Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Genet Evol ; 119: 105577, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403035

RESUMO

In January 2021, the monitoring of circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 was initiated in Germany under the Corona Surveillance Act, which was discontinued after July 2023. This initiative aimed to enhance pandemic containment, as specific amino acid changes, particularly in the spike protein, were associated with increased transmission and reduced vaccine efficacy. Our group conducted whole genome sequencing using the ARTIC protocol (currently V4) on Illumina's NextSeq 500 platform (and, starting in May 2023, on the MiSeq DX platform) for SARS-CoV-2 positive specimen from patients at Heidelberg University Hospital, associated hospitals, and the public health office in the Rhine-Neckar/Heidelberg region. In total, we sequenced 26,795 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples between January 2021 and July 2023. Valid sequences, meeting the requirements for upload to the German electronic sequencing data hub (DESH) operated by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), were determined for 24,852 samples, and the lineage/clade could be identified for 25,912 samples. The year 2021 witnessed significant dynamics in the circulating variants in the Rhine-Neckar/Heidelberg region, including A.27.RN, followed by the emergence of B.1.1.7 (Alpha), subsequently displaced by B.1.617.2 (Delta), and the initial occurrences of B.1.1.529 (Omicron). By January 2022, B.1.1.529 had superseded B.1.617.2, dominating with over 90%. The years 2022 and 2023 were then characterized by the dominance of B.1.1.529 and its sublineages, particularly BA.5 and BA.2, and more recently, the emergence of recombinant variants like XBB.1.5. Since the global dominance of B.1.617.2, the identified variant distribution in our local study, apart from a time delay in the spread of new variants, can be considered largely representative of the global distribution. om a time delay in the spread of new variants, can be considered largely representative of the global distribution.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários
2.
Transplantation ; 107(5): 1139-1150, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36617671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impaired immune response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) leads to an urgent need for adapted immunization strategies. METHODS: Sixty-nine KTRs without seroconversion after ≥3 COVID-19 vaccinations were enrolled, and humoral response was determined after an additional full-dose mRNA-1273 vaccination by measuring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibodies and neutralizing antibody activity against the Delta and Omicron variants 1 and 3 mo postvaccination. T-cell response was analyzed 3 mo postvaccination by assessing interferon-γ release. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) was withdrawn in 41 KTRs 1 wk before until 4 wk after vaccination to evaluate effects on immunogenicity. Graft function, changes in donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, and donor-derived cell-free DNA were monitored in KTRs undergoing MPA withdrawal. RESULTS: Humoral response to vaccination was significantly stronger in KTRs undergoing MPA withdrawal 1 mo postvaccination; however, overall waning humoral immunity was noted in all KTRs 3 mo after vaccination. Higher anti-S1 immunoglobulin G levels correlated with better neutralizing antibody activity against the Delta and Omicron variants, whereas no significant association was detected between T-cell response and neutralizing antibody activity. No rejection occurred during study, and graft function remained stable in KTRs undergoing MPA withdrawal. In 22 KTRs with Omicron variant breakthrough infections, neutralizing antibody activity was better against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 wild-type and the Delta variants than against the Omicron variant. CONCLUSIONS: MPA withdrawal to improve vaccine responsiveness should be critically evaluated because withdrawing MPA may be associated with enhanced alloimmune response, and the initial effect of enhanced seroconversion rates in KTRs with MPA withdrawal disappears 3 mo after vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Rim , Vacinas , Humanos , Ácido Micofenólico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Imunidade Humoral , Transplantados
3.
Nat Cancer ; 4(1): 96-107, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36581734

RESUMO

Patients with cancer are at high risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with high morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, impaired humoral response renders severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines less effective and treatment options are scarce. Randomized trials using convalescent plasma are missing for high-risk patients. Here, we performed a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001632-10/DE ) in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 (n = 134) within four risk groups ((1) cancer (n = 56); (2) immunosuppression (n = 16); (3) laboratory-based risk factors (n = 36); and (4) advanced age (n = 26)) randomized to standard of care (control arm) or standard of care plus convalescent/vaccinated anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma (plasma arm). No serious adverse events were observed related to the plasma treatment. Clinical improvement as the primary outcome was assessed using a seven-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes were time to discharge and overall survival. For the four groups combined, those receiving plasma did not improve clinically compared with those in the control arm (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.29; P = 0.205). However, patients with cancer experienced a shortened median time to improvement (HR = 2.50; P = 0.003) and superior survival with plasma treatment versus the control arm (HR = 0.28; P = 0.042). Neutralizing antibody activity increased in the plasma cohort but not in the control cohort of patients with cancer (P = 0.001). Taken together, convalescent/vaccinated plasma may improve COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer who are unable to intrinsically generate an adequate immune response.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Imunização Passiva/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Soroterapia para COVID-19 , Anticorpos Antivirais , Neoplasias/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA