[Long-term efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 2-year treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' dvukhletnei terapii divozilimabom u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg every 24 weeks during 100 weeks for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS (NCT05385744) included 338 adult patients with MS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and teriflunomide (TRF) 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks, then entered an additional period from weeks 49 to 100, which included three cycles of therapy. The efficacy was assessed based on the results of brain MRI and registration of data on relapses. RESULTS: 308 subjects completed 5 therapy cycles according to the study protocol. An analysis of the effectiveness of DIV therapy over 2 years showed a persistent suppression of MRI and clinical activity of the disease in comparison with TRF, which was confirmed by all the studied MRI indicators (including CUA; total number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions on T1-weighted scans ; number of new or enlarged lesions on T2-weighted scans; lesions volume change on T2-weighted scans; change in the volume of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted scans). The use of DIV was associated with a statistically significant decrease in ARR compared to TRF (p=0.0001). The ARR in the DIV group was 0.057, in the TRF group - 0.164 with 95% confidential interval for the frequency ratio [0.202; 0.593]. The incidence of GdE lesions on T1-weighted scans in the DIV group was significantly lower than in the TRF group. The average number of such lesions was 0.0±0.08 and 1.0±4.46 in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Progression of EDSS was detected in 18 (10.7%) and 36 (21.3%) patients in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p=0.0075). The proportion of patients with relapses was 11.2% (n=19) in the DIV group and 23.1% (n=39) in the TRF group (p=0.0039). In the subpopulation of patients with SPMS, no cases of increase in EDSS were detected, and not a single case of exacerbation was recorded over 2 years of using DIV. Also, DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and laboratory abnormalities, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS CT indicate a high sustained efficacy and safety of long-term use of DIV in comparison with TRF during 2 years of therapy.

[Efficacy and safety of antiCD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab during 48-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' 48 nedel'nogo primeneniya monoklonal'nogo antitela protiv CD20 divozilimaba u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom: rezul'taty randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in comparison with the teriflunomide (TRF). The study of the efficacy and safety of the use of the drug DIV was carried out for 48 weeks of therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS included 338 adult patients with RRMS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and TRF 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks. The primary end point was «Mean annualized relapse rate 48 weeks after the last patient is randomized in the study¼. RESULTS: 321 subjects completed 48 weeks of therapy according to the study protocol. The analysis of the of efficacy data for the primary endpoint successively proved the hypothesis of superiority of the test drug DIV at a dose of 500 mg over the reference drug TRF. A rapid suppression of acute disease activity according to the brain MRI and clinical manifestations of the disease was shown after the first infusion of DIV in patients with RRMS. Thus, after 48 weeks of therapy in patients treated with DIV, there were no T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, while in the TRF group such lesions were observed in 20.7% (35/169) of subjects. Evaluation of the CUA per scan showed that the mean values for the estimated period were statistically significantly lower in the DIV drug group compared to the TRF group: the ratio of the adjusted per scan rates (DIV/TRF) was 0.125 [95% CI: 0.089; 0.177]. Over the 48 weeks of therapy, the proportion of subjects with relapses was 9.5% (n=16/169) in the DIV group and 19.5% (33/169) in the TRF group (p=0.0086). DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and deviations of laboratory data, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the clinical study indicate the high efficacy and safety of DIV in comparison with TRF.

[Pattern of biochemical markers of mineral and bone disorders in kidney transplant recipients: real-world data].

