Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Spine Deform ; 2024 Sep 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39307890

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess patients' perceptions of their abdominal wall following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for adult spinal deformity (ASD) using validated questionnaires. METHODS: Adults who underwent anterior-posterior thoracolumbar spinal operations to the pelvis for ASD in which the anterior fusion was performed through an extensile anterolateral approach were reviewed. Three questionnaires were administered at least 1 year following surgery and included The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Survey (AHS-QC), The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and The Anterior Abdominal Incision Questionnaire (AAIQ). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (80.4% female, median age 65 years) were included. Average follow-up was 2.8 ± 1.7 years. Average number of anterior fusion levels was 3.5 ± 1.4. Patients achieved high satisfaction rates from surgery (74.5%). AAIQ responses included postoperative pain (33.3%), bulging (41.7%), and limitations in daily activities (18.8%) with only 15.7% experienced moderate-severe pain related to their incisions and only 6.3% seeking treatment for their scars. Post-operatively, 63.2% had a neutral or improved self-image of their torso and trunk, while only 10.2% stating it was much worse. Patients' overall opinion of their scar compared to their normal skin was very positive [average 2.75 ± 2.93 (10 = worst possible scar)]. Favorable scores were also reported for color difference, stiffness, change in thickness, and irregularity in their abdominal scar compared to normal skin. CONCLUSIONS: Following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for ASD, the majority of patients reported mild pain, mild functional limitations, good cosmesis, and high satisfaction rates with their anterior incisions based on validated questionnaires.

2.
Spine J ; 24(8): 1342-1351, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408519

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are commonly performed operations to address cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Trends in utilization and revision surgery rates warrant investigation. PURPOSE: To explore the epidemiology, postoperative complications, and reoperation rates of ACDF and CDA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 433,660 patients who underwent ACDF or CDA between 2011 and 2021 were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following data were observed for all cases: patient demographics, complications, and revisions. METHODS: The PearlDiver database was queried to identify patients who underwent ACDF and CDA between 2011 and 2021. Epidemiological analyses were performed to examine trends in cervical procedure utilization by age group and year. After matching by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), levels of operation, and reason for surgery, the early postoperative (2-week), short-term (2-year), and long-term (5-year) complications of both cervical procedures were examined. RESULTS: In total, 404,195 ACDF and 29,465 CDA patients were included. ACDF utilization rose by 25.25% between 2011 and 2014 while CDA utilization rose by 654.24% between 2011-2019 followed by relative plateauing in both procedures. Mann-Kendall trend test confirmed a significant but small rise in ACDF and large rise in CDA procedures from 2011 to 2021 (p<.001). After matching, ACDF and CDA had an overall complication rate of 12.20% and 8.77%, respectively, with the most common complications being subsequent anterior revision (4.96% and 3.35%) and dysphagia (3.70% and 2.98%). The ACDF cohort, especially multilevel ACDF patients, generally had more complications and higher revision rates than the CDA cohort (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: While ACDF utilization has plateaued since 2014, CDA rates have risen by a staggering 654.24% over the past decade. ACDF and CDA complication and revision rates were relatively low in comparison to previously published values, with significantly lower rates in CDA. Although a lack of radiographic data in this study limits its power to recommend either procedure for individual patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy, CDA may be associated with minor improvement in the complication and revision profile.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais , Discotomia , Reoperação , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Discotomia/efeitos adversos , Discotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Discotomia/tendências , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Radiculopatia/epidemiologia , Artroplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Artroplastia/efeitos adversos , Substituição Total de Disco/efeitos adversos , Substituição Total de Disco/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 14(2): 106-111, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38420237

RESUMO

Introduction: Acute exertional compartment syndrome (AECS) is a condition with the potential for devastating outcomes if not promptly treated. Physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating patients presenting with pain, swelling, decreased range of motion, and numbness within a muscle compartment. However, AECS is frequently misdiagnosed due to a multitude of factors, leading to a delay in treatment. In this case report, we would like to shed light on a rare case of bilateral upper-extremity AECS and suggest the treatment paradigm we believe will help prevent negative outcomes. Case Report: A previously healthy 33-year-old male presented with bilateral weakness, tingling, tenderness, swelling, and pain upon movement in the trapezius and deltoid muscles. The symptoms started after he performed "burpees" for 18 h following a 12-h forest-fire firefighting shift. The patient's rapidly developing clinical presentation warranted compartmental pressure checks for suspicion of AECS. Being able to quickly determine the elevated trapezius, deltoid, and supraspinatus compartmental pressures allowed us to perform immediate bilateral fasciotomies with delayed primary closure to relieve compartment pressure. Conclusion: The delay in treatment for patients presenting with AECS is multifactorial and may lead to devastating outcomes if not promptly addressed. The lack of literature regarding bilateral upper-extremity AECS makes the treatment for this condition even more difficult. For our patient, having a proper criterion for performing compartmental pressure checks played a vital role in ensuring an accurate diagnosis and timely medical intervention.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA