Serum Albumin: Early Prognostic Marker of Benefit for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy But Not Chemoimmunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia exhibits decreased albumin and associates with short overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but whether on-treatment albumin changes associate with OS in NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and combination chemoimmunotherapy has not been thoroughly evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line ICI with or without chemotherapy between 2013 and 2020. The association of pretreatment albumin and early albumin changes with OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were included: 109 in ICI cohort and 101 in ICI + Chemo cohort. Within a median of 21 days from treatment initiation, patients with ≥ 10% of albumin decrease had significantly shorter OS compared to patients without albumin decrease in ICI cohort. Pretreatment albumin and albumin decrease within the first or second cycle of treatment were significantly and independently associated with OS in ICI cohort, but not in ICI + Chemo cohort. The lack of association between albumin and OS with the addition of chemotherapy was more pronounced among patients with ≥ 1% PD-L1 expression in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment serum albumin and early albumin decrease in ICI monotherapy was significantly associated with OS in advanced NSCLC. Early albumin change, as a routine lab value tested in clinic, may be combined with established biomarkers to improve outcome predictions of ICI monotherapy. The underlying mechanism of the observed association between decreased albumin and ICI resistance warrants further investigation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related thrombocytopenia: incidence, risk factors and effect on survival.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are associated with unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune-related thrombocytopenia (irTCP) is an understudied and poorly understood toxicity; little data are available regarding either risk of irTCP or the effect of irTCP on clinical outcomes of patients treated with ICI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of sequential cancer patients treated with ICI between 2011 and 2017 at our institution. All patients who received ICI alone or in combination with other systemic therapy in any line of treatment were included; those with thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 at baseline were excluded. We calculated the incidence of ≥ grade 3 irTCP and overall survival (OS). Patient factors associated with irTCP were assessed. RESULTS: We identified 1,038 patients that met eligibility criteria. Overall, 89 (8.6%) patients developed grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia; eighteen were attributed to ICI (1.73% overall). Patients who developed grade ≥ 3 irTCP had worse overall survival compared to those whose thrombocytopenia was unrelated to ICI (4.17 vs. 10.8 month; HR. 1.94, 95% CI 1.13, 3.33; log-rank p = 0.0164). Patients with grade ≥ 3 irTCP also had worse survival compared to those without thrombocytopenia (4.17 vs. 13.31 months; HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.36, 3.62; log-rank p = 0.001). The incidence of irTCP appeared lowest among those treated with PD-1/L1 monotherapy (p = 0.059) and was not associated with cancer type, smoking status, age, gender, race, or line of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other irAEs, we found that irTCP was associated with worse overall survival. The incidence of irTCP appeared lowest among those treated with PD-1/L1 monotherapy.

Comparative assessment of manual chart review and ICD claims data in evaluating immunotherapy-related adverse events.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to demonstrate that irAEs, specifically gastrointestinal and pulmonary, examined through International Classification of Disease (ICD) data leads to underrepresentation of true irAEs and overrepresentation of false irAEs, thereby concluding that ICD claims data are a poor approach to electronic health record (EHR) data mining for irAEs in immunotherapy clinical research. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was conducted in 1,063 cancer patients who received ICIs between 2011 and 2017. We identified irAEs by manual review of medical records to determine the incidence of each of our endpoints, namely colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, other irAE, or no irAE. We then performed a secondary analysis utilizing ICD claims data alone using a broad range of symptom and disease-specific ICD codes representative of irAEs. RESULTS: 16% (n = 174/1,063) of the total study population was initially found to have either pneumonitis 3% (n = 37), colitis 7% (n = 81) or hepatitis 5% (n = 56) on manual review. Of these patients, 46% (n = 80/174) did not have ICD code evidence in the EHR reflecting their irAE. Of the total patients not found to have any irAEs during manual review, 61% (n = 459/748) of patients had ICD codes suggestive of possible irAE, yet were not identified as having an irAE during manual review. DISCUSSION: Examining gastrointestinal and pulmonary irAEs through the International Classification of Disease (ICD) data leads to underrepresentation of true irAEs and overrepresentation of false irAEs.

Increased bleeding risk associated with concurrent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and low-molecular-weight heparin.

BACKGROUND: Some cancer patients who are diagnosed with thromboembolism may require dual treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and factor Xa inhibitors (low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH] or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]). However, to the authors' knowledge, the safety of such combinations has not been well characterized. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer who were treated with concurrent VEGFR TKIs and factor Xa inhibitors between 2010 and 2018 at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center were included. Charts were reviewed retrospectively for clinically significant bleeding events occurring during concurrent treatment compared with those occurring during factor Xa inhibitor therapy alone, using each patient as their own control. The Fisher exact test was used to compare distribution of bleeding severities. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare bleeding risk between groups. RESULTS: Among 86 patients, there were 29 clinically significant bleeding events (including 8 major bleeding events) reported during concurrent treatment and 17 events (including 4 major bleeding events) reported during factor Xa inhibitor therapy alone over a median follow-up of 63 days. Concurrent treatment was associated with significantly higher risks of overall bleeding (hazard ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.69 [P = .007]) and first-onset bleeding (hazard ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-4.42 [P = .02]). Analysis of 6-month bleeding risk and the subgroups of patients treated with concurrent TKIs and LMWH versus LMWH alone demonstrated a similar trend. The sample size was inadequate for comparisons between treatment with concurrent TKIs and DOACs versus DOACs alone. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent treatment with VEGFR TKIs and LMWH was found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding events when compared with LMWH therapy alone.

Multisystem Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: The spectrum of individual immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been reported widely, and their development is associated with improved patient survival across tumor types. The spectrum and impact on survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop multisystem irAEs from ICIs, has not been described. Objective: To characterize multisystem irAEs, their association with survival, and risk factors for multisystem irAE development. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study carried out in 5 academic institutions worldwide included 623 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC, treated with anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs alone or in combination with another anticancer agent between January 2007 and January 2019. Exposures: Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy or combinations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multisystem irAEs were characterized by combinations of individual irAEs or organ system involved, separated by ICI-monotherapy or combinations. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in PFS and OS between irAE groups were assessed by multivariable models. Risk for multisystem irAE was estimated as odds ratios by multivariable logistic regression. Results: The 623 patients included in the study were mostly men (60%, n = 375) and White (77%, n = 480). The median (range) age was 66 (58-73) years, and 148 patients (24%) developed a single irAE, whereas 58 (9.3%) developed multisystem irAEs. The most common multisystem irAE patterns in patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were pneumonitis thyroiditis (n = 7, 14%), hepatitis thyroiditis (n = 5, 10%), dermatitis pneumonitis (n = 5, 10%), and dermatitis thyroiditis (n = 4, 8%). Favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (ECOG PS = 0/1 vs 2; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94; P = .04) and longer ICI duration (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .001) were independent risk factors for development of multisystem irAEs. Patients with 1 irAE and multisystem irAEs demonstrated incrementally improved OS (adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.12; P = .26; and aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = . 005, respectively) and PFS (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = .001; and aHR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.55; P < .001, respectively) vs patients with no irAEs, in multivariable models adjusting for ICI duration. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter cohort study, development of multisystem irAEs was associated with improved survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs.

Brief report: inhaled corticosteroid use and the risk of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is an immune-related adverse event that may complicate treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and can cause significant morbidity. We sought to identify predictors for the development of CIP, and whether the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at time of ICI may be protective. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI from 2011 and 2018 were included in this study. CIP attribution to ICI was determined by treating physician at time of diagnosis. Predictors were assessed by univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: We identified 837 pts treated with ICI, of whom 30 (3.6%) developed grade 2 or higher CIP. 82 patients (9.8%) were receiving ICS at time of ICI and had increased risk of developing CIP with hazard ration (HR) of 4.22 (95% CI 1.93-9.21, p < 0.001) compared to those patients not receiving ICS. Patients with age ≥ 65 years had increased risk of developing CIP (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.02-4.40, p = 0.044), as did 209 patients with lung cancer (198 NSCLC and 11 SCLC) compared to other types of cancers (HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.54-6.46, p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 years, lung cancer diagnosis, and ICS use remained statistically associated with the development of CIP, with adjusted HR for ICS 3.09 (95% CI 1.32-7.24, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with ICS at time of ICI initiation had an increased risk of developing CIP. We further identified older adults with age ≥ 65 years and lung cancers as independent risk factors for CIP.

