Radiographic Outcomes of Hallux Valgus Deformity Correction With Chevron and Scarf Osteotomies.

There is no gold standard in the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. The purpose of our study was to compare various aspects of radiographic assessment following scarf and chevron osteotomies and try to determine which technique helps achieve a more pronounced intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) correction and produces lower rates of complications, including adjacent-joint arthritis. This study included patients who underwent hallux valgus correction with the scarf (n = 32) or chevron (n = 181) method with a follow-up period of over 3 years. We evaluated the following parameters: HVA, IMA, duration of hospital stay, complications, development of adjacent-joint arthritis. The scarf technique helped achieve a mean HVA and IMA correction of 18.3° and 3.6°, respectively, and the chevron technique helped achieve a mean correction of 13.1° and 3.7°, respectively. The achieved deformity correction in terms of both the HVA and IMA was statistically significant in both patient groups. The loss of correction assessed with the HVA was statistically significant only in the chevron group. Neither group showed a statistically significant loss of IMA correction. The duration of hospital stay, reoperation rates, and fixation instability rates were comparable in the 2 groups. Neither of the evaluated methods caused a significant increase in total arthritis scores in the evaluated joints. Our study showed good outcomes of hallux valgus deformity correction in both evaluated groups; however, scarf osteotomy yielded somewhat better radiographic outcomes in HVA correction and no loss of HVA correction at 3.5 years of follow-up.

Kinematic parameters after tibial nonunion treatment using the Ilizarov method.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the outcomes of Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunion shows functional deficits in the lower limbs of some patients. Biomechanical gait parameters are an important measure for assessing musculoskeletal disorder treatments that aim to restore normal gait. The purpose of our study was to compare the kinematic parameters in patients with tibial nonunion treated using the Ilizarov method and those in a control group of healthy volunteers. METHODS: The study population consisted of 23 patients (age 54.9 ± 16.4 years) who were treated for tibial nonunion using the Ilizarov method, as well as 22 healthy adult controls (age 52.7 ± 10.6 years). Kinematic parameters were measured using a Noraxon MyoMOTION System. We measured hip flexion and abduction, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, inversion, and abduction during walking. RESULTS: Our analysis showed significant differences between the patients' operated limbs (OLs) and the controls' nondominant limbs (NDLs) in the ranges of hip flexion, hip abduction, and knee flexion. We observed no significant differences in knee flexion between the OL and the NOL in patients or between the dominant limb (DL) and NDL in controls. Our evaluation of the kinematic parameters of the ankle joint demonstrated significant differences between the patients' OLs and the controls' NDLs in the ranges of ankle dorsiflexion, ankle inversion, and ankle abduction. There were also significant differences in the range of ankle dorsiflexion and ankle abduction between the patients' NOLs and the controls' DLs. CONCLUSION: Tibial nonunion treatment using the Ilizarov method does not ensure complete normalization of kinematic parameters assessed 24-48 months following the completion of treatment and rehabilitation.

In Patients with Grade I and II Ankle Sprains, Dynamic Taping Seems to Be Helpful during Certain Tasks, Exercises and Tests in Selected Phases of the Rehabilitation Process: A Preliminary Report.

We aimed to investigate changes in postural stability on a stable surface after the application of dynamic tape for patients with inversion ankle sprains. This study enrolled 30 patients (age 25.5 ± 8.0 years) with grade I and II ankle sprains, which occurred 7−21 days before enrolment. Postural stability (balance, coordination, feedback) was assessed before and after the application of dynamic tape using a stabilographic platform. Three 32-s exercises were performed on the stabilographic platform, one with eyes open, one with eyes closed and one with visual feedback. After the application of dynamic tape, an improvement was observed in terms of the mean radius of sway (4.2 ± 1.3 mm vs. 3.4 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.012) and coordination (48.8 ± 19.2% vs. 59.3 ± 5.8%; p = 0.021). Selected balance parameters did not improve significantly in the tests with open and closed eyes. Asymmetric load improved for all tests, but significant differences were only observed with eyes closed (34.9 ± 24.4 vs. 41.7 ± 30.5; p < 0.01). We concluded that the use of dynamic tape after an ankle sprain significantly improved balance and coordination on a stable surface. The benefits were shown in terms of a significant improvement in the asymmetric load of the injured limb in comparison to the healthy limb during the test with closed eyes and a considerable improvement in the asymmetric load that was evaluated with visual feedback on a stable surface.

Kinematic Parameters Following Pilon Fracture Treatment with the Ilizarov Method.

Background: The purpose of our study was to analyze kinematic parameters following pilon fracture treatment with the Ilizarov method. Methods: Our study assessed kinematic parameters of gait in 23 patients with pilon fractures treated with the Ilizarov method. Patients had completed their treatment 24−48 months prior to measurements. The range-of-motion values in the non-operated limb (NOL) and operated limb (OL) were compared. Kinematic parameters were measured using the Noraxon MyoMOTION System. Results: We observed no significant differences in hip flexion, hip abduction, or knee flection between the OLs and NOLs in patients after treatment with the Ilizarov method. We observed significant differences in the ranges of ankle dorsiflexion, inversion, and abduction (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.003, respectively) between the OLs and the NOLs. Conclusion: Following pilon fracture treatment with the Ilizarov method, we observed no differences in terms of knee or hip joint mobility between the OL and the NOL, whereas the range of motion in the ankle joint of the OL was significantly limited. The treatment of pilon fractures with the Ilizarov method does not ensure the complete normalization of ankle joint kinematic parameters. Therefore, intense personalized rehabilitation of the ankle joint is recommended.

Dynamic Gait Parameters in Patients With Nonunion of the Tibia Following Treatment With the Ilizarov Method.

The purpose of this study was a comprehensive assessment of the dynamic parameters of gait in patients who underwent Ilizarov treatment for nonunion of the tibia. The experimental group consisted of 24 individuals treated with the Ilizarov method for nonunion of the tibia. The control group comprised 31 healthy individuals, matched for BMI, sex, and age. The dynamic gait parameters in patients and in the control group were measured with a Zebris pedobarographic platform. The treatment group and the control group showed statistically significant differences in terms of the following gait parameters: maximum force during braking nonoperated-limb (NOL), time maximum force during braking operated-limb (OL), time maximum force during braking NOL, maximum force during push-off NOL, time maximum force during push-off OL, and maximum force forefoot OL. Most of the evaluated gait parameters were bilaterally similar in patients group. The only significant differences between the operated and nonoperated limb were seen in terms of Time maximum force during push-off and Maximum force forefoot. The most pronounced abnormalities in dynamic gait parameters were observed in the forefoot (maximum force forefoot OL was 13.3% lower than in the control group, maximum force forefoot OL was 12.4% lower than in NOL). The patients treated with the Ilizarov method did not achieve a complete normalization of dynamic gait parameters, as their gait parameters did not equal those measured in the control group. The Ilizarov method for the treatment of tibial nonunion helps restore a symmetrical distribution of gait parameter values between the affected limb and the healthy limb. Patients continue to show the following abnormalities in their dynamic gait parameters after treatment: higher values maximum force during braking NOL, Time maximum force during braking OL, time maximum force during braking NOL, maximum force during push-off NOL, contact time forefoot NOL, contact time midfoot NOL, contact time heel NOL and smaller values of time maximum force during push-off OL.

Assessment of Lower Limb Load Distribution in Patients Treated with the Ilizarov Method for Tibial Nonunion.

BACKGROUND Successful treatment of tibial nonunion should lead to a complete bone union, lack of pain, and pathological mobility of the lower extremity, as well as to the achievement of satisfactory joint mobility and muscle strength, which in turn improves its biomechanics. The objective of this study was to assess the load placed on the lower limbs in patients subjected to treatment with the Ilizarov method due to aseptic tibial nonunion. MATERIAL AND METHODS This research involved 24 participants (average age, 55 years). All were diagnosed with aseptic tibia nonunion and treated with the Ilizarov external fixator between 2000 and 2017. The control group was matched to the treated group in terms of sex and age. This study used pedobarography evaluation to assess lower limb load distribution. RESULTS No differences were found in the distribution of the load over the entire foot or of the forefoot and hindfoot of the treated limb in comparison to the non-dominant limb of the controls, or in the healthy limb of the treated group compared to the dominant limb of the control group. Similarly, differences in load distribution between the operated and healthy limbs of the treated group were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS Patients subjected to treatment with the Ilizarov external fixator for aseptic tibial nonunion show symmetrical load distribution on both lower limbs following treatment, which does not differentiate them in this respect from healthy individuals. Treated patients presented with a symmetrical distribution of the load on the lower extremities over the entire foot surface, including the forefoot and hindfoot. Finally, the Ilizarov external fixator enables restoration of correct static biomechanics of the treated limbs over the period of aseptic tibial nonunion therapy.

Assessment of Gait after Treatment of Tibial Nonunion with the Ilizarov Method.

BACKGROUND: Tibial nonunion is a common bone union disorder leading to abnormal gait, and thus reducing quality of life in the social dimension. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of our work was to comprehensively assess gait parameters of patients who had undergone Ilizarov treatment for tibial nonunion compared to a control group of healthy individuals. METHODS: This study evaluated patients treated for aseptic tibial nonunion with the Ilizarov method. 24 patients with a mean age of 55.0 years were included in the study. The control group consisted of 32 healthy volunteers with no significant medical history who were selected to match the gender and age of patients in the study group so that the groups were homogeneous. A Zebris Medical GmbH pedobarographic platform was used to assess the gait parameters. RESULTS: For all gait parameters examined, force forefoot max, force backfoot max, step length, stance phase, swing phase and step time, we observed statistically significant differences between the group that had undergone treatment and the control group. In the group of patients, statistically significant differences between the operated lower limb and the non-operated limb were only observed for the force forefoot max and step time parameters (p = 0.029 and p = 0.045, respectively). Patients presented a longer loading of the operated limb (0.720 s) than the non-operated limb (0.635 s). For the stride time, step cadence and gait velocity parameters, healthy subjects achieved much better results during locomotion, and these differences were statistically significant at p < 0.001. SIGNIFICANCE: Treatment of tibial nonunion with the Ilizarov method did not restore normal gait parameters in our group of patients. In fact, the gait parameters of patients were significantly worse than the healthy individuals in the control group. Furthermore, gait parameters following treatment were not symmetrical, and the dynamics of the musculoskeletal system remained impaired.

Assessment of the quality of life in patients with varying degrees of equalization of lower limb length discrepancy treated with Ilizarov method.

BACKGROUND: Inequalities in leg length result in functional disorders, as they impair the biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system, significantly reducing the quality of life (QoL). This study used the WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire in patients with varying degrees of lower leg shortness who had undergone treatment by the Ilizarov method, compared to a healthy control group. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients treated with the Ilizarov method for discrepancies in lower limb length were grouped by degree of limb equalization (group 1, 37 treated individuals with limb length discrepancy < 1 cm; group 2, 21 individuals with discrepancy ≥ 1 cm but not more than 4 cm). The control group 3 contained 61 healthy individuals. Patient quality of life (QoL) was assessed using a shortened version of the WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire, at least 24 months after the end of Ilizarov therapy. RESULTS: Control subjects obtained higher scores in all domains than subjects in both treatment groups, as well as significantly higher self-assessed QoL, and health, in the physical, psychological, social, and general lifestyle domains, as compared to those with inequalities ≥ 1 cm. Furthermore, patients with inequalities ≥ 1 cm had higher odds ratios of low self-assessment (3.28 times; p = 0.043), low self-assessment of health (4. 09 times; p = 0.047), and low physical and psychological domains (respectively 6.23 times; p = 0.005 and 8.46 times, p = 0.049) compared with patients with inequality < 1 cm. The shortened version of the WHOQoL questionnaire was used. CONCLUSIONS: After at least 24 months of treatment with the Ilizarov method, patients with limb length discrepancy < 1 cm did not differ significantly from healthy individuals in the WHOQoL self-assessment of mental functioning, social, or life satisfaction.

