Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 81: 99-104, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718560

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of USG-guided PENG (Peri capsular nerve group) block with Intravenous Nalbuphine hydrochloride (IVN) in patients with hip fracture coming to the emergency department (ED). The purpose was also to monitor the adverse effects and rescue analgesic requirements in both treatment modalities. METHODS: The study was an open-label randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing PENG block versus IVN in treating patients with femoral head and neck fractures, as well as pubic rami fracture of the hip (HF). The participants in the PENG group received a USG-guided PENG block by injection of 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, whereas the IVN group received 0.15 mg/kg of nalbuphine. An emergency physician with expertise in ultrasound-guided nerve blocks performed the PENG blocks. The primary outcome was to measure the improvement of the NRS (Numerical rating scale) score at 30 min in both static position (Patient-chosen position for the best comfort) and dynamic position (15-degree passive affected lower limb elevation). Secondary outcomes were to measure static and dynamic NRS pain scores at 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after intervention in both groups. The requirement for rescue analgesia, adverse events and any block-related complications were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with HF were included in the final analysis. The static and dynamic NRS score was significantly lower in the PENG group compared to the IVN group at 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h post-intervention. In the PENG group, the static NRS score was improved by 5.73 ± 1.17, while In the IVN group, the static NRS score was just improved by 2.13 ± 0.97 at 30 min. In the same duration, the Dynamic NRS score in the PENG group was improved by 6.13 ± 1.38, while In the IVN group, it improved just by 2.43 ± 1.28. Rescue analgesia was required in 50.0% of patients in the IVN group but none in the PENG group. Further, no block-related complications or adverse events were observed in the patients of the PENG group. CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence that the ultrasound-guided PENG block has a better analgesic effect and has fewer adverse events than IV opioids in patients with HF.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Bloqueio Nervoso , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Humanos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Idoso , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Nalbufina/administração & dosagem , Nalbufina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Fraturas do Quadril , Medição da Dor , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Manejo da Dor/métodos
2.
Pharm Methods ; 3(1): 26-30, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23781474

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The main objective was to develop and validate a simple, accurate, precise, and sensitive ion-pair spectrophotometric extraction method for the assay of gemifloxacin mesylate (GFX) in pure, tablets and spiked human urine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The method is based upon the reaction of gemifloxacin with methyl orange, forming a yellow-colored complex in acidic medium, which is extracted in chloroform and analyzed. The extracted complexes showed absorbance maxima (λmax) found to be at 427 nm. RESULTS: Beer's law was obeyed for a wide concentration range, i.e., 10-80 µg/ mL as the extracted species seemed well defined and stable. The surface or an interphase adsorption phenomenon was not a problem. Optimization of the reaction was carried out with factors such as buffer strength, stability of complex, and molar ratio of drug: Dye and extraction time. The proposed method was validated as per the ICH guidelines. The recovery studies confirmed the accuracy and precision of the method. CONCLUSION: The above-mentioned method was a rapid tool for routine analysis of GFX in the bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA