Exendin-4 decreases liver inflammation and atherosclerosis development simultaneously by reducing macrophage infiltration.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aetiology of inflammation in the liver and vessel wall, leading to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and atherosclerosis, respectively, shares common mechanisms including macrophage infiltration. To treat both disorders simultaneously, it is highly important to tackle the inflammatory status. Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, reduces hepatic steatosis and has been suggested to reduce atherosclerosis; however, its effects on liver inflammation are underexplored. Here, we tested the hypothesis that exendin-4 reduces inflammation in both the liver and vessel wall, and investigated the common underlying mechanism. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Female APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice, a model with human-like lipoprotein metabolism, were fed a cholesterol-containing Western-type diet for 5 weeks to induce atherosclerosis and subsequently treated for 4 weeks with exendin-4. KEY RESULTS: Exendin-4 modestly improved dyslipidaemia, but markedly decreased atherosclerotic lesion severity and area (-33%), accompanied by a reduction in monocyte adhesion to the vessel wall (-42%) and macrophage content in the plaque (-44%). Furthermore, exendin-4 reduced hepatic lipid content and inflammation as well as hepatic CD68⁺ (-18%) and F4/80⁺ (-25%) macrophage content. This was accompanied by less monocyte recruitment from the circulation as the Mac-1⁺ macrophage content was decreased (-36%). Finally, exendin-4 reduced hepatic chemokine expression in vivo and suppressed oxidized low-density lipoprotein accumulation in peritoneal macrophages in vitro, effects dependent on the GLP-1 receptor. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Exendin-4 reduces inflammation in both the liver and vessel wall by reducing macrophage recruitment and activation. These data suggest that exendin-4 could be a valuable strategy to treat NASH and atherosclerosis simultaneously.

Pharmacological modulation of dopamine receptor D2-mediated transmission alters the metabolic phenotype of diet induced obese and diet resistant C57Bl6 mice.

High fat feeding induces a variety of obese and lean phenotypes in inbred rodents. Compared to Diet Resistant (DR) rodents, Diet Induced Obese (DIO) rodents are insulin resistant and have a reduced dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) mediated tone. We hypothesized that this differing dopaminergic tone contributes to the distinct metabolic profiles of these animals. C57Bl6 mice were classified as DIO or DR based on their weight gain during 10 weeks of high fat feeding. Subsequently DIO mice were treated with the DRD2 agonist bromocriptine and DR mice with the DRD2 antagonist haloperidol for 2 weeks. Compared to DR mice, the bodyweight of DIO mice was higher and their insulin sensitivity decreased. Haloperidol treatment reduced the voluntary activity and energy expenditure of DR mice and induced insulin resistance in these mice. Conversely, bromocriptine treatment tended to reduce bodyweight and voluntary activity, and reinforce insulin action in DIO mice. These results show that DRD2 activation partly redirects high fat diet induced metabolic anomalies in obesity-prone mice. Conversely, blocking DRD2 induces an adverse metabolic profile in mice that are inherently resistant to the deleterious effects of high fat food. This suggests that dopaminergic neurotransmission is involved in the control of metabolic phenotype.

Blocking dopamine D2 receptors by haloperidol curtails the beneficial impact of calorie restriction on the metabolic phenotype of high-fat diet induced obese mice.

Calorie restriction is the most effective way of expanding life-span and decreasing morbidity. It improves insulin sensitivity and delays the age-related loss of dopamine receptor D(2) (DRD2) expression in the brain. Conversely, high-fat feeding is associated with obesity, insulin resistance and a reduced number of DRD2 binding sites. We hypothesised that the metabolic benefit of calorie restriction involves the preservation of appropriate DRD2 transmission. The food intake of wild-type C57Bl6 male mice was restricted to 60% of ad lib. intake while they were treated with the DRD2 antagonist haloperidol or vehicle using s.c. implanted pellets. Mice with ad lib. access to food receiving vehicle treatment served as controls. All mice received high-fat food throughout the experiment. After 10 weeks, an i.p. glucose tolerance test was performed and, after 12 weeks, a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. Hypothalamic DRD2 binding was also determined after 12 weeks of treatment. Calorie-restricted (CR) vehicle mice were glucose tolerant and insulin sensitive compared to ad lib. (AL) fed vehicle mice. CR mice treated with haloperidol were slightly heavier than vehicle treated CR mice. Haloperidol completely abolished the beneficial impact of calorie restriction on glucose tolerance and partly reduced the insulin sensitivity observed in CR vehicle mice. The metabolic differences between AL and CR vehicle mice were not accompanied by alterations in hypothalamic DRD2 binding. In conclusion, blocking DRD2 curtails the metabolic effects of calorie restriction. Although this suggests that the dopaminergic system could be involved in the metabolic benefits of calorie restriction, restricting access to high-fat food does not increase (hypothalamic) DRD2 binding capacity, which argues against this inference.

The dopamine receptor D2 agonist bromocriptine inhibits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by direct activation of the alpha2-adrenergic receptors in beta cells.

Treatment with the dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) agonist bromocriptine improves metabolic features in obese patients with type 2 diabetes by a still unknown mechanism. In the present study, we investigated the acute effect of bromocriptine and its underlying mechanism(s) on insulin secretion both in vivo and in vitro. For this purpose, C57Bl6/J mice were subjected to an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (ipGTT) and a hyperglycemic (HG) clamp 60min after a single injection of bromocriptine or placebo. The effects of bromocriptine on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), cell membrane potential and intracellular cAMP levels were also determined in INS-1E beta cells. We report here that bromocriptine increased glucose levels during ipGTT in vivo, an effect associated with a dose-dependent decrease in GSIS. During the HG clamp, bromocriptine reduced both first-phase and second-phase insulin response. This inhibitory effect was also observed in INS-1E beta cells, in which therapeutic concentrations of bromocriptine (0.5-50nM) decreased GSIS. Mechanistically, neither cellular energy state nor cell membrane depolarization was affected by bromocriptine whereas intracellular cAMP levels were significantly reduced, suggesting involvement of G-protein-coupled receptors. Surprisingly, the DRD2 antagonist domperidone did not counteract the effect of bromocriptine on GSIS, whereas yohimbine, an antagonist of the alpha2-adrenergic receptors, completely abolished bromocriptine-induced inhibition of GSIS. In conclusion, acute administration of bromocriptine inhibits GSIS by a DRD2-independent mechanism involving direct activation of the pancreatic alpha2-adrenergic receptors. We suggest that treatment with bromocriptine promotes beta cells rest, thereby preventing long-lasting hypersecretion of insulin and subsequent beta cell failure.

Ghrelin differentially affects hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity in mice.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ghrelin on insulin's capacity to suppress endogenous glucose production and promote glucose disposal in mice. To establish whether the growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor can mediate the putative effect of ghrelin on the action of insulin, we also determined the metabolic effects of growth hormone releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6), a specific GHS receptor agonist. In addition, we explored the biological significance of des-ghrelin (unacylated ghrelin) in this experimental context. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vehicle (n=8), ghrelin (n=9), GHRP-6 (n=9), des-ghrelin (n=8) or a combination of des-ghrelin and ghrelin (n=7) were infused i.v. for 3 h. Simultaneously, endogenous glucose production and glucose disposal were measured by (14)C-glucose dilution during a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. Tissue-specific glucose uptake in muscle and adipose tissue was measured using (3)H-2-deoxyglucose. RESULTS: During hyperinsulinaemia, glucose disposal was 31% higher in mice treated with ghrelin than in those treated with vehicle (77+/-16 and 59+/-8 micromol kg(-1) h(-1), respectively, p<0.05). This was in accordance with enhanced 2-deoxyglucose uptake in muscle in ghrelin-treated animals. In contrast, endogenous glucose production was less effectively suppressed by insulin during ghrelin infusion (46+/-22 vs 71+/-11% in controls, p<0.05). GHRP-6 did not affect insulin action. Des-ghrelin hampered insulin's capacity to inhibit endogenous glucose production, whereas it did not affect glucose disposal. The restraining effects of des-ghrelin and ghrelin on hepatic insulin action were abolished by simultaneous administration of both peptides. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Ghrelin hampers insulin's capacity to suppress endogenous glucose production, whereas it reinforces the action of insulin on glucose disposal, independently of food intake and body weight. These metabolic effects are unlikely to be mediated by the GHS receptor. Furthermore, simultaneous administration of des-ghrelin abolishes the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on hepatic insulin action.