Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nat Med ; 25(9): 1422-1427, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31406350

RESUMO

TRK fusions are found in a variety of cancer types, lead to oncogenic addiction, and strongly predict tumor-agnostic efficacy of TRK inhibition1-8. With the recent approval of the first selective TRK inhibitor, larotrectinib, for patients with any TRK-fusion-positive adult or pediatric solid tumor, to identify mechanisms of treatment failure after initial response has become of immediate therapeutic relevance. So far, the only known resistance mechanism is the acquisition of on-target TRK kinase domain mutations, which interfere with drug binding and can potentially be addressable through second-generation TRK inhibitors9-11. Here, we report off-target resistance in patients treated with TRK inhibitors and in patient-derived models, mediated by genomic alterations that converge to activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. MAPK pathway-directed targeted therapy, administered alone or in combination with TRK inhibition, re-established disease control. Experimental modeling further suggests that upfront dual inhibition of TRK and MEK may delay time to progression in cancer types prone to the genomic acquisition of MAPK pathway-activating alterations. Collectively, these data suggest that a subset of patients will develop off-target mechanisms of resistance to TRK inhibition with potential implications for clinical management and future clinical trial design.


Assuntos
Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Receptor trkA/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Benzamidas/administração & dosagem , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/genética , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Feminino , Xenoenxertos , Humanos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Indazóis/administração & dosagem , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP Quinases/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Camundongos , Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno/antagonistas & inibidores , Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno/genética , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patologia , Oximas/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Piridonas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinonas/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
2.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 20172017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29629425

RESUMO

Purpose: Ewing Sarcoma (ES) and Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors (DSRCT) are aggressive sarcomas molecularly characterized by EWSR1 gene fusions. As pathognomonic genomic events in these respective tumor types, EWSR1 fusions represent robust potential biomarkers for disease monitoring. Patients and Methods: To investigate the feasibility of identifying EWSR1 fusions in plasma derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from ES and DSRCT patients, we evaluated two complementary approaches in samples from 17 patients with radiographic evidence of disease. The first approach involved identification of patient-specific genomic EWSR1 fusion breakpoints in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor DNA using a broad, hybridization capture-based next generation sequencing (NGS) panel, followed by design of patient-specific droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays for plasma cfDNA interrogation . The second approach employed a disease-tailored targeted hybridization capture-based NGS panel applied directly to cfDNA which included EWSR1 as well as several other genes with potential prognostic utility. Results: EWSR1 fusions were identified in 11/11 (100%) ES and 5/6 (83%) DSRCT samples by ddPCR, while 10/11 (91%) and 4/6 (67%) were identified by NGS. The ddPCR approach had higher sensitivity, ranging between 0.009-0.018% sensitivity. However, the hybrid capture-based NGS assay identified the precise fusion breakpoints in the majority of cfDNA samples, as well as mutations in TP53 and STAG2, two other recurrent, clinically significant alterations in ES, all without prior knowledge of the tumor sequencing results. Conclusion: These results provide a compelling rationale for an integrated approach utilizing both NGS and ddPCR for plasma cfDNA-based biomarker evaluations in prospective cooperative group studies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA