An Initial miRNA Profile of Persons With Persisting Neurobehavioral Impairments and States of Disordered Consciousness After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the merits of using microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers of disorders of consciousness (DoC) due to traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTINGS: Acute and subacute beds. PARTICIPANTS: Patients remaining in vegetative and minimally conscious states (VS, MCS), an average of 1.5 years after TBI, and enrolled in a randomized clinical trial ( n = 6). Persons without a diagnosed central nervous system disorder, neurotypical controls ( n = 5). DESIGN: Comparison of whole blood miRNA profiles between patients and age/gender-matched controls. For patients, correlational analyses between miRNA profiles and measures of neurobehavioral function. MAIN MEASURES: Baseline measures of whole blood miRNAs isolated from the cellular and fluid components of blood and measured using miRNA-seq and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Baseline neurobehavioral measures derived from 7 tests. RESULTS: For patients, relative to controls, 48 miRNA were significantly ( P < .05)/differentially expressed. Cluster analysis showed that neurotypical controls were most similar to each other and with 2 patients (VS: n = 1; and MCS: n = 1). Three patients, all in MCS, clustered separately. The only female in the sample, also in MCS, formed an independent group. For the 48 miRNAs, the enriched pathways identified are implicated in secondary brain damage and 26 miRNAs were significantly ( P < .05) correlated with measures of neurobehavioral function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients remaining in states of DoC an average of 1.5 years after TBI showed a different and reproducible pattern of miRNA expression relative to age/gender-matched neurotypical controls. The phenotypes, defined by miRNA profiles relative to persisting neurobehavioral impairments, provide the basis for future research to determine the miRNA profiles differentiating states of DoC and the basis for future research using miRNA to detect treatment effects, predict treatment responsiveness, and developing targeted interventions. If future research confirms and advances reported findings, then miRNA profiles will provide the foundation for patient-centric DoC neurorehabilitation.

"Fluctuation is the norm": Rehabilitation practitioner perspectives on ambiguity and uncertainty in their work with persons in disordered states of consciousness after traumatic brain injury.

The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical lifeworld of rehabilitation practitioners who work with patients in disordered states of consciousness (DoC) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We interviewed 21 practitioners using narrative interviewing methods from two specialty health systems that admit patients in DoC to inpatient rehabilitation. The overarching theme arising from the interview data is "Experiencing ambiguity and uncertainty in clinical reasoning about consciousness" when treating persons in DoC. We describe practitioners' practices of looking for consistency, making sense of ambiguous and hard to explain patient responses, and using trial and error or "tinkering" to care for patients. Due to scientific uncertainty about diagnosis and prognosis in DoC and ambiguity about interpretation of patient responses, working in the field of DoC disrupts the canonical meaning-making processes that practitioners have been trained in. Studying the lifeworld of rehabilitation practitioners through their story-making and story-telling uncovers taken-for-granted assumptions and normative structures that may exist in rehabilitation medical and scientific culture, including practitioner training. We are interested in understanding these canonical breaches in order to make visible how practitioners make meaning while treating patients.

Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs for Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury With Chronic Vestibular Impairment.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the economic burden of all-cause health care resource utilization (HCRU) among adults with and without chronic vestibular impairment (CVI) after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study. SETTING: IQVIA Integrated Data Warehouse. PARTICIPANTS: People with mTBI+CVI (n=20,441) matched on baseline age, sex, year of mTBI event, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score to people with mTBI only (n=20,441) (N=40,882). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause health HCRU and costs at 12 and 24 months post mTBI diagnosis. RESULTS: People with mTBI+CVI had significantly higher all-cause HCRU and costs at both time points than those with mTBI only. Multivariable regression analysis showed that, when controlling for baseline variables, costs of care were 1.5 times higher for mTBI+CVI than mTBI only. CONCLUSIONS: People who developed CVI after mTBI had greater overall HCRU and costs for up to 2 years after the injury event compared with people who did not develop CVI after controlling for age, sex, region, and CCI score. Further research on access to follow-up services and effectiveness of interventions to address CVI is warranted.

Psychometric measurement properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) evaluated among veterans with mild traumatic brain injury and behavioral health conditions.

PURPOSE: Examine the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among U.S. Iraq/Afghanistan Veterans with a combination of mild traumatic brain injury and behavioral health conditions using Rasch analysis. METHODS: 307 Veterans were classified as either combat control (n = 141), or one of three clinical groups: mild traumatic brain injury (n = 10), behavioral health conditions (n = 24), or both (n = 128). Data from the three clinical groups were used to establish step and item calibrations serving as anchors when including the control group. RESULTS: Measurement precision was excellent (person separation reliability = 0.93). Ordering of item calibrations formed a logical hierarchy. Test items were off-target (too easy) for the clinical groups. Principal component analysis indicated unidimensionality although 4/36 items misfit the measurement model. No meaningful differential item functioning was detected. There was a moderate effect size (Hedge's g = 1.64) between the control and clinical groups. CONCLUSIONS: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule was suitable for our study sample, distinguishing 4 levels of functional ability. Although items may be easy for some Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury and/or behavioral health conditions, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule can be used to capture disability information for those with moderate to severe disability.Implications for rehabilitationPersistent functional disability is seen in military and civilian populations with mild traumatic brain injury which often co-occurs with behavioral health conditions.A comprehensive measure of disability is needed to distinguish between levels of disability to inform clinical decisions for individual patients and to detect treatment effects between groups in research.Results of this analysis indicate the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule items are sufficiently unidimensional to evaluate level of disability in the moderate and severe range among persons with mild traumatic brain injury with and without behavioral health conditions.Further examination of the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization.Disability Assessment Schedule is necessary before measurement of disability is recommended for those with less than moderate levels of disability.