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies providing comprehensive data on the prevalence of mineral and bone disorders (MBD) laboratory abnormalities after kidney transplantation in Russia. AIM: to obtain real-world data on the prevalence of the main mineral abnormalities among kidney transplant recipients and to revise their concomitant MBD therapy. METHOD: This cross-sectional study included 236 patients with successful kidney transplantation. Their serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), total calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were measured. RESULTS: Only 6.2% of our cohort had all laboratory parameters within the target range, whereas persistent HPT along with hypercalcemia was noted in almost one third of the patients (31%). Normal iPTH levels were observed in 13% cases; 84% of the patients had hyperparathyroidism. The fraction of patients with target iPTH did not differ between the groups with normal and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p=0.118). Hypercalcemia was observed in 29% cases. The serum P level varied significantly in groups with different eGFR (p<0.0001), increasing with declining graft function. Furthermore, 40.7% of patients had ALP above the target range. While 123 patients received active vitamin D (alfacalcidol), 33 received monotherapy with inactive vitamin D (cholecalciferol). The control group consisted of 57 medication-naïve patients. The serum total Ca level varied significantly between the groups (p=0.0006), being higher in patients supplemented with cholecalciferol. The fraction of patients with normocalcemia was lowest in the cholecalciferol group (chi-square, р=0.0018). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of biochemical abnormalities after kidney transplantation is high. Alfacalcidol usage may be safer than using cholecalciferol to prevent hypercalcemia development.

[Efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 24-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-2]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' 24 nedel' primeneniya divozilimaba sredi patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-2.

OBJECTIVE: To find the optimal therapeutic dose of the anti-B cell mAb divozilimab (DIV) based on the efficacy and safety data of intravenous administration at a dose of 125 mg or 500 mg in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) compared to placebo (PBO) and teriflunomide (TRF). To study the efficacy and safety of DIV within 24 weeks of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-2 involved 271 adult patients with RRMS from 25 centres In Russia. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1) into 4 groups: TRF, DIV 125 mg, DIV 500 mg and PBO. After screening patients entered to the main period, which consisted of one cycle of therapy for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions (Gd+) observed on brain MRI scans after 24 weeks (per scan - involves estimating the mean value of the score from all the MRI assessments performed for each participant in the study). RESULTS: 263 patients completed 24 weeks of treatment. Most of the patients in the DIV groups had no lesions on T1-weighted MRI after 24 weeks of treatment (94.44% on 125 mg and 93.06% on 500 mg). In the TRF and PBO groups the values were significantly lower: 68.06% and 56.36% respectively (both p<0.05). The proportions of relapse-free patients in the DIV groups were 93.06% and 97.22% (125 mg and 500 mg, respectively). As expected, DIV reduced the CD19+ B-cells. However, the repopulation rate of CD19+ B-cells in the 125 mg group was more pronounced (mainly due to the recovering pool of CD27-naive B-cells) compared to the 500 mg group. DIV showed a favorable safety profile at both doses. CONCLUSION: Thus, the assessment of 24 weeks treatment demonstrated that DIV is a highly effective, safe and convenient option for the treatment of RRMS patients, both naive and previously treated with disease modifying therapy. A dose of 500 mg is recommended for further efficacy and safety evaluation during phase 3 CT.

[Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Sampeginterferon-ß1a in the Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial 104-Week Results]. / Dolgosrochnye dannye po effektivnosti i bezopasnosti preparata sampeginterferon-ß1a u patsientov s remittiruyushchim rasseyannym sklerozom: rezul'taty 104-nedel'nogo randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sampeginterferon-ß1a (samPEG-IFN-ß1a) 180 µg and 240 µg administered once every 2 weeks compared to placebo and low dose interferon beta-1a (LIB) 30 µg administered once weekly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis aged 18-60 years, with Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤5.5 were randomized at a ratio of 2:2:2:1 to the following groups: samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg, samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg, LIB, placebo. After 20 weeks, the placebo group completed the study. After week 52, the final analysis was performed, which included the primary endpoint analysis, the LIB group patients completed their participation in the study. The patients in samPEG-IFN-ß1a groups continued to receive therapy with samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg until week 100 inclusive. The results of the final analysis after 52 weeks have been previously published. The current article presents a long-term efficacy and safety of samPEG-IFN-ß1a after 104 weeks of the trial. RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate over the second year was 0.16 in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg group and 0.09 in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg group. By week 104, the proportion of relapse-free patients was 77.0% (87/113) and 83.3% (95/114) in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg and 240 µg groups, respectively. There were no negative dynamics of MRI markers, neurological deficit parameters and cognitive functions by scales and tests. The safety profile of samPEG-IFN-ß1a was consistent with the known safety profile of IFN-ß therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with samPEG-IFN-ß1a is an effective and safe first-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

