Utility of multimodal sampling and testing during advanced bronchoscopy for diagnosing atypical respiratory infections in a Coccidioides-endemic region.

Background: The role of advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy (ADB) for assessing atypical respiratory infections is unclear. The purpose of this study was to ascertain: (I) the diagnostic utility of ADB-tissue sampling in patients with focal thoracic lesions due to atypical respiratory infections; (II) how multimodal bronchoscopic sampling and testing enhance diagnosis in a Coccidioides-endemic region. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study analyzing all ADBs performed over a 10-year period in patients with focal thoracic lesions diagnosed with a non-malignant disorder. Only cases which procured lower respiratory tract secretion and tissue samples by ADB, and had both cytohistology and culture results available were included. Results: Among 403 subjects with non-malignant disease, 136 (33.7%) were diagnosed with atypical respiratory infections, with ADB contributing a diagnosis in 119 (87.5%) of these. Coccidioidal disease was independently associated with a cytohistologic diagnosis [odds ratio =7.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.51-23.26; P<0.001]. Mycobacteria were more effectively identified by culture (overall yield of 8.4%, vs. 2.7% by cytohistology; P<0.001). Among subjects for which both respiratory secretion and tissue sampling were dual-tested with culture and cytology/cytohistology, adding ADB-guided transbronchial needle aspiration and/or forceps biopsy (TBNA/TBFB) to bronchoalveolar lavage and/or bronchial washings (BAL/BW) more than doubled the yield for dimorphic fungi, from 7.1% to 15.1% (increase of 8.0%, 95% CI: 5.2-11.9%). For lung lesions, adding tissue culture to dual TBNA/TBFB cytohistology-tested lung samples doubled the proportion diagnosed with atypical infection over using TBNA-cytohistology alone (increase of 15.8%, 95% CI: 10.4-23.1%). Adding lymph node to lung sampling increased the proportion diagnosed with coccidioidomycosis by 8.8% (95% CI: 4.8-15%). Among subjects with atypical respiratory infections, major ADB-related complications occurred in 1.5%. Conclusions: ADB is useful for diagnosing atypical respiratory infections manifesting as focal thoracic lesions. A multimodal approach to both sampling and testing enhances yield, while maintaining a favorable procedure safety profile. Cytohistology testing and nodal sampling are beneficial for pulmonary coccidioidomycosis, and culture for mycobacterial disease. The approach to ADB-sampling should be adjusted according to clinical context and regional infection patterns.

Molnupiravir: an antiviral drug against COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, has caused numerous deaths worldwide and poses significant challenges. Researchers have recently studied a new antiviral drug called molnupiravir for treating COVID-19. This review examines the causes and immunopathogenesis of COVID-19, as well as the role of molnupiravir in its treatment. Molnupiravir is a prodrug of ß-D-N4-hydroxyctytidine (NHC) and has demonstrated activity against various viruses, including MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and influenza virus. The active form of molnupiravir, NHC triphosphate, acts as a nucleoside analog that disrupts viral replication by causing mutations in the viral RNA, thereby inhibiting viral growth. This review summarizes the results of multiple clinical trials that have evaluated the effectiveness of molnupiravir against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. Animal studies have also shown that molnupiravir significantly reduces the viral load and prevents transmission to other animals. Overall, molnupiravir has demonstrated strong efficacy and reasonable safety, reducing hospitalization rates by nearly 50% among COVID-19-positive individuals at risk of complications. Patients in clinical settings have tolerated molnupiravir well and experienced positive outcomes, such as clearance of viral RNA, decreased viral load, and reduced hospitalization rates. Additionally, compared to a placebo, molnupiravir has been associated with lower mortality rates. Therefore, molnupiravir can be a beneficial drug to treat patients suffering from SARS-CoV-2, and further studies can provide more information about its safety and efficacy.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Hiora SG Gel With Triamcinolone Acetonide Gel in Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis.

Background The oral condition known as recurrent aphthous ulceration (RAU) or recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is very prevalent. Its etiopathogenesis is unknown; hence, symptomatic therapy is all that can be offered if it manifests clinically. Lesion care aims to minimize discomfort and the frequency of relapses by bringing active illness under local control in the affected area. The current treatment options that may have negative side effects include the use of topical and systemic steroids, antibiotics, cauterization, and laser therapy. Objectives and Importance This study aimed to compare the efficiency of HiOra SG gel with triamcinolone acetonide gel in the management of RAS. Materials and Methods Fifty individuals with RAS were recruited for the trial and randomly assigned to either group I (HiOra SG gel) or group II (0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment; Oraways). After each meal for a total of 10 days, those with mouth ulcers were instructed to topically administer the drugs. The clinical data were analyzed by comparing the ulcer severity scores from the first, fifth, and 10th days. Results There was a statistically significant (p = 0.001) reduction in reported pain, pain duration, and overall ulcer severity across all groups. After therapy, however, neither the HiOra gel group nor the triamcinolone group showed any discernible improvement over the other. Conclusion The present study's findings corroborate the efficacy of HiOra SG gel in the treatment of RAS when compared to triamcinolone acetonide gel (0.1%). In this trial, no patients had any negative reactions to HiOra SG gel. In the future, further studies are needed with larger samples to prove its benefits.

Original Research: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Southern California Nurses.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate characteristics of vaccine-hesitant nurses at two large Southern California medical centers where rates of COVID-19 vaccination were lower than expected. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of nurse participants in a cross-sectional study conducted at the two medical centers. Participants completed an online survey regarding their demographics; work setting and role characteristics; influenza vaccination history; COVID-19 knowledge and beliefs; and personal history of COVID-19 exposure, diagnosis, and disease impact (infection or death) on those closest to them. RESULTS: Of 869 nurse participants, most (78.6%) were vaccinated and 21.4% were unvaccinated; more than half of the unvaccinated participants reported being unwilling to be vaccinated ("vaccine hesitant"). The χ 2 comparisons revealed no significant differences between vaccinated and vaccine-hesitant nurses in terms of education, contact with COVID-19 patients, work environment, or having friends and family impacted by COVID-19. Binary logistic regression showed that nurses who had no history of recent influenza vaccination were 10 times more likely to be vaccine hesitant, those who had inaccurate knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines were seven times more likely to be vaccine hesitant, and younger nurses and those with a prior COVID-19 diagnosis were approximately three times more likely to be vaccine hesitant. Furthermore, 17.3% of all participants were unwilling to recommend COVID-19 vaccination to others. CONCLUSION: The findings offer a nuanced understanding of vaccine hesitancy among nurses and will be useful to the planning and development of policies, campaigns, and interventions aimed at increasing vaccination rates among nurses. Changing attitudes is essential, and particular attention must be paid to nurses who are unwilling to recommend vaccination to others. Effective interventions are needed.

Racial/Ethnic Variances in COVID-19 Inoculation among Southern California Healthcare Workers.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) from minoritized communities are a critical partner in moving vaccine-hesitant populations toward vaccination, yet a significant number of these HCWs are delaying or deciding against their own COVID-19 vaccinations. Our study aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of vaccine hesitancy among racially and ethnically minoritized HCWs and to describe factors associated with vaccine non-acceptance. Analysis of a sub-sample of racially and ethnically minoritized HCWs (N = 1131), who participated in a cross-sectional study at two large Southern California medical centers, was conducted. Participants completed an online survey consisting of demographics, work setting and clinical role, influenza vaccination history, COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, personal COVID-19 exposure, diagnosis, and impact on those closest to them. While overall most HCWs were vaccinated (84%), 28% of Black, 19% of Hispanic, and 8% of Asian American HCWs were vaccine-hesitant. Age, education level, occupation, history of COVID-19, and COVID-19 related knowledge were predictive of vaccine hesitancy. We found significant variations in COVID-19 related knowledge and reasons for vaccine hesitancy among Black (governmental mistrust), Hispanic (preference for physiological immunity), and Asian-American HCWs (concern about side effects) who were vaccine-hesitant or not. Our findings highlight racial and ethnic differences in vaccine-hesitancy and barriers to vaccination among HCWs of color. This study indicates the necessity of targeted interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy that are mindful of the disparities in knowledge and access and differences between and among racial and ethnic groups.

Impact of COVID-19 vaccine-associated side effects on health care worker absenteeism and future booster vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Short-term side effects related to mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are frequent and bothersome, with the potential to disrupt work duties and impact future vaccine decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors more likely to lead to vaccine-associated work disruption, employee absenteeism, and future vaccine reluctance among healthcare workers (HCWs). HYPOTHESIS: Side effects related to COVID vaccination: 1- frequently disrupt HCW duties, 2- result in a significant proportion of HCW absenteeism, 3- contribute to uncertainty about future booster vaccination, 4- vary based on certain demographic, socioeconomic, occupational, and vaccine-related factors. METHODS: Using an anonymous, voluntary electronic survey, we obtained responses from a large, heterogeneous sample of COVID-19-vaccinated HCWs in two healthcare systems in Southern California. Descriptive statistics and regression models were utilized to evaluate the research questions. RESULTS: Among 2,103 vaccinated HCWs, 579 (27.5%) reported that vaccine-related symptoms disrupted their professional responsibilities, and 380 (18.1%) missed work as a result. Independent predictors for absenteeism included experiencing generalized and work-disruptive symptoms, and receiving the Moderna vaccine [OR = 1.77 (95% CI = 1.33 - 2.36), p < 0.001]. Physicians were less likely to miss work due to side effects (6.7% vs 21.2% for all other HCWs, p < 0.001). Independent predictors of reluctance toward future booster vaccination included lower education level, younger age, having received the Moderna vaccine, and missing work due to vaccine-related symptoms. CONCLUSION: Symptoms related to mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 may frequently disrupt work duties, lead to absenteeism, and impact future vaccine decision-making. This may be more common in Moderna recipients and less likely among physicians. Accordingly, health employers should schedule future booster vaccination cycles to minimize loss of work productivity.

Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers in Southern California: Not Just "Anti" vs. "Pro" Vaccine.

In this study, we evaluated the status of and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination of healthcare workers in two major hospital systems (academic and private) in Southern California. Responses were collected via an anonymous and voluntary survey from a total of 2491 participants, including nurses, physicians, other allied health professionals, and administrators. Among the 2491 participants that had been offered the vaccine at the time of the study, 2103 (84%) were vaccinated. The bulk of the participants were middle-aged college-educated White (73%), non-Hispanic women (77%), and nursing was the most represented medical occupation (35%). Political affiliation, education level, and income were shown to be significant factors associated with vaccination status. Our data suggest that the current allocation of healthcare workers into dichotomous groups such as "anti-vaccine vs. pro-vaccine" may be inadequate in accurately tailoring vaccine uptake interventions. We found that healthcare workers that have yet to receive the COVID-19 vaccine likely belong to one of four categories: the misinformed, the undecided, the uninformed, or the unconcerned. This diversity in vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers highlights the importance of targeted intervention to increase vaccine confidence. Regardless of governmental vaccine mandates, addressing the root causes contributing to vaccine hesitancy continues to be of utmost importance.

An Immunohistochemical Study of HIF-1 Alpha in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

To evaluate and compare the expression of HIF-1 Alpha (HIF-1α) in oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) and various grades of Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). 30 cases each of OEDand OSCC were stained with HIF-1α antibody. Quantification of HIF-1α positive cellswas carried out and the data was statistically analysed. The mean % HIF-1α labeling index (HIF-1α LI) increased significantly from mild OED (32.11%), moderate OED (55.07%), to severe OED (64.58%). There was a statistically significant increase in the expression of HIF-1α as grades of OED increased. The mean HIF-1α LI % in well differentiated OSCC was 46.3%, Moderately differentiated OSCC-76.31% and Poorly differentiated OSCC-89.9%. The mean HIF-1α LI was found to increase with increasing grades of OSCC which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Further a comparison of mean HIF-1α LI in OED with different histologic grades of OSCC by Independent samples t test was performed. We found statistically significant difference between OED and moderately differentiated OSCC and OED and poorly differentiated OSCC (P = 0.000). Progressive increase in expression of HIF-1α was noted from OED to OSCC. It can be postulated that epithelial dysplastic lesions with increased HIF-1α expression are at greater risk of malignant transformation, suggesting that the expression of HIF-1α is an early event in oral carcinogenesis.

Haemangioendothelioma of Oral Cavity: A Rare Entity with Unusual Location.

Hemangioendothelioma is a rare, locally aggressive vascular tumor, originating from soft tissue, bone, skin, and organs such as liver or lung and exceptionally the oral cavity. It is usually benign but can show variable grades of malignancy. Most of the cases of oral epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas are asymptomatic, and diagnosis is hampered by the fact that the histological features somewhat overlap with hemangioma and angiosarcoma, with epithelioid cells, intracytoplasmic vacuoles, low mitotic activity, and rarely necrosis. Immunohistochemical analysis is required to rule out carcinoma or other epithelioid vascular neoplasms. Here, we report a very rare case of oral haemangioendothelioma in a 41-year female patient which presented as an exophytic, painless, mass on the labial gingiva, clinically diagnosed as pyogenic granuloma, which presented a diagnostically challenging histological picture, which required immunohistochemistry to achieve at the correct diagnosis.

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Technical Algorithm.

Despite falling out of favor in the 1970s, prepectoral breast reconstruction has resurfaced in the recent years as a safe and effective alternative to subpectoral/partial subpectoral breast reconstruction in carefully selected patients. This article outlines an algorithmic technical approach to prepectoral breast reconstruction for new patients and revision patients.

A Case Report of Mucormycosis with Palatal Ulcer: A Rare Clinical Dilemma.

Mucormycosis represents a group of life-threatening infections caused by fungi of the order mucorales of subphylum mucormycotina (formely known as the class zygomycetes). It is highly invasive and progressive disease resulting in higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Newer therapies have declined the rates of mortality. Early initiation of therapy often before confirmation of the diagnosis is necessary to optimize outcomes. Here, we report a case of mucormycosis with palatal ulcer in a 63-year male patient, which is a rare anatomic site for the occurrence of mucormycosis or is a rare clinical presentation. The patient was successfully treated with surgical debridement and amphotericin B.

Does oral radiocontrast affect image quality of abdominal sonography?

OBJECTIVE: Emergency Department patients with abdominal pain may require both an ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) for an accurate diagnosis. Patients are often asked to drink oral radiocontrast while awaiting ultrasound, in order to better expedite a CT in the case of a non-diagnostic US. The impact of oral radiocontrast on US image quality has not been studied. We compared the quality of US images obtained before and after the ingestion of oral radiocontrast in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: This was a prospective study in which adult volunteer subjects underwent sonographic studies of the aorta, the right upper quadrant, the right lower quadrant, and the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination. Initial studies were performed prior to ingestion of oral radiocontrast, with subsequent imaging occurring at 1 and 2hour post-ingestion. All of the images from the sonographic exams were randomized and subsequently scored for quality by two emergency ultrasound fellowship trained emergency physicians with extensive experience in performing and interpreting US. RESULTS: 638 images from 240 exams were obtained from 20 subjects at three time points. Six exams were not scored due to inadequate images. There were no significant differences in image quality for any of the US exam types after the ingestion of oral radiocontrast at 1 and 2h. CONCLUSION: Ingestion of oral radiocontrast did not affect image quality of four common abdominal ultrasound examinations.

Syncope: a review of emergency department management and disposition.

Syncope is defined as a transient loss of consciousness due to cerebral hypoperfusion with spontaneous return to baseline function without intervention. It is a common chief complaint of patients presenting to the emergency department. The differential diagnosis for syncope is broad and the management varies significantly depending on the underlying etiology. In the emergency department, determining the cause of a syncopal episode can be difficult. However, a thorough history and certain physical exam findings can assist in evaluating for life-threatening diagnoses. Risk-stratifying patients into low, moderate and high-risk groups can assist in medical decision making and help determine the patient's disposition. Advancements in ambulatory monitoring have made it possible to obtain prolonged cardiac evaluations of patients in the outpatient setting. This review will focus on the diagnosis and management of the various types of syncope.

Pyrosequencing of the genital microbiotas of HIV-seropositive and -seronegative women reveals Lactobacillus iners as the predominant Lactobacillus Species.

The species of vaginal lactobacilli in HIV-seropositive and -seronegative women were determined by 16S gene pyrosequencing. Lactobacillus iners sequences were the predominant lactobacillus sequences in 66% of HIV(+) women and 90% of HIV(-) women. This has implications for resistance of HIV(+) and HIV(-) women to genital colonization by pathogenic organisms.