Drug allergy passport and other documentation for patients with drug hypersensitivity - An ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group Position Paper.

The strongest and best-documented risk factor for drug hypersensitivity (DH) is the history of a previous reaction. Accidental exposures to drugs may lead to severe or even fatal reactions in sensitized patients. Preventable prescription errors are common. They are often due to inadequate medical history or poor risk assessment of recurrence of drug reaction. Proper documentation is essential information for the doctor to make sound therapeutic decision. The European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology have formed a task force and developed a drug allergy passport as well as general guidelines of drug allergy documentation. A drug allergy passport, a drug allergy alert card, a certificate, and a discharge letter after medical evaluation are adequate means to document DH in a patient. They are to be handed to the patient who is advised to carry the documentation at all times especially when away from home. A drug allergy passport should at least contain information on the culprit drug(s) including international nonproprietary name, clinical manifestations including severity, diagnostic measures, potential cross-reactivity, alternative drugs to prescribe, and where more detailed information can be obtained from the issuer. It should be given to patients only after full allergy workup. In the future, electronic prescription systems with alert functions will become more common and should include the same information as in paper-based documentation.

Phase II clinical investigation of gemcitabine in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and window evaluation of dose rate on gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and optimal dose rate of gemcitabine in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) by comparing levels of gemcitabine triphosphate (GTP) in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients receiving two different dose rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six assessable patients with STS (17 gastrointestinal [GI] leiomyosarcomas and 39 other histologies) were treated on a two-arm phase II study. Gemcitabine was given at 1 g/m2 as a 30-minute infusion weekly for up to 7 weeks followed by 1 week of rest and reassessment of tumor. Subsequent cycles were given at 1 g/m2 weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest. Nine patients underwent cellular pharmacologic studies at two different dose rates (1 g/m2 over a standard 30-minute infusion on week 1 and over pharmacologically based infusion of 150 minutes on week 2) to evaluate GTP levels in PBMCs. RESULTS: Seven partial responses were noted among 39 patients, for an overall response rate of 18% (95% confidence interval, 7% to 29%). Median duration of response was 3.5 months (range, 2 to 13 months). Four of 10 patients with non-GI leiomyosarcomas achieved a partial response. No objective responses were noted in 17 patients with GI leiomyosarcomas. One patient had a mixed response. Median time to progression for all patients (both arms) was 3 months; median survival was 13.9 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Comparison of cellular pharmacology demonstrated a significant 1.4-fold increase in the concentration of GTP with the 150-minute infusion. CONCLUSION: Given the limited therapeutic armamentarium for STS, the activity of gemcitabine is encouraging. Its potential for combination therapy in the salvage setting should be studied with pharmacologically guided fixed dose-rate infusion.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative morbidity in soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoCT) does not increase morbidity in patients undergoing radical surgery for soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 309 patients who presented to The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center for definitive surgical management of primary soft tissue sarcomas were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred five patients who received NeoCT were compared with 204 patients who had surgery first (Surg). Patients had extremity sarcomas (71 NeoCT patients and 130 Surg patients) or retroperitoneal/visceral sarcomas (34 NeoCT and 74 Surg). RESULTS: NeoCT patients had larger tumors (median, 12 v 8 cm), more frequently had high-grade tumors (90% v 64%), and were younger (median age 47 v 55 years). The incidence of surgical complications was not different for NeoCT patients than for Surg patients, both in those with extremity sarcomas (34% v 41%) and in those with retroperitoneal/visceral sarcomas (29% v 34%). The most common complications were wound infections and other wound complications. Preoperative radiation therapy, autologous flap coverage, and extremity tumors were associated with increased wound complications. No significant differences in length of hospital stay, rate of readmission, or rate of reoperation for complications were found between the NeoCT and Surg groups. One of the three postoperative deaths in our series occurred in the NeoCT group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective review, there was no evidence that NeoCT increased postoperative morbidity in patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Phase II study of CI-980 (NSC 635370) in patients with previously treated advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.

Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are the two most active agents in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas. Patients whose tumors have failed these two drugs have very limited systemic therapy options. It is, therefore, important to identify newer drugs with activity against this disease. CI-980 is a synthetic mitotic inhibitor that binds to tubulin at the colchicine binding site and inhibits the polymerization of tubulin and blocks cell cycle progression in mitosis. Given its broad spectrum activity against several solid tumor models in vivo, we decided to perform a phase 2 study of this drug in previously treated soft-tissue sarcomas. A total of 18 eligible and evaluable patients were entered in the first stage of the trial. The median age was 53 yrs (range, 17-72). No objective responses have been noted. Six patients had stable disease after a median of 3.5 cycles of chemotherapy while 12 others had progressive disease. A total of 48 cycles were administered, 42 of which were administered at dose level 0 (4.5 mg/m2/d x 3). The median AGC nadir was 1.2/microl(0.1 -4.7) on day 10 and the median platelet nadir was 150,000/microl (31,000-338,000). Twenty cycles were complicated with grade 3-4 neutropenia and two cycles were complicated with FUO. There were no CNS toxicities. One patient had a grade 1 thrombophlebitis in 2 cycles and one other patient had a grade 4 thrombophlebitis in one cycle. In conclusion, CI-980 was well tolerated at this dose and schedule but inactive in soft-tissue sarcomas.

Results of two consecutive trials of dose-intensive chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide in patients with sarcomas.

The authors evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of dose-intensive doxorubicin and ifosfamide combination chemotherapy in patients with sarcomas. From January 1995 to April 1996, 33 evaluable patients with either metastatic sarcoma or primary sarcomas with a high-risk for metastases (all except one was previously untreated with chemotherapy) were treated on two consecutive protocols. The median age was 45 years (range, 15-68 years). The first protocol included doxorubicin at 75 mg/m2 given as a 72-hour infusion on days 1 to 3 along with ifosfamide at 2 g/m2/d over 2 hours x 5, days 1 to 5 (protocol AI 75/10). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used only if indicated according to American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. The second protocol included doxorubicin at 90 mg/m2 as a 72-hour continuous infusion and ifosfamide at 2.5 g/m2/d for 4 days (protocol AI 90/10) with prophylactic G-CSF. A median of four cycles were administered (range, 1-6). Three patients achieved a pathologic complete response (CR) and 18 patients achieved a partial response (PR) for a response rate (RR) of 64% (95% confidence interval (CI), 45-80%). Response rate for the subset of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas was 66% (95% CI, 46-82%). Only three patients progressed on therapy. Febrile neutropenia was noted in 31% of cycles at AI 75/10 and in 56% of cycles at AI 90/10. One patient developed reversible grade 3 central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. There was one treatment-related death on AI 90/10 secondary to doxorubicin cardiac toxicity at a cumulative dose of 435 mg/m2. Dose-intensive doxorubicin plus ifosfamide is feasible in appropriately selected patients and appears to be a very active regimen in patients with sarcomas. The authors are currently testing this regimen with G-CSF and thrombopoietin.

High-dose ifosfamide in bone and soft tissue sarcomas: results of phase II and pilot studies--dose-response and schedule dependence.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) at a total dose of 14 g/m2 per cycle with mesna in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in adult patients with sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1991 and February 1994, 74 patients with sarcomas (37 bone and 37 soft tissue) were treated on two simultaneous phase II studies that evaluated HDI given as a continuous infusion over 74 hours. G-CSF was started on day 5 at 5 microg/kg/d until recovery of granulocyte count. Additionally, between March 1993 and March 1994, 15 similar patients with previously treated bone or soft tissue sarcomas were treated on a pilot study in which the same total dose of ifosfamide was administered by a bolus schedule, along with mesna and G-CSF. Patients were treated until maximal response, and where possible, surgical resection of gross disease was performed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients from the phase II study using continuous infusion are assessable for response. Four complete responses (CRs) and 17 partial responses (PRs) were noted, for an overall response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 39%). The response rate was 40% (95% CI, 24% to 56%) for bone sarcomas and 19% (95% CI, 6% to 32%) for soft tissue sarcomas. Fourteen patients from the pilot study that used a bolus schedule are assessable for response. One CR and seven PRs were noted, for an overall response rate of 57% (95% CI, 31% to 83%) and a response rate of 45% for soft tissue sarcomas. Two patients developed grade 3 to 4 renal toxicity, three developed grade 3 CNS toxicity, one had possible grade 3 cardiac toxicity, and two developed severe painful peripheral neuropathy. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: HDI at 14 g/m2 with mesna and G-CSF is an active salvage regimen for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas. There is a definite positive dose-response curve, and bolus administration appears to be more active than continuous infusion.

Stimulation of megakaryocyte and platelet production by a single dose of recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is frequently encountered in patients with cancer. It is associated with an increased risk for clinically important bleeding episodes, which increases the demand for platelet transfusion. OBJECTIVE: To assess hematopoietic response to and clinical tolerance of recombinant human thrombopoietin, a recently cloned novel cytokine. DESIGN: Phase I and II clinical cohort study. SETTING: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. PATIENTS: 12 patients with sarcoma who had high risk for severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. INTERVENTION: A single intravenous dose of thrombopoietin (0.3 to 2.4 micrograms/kg of body weight) 3 weeks before chemotherapy. MEASUREMENTS: Peripheral blood and bone marrow evaluation before and after thrombopoietin administration. RESULTS: A single dose of thrombopoietin was associated with an increase in platelet counts (mean increase from baseline, 61% to 213%; P = 0.002) in a dose-related manner. This increase began by day 4 in most patients and peaked on a median of day 12. This sustained response was associated with a prolonged serum thrombopoietin half life (20 to 30 hours). The platelets appeared morphologically normal and showed normal aggregation in response to various agonists. Platelet response was accompanied by a dose-related increase in bone marrow megakaryocytes (as much as 4-fold); the expansion of the bone marrow progenitors of myeloid, erythroid, multipotential, and megakaryocytic lineages; and the marked mobilization of progenitors (maximum, 5.7-fold to 10-fold) of multiple cell lineages in the peripheral blood. Treatment was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombopoietin, administered as a single dose, is a potent stimulus for prolonged platelet production in humans. It merits further evaluation for the prevention and treatment of thrombocytopenia.

Mismatch repair gene defects in sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.

Microsatellite instability has been observed in both sporadic and hereditary forms of colorectal cancer. In the hereditary form, this instability is generally due to germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. However, only one in ten patients with sporadic tumours exhibiting microsatellite instability had a detectable germline mutation. Moreover, only three of seven sporadic tumour cell lines with microsatellite instability had mutations in a MMR gene, and these mutations could occur somatically. These results demonstrate that tumours can acquire somatic mutations that presumably do not directly affect cell growth but result only in genetic instability. They also suggest that many sporadic tumours with microsatellite instability have alterations in genes other than the four now known to participate in MMR.