Inferring the role of the microbiome on survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: causal modeling, timing, and classes of concomitant medications.

BACKGROUND: The microbiome has been shown to affect the response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in a small number of cancers and in preclinical models. Here, we sought to broadly survey cancers to identify those in which the microbiome may play a prognostic role using retrospective analyses of patients with advanced cancer treated with ICIs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 690 patients who received ICI therapy for advanced cancer. We used a literature review to define a causal model for the relationship between medications, the microbiome, and ICI response to guide the abstraction of electronic health records. Medications with precedent for changes to the microbiome included antibiotics, corticosteroids, proton pump inhibitors, histamine receptor blockers, non-steroid anti-inflammatories and statins. We tested the effect of medication timing on overall survival (OS) and evaluated the robustness of medication effects in each cancer. Finally, we compared the size of the effect observed for different classes of antibiotics to taxa that have been correlated to ICI response using a literature review of culture-based antibiotic susceptibilities. RESULTS: Of the medications assessed, only antibiotics and corticosteroids significantly associated with shorter OS. The hazard ratios (HRs) for antibiotics and corticosteroids were highest near the start of ICI treatment but remained significant when given prior to ICI. Antibiotics and corticosteroids remained significantly associated with OS even when controlling for multiple factors such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and stage. When grouping antibiotics by class, ß-lactams showed the strongest association with OS across all tested cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The timing and strength of the correlations with antibiotics and corticosteroids after controlling for confounding factors are consistent with the microbiome involvement with the response to ICIs across several cancers.

Correction to: Outcomes associated with immune-related adverse events in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: a pooled exploratory analysis from a global cohort.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The second sentence of the section "irAEs and ICI efficacy" should read as.

Outcomes associated with immune-related adverse events in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: a pooled exploratory analysis from a global cohort.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) comprise a distinct spectrum of auto-inflammatory manifestations triggered due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Current data on the association of irAEs with outcomes in NSCLC treated with nivolumab are limited. METHODS AND OBJECTIVES: We pooled data from 531 metastatic NSCLC patients from five centers treated with nivolumab after failing platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective was to investigate the relationship between irAEs with clinical benefit to nivolumab as well as to elucidate patterns of irAE-related ICI discontinuations and their impact on survival. RESULTS: 33.0% (173/531) of patients treated with nivolumab were noted to have an irAE. Patients with irAEs had a significantly longer median PFS [6.1 vs. 3.1 months, HR 0.68 95% CI (0.55-0.85); p = 0.001] and OS [14.9 vs. 7.4 months, HR 0.66 95% CI (0.52-0.82); p < 0.001)] compared to those without irAEs. In multivariate analysis, the presence of irAEs showed a significantly better PFS [HR 0.69, 95% CI (0.55-0.87); p = 0.002] and a trend for better OS [HR 0.62, 95% CI (0.55-1.03); p = 0.057]. Patients with permanent ICI discontinuation secondary to index irAE had a significantly shorter median PFS [2.3 vs. 6.6 months, HR 1.74 95% CI (1.06-2.80); p = 0.02] and median OS [3.6 vs. 17.6 months; HR 2.61 95% CI (1.61-4.21); p < 0.001] compared to those that did not have permanent ICI discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled exploratory analysis demonstrates improved clinical benefit to nivolumab in NSCLC patients experiencing irAEs. We also observed negative impact of irAE-related treatment discontinuation on survival in this group of patients.