Radiology of acute pancreatitis today: the Atlanta classification and the current role of imaging in its diagnosis and treatment. / Radiología de la pancreatitis aguda hoy: clasificación de Atlanta y papel actual de la imagen en su diagnóstico y tratamiento.

Acute pancreatitis is common and requires multidisciplinary management. The revised Atlanta classification, published in 2012, defines the terminology necessary to enable specialists from different backgrounds to discuss the morphological and clinical types of acute pancreatitis. Radiologists' role depends fundamentally on computed tomography (CT), which makes it possible to classify the morphology of this disease and to predict its clinical severity by applying imaging severity indices. Furthermore, CT- or ultrasound-guided drainage is, together with endoscopy, the current technique of choice in the initial approach to collections that appear as a complication. This paper aims to disseminate the concepts coined in the revised Atlanta classification and to describe the current role of radiologists in the diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis.

Awards for the best presentations at the XVI Congress of SEDIA. / Premios a las mejores presentaciones en el XVI Congreso de la SEDIA.

In October, the sixteenth SEDIA congress was held in Seville with great success. The board of directors awarded prizes for the best oral communication and the best electronic educational and scientific posters. In this special article we summarize the content of the awards presentations.

[Computed tomographic colonography: applications, advantages and disadvantages]. / Colonografía tomográfica computarizada: aplicaciones, ventajas e inconvenientes.

INTRODUCTION: Complete preoperative study of the colon is required in the management of colorectal cancer, due to the frequent association of primary colonic neoplasms with colonic adenomas (28%) and/or synchronous carcinomas (5%) of the colon. We present a series of patients who underwent computed tomographic colonography, the indications for this procedure, and the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a descriptive prospective study. Between May 2003 and August 2004, 50 computed tomographic colonographies were performed in 50 patients with suspected stenosing colorectal cancer and incomplete conventional colonoscopy. RESULTS: Fifty computed tomographic colonographies were performed. The findings were as follows: three were normal (6%), and in the remainder, one was a false positive for a suspected neoplastic pelvic mass (3.125%) and two were false positives (11.7%) for colonic polyps. Fifty percent of the findings (n = 32) were related to peritoneal metastases and colonic neoplasms. There were 12 technical complications [lack of cleaning of the colon (5), lack of distension (2), little air insufflation (5)]. Patient complications included vegetative manifestations in one (vomiting) and rectal bleeding in another. The overall complication rate was 27.4% (23.4% corresponded to technical complications and the remaining 4% were patient-related). There was no mortality related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Because computed tomographic colonography is safe, effective and well tolerated by the patient, it should be considered as a technical alternative in the study of stenosing neoplasms of the proximal colon with incomplete colonoscopy. In addition, it allows other associated findings, both intra- and extracolonic, to be obtained and improves the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the patient.