Routine Use of a Standardized Mastectomy Diagram by Surgeons Improves Accuracy and Timeliness of the Final Pathological Report.

BACKGROUND: Accurate and timely assessment of pathology specimens is critical for patient care and oncologic management. This study aimed to determine whether a standardized mastectomy diagram would facilitate communication among surgeons and pathologists and improve pathologic processing. METHODS: A prospective quality improvement study was conducted over a continuous 12-month period. During the first 6 months, usual pathologic processing of mastectomy specimens was performed per standard department protocol. In the second 6 months, a standardized mastectomy diagram was completed at the time of surgery, noting the location and preoperative pathologic diagnosis of all benign and malignant lesions. An analysis of covariance was used to compare the number of breast lesions identified and the number of days between specimen receipt and the date of the final pathology report between each group. RESULTS: Time from specimen receipt to final pathologic report decreased from a mean (± SE) of 8.3 ± 0.7 days in the usual processing group to 6.1 ± 0.6 days with the use of the standardized mastectomy diagram, for a between-group difference of 2.1 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.0; p = 0.02). The number of lesions identified increased from 1.8 ± 0.2 to 2.6 ± 0.2, for a between-group difference of 0.8 (95% CI 0.1-1.5; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A standardized mastectomy diagram completed at the time of surgery improves the quality of pathologic processing. The diagram, which serves as a mastectomy lesion map, assists lesion localization, enhances accuracy, and reduces time to final pathology report.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Deep Inferior Epigastric Arteries for Surgical Planning (Breast Reconstruction Surgery): 2022 Update.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States, with surgical options including lumpectomy and mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a muscle-sparing perforator free flap breast reconstruction technique, which uses the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforators to create a vascular pedicle. Multiple perforators are identified by preoperative imaging, which are typically ranked based on size, location, and intramuscular course. The goal of preoperative imaging is to aid the surgical team in preoperative planning given the variability of the DIEA perforator branches anatomy between patients. The objective of this document is to review the imaging modalities that can be used preoperatively to identify the optimal perforator and thereby reduce intraoperative complications, reduce postoperative complications, and improve clinical outcomes. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.

Mastectomy may be performed to treat breast cancer or as a prophylactic approach in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer. In addition, mastectomies may be performed with or without reconstruction. Reconstruction approaches differ and may be autologous, involving a transfer of tissue (skin, subcutaneous fat, and muscle) from other parts of the body to the chest wall. Reconstruction may also involve implants. Implant reconstruction may occur as a single procedure or as multistep procedures with initial use of an adjustable tissue expander allowing the mastectomy tissues to be stretched without compromising blood supply. Ultimately, a full-volume implant will be placed. Reconstructions with a combination of autologous and implant reconstruction may also be performed. Other techniques such as autologous fat grafting may be used to refine both implant and flap-based reconstruction. This review of imaging in the setting of mastectomy with or without reconstruction summarizes the literature and makes recommendations based on available evidence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive cancer: the contralateral breast controversy.

We determined if the risk of relapse is increased in patients with the concomitant diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and an invasive cancer, suggesting the need for a more aggressive surgical approach. A retrospective chart review was conducted from the University of Michigan's Cancer Registry of patients with LCIS and a simultaneous invasive cancer and patients with invasive cancer only diagnosed between 1981 and 1997. The two groups were compared statistically with the following variables: age at diagnosis, tumor stage, histopathologic type of cancer, type of surgery, first line of treatment, relapse status with dates, site of relapse, and vital status. Statistically significant differences were found in the distribution of age (mean p = 0.0484 and median p = 0.0216), and histopathologic type of cancer (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was noted in the overall survival between the two groups (p = 0.511). There was also a significant difference in the relapse-free survival curves between the groups (p = 0.032). The risk of relapse was almost double (1.92) for the cancer-only patients relative to patients with LCIS as a histologic component of cancer. There was no significant increase in contralateral or ipsilateral breast recurrence for patients with LCIS and an invasive cancer compared to an invasive cancer alone. This lends support to the use of breast conservation therapy for invasive cancer patients with a histologic component of LCIS. The significant difference in the types of cancer may support the theory of genetic progression of LCIS to cancer, but clearly further data are required to prove this hypothesis.

Mammographic screening of TRAM flap breast reconstructions for detection of nonpalpable recurrent cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate findings from routine mammographic screenings in patients with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 25-month study period, 214 consecutive screening mammograms in 113 asymptomatic women (mean age, 51 years) with TRAM flap reconstructions were obtained. Mastectomies were performed for cancer in 106 (94%) of the 113 women and for prophylaxis in seven (6%). Prospectively, a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment category 1-5 was assigned to each mammogram. Surgical, medical, pathologic, and radiographic records were retrospectively reviewed. CIs were determined by the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. RESULTS: Seven (3%) of 214 examinations were BI-RADS category 4 or 5. Six (86%) of seven patients underwent biopsy. Two (33%) of these six biopsies demonstrated invasive ductal carcinoma. Cancer detection rate for mammography was 1.9% (two of 106) (95% CI: 0.33%, 7.32%) for women with reconstruction for breast cancer during the 2-year period. One (6%) of 16 BI-RADS category 3 examinations later proved to be invasive ductal carcinoma at follow-up. No interval cancer was discovered in 171 cases of BI-RADS category 1 or 2 examinations with 1-year follow-up. No cancers occurred in women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy. A biopsy positive predictive value of 33% (95% CI: 6%, 76%) was observed. CONCLUSION: Screening mammography of TRAM flap-reconstructed breasts enables detection of nonpalpable cancer before clinical examination.