Vitamin B12-Related Biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Adult vitamin B12 (B12) deficiency may present itself with nonspecific mainly neurological symptoms, and thus plasma biomarkers are often judged to be of major importance in the further diagnostic process. Four biomarkers are of special relevance: total B12, holotranscobalamin (the part of B12 bound to the active transport protein, transcobalamin, also named holoTC or active B12) and the 2 so-called metabolic markers that accumulate if B12 is lacking, methylmalonic acid (MMA) and homocysteine. OBJECTIVE: This article briefly reviews the inherent limitation of biomarkers, discusses its use in establishing the diagnosis and cause of B12 deficiency, and when following or discontinuing treatment with B12. METHODS: The review is based on published papers, but also on knowledge gained from working within the area. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that a combination of a B12 and a metabolic marker, for example, total B12 and MMA, may prove most useful in daily practice. An unexpectedly high level of total B12 is most often of no clinical importance, though sometimes related to the presence of underlying cancer. Measurement of total B12 is of limited value in patients on treatment with pharmacological doses of B12 but may be helpful if B12 treatment is discontinued.

Plain language titleVitamin B12-Related Blood TestsPlain language summaryBlood-testing is considered an important part of the diagnostic procedure in patients suspected to suffer from B12 deficiency. A deficiency is supported by a low level of plasma B12, and confirmed by a high level of methylmalonic acid, judged according to age and kidney function. Alternatively, a high level of homocysteine may support the diagnosis. Treatment of B12 deficiency is mainly guided by improvement of symptoms, with a very limited need for further blood testing. If B12-treatment is discontinued, B12 status should be judged every 6 months for approximately 2 years to detect a possible reoccurrence of a deficient state. An unexpected high level of plasma B12 is most often of no clinical implication.

Neurofilament light chain is elevated in patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is a secondary headache disorder potentially causing visual loss. Neurofilament light chain is a candidate, prognostic biomarker, but further studies of neuronal biomarkers are needed. Our objective was to investigate neurofilament light chain in cerebrospinal fluid (cNfL) and plasma (pNfL), amyloid-beta 42 (Aß-42), total-tau and phosphorylated-tau in cerebrospinal fluid in new-onset idiopathic intracranial hypertension. METHODS: Prospective case-control study including new-onset idiopathic intracranial hypertension and age, sex and BMI matched controls. Biomarkers were compared between patients and controls and related to papilledema, visual fields and opening pressure. RESULTS: We included 37 patients and 35 controls. Patients had higher age-adjusted cNfL (1.4 vs. 0.6 pg/mL, p-adjusted < 0.001), pNfL (0.5 vs. 0.3 pg/mL, p-adjusted < 0.001) and total-tau/Aß-42 (0.12 vs. 0.11, p-adjusted = 0.039). Significant, positive linear correlations were found between cNfL, pNfL, total-tau/Aß-42 and opening pressure. Patients with severe papilledema had elevated cNfL compared to mild-moderate papilledema (median cNfL: 4.3 pg/mL (3.7) versus 1.0 pg/mL (1.4), p-adjusted = 0.009). cNFL was inversely associated with perimetric mean deviation (r = -0.47, p-adjusted < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: cNfL, pNfL and total-tau/Aß-42 were elevated in new-onset idiopathic intracranial hypertension. cNfL was associated with severity of papilledema and visual field defects at diagnosis. This indicates early axonal damage. Neurofilament light chain is a candidate biomarker for disease severity.

Establishing a pediatric reference interval for plasma calprotectin.

Plasma calprotectin is a promising new biomarker of inflammatory activity and has been found to correlate well with clinical and endoscopic activity in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. A pediatric reference interval for plasma calprotectin has not been established for the Phadia 250 EliA™ Calprotectin fluoroenzyme immunoassay. In studies regarding pre-analytical properties, excellent precision and stability was found. However, sensitivity to hemolysis was demonstrated. We identified pediatric blood samples from apparently healthy children who were referred by their general practitioner for blood sampling including measurement of hemoglobin (Hb) and C-reactive protein (CRP). We excluded samples from children who had undergone additional blood sampling within 2 months before or after the index sample, if Hb was outside of local reference ranges or CRP levels were above the lower limit of the measuring interval (LLM), and any samples with a hemolysis above 0.02 mmol/L. Using this algorithm, we identified 141 blood samples. No outliers were identified. We established the following reference intervals according to CLSI C28-A3 using non-parametric statistics: 1-17 years: 16-246 µg/L. Our results may prove useful for further utilization of plasma calprotectin as a marker of inflammation in children and adolescents with inflammatory disorders.

Longitudinal Change in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Type 2 Diabetes and Early Diabetic Polyneuropathy: ADDITION-Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the longitudinal development of neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in type 2 diabetes with and without diabetic polyneuropathy (+/-DPN) and to explore the predictive potential of NfL as a biomarker for DPN. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed retrospective longitudinal case-control analysis of data from 178 participants of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care-Denmark (ADDITION-Denmark) cohort of people with screen-detected type 2 diabetes. Biobank samples acquired at the ADDITION-Denmark 5- and 10-year follow-ups were analyzed for serum NfL (s-NfL) using single-molecule array, and the results were compared with established reference material to obtain NfL z-scores. DPN was diagnosed according to Toronto criteria for confirmed DPN at the 10-year follow-up. RESULTS: s-NfL increased over time in +DPN (N = 39) and -DPN participants (N = 139) at levels above normal age-induced s-NfL increase. Longitudinal s-NfL change was greater in +DPN than in -DPN participants (17.4% [95% CI 4.3; 32.2] or 0.31 SD [95% CI 0.03; 0.60] higher s-NfL or NfL z-score increase in +DPN compared with -DPN). s-NfL at the 5-year follow-up was positively associated with nerve conduction studies at the 10-year follow-up (P = 0.02 to <0.001), but not with DPN risk. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for s-NfL were not inferior to AUCs for the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire score or vibration detection thresholds. Higher yearly s-NfL increase was associated with higher DPN risk (odds ratio 1.36 [95% CI 1.08; 1.71] per 1 ng/L/year). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that preceding s-NfL trajectories differ slightly between those with and without DPN and imply a possible biomarker value of s-NfL trajectories in DPN.

Serum neurofilament light chain - A potential biomarker for polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes?

AIMS: To investigate the relationship between neurofilament light chain (NfL) and the presence and severity of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analysis of data from 178 participants of the ADDITION-Denmark cohort of people with screen-detected type 2 diabetes and 32 healthy controls. Biobank serum samples were analyzed for NfL using single-molecule array. DPN was defined by Toronto criteria for confirmed DPN. Original and axonal nerve conduction study (NCS) sum z-scores were used as indicators of the severity of DPN and peripheral nerve damage. RESULTS: 39 (21.9%) participants had DPN. Serum NfL (s-NfL) was significantly higher in participants with DPN (18.8 ng/L [IQR 14.4; 27.9]) than in participants without DPN (15.4 ng/L [IQR 11.7; 20.1]). There were no unadjusted s-NfL differences between controls (17.6 ng/L [IQR 12.7; 19.8]) and participants with or without DPN. Higher original and axonal NCS sum z-scores were associated with 10% higher s-NfL (10.2 and 12.1% [95% CI's 4.0; 16.8 and 6.6; 17.9] per 1 SD). The AUC of s-NfL for DPN was 0.63 (95% CI 0.52; 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: S-NfL is unlikely to be a reliable biomarker for the presence of DPN. S-NfL is however associated tothe severity of the nerve damage underlying DPN.