Bone material strength index as measured by in vivo impact microindentation is normal in subjects with high-energy trauma fractures.

Bone material properties were assessed using impact microindentation in patients with high-energy trauma fractures. Compared to patients with low-energy trauma fractures, bone material strength index was significantly higher in patients with high-energy trauma fractures, and did not differ between patients with osteopenia and those with osteoporosis within each trauma group. INTRODUCTION: Impact microindentation (IMI) is a technique to assess tissue-level properties of bone at the tibia. Bone material strength index (BMSi), measured by IMI, is decreased in patients with low-energy trauma fractures, independently of areal bone mineral density (aBMD), but there is no information about BMSi in patients with high-energy trauma fractures. In the present study, we evaluated tissue-level properties of bone with IMI in patients with high-energy trauma fractures. METHODS: BMSi was measured 3.0 months (IQR 2.0-5.8) after the fracture in 40 patients with high-energy trauma and 40 age- and gender-matched controls with low-energy trauma fractures using the OsteoProbe® device. RESULTS: Mean age of high- and low-energy trauma patients was 57.7 ± 9.1 and 57.2 ± 7.7 years, respectively (p = 0.78). Fracture types were comparable in high- vs low-energy trauma patients. Lumbar spine (LS)-aBMD, but not femoral neck (FN)-aBMD, was higher in high- than in low-energy trauma patients (LS 0.96 ± 0.13 vs 0.89 ± 0.13 g/cm2, p = 0.02; FN 0.75 ± 0.09 vs 0.72 ± 0.09 g/cm2, p = 0.09). BMSi was significantly higher in high- than in low-energy trauma patients (84.4 ± 5.0 vs 78.0 ± 4.6, p = 0.001), also after adjusting for aBMD (p = 0.003). In addition, BMSi did not differ between patients with osteopenia and those with osteoporosis within each trauma group. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that BMSi and LS-aBMD, but not FN-aBMD, are significantly higher in high-energy trauma patients compared to matched controls with similar fractures from low-energy trauma. Further studies of non-osteoporotic patients with high-energy trauma fracture with measurements of BMSi are warranted to determine whether IMI might help in identifying those with reduced bone strength.

Denosumab for the treatment of primary pediatric osteoporosis.

Primary osteoporosis is rare in children and adolescents and its optimal pharmacological management is uncertain. Bisphosphonates are commonly used while denosumab has only been administered to a few children with osteogenesis imperfecta. We studied a treatment-naïve 13.5-year-old boy with severe osteoporosis and multiple vertebral deformities who presented with back pain and difficulty in walking. Causes of secondary osteoporosis were excluded and there were no abnormalities in genes known to cause bone fragility. He was treated with denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 3 months for 30 months, and he was pain-free within 6 weeks after the first injection. Lumbar spine BMD and femoral neck BMD increased with treatment by 65.6% and 25.3%, respectively, and deformed vertebrae regained their normal shape; linear growth was not impaired. During the second year of treatment, transient hypercalcemia (maximum 3.09 mmol/l) before the denosumab injection was observed. In conclusion, denosumab was highly effective in this case of primary pediatric osteoporosis, with remarkable clinical and radiological response. Transient hypercalcemia was probably due to amplification of the effect of growth spurt and puberty on bone remodeling by the transient, short-term discontinuation of the drug. Furthermore, our data suggest that mobilization of calcium from treatment-induced sclerotic transverse lines in bone metaphyses may contribute to the development of hypercalcemia.

Bone fragility in patients affected by congenital diseases non skeletal in origin.

BACKGROUND: Bone tissue represents a large systemic compartment of the human body, with an active metabolism, that controls mineral deposition and removal, and where several factors may play a role. For these reasons, several non-skeletal diseases may influence bone metabolism. It is of a crucial importance to classify these disorders in order to facilitate diagnosis and clinical management. This article reports a taxonomic classification of non-skeletal rare congenital disorders, which have an impact on bone metabolism METHODS: The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Skeletal Rare Diseases Working Group (SRD-WG), comprised of basic and clinical scientists, has decided to review the taxonomy of non-skeletal rare disorders that may alter bone physiology. RESULTS: The taxonomy of non-skeletal rare congenital disorders which impact bone comprises a total of 6 groups of disorders that may influence the activity of bone cells or the characteristics of bone matrix. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides the first comprehensive taxonomy of non-skeletal rare congenital disorders with impact on bone physiology.

The osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in European primary care: a multi-country cross-sectional observational study.

This study in 8 countries across Europe found that about 75% of elderly women seen in primary care who were at high risk of osteoporosis-related fractures were not receiving appropriate medication. Lack of osteoporosis diagnosis appeared to be an important contributing factor. INTRODUCTION: Treatment rates in osteoporosis are documented to be low. We wished to assess the osteoporosis treatment gap in women ≥ 70 years in routine primary care across Europe. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study in 8 European countries collected data from women 70 years or older visiting their general practitioner. The primary outcome was treatment gap: the proportion who were not receiving any osteoporosis medication among those at increased risk of fragility fracture (using history of fracture, 10-year probability of fracture above country-specific Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [FRAX] thresholds, T-score ≤ - 2.5). RESULTS: Median 10-year probability of fracture (without bone mineral density [BMD]) for the 3798 enrolled patients was 7.2% (hip) and 16.6% (major osteoporotic). Overall, 2077 women (55%) met one or more definitions for increased risk of fragility fracture: 1200 had a prior fracture, 1814 exceeded the FRAX threshold, and 318 had a T-score ≤ - 2.5 (only 944 received a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan). In those at increased fracture risk, the median 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture was 11.2% and 22.8%, vs 4.1% and 11.5% in those deemed not at risk. An osteoporosis diagnosis was recorded in 804 patients (21.2%); most (79.7%) of these were at increased fracture risk. The treatment gap was 74.6%, varying from 53% in Ireland to 91% in Germany. Patients with an osteoporosis diagnosis were found to have a lower treatment gap than those without a diagnosis, with an absolute reduction of 63%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large treatment gap in women aged ≥ 70 years at increased risk of fragility fracture in routine primary care across Europe. The gap appears to be related to a low rate of osteoporosis diagnosis.

Treatments of osteoporosis increase bone material strength index in patients with low bone mass.

Effects on bone material properties of two-year antiosteoporotic treatment were assessed using in vivo impact microindentation (IMI) in patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) values. Antiresorptive treatment, in contrast to vitamin D ± calcium treatment alone, induced BMD-independent increases in bone material strength index, measured by IMI, the magnitude of which depended on pretreatment values. INTRODUCTION: Bone material strength index (BMSi), measured by IMI in vivo, is reduced in patients with fragility fractures, but there is no information about changes in values during long-term therapy. In the present study, we assessed changes in BMSi in patients receiving antiosteoporotic treatments for periods longer than 12 months. METHODS: We included treatment-naive patients with low bone mass who had a BMSi measurement with OsteoProbe® at presentation and consented to a repeat measurement after treatment. RESULTS: We studied 54 patients (34 women), median age 58 years, of whom 30 were treated with bisphosphonates or denosumab (treatment group) and 24 with vitamin D ± calcium alone (control group). There were no differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups with the exception of a higher number of previous fragility fractures in the treatment group. Baseline hip BMD and BMSi values were lower in the treatment group. After 23.1 ± 6.6 months, BMSi increased significantly in the treatment group (82.4 ± 4.3 vs 79.3 ± 4.1; p < 0.001), but did not change in the control group (81.5 ± 5.2 vs 82.2 ± 4.1; p = 0.35). Changes in BMSi with antiresorptives were inversely related with baseline values (r = - 0.43; p = 0.02) but not with changes in BMD. Two patients in the control group with large decreases in BMSi values sustained incident fractures. CONCLUSION: In patients at increased fracture risk, antiresorptive treatments induced BMD-independent increases in BMSi values, the magnitude of which depended on pretreatment values.

The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies.

This post-hoc analysis queried whether women experiencing fracture on denosumab indicates inadequate treatment response or whether the risk of subsequent fracture remains low with continuing denosumab. Results showed that denosumab decreases the risk of subsequent fracture and fracture sustained while on denosumab is not necessarily indicative of inadequate treatment response. INTRODUCTION: This analysis assessed whether a fracture sustained during denosumab therapy indicates inadequate treatment response and if the risk of a subsequent fracture decreases with continuing denosumab treatment. METHODS: In FREEDOM, a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to placebo or denosumab for 3 years. In the 7-year FREEDOM Extension, all participants were allocated to receive denosumab. Here we compare subsequent osteoporotic fracture rates between denosumab-treated subjects during FREEDOM or the Extension and placebo-treated subjects in FREEDOM. RESULTS: During FREEDOM, 438 placebo- and 272 denosumab-treated subjects had an osteoporotic fracture. Exposure-adjusted subject incidence per 100 subject-years was lower for denosumab (6.7) vs placebo (10.1). Combining all subjects on denosumab from FREEDOM and the Extension for up to 10 years (combined denosumab), 794 (13.7%) had an osteoporotic fracture while on denosumab. Of these, one or more subsequent fractures occurred in 144 (18.1%) subjects, with an exposure-adjusted incidence of 5.8 per 100 subject-years, similar to FREEDOM denosumab (6.7 per 100 subject-years) and lower than FREEDOM placebo (10.1 per 100 subject-years). Adjusting for prior fracture, the risk of having a subsequent on-study osteoporotic fracture was lower in the combined denosumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.43-0.81]; P = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that denosumab decreases the risk of subsequent fracture and a fracture sustained while on denosumab is not necessarily indicative of inadequate treatment response.

Bone material strength index as measured by impact microindentation is low in patients with fractures irrespective of fracture site.

We evaluated the relationship between bone material strength index (BMSi) and fragility fractures, including vertebral fractures. Our data showed that BMSi is low in all fracture patients with low bone mass, independently of whether patients sustained a vertebral or a non-vertebral fracture. INTRODUCTION: Impact microindentation (IMI) is a new technique for the measurement of tissue level properties of cortical bone in vivo. Previous studies showed an association between BMSi and non-vertebral fractures, but an association with vertebral fractures is still being debated. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the relationship between BMSi and different types of fragility fractures, including vertebral fractures. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we measured BMSi in patients of both sexes with different types of fragility fractures and low bone mass with the IMI method using the Osteoprobe®. Vertebral fractures were diagnosed and graded on lateral spine radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were included in the study, of whom 101 patients (65 women) had sustained a low energy fracture and 31 (mean age 57.7 ± 9.9 years) had no history or radiological evidence for a fracture. Of the fracture patients, 53 (mean age 62.8 ± 8.3 years) had only non-vertebral fractures (VF-/Fx+), 34 (mean age 62.8 ± 9.9 years) had vertebral and non-vertebral fractures (VF+/Fx+), and 14 (mean age 64.7 ± 9.3 years) had only vertebral fractures (VF+/Fx-). BMSi values, adjusted for age and BMD, were similar for all three groups of fracture patients (78.9 ± 0.7, 78.3 ± 0.9, and 78.4 ± 1.4, respectively; p = 0.866). BMSi values were not associated with number or severity of vertebral fractures. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that BMSi is low in fracture patients with low bone mass, irrespective of whether they sustained a vertebral fracture or a non-vertebral fracture.

Technical note: Recommendations for a standard procedure to assess cortical bone at the tissue-level in vivo using impact microindentation.

Impact microindentation is a novel method for measuring the resistance of cortical bone to indentation in patients. Clinical use of a handheld impact microindentation technique is expanding, highlighting the need to standardize the measurement technique. Here, we describe a detailed standard operation procedure to improve the consistency and comparability of the measurements across centers.

The effect of 8 or 5 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM Extension study.

UNLABELLED: The FREEDOM study and its Extension provide long-term information about the effects of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Treatment for up to 8 years was associated with persistent reduction of bone turnover, continued increases in bone mineral density, low fracture incidence, and a favorable benefit/risk profile. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to report the results through year 5 of the FREEDOM Extension study, representing up to 8 years of continued denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Women who completed the 3-year FREEDOM study were eligible to enter the 7-year open-label FREEDOM Extension in which all participants are scheduled to receive denosumab, since placebo assignment was discontinued for ethical reasons. A total of 4550 women enrolled in the Extension (2343 long-term; 2207 cross-over). In this analysis, women in the long-term and cross-over groups received denosumab for up to 8 and 5 years, respectively. RESULTS: Throughout the Extension, sustained reduction of bone turnover markers (BTMs) was observed in both groups. In the long-term group, mean bone mineral density (BMD) continued to increase significantly at each time point measured, for cumulative 8-year gains of 18.4 and 8.3 % at the lumbar spine and total hip, respectively. In the cross-over group, mean BMD increased significantly from the Extension baseline for 5-year cumulative gains of 13.1 and 6.2 % at the lumbar spine and total hip, respectively. The yearly incidence of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures remained low in both groups. The incidence of adverse and serious adverse events did not increase over time. Through Extension year 5, eight events of osteonecrosis of the jaw and two events of atypical femoral fracture were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab treatment for up to 8 years was associated with persistent reductions of BTMs, continued BMD gains, low fracture incidence, and a consistent safety profile.

Taxonomy of rare genetic metabolic bone disorders.

UNLABELLED: This article reports a taxonomic classification of rare skeletal diseases based on metabolic phenotypes. It was prepared by The Skeletal Rare Diseases Working Group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and includes 116 OMIM phenotypes with 86 affected genes. INTRODUCTION: Rare skeletal metabolic diseases comprise a group of diseases commonly associated with severe clinical consequences. In recent years, the description of the clinical phenotypes and radiographic features of several genetic bone disorders was paralleled by the discovery of key molecular pathways involved in the regulation of bone and mineral metabolism. Including this information in the description and classification of rare skeletal diseases may improve the recognition and management of affected patients. METHODS: IOF recognized this need and formed a Skeletal Rare Diseases Working Group (SRD-WG) of basic and clinical scientists who developed a taxonomy of rare skeletal diseases based on their metabolic pathogenesis. RESULTS: This taxonomy of rare genetic metabolic bone disorders (RGMBDs) comprises 116 OMIM phenotypes, with 86 affected genes related to bone and mineral homeostasis. The diseases were divided into four major groups, namely, disorders due to altered osteoclast, osteoblast, or osteocyte activity; disorders due to altered bone matrix proteins; disorders due to altered bone microenvironmental regulators; and disorders due to deranged calciotropic hormonal activity. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides the first comprehensive taxonomy of rare metabolic skeletal diseases based on deranged metabolic activity. This classification will help in the development of common and shared diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for these patients and also in the creation of international registries of rare skeletal diseases, the first step for the development of genetic tests based on next generation sequencing and for performing large intervention trials to assess efficacy of orphan drugs.

Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: development history and design and participant characteristics of LOFT, the Long-Term Odanacatib Fracture Trial.

SUMMARY: Odanacatib is a cathepsin K inhibitor investigated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Phase 2 data indicate that 50 mg once weekly inhibits bone resorption and increases bone mineral density, with only a transient decrease in bone formation. We describe the background, design and participant characteristics for the phase 3 registration trial. INTRODUCTION: Odanacatib (ODN) is a selective cathepsin K inhibitor being evaluated for the treatment of osteoporosis. In a phase 2 trial, ODN 50 mg once weekly reduced bone resorption while preserving bone formation and progressively increased BMD over 5 years. We describe the phase III Long-Term ODN Fracture Trial (LOFT), an event-driven, randomized, blinded placebo-controlled trial, with preplanned interim analyses to permit early termination if significant fracture risk reduction was demonstrated. An extension was planned, with participants remaining on their randomized treatment for up to 5 years, then transitioning to open-label ODN. METHODS: The three primary outcomes were radiologically determined vertebral, hip, and clinical non-vertebral fractures. Secondary end points included clinical vertebral fractures, BMD, bone turnover markers, and safety and tolerability, including bone histology. Participants were women, 65 years or older, with a BMD T-score≤-2.5 at the total hip (TH) or femoral neck (FN) or with a prior radiographic vertebral fracture and a T-score≤-1.5 at the TH or FN. They were randomized to ODN or placebo tablets. All received weekly vitamin D3 (5600 international units (IU)) and daily calcium supplements as needed to ensure a daily intake of approximately 1200 mg. RESULTS: Altogether, 16,713 participants were randomized at 387 centers. After a planned interim analysis, an independent data monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped early due to robust efficacy and a favorable benefit/risk profile. Following the base study closeout, 8256 participants entered the study extension. CONCLUSIONS: This report details the background and study design of this fracture end point trial and describes the baseline characteristics of its participants.

Goal-directed treatment of osteoporosis in Europe.

UNLABELLED: Despite the proven predictive ability of bone mineral density, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®), bone turnover markers, and fracture for osteoporotic fracture, their use as targets for treatment of osteoporosis is limited. INTRODUCTION: Treat-to-target is a strategy applied in several fields of medicine and has recently become an area of interest in the management of osteoporosis. Its role in this setting remains controversial. This article was prepared following a European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group meeting convened under the auspices of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) to discuss the feasibility of applying such a strategy in osteoporosis in Europe. METHODS: Potential targets range from the absence of an incident fracture to fixed levels of bone mineral density (BMD), a desired FRAX® score, a specified level of bone turnover markers or indeed changes in any one or a combination of these parameters. RESULTS: Despite the proven predictive ability of all of these variables for fracture (particularly BMD and FRAX), their use as targets remains limited due to low sensitivity, the influence of confounders and current lack of evidence that targets can be consistently reached. CONCLUSION: ESCEO considers that it is not currently feasible to apply a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis, though it did identify a need to continue to improve the targeting of treatment to those at higher risk (target-to-treat strategy) and a number of issues for the research agenda. These include international consensus on intervention thresholds and definition of treatment failure, further exploration of the relationship between fracture and BMD, and FRAX and treatment efficacy and investigation of the potential of short-term targets to improve adherence.

Serum Dickkopf 1 levels in sclerostin deficiency.

CONTEXT: Sclerostin and Dickkopf 1 (DKK1) are antagonists of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, both binding to the same low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 on osteoblasts, thereby inhibiting bone formation. It is not known whether there is an interaction between sclerostin and DKK1. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether a lack of sclerostin is compensated by increased DKK1 levels. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We measured DKK1 levels in serum samples of patients and carriers of sclerosteosis (19 patients, 24 carriers) and van Buchem disease (VBD) (13 patients, 22 carriers) and 25 healthy controls. Sclerosteosis and VBD are caused by deficient sclerostin synthesis and are characterized by increased bone formation and hyperostotic phenotypes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: DKK1 levels were compared between patients and carriers, and between patients and healthy controls. We also examined associations between levels of DKK1 and the bone turnover markers procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide and carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide. RESULTS: We found that DKK1 levels were significantly higher in patients with both sclerosteosis (4.28 ng/mL [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.46-5.11 ng/mL]) and VBD (5.28 ng/mL [95% CI, 3.84-6.71 ng/mL]), compared to levels in carriers of the two diseases (sclerosteosis, 2.03 ng/mL [95% CI, 1.78-2.29 ng/mL], P < .001; VBD, 3.47 ng/mL [95% CI, 2.97-3.97 ng/mL], P = 0.017) and to levels in healthy controls (2.77 ng/mL [95% CI, 2.45-3.08 ng/mL]; P = 0.004 and P < .001, respectively). Serum DKK1 levels were positively associated with levels of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide and carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide in both disorders. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that increased DKK1 levels observed in patients with sclerosteosis and VBD represent an adaptive response to the increased bone formation characterizing these diseases, although these increased levels do not compensate for the lack of sclerostin on bone formation.

Long-term treatment of osteoporotic women with bisphosphonates does not impair the response to subsequently administered intravenous pamidronate.

UNLABELLED: We addressed the question whether the response of osteoporotic patients to bisphosphonate treatment is reduced with time. Bisphosphonate-treated women with postmenopausal or glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis showed adequate and consistent changes of bone markers to subsequently administered intravenous pamidronate. Response of osteoporotic patients to bisphosphonates is not impaired during their long-term administration. INTRODUCTION: Inadequate response to bisphosphonate treatment has been described in patients with Paget's disease of bone but has not been addressed in osteoporosis although treatment failure is a clinically relevant problem. METHODS: Twenty one women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) aged 68 ± 8.2 years and 14 women with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) aged 65 ± 10 years were treated with tri-monthly intravenous infusions of 45 mg of pamidronate for 1 year. All patients had been previously treated with bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, pamidronate) for a mean period of 6.2 years (range, 1.3-14 years). Blood samples were taken for measurement of the bone resorption marker C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) on days 1 and 4 and of the bone formation marker procollagen type I N propeptide, (P1NP) on day 1 of every tri-monthly treatment course. RESULTS: With each treatment course there was a significant decrease in serum CTX-I on day 4 and an increase to baseline values 3 months after each infusion in both PMO (mean values, day 1: 291.33 ± 160.78 pg/ml vs. day 4: 131 ± 91.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001) and GIOP (day 1: 219.3 ± 114.8 pg/ml vs. day 4: 98.8 ± 51.6 pg/ml, p < 0.001). Serum P1NP remained stable during the whole year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term bisphosphonate treatment of women with either PMO or GIOP does not impair the response to subsequently administered intravenous pamidronate suggesting that inadequate response to long-term bisphosphonate treatment is not responsible for treatment failure.

Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

This review summarizes the available evidence-based data that form the basis for therapeutic intervention and covers the current status of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) management, regulatory requirements, and risk-assessment options. Glucocorticoids are known to cause bone loss and fractures, yet many patients receiving or initiating glucocorticoid therapy are not appropriately evaluated and treated. An European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis workshop was convened to discuss GIOP management and to provide a report by a panel of experts. An expert panel reviewed the available studies that discussed approved therapeutic agents, focusing on randomized and controlled clinical trials reporting on bone mineral density and/or fracture risk of at least 48 weeks' duration. There is no evidence that GIOP and postmenopausal osteoporosis respond differently to treatments. The FRAX algorithm can be adjusted according to glucocorticoid dose. Available antiosteoporotic therapies such as bisphosphonates and teriparatide are efficacious in GIOP management. Several other agents approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis may become available for GIOP. It is advised to stop antiosteoporotic treatment after glucocorticoid cessation, unless the patient remains at increased risk of fracture. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation as an osteoporosis-prevention measure is less effective than specific antiosteoporotic treatment. Fracture end-point studies and additional studies investigating specific subpopulations (pediatric, premenopausal, or elderly patients) would strengthen the evidence base and facilitate the development of intervention thresholds and treatment guidelines.

Circulating sclerostin levels are decreased in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism and increase after treatment.

CONTEXT: Increased bone fragility is a frequent complication of hypercortisolism due predominantly to suppression of bone formation. Sclerostin is an osteocyte-produced negative regulator of bone formation, which is up-regulated by glucocorticoids in mice. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effect of endogenous hypercortisolism on circulating sclerostin and bone turnover in humans. DESIGN: We measured sclerostin, ß-C-terminal telopeptide, amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, and fibroblast growth factor 23 in blood samples of 21 patients with endogenous hypercortisolism and 21 age- and gender-matched controls. In 12 patients, measurements were repeated at various time intervals after successful surgical treatment (transsphenoidal surgery or adrenalectomy). RESULTS: Plasma sclerostin levels were significantly decreased in patients compared with controls (112±49 vs. 207±48 pg/ml, P<0.001). In the 12 patients who were evaluated after surgical treatment, sclerostin levels increased from 121.4±46.5 to 175.8±78.5 pg/ml (P=0.003). These changes in plasma sclerostin levels were accompanied by significant increases in levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (from 44.2±12.2 to 84.0±58.8 pg/ml, P=0.017) and of the bone turnover markers amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (from 31.7±18.2 to 94.2±92.2 ng/ml, P=0.037) and ß-C-terminal telopeptide (from 134.2±44 to 409.2±285 pg/ml, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the findings in mice, circulating sclerostin is decreased in patients with chronic endogenous hypercortisolism and increases after treatment. These findings suggest that in humans, chronic exposure to glucocorticoids affects the number or function of osteocytes rather than the production of sclerostin.

A rare cause of facial nerve palsy in children: hyperostosis corticalis generalisata (Van Buchem disease). Three new pediatric cases and a literature review.

Differential diagnosis of facial nerve palsy in children is extensive. We report on three pediatric cases presenting with facial nerve palsy caused by hyperostosis corticalis generalisata (Van Buchem disease). This autosomal recessive disease is characterized by progressive bone overgrowth, with narrowing of the neuroforamina in the skull causing cranial neuropathies. These three new cases of Van Buchem disease are of interest because of exceptionally early presentation of symptoms. Furthermore, this is the first report describing bilateral papilledema in a child with Van Buchem disease. Head computerized tomography (CT) scan revealed thickened calvarium, skull base and mandible in all three children, with narrowed facial nerve canals. Bone mineral density (BMD) was markedly increased at all measured points and biochemical markers of bone formation were significantly elevated. Diagnosis of Van Buchem disease was genetically confirmed. The cases are unique in that these are the first well-documented pediatric cases of Van Buchem disease.

Implications for fracture healing of current and new osteoporosis treatments: an ESCEO consensus paper.

Osteoporotic fracture healing is critical to clinical outcome in terms of functional recovery, morbidity, and quality of life. Osteoporosis treatments may affect bone repair, so insights into their impact on fracture healing are important. We reviewed the current evidence for an impact of osteoporosis treatments on bone repair. Treatment with bisphosphonate in experimental models is associated with increased callus size and mineralization, reduced callus remodeling, and improved mechanical strength. Local and systemic bisphosphonate treatment may improve implant fixation. No negative impact on fracture healing has been observed, even after major surgery or when administered immediately after fracture. Experimental data for denosumab and raloxifene suggest no negative implications for bone repair. The extensive experimental results for teriparatide indicate increased callus formation, improved biomechanical strength, and greater external callus volume and total bone mineral content and density. Case reports and a randomized trial have produced mixed results but are consistent with a positive impact of teriparatide on clinical fracture healing. Studies with strontium ranelate in models of fracture healing indicate that it is associated with improved bone microstructure, callus volume, and biomechanical properties. Finally, there is experimental evidence for a beneficial effect of some of the agents currently being developed for osteoporosis, notably sclerostin antibody and DKK1 antibody. There is currently no evidence that osteoporosis treatments are detrimental for bone repair and some promising experimental evidence for positive effects on healing, notably for agents with a bone-forming mode of action, which may translate into therapeutic applications.