RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium acnes has been described as the most common causative microorganism in prosthetic shoulder infections. Conventional anaerobic culture or molecular-based technologies are usually used for this purpose, but little to no concordance between these methodologies (k = 0.333 or less) has been observed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the minimum C. acnes load for detection higher for next-generation sequencing (NGS) than for anaerobic conventional culture? (2) What duration of incubation is necessary for anaerobic culture to detect all C. acnes loads? METHODS: Five C. acnes strains were tested for this study: Four strains were causing infection and were isolated from surgical samples. Meanwhile, the other was a reference strain commonly used as a positive and quality control in microbiology and bioinformatics. To create inoculums with varying degrees of bacterial load, we began with a standard bacterial suspension at 1.5 x 10 8 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL and created six more diluted suspensions (from 1.5 x 10 6 CFU/mL to 1.5 x 10 1 CFU/mL). Briefly, to do so, we transferred 200 µL from the tube with the highest inoculum (for example, 1.5 x 10 6 CFU/mL) to the following dilution tube (1.5 x 10 5 CFU/mL; 1800 µL of diluent + 200 µL of 1.5 x 10 6 CFU/mL). We serially continued the transfers to create all diluted suspensions. Six tubes were prepared per strain. Thirty bacterial suspensions were tested per assay. Then, 100 µL of each diluted suspension was inoculated into brain heart infusion agar with horse blood and taurocholate agar plates. Two plates were used per bacterial suspension in each assay. All plates were incubated at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber and assessed for growth after 3 days of incubation and daily thereafter until positive or Day 14. The remaining volume of each bacterial suspension was sent for NGS analysis to identify bacterial DNA copies. We performed the experimental assays in duplicate. We calculated mean DNA copies and CFUs for each strain, bacterial load, and incubation timepoint assessed. We reported detection by NGS and culture as a qualitative variable based on the identification or absence of DNA copies and CFUs, respectively. In this way, we identified the minimum bacterial load detected by NGS and culture, regardless of incubation time. We performed a qualitative comparison of detection rates between methodologies. Simultaneously, we tracked C. acnes growth on agar plates and determined the minimum incubation time in days required for CFU detection in all strains and loads examined in this study. Growth detection and bacterial CFU counting were performed by three laboratory personnel, with a high intraobserver and interobserver agreement (κ > 0.80). A two-tailed p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Conventional cultures can detect C. acnes at a load of 1.5 x 10 1 CFU/mL, whereas NGS can detect bacteria when the concentration was higher, at 1.5 x 10 2 CFU/mL. This is represented by a lower positive detection proportion (73% [22 of 30]) for NGS than for cultures (100% [30 of 30]); p = 0.004). By 7 days, anaerobic cultures were able to detect all C. acnes loads, even at the lowest concentrations. CONCLUSION: When NGS is negative and culture is positive for C. acnes , there is likely a low bacterial load. Holding cultures beyond 7 days is likely unnecessary. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is important for treating physicians to decide whether low bacterial loads necessitate aggressive antibiotic treatment or whether they are more likely contaminants. Cultures that are positive beyond 7 days likely represent contamination or bacterial loads even below the dilution used in this study. Physicians may benefit from studies designed to clarify the clinical importance of the low bacteria loads used in this study at which both methodologies' detection differed. Moreover, researchers might explore whether even lower C. acnes loads have a role in true periprosthetic joint infection.
