RESUMO
Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion: This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.
RESUMO
We investigated the differences in quantity and quality of skeletal muscle between metabolically healthy obese (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO) individuals using abdominal CT. One hundred and seventy-two people with morbid obesity who underwent bariatric surgery and 64 healthy control individuals participated in this retrospective study. We divided the people with morbid obesity into an MHO and MUO group. In addition, nonobese metabolic healthy people were included analysis to provide reference levels. CT evaluation of muscle quantity (at the level of the third lumbar vertebra [L3]) was performed by calculating muscle anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA), which was normalized to patient height to produce skeletal muscle index (SMI). Muscle quality was assessed as skeletal muscle density (SMD), which was calculated from CT muscle attenuation. To characterize intramuscular composition, muscle attenuation was classified into three categories using Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds: -190 HU to -30 HU for intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), -29 to +29 HU for low attenuation muscle (LAM), and +30 to +150 HU for normal attenuation muscle (NAM). People with morbid obesity comprised 24 (14%) MHO individuals and 148 (86%) MUO individuals. The mean age of the participants was 39.7 ± 12.5 years, and 154 (65%) participants were women. MUO individuals had a significantly greater total skeletal muscle CSA than MHO individuals in the model that adjusted for all variables. Total skeletal muscle SMI, SMD, NAM index, LAM index, and IMAT index did not differ between MHO and MUO individuals for all adjusted models. Total skeletal muscle at the L3 level was not different in muscle quantity, quality, or intramuscular composition between the MHO and MUO individuals, based on CT evaluation. MHO individuals who are considered "healthy" should be carefully monitored and can have a similar risk of metabolic complications as MUO individuals, at least based on an assessment of skeletal muscle.