Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 30(4): 431-443, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35123862

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the psychological and functional sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults living in long term care facilities (LTCFs). DESIGN: Cohort longitudinal study SETTING ANT PARTICIPANTS: A total of 215 residents ≥ 65 years without moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment, living in five LTCFs in Albacete (Spain). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline on-site data were collected between March - June 2020 and three-month follow-up between June to September 2020. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and sleep disturbances were measured as psychological variables. Disability in basic activities of daily living (BADL), ambulation and frailty were assessed as functional variables. Differences were analyzed in relation to level of comorbidity and test positivity for COVID-19. RESULTS: At baseline, residents with COVID-19 presented worse functionality, higher frailty levels and malnutrition risk compared to non-COVID-19 residents. At three-month follow-up, higher rates of clinically significant depressive symptoms (57.7%), anxiety symptoms (29.3%), PTSD symptoms (19.1%) and sleep disturbances (93.0%) were found among residents regardless of COVID status. Thus, among 215 residents, 101 (47%) experienced a decline in BADL from baseline to the 3-month follow-up (median functional loss = 5 points in Barthel Index). In multivariate analyses, COVID-19 status did not explain either the functional or the ambulation loss. By contrast, residents with low comorbidity and COVID-19 presented higher PTSD symptoms (effect 2.58; 95% CI 0.93 to 4.23) and anxiety symptoms (effect 2.10; 95% CI 0.48 to 3.73) compared to the low comorbidity/non-COVID19 group. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic was associated, after three-months, with high psychological impact in older adults in LTCFs., specifically with higher post-traumatic stress and anxiety symptoms. Functional decline did not differ in relation to COVID-19 status but could be related to isolation strategies used for pandemic control.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Estudos Longitudinais , Pandemias , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia
3.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 37(5): 719-726, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591851

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has a wide range of symptoms reported, which may vary from very mild cases (even asymptomatic) to deadly infections. Identifying high mortality risk individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus through a prediction instrument that uses simple clinical and analytical parameters at admission can help clinicians to focus on treatment efforts in this group of patients. METHODS: Data was obtained retrospectively from the electronic medical record of all COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the Albacete University Hospital Complex until July 2020. Patients were split into two: a generating and a validating cohort. Clinical, demographical and laboratory variables were included. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to select variables associated with in-hospital mortality in the generating cohort. A numerical and subsequently a categorical score according to mortality were constructed (A: mortality from 0% to 5%; B: from 5% to 15%; C: from 15% to 30%; D: from 30% to 50%; E: greater than 50%). These scores were validated with the validation cohort. RESULTS: Variables independently related to mortality during hospitalization were age, diabetes mellitus, confusion, SaFiO2, heart rate and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at admission. The numerical score defined ranges from 0 to 13 points. Scores included are: age ≥71 years (3 points), diabetes mellitus (1 point), confusion (2 points), onco-hematologic disease (1 point), SaFiO2 ≤ 419 (3 points), heart rate ≥ 100 bpm (1 point) and LDH ≥ 390 IU/L (2 points). The area under the curve (AUC) for the numerical and categorical scores from the generating cohort were 0.8625 and 0.848, respectively. In the validating cohort, AUCs were 0.8505 for the numerical score and 0.8313 for the categorical score. CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis found a correlation between clinical admission parameters and in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients. This correlation is used to develop a model to assist physicians in the emergency department in the COVID-19 treatment decision-making process.


Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha
4.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol ; 45(4): 219-28, 2010.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20488585

RESUMO

Comorbidity is common in the elderly and contributes to the complexity of this population subgroup. This problem is a risk factor for major adverse events such as functional decline, disability, dependency, poor quality-of-life, institutionalization, hospitalization and death, but is not the most important factor. Age and risk of functional decline rather than comorbidity (understood as a compilation of diseases) are the main characteristics defining the target population attended by geriatricians. Comorbidity indexes should not be interpreted independently in the elderly, but within a context of comprehensive geriatric assessment that includes age-related preclinical dysfunctions, frailty measures, and functional, mental and psychosocial issues. The clinical management of comorbidity in the elderly requires advanced knowledge of geriatrics because the treatment of one condition may worsen or lead to the development of others and because preclinical physiological dysfunctions modulate drug response. Recommending a specific comorbidity index is difficult and depends on multiple factors, due to their psychometric characteristics, applicability in the elderly and their construct. However, the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, in the version adapted to the elderly, could be highly suitable. Other instruments, such as the Charlson index, the Index of CoExistent Disease and the Kaplan index are also valid and reproducible.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Avaliação Geriátrica , Geriatria , Idoso , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
5.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol ; 45(3): 125-30, 2010.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20338671

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Subclinical atherosclerosis is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but its relationship with functional limitation as a precursor of disability has not been determined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study was performed in 171 high-functioning community-dwelling adults aged more than 64 years old (mean age 73.7 years, 110 women). All received a carotid ultrasound examination at the beginning of the study. Subclinical atherosclerosis was determined by the presence or absence of atherosclerotic plaques and the sum of the diameters of all the plaques (SDP) in the carotid bilateral tree. Subjects were followed-up at 12 months. The association between subclinical atherosclerosis and functional limitation was assessed with the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) at entry and at 1 year, adjusted by demographic, functional, affective, cognitive and cardiovascular risk factors as covariables. RESULTS: At 1 year after baseline, 37 subjects (21.6%) performed the TUG 20% more slowly: 30 with plaque (30.7%) and seven without plaque (9.5%) (p=0.001). Those with plaque had an adjusted increased risk of performing the TUG 20% more slowly than those without plaque [OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.2-15.8]. SDP was 1.48 mm greater in subjects with more than 20% slowing on the TUG [3.34 vs 1.85; 95% CI 0.52-2.44]. For each 2-mm increment in the SDP, subjects had a 1.9-fold greater adjusted risk of performing the TUG 20% more slowly at 1 year [95% CI 1.4-2.5]. CONCLUSION: Subclinical atherosclerosis is an independent predictor of functional limitation at 1 year in high-functioning older adults.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose/diagnóstico , Aterosclerose/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Prognóstico , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA