Impact of pre- and peri-operative risk factors on length of stay and hospital readmission following minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy.

Objective: We conducted an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy cases reported with the goal to identify pre- and peri-operative variables associated with length of stay (LOS) greater than 3 days and readmission within 30 days. Methods: Records from 2008 to 2018 for "laparoscopy, surgical; partial nephrectomy" for prolonged LOS and readmission cohorts were compiled. Univariate analysis with Chi-square, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (ORs), p-values, and 95% confidence intervals assessed statistical associations. Results: Totally, 20 306 records for LOS greater than 3 days and 15 854 for readmission within 30 days were available. Univariate and multivariable analysis exhibited similar results. For LOS greater than 3 days, undergoing non-elective surgery (OR=5.247), transfusion of greater than four units within 72 h prior to surgery (OR=5.072), pre-operative renal failure or dialysis (OR=2.941), and poor pre-operative functional status (OR=2.540) exhibited the strongest statistically significant associations. For hospital readmission within 30 days, loss in body weight greater than 10% in 6 months prior to surgery (OR=2.227) and bleeding disorders (OR=2.081) exhibited strongest statistically significant associations. Conclusion: Multiple pre- and peri-operative risk factors are independently associated with prolonged LOS and hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Recognizing the risks factors that can potentially be improved prior to minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy is crucial to informing patient selection, optimization strategies, and patient education.

Creation of a Novel, Race-Adjusted, and Risk-Adapted Scoring System to Predict Positive Surgical Margins and Prolonged Operative Time During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.

Objectives: To compare racial differences and pelvis dimensions between Caucasians and African Americans (AAs) and to develop a risk calculator and scoring system to predict the risk of prolonged operative time and presence of positive surgical margins (PSM) based on these dimensions. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 88 consecutive patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with a preoperative prostate MRI conducted. Data extraction included demographic, perioperative, and postoperative oncologic outcomes. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was obtained within 3 months postsurgery. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical data, respectively. Single and multivariable regression analysis were used to determine contribution of each factor to the composite outcomes. A risk score was created based on this analysis for predicting the composite outcome. Results: We identified 88 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer that underwent a preoperative prostate MRI. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to age, body mass index, or any postoperative outcome. PSA was lower at diagnosis (6.49 vs 9.72, p = 0.006) and operative times were shorter in Caucasians. Rates of PSM (13 vs 14, p = 0.35), biochemical recurrence (4 vs 2, p = 0.69), and complications did not vary between the groups. Caucasians had wider/shallower pelvis dimensions. Based on these variables, we found that the log (odds of OR time >3 hours or PSM) = -5.333 + 1.158 (if AA) +0.105 × PSA +0.076 × F -0.035 × G with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73. Using the predefined variables, patients can be risk stratified for PSM or prolonged operative times. Conclusions: Several pelvis dimensions were found to be shorter/narrower in AAs and were associated with longer operative times. The presented risk calculator and stratification system may be used to predict prolonged operative time or having PSM.

Robotic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancer: inching toward standard of care?

Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy. Current guidelines strongly recommend radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template-based lymph node dissection for all high-risk upper-tract urothelial carcinomas. Although the open approach is still considered the standard of care, evolution of minimally invasive approaches especially the robotic-assisted approach, has been found to be oncologically equivalent. Since its initial description in 2006, the surgical technique as well as the robotic surgical system has gone through a major evolution. With well-established advantages of the minimally invasive approach, robotic radical nephroureterectomy also has the ability to address both upper and lower urinary tract simultaneously without the need of patient repositioning, standardized single docking technique, ease of performing crucial steps like excision of ureterovesical junction and bladder cuff with watertight cystotomy closure, allowing perioperative instillation of intra-vesical chemotherapy. Robot-assisted radical nephro-ureterectomy and template-based lymph node dissection is gradually emerging as the current standard of care to achieve the best possible oncologic and functional outcomes. In this review article we are focusing on the evolution of this approach in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma along with a review of oncologic outcomes.