), whereas men and women in Group 2 B had similar platelet aggregation (p = 0.5). The occurrence of ischemic endpoints did not differ significantly between men and women in Group 1A and Group 1B. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet PAR-1 signaling is more pronounced in women than in men without ACS. In ACS, however, PAR-1-mediated platelet activation is similar in male and female patients.

Circulating MicroRNAs and Monocyte-Platelet Aggregate Formation in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs) are a sensitive marker of in vivo platelet activation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and associated with clinical outcomes. MicroRNAs (miRs) play an important role in the regulation of platelet activation, and may influence MPA formation. Both, miRs and MPA, could be influenced by the type of P2Y12 inhibitor. AIM: To study the association of platelet-related miRs with MPA formation in ACS patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and to compare miRs and MPA levels between prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 10 circulating platelet-related miRs in 160 consecutive ACS patients on DAPT with low-dose aspirin and either prasugrel (n = 80) or ticagrelor (n = 80). MPA formation was measured by flow cytometry without addition of platelet agonists and after simulation with the toll-like receptor (TLR)-1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4, adenosine diphosphate (ADP), or arachidonic acid (AA). In multivariate regression analyses, we identified miR-21 (ß = 9.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60-17.40, p = 0.019) and miR-126 (ß = 7.50, 95% CI: 0.55-14.44, p = 0.035) as independent predictors of increased MPA formation in vivo and after TLR-1/2 stimulation. In contrast, none of the investigated miRs was independently associated with MPA formation after stimulation with ADP or AA. Platelet-related miR expression and MPA formation did not differ significantly between prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Platelet-related miR-21 and miR-126 are associated with MPA formation in ACS patients on DAPT. miRs and MPA levels were similar in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Implications for Platelet Reactivity?

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are preferred over angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). However, in a recent pilot study, treatment with ACE inhibitors was associated with increased platelet reactivity compared to ARBs. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with ACE inhibitors and ARBs on platelet aggregation in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: On-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), SFLLRN, AYPGKF, and collagen was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 197 ACS patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and either prasugrel or ticagrelor. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five (83.7%) patients were treated with ACE inhibitors, 32 (16.3%) with ARBs. On-treatment residual AA- and ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly higher in patients with ACE inhibitors (both p < 0.05). Likewise, SFLLRN was significantly higher in patients with ACE inhibitors (p = 0.036) and there was a trend for higher AYPGKF- and collagen-inducible platelet reactivity (p = 0.053 and p = 0.082). The incidence of high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity AA was significantly higher in patients with ACE inhibitors (52 [31.5%] vs. 3 [9.4%] patients; p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: ACE inhibitors are associated with increased on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in ACS patients with potent DAPT. Further clinical trials are needed to elucidate the role of RAAS blockade with ACE inhibitors and ARBs in ACS patients treated according to current standards.

Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors.

Since data on the agreement between light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in patients on the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors are missing so far, we investigated if the evaluation of the responsiveness to therapy by LTA can be replaced by MEA in 160 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 80 each). Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) were defined according to previous studies showing an association of HRPR with the occurrence of adverse ischemic outcomes. ADP- inducible platelet aggregation was 33% and 37% (P = 0.07) by LTA and 19 AU and 20 AU (P = 0.38) by MEA in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. AA- inducible platelet aggregation was 2% and 3% by LTA and 15 AU and 16 AU by MEA, (all P ≥ 0.3) in patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. By LTA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 5%/5% and in 4%/ 13% of patients receiving prasugrel- and ticagrelor, respectively. By MEA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 3%/ 25% and 0%/24% of prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by MEA correlated significantly with LTA ADP in prasugrel-treated patients (r = 0.4, P < 0.001), but not in those receiving ticagrelor (r = 0.09, P = 0.45). AA-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not correlate in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Sensitivity/specificity of HRPR by MEA to detect HRPR by LTA were 25%/99% for MEA ADP and 100%/79% for MEA AA in prasugrel-treated patients, and 0%/100% for MEA ADP and 70%/83% for MEA AA in ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by LTA and MEA shows a significant correlation in prasugrel- but not ticagrelor-treated patients. However, in both groups LTA and MEA revealed heterogeneous results regarding the classification of patients as responders or non-responders to P2Y12 inhibition.

Mean Corpuscular Volume Predicts Adverse Outcomes Following Peripheral Angioplasty With Stenting and Is Associated With On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity.

Structural aspects of red blood cells have been associated with cardiovascular disease. No data linking mean corpuscular volume (MCV) to clinical outcomes and on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are available. We investigated a composite of atherothrombotic events and target vessel restenosis or reocclusion following infrainguinal stenting for stable PAD. Residual platelet reactivity was measured by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow assays. We included 104 patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel. In receiver-operating characteristic analysis, MCV effectively discriminated between patients with and without adverse outcomes and identified a MCV ≤90.8 fL as optimal cutoff. Adverse outcomes occurred significantly more often in patients with low MCV (log-rank P = .002). In univariable Cox regression analysis, low MCV was associated with an increased risk of future adverse outcomes (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.662 [95%CI: 1.304-5.434]; P = .007) and remained significantly associated after adjustment (HR: 2.591 [95%CI: 1.242-5.403]; P = .011). Mean corpuscular volume was inversely correlated with arachidonic acid (AA)- and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity by LTA and with the VerifyNow aspirin assay. Low MCV is associated with adverse outcomes over 2 years following infrainguinal stenting. Mean corpuscular volume correlates inversely with AA- and ADP-inducible platelet reactivity during DAPT.

Decreased Platelet Inhibition by Thienopyridines in Hyperuricemia.

PURPOSE: Hyperuricemia carries an increased risk of atherothrombotic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This may at least in part be due to inadequate P2Y12 inhibition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the potential association between hyperuricemia and decreased platelet inhibition by P2Y12 antagonists. METHODS: Levels of uric acid as well as on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were assessed in 301 clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing elective angioplasty and stenting, and in 206 prasugrel- (n = 118) or ticagrelor-treated (n = 88) ACS patients following acute PCI. Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity (HRPR) were based on previous studies showing an association of test results with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Hyperuricemia was significantly associated with increased on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients in univariate analyses and after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics by multivariate regression analyses. In contrast, ticagrelor-treated patients without and with hyperuricemia showed similar levels of on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP. HRPR occurred more frequently in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients with hyperuricemia than in those with normal uric acid levels. In contrast, hyperuricemic patients receiving ticagrelor did not have a higher risk of HRPR compared with those with normal uric acid levels. CONCLUSION: Hyperuricemia is associated with decreased platelet inhibition by thienopyridines but a normal response to ticagrelor. It remains to be established if lowering uric acid increases the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and prasugrel in hyperuricemic patients with HRPR.

Residual platelet reactivity in low-dose aspirin-treated patients with class 1 obesity.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest a decreased clinical efficacy of low-dose aspirin in patients weighing ≥70 kg. We therefore investigated the impact of body weight and class 1 obesity on thromboxane generation and platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid (AA) in 316 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy following angioplasty and stenting. METHODS: Platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa in response to AA were determined by flow cytometry as sensitive markers of platelet activation. Urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (11-dehydro-TXB2) and serum TXB2 were measured by commercially-available immunoassays. On-treatment residual AA-inducible platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow aspirin assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). RESULTS: Class 1 obesity was independently associated with increased platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa, but not with urinary 11-dehydro-TXB2, serum TXB2, and on-treatment platelet aggregation by all assays. Of all measured parameters, only MEA showed a positive albeit very weak correlation with body weight (r = 0.13, p = 0.02). Furthermore, the results of all tests did not differ significantly between patients without and with a body weight ≥ 70 kg. After adjustment for age and diabetes by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the frequency of high-on treatment residual TXB2 generation and high on-treatment residual AA-inducible platelet reactivity (HRTG/HRPR) did not differ significantly between obese and non-obese patients. CONCLUSION: Class 1 obesity is associated with enhanced platelet activation in response to AA in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. This seems to be independent of cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition and does not translate into HRTG/HRPR.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratios Predict Target Vessel Restenosis after Infrainguinal Angioplasty with Stent Implantation.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR) ratios are associated with the occurrence of critical limb ischemia in peripheral artery disease (PAD). We therefore investigated whether PLR, NLR or LMR are linked to target vessel restenosis (TVR) following infrainguinal angioplasty and stenting. Moreover, we studied on-treatment platelet reactivity and neutrophil-platelet aggregate (NPA) formation as potential underlying mechanisms. Platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts were determined one day after angioplasty and stenting in 95 stable PAD patients. Platelet reactivity and NPA formation in response to protease-activated receptor-1 stimulation were measured by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and flow cytometry, respectively. PLR and NLR were significantly higher in patients who subsequently developed TVR (both p < 0.05). In contrast, LMR did not differ significantly between patients without and with TVR (p = 0.28). A PLR ≥ 91 and NLR ≥2.75 were identified as the best thresholds to predict TVR, providing sensitivities of 87.5% and 81.3%, and specificities of 34.9% and 50.8%, respectively, and were therefore defined as high PLR and high NLR. TVR occurred significantly more often in patients with high PLR and high NLR than in those with lower ratios (both p < 0.05). Patients with high PLR and high NLR exhibited significantly increased on-treatment platelet aggregation compared to those with lower ratios, and patients with high PLR had higher levels of NPA formation (all p < 0.01). In conclusion, PLR and NLR predict TVR after infrainguinal angioplasty with stent implantation. Platelet activation and neutrophil-platelet interaction may be involved in the underlying pathomechanisms.