Abdominal muscles activity during abdominal bracing and posterior pelvic tilt in women after natural birth and after caesarean delivery.

PURPOSE: Exercises after pregnancy can reduce the severity and risk of postnatal locomotor system disorders and muscular dysfunctions. The aim of the study was to evaluate electromyographic activity of abdominal muscles in women who gave birth naturally and via a caesarean section, and to compare it to a group of women who have never given birth. METHODS: 27 women were included into the study after completing the personal questionnaire and functional examination. The surface electromyography during abdominal bracing and posterior pelvic tilt was used to test rectus abdominis muscles and internus oblique/ transversus abdominis muscles bilaterally. After normalization test, patients were asked to perform abdominal bracing and posterior pelvic tilt exercises. RESULTS: Activity of rectus abdominis muscle is higher in posterior pelvic tilt compared to abdominal bracing. It should be noted that the internus oblique/transversus abdominis muscle activity in both exercises is similar. CONCLUSIONS: In women after natural birth and after a cesarean section who experienced no locomotor system symptoms, no statistically significant differences in abdominal muscle activity in both exercises were observed. In each group being studied, posterior pelvic tilt activated rectus abdominis muscles to a greater extent than just bracing.

Assessment of body balance of patients treated with the Ilizarov method for tibial nonunion.

PURPOSE: The biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system in patients after tibial nonunion treatment using the Ilizarov method have not yet been fully explored. From the orthopaedic and patient point of view, after the treatment, an assessment should be carried out of the biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. The aim of this study was to assess the body balance of patients treated with the Ilizarov method for tibial nonunion. METHODS: The research group included 24 individuals with a mean age of 55 years, who were treated for aseptic tibial nonunion with the Ilizarov method. The control group was matched to the study group in terms of gender and age, and consisted of 32 subjects with a mean age of 50.5 years and no significant medical history. This study evaluated the balance of patients with the use of pedobarography. RESULTS: In the control group, a statistically significantly shorter path of centre of gravity was observed. There were no statistical differences between the study and control groups for the field area of the centre of gravity. There were no statistical differences between the study and control groups for the minor axis length or major axis length of the centre of gravity. There was a relationship between the centre of pressure path length and the age of the participants in both the control group and the study group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with tibial nonunion with the Ilizarov fixator achieves similar balance to healthy volunteers. In the pedobarographic evaluation, patients treated for tibial nonunion using the Ilizarov method had similar statics of the musculoskeletal system to healthy volunteers.

Clinical evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: Ankle arthrodesis may have internal or external stabilization. We assessed whether the type of stabilization after ankle arthrodesis will affect: (1) functional outcome in Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scale, (2) pain level, (3) period of hospitalization, (4) rate of complications. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 47 individuals after ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation (group 1, n = 21) and internal stabilization (group 2, n = 26) at our institution in years 2007-2015. Clinical outcomes were measure by: (1) functional outcome in FAAM scale, (2) pain level, (3) period of hospitalization, (4) rate of complications. RESULTS: Total number of complications in Ilizarov group was 13, which corresponded to 0.62 complications per patient on average. In group 2 there were 15 complications, which corresponded to 0.58 complications per patient on average. The intergroup difference in rate of complications was not statistically significant (p = 0.066). In group 1 the mean VAS pain level before treatment was 4.69 and after treatment was 1.5 (p = 0.037). In group with internal stabilization the mean VAS pain level before treatment was 4.71 and after treatment was 2.9 (p = 0.044). In group 1 the mean period of hospitalization was 5.29 days, in group 2 was 5.71 days (p = 0.517). In group 1 the mean functional outcome in FAAM scale was 79.38, in group 2 was 70.11 (p = 0.458). CONCLUSIONS: Ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov stabilization is associated with lower prevalence of