[Efficacy, tolerability and safety of the treatment with teberif: the results of a 2-year randomized clinical trial of treatment naïve patients with remitting multiple sclerosis, who have not received DMT, after switching from other interferon ß-1a]. / Éffektivnost', perenosimost' i bezopasnost' terapii preparatom teberif: rezul'taty dvukhletnego klinicheskogo issledovaniia u patsientov s remittiruiushchim rasseiannym sklerozom, ranee ne poluchavshikh PITRS, i pri perekliuchenii s drugogo interferona ß-1a.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the treatment with teberif/interferon ß-1a, to analyze safety, tolerability and dynamics of key efficacy variables after switching from referent drug rebif to biosimilar teberif in patients with remitting multiple sclerosis (RMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the main period of the international multicenter randomized study patients were randomized to receive treatment with teberif for 52 weeks, or rebif for 52 weeks, or placebo for 16 weeks to evaluate efficacy and safety of treatment. After the main study period, patients were group-independently switched to take open-label teberif treatment during the next 48 weeks. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The analysis of multiple evaluation parameters of the efficiency during the 1st study period (blinded) and the 2nd study period (open-label) has shown that teberif and rebif demonstrate equivalent efficacy and stable 2-year efficacy of teberif was proven. There were no significant differences between teberif and rebif for all safety, and tolerability parameters. Switching from rebif to teberif didn't influence treatment efficacy. The 2-year study results confirmed a biosimilar teberif's benign tolerability and expected safety profile to other interferons ß-1a in patients with RMS.

[A comparative placebo-controlled clinical study on the efficacy and safety of interferon beta-1a for subcutaneous injections in patients with remitting multiple sclerosis: results of the first year of observations]. / Sravnitel'noe platsebo-kontroliruemoe klinicheskoe issledovanie éffektivnosti i bezopasnosti preparatov interferona beta-1a dlia podkozhnogo vvedeniia u patsientov s remittiruiushchim rasseiannym sklerozom: rezul'taty pervogo goda nabliudeniia.

AIM: To prove the equivalent efficacy of teberif (BCD-033, interferon beta-1) and rebif (interferon beta-1a) in patients with remitting multiple sclerosis (RMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter double blind placebo-controlled comparative randomized III phase study included 163 patients with RMS. Patients were randomized into three equal groups (teberif, rebif or placebo). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After 52 weeks, the equivalent efficacy of teberif and the brand drug rebif was shown. The result of assessment of the primary endpoint, which was combined unique active (CUA) lesion (the total of MRI T1-weighted lesions and new or newly enlarging T2-weighted lesions, without double counting of lesions with both activities), showed no significant differences (0.727±1.042 and 0.652±1.059 (p=0.7354, t-Student test) in the teberif and rebif groups, respectively. No between-group differences were found for other MRI indices and clinical parameters related with relapses. Teberif was shown to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile comparable to that of rebif. The results suggest the therapeutic equivalency of the drugs and form the basis for using the bioanalogue of interferon-beta 1 in patients with RMS.

[Seasonal changes in the physiological age of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) imagoes on the Stavropol Elevation].

Ixodes ricinus imagoes were caught using a flannel flag in the April to October of 2011 to 2013. There were two seasons when these stages were numerous, namely: spring and autumn. The physiological age of 506 hungry I. ricinus imagoes was determined from their outward signs: the shape of their rear body, the surface of the cuticle, and visibility of the internals through the latter. The change in the age composition suggests that an autumn imago cohort consists of specimens that emerged from nymphs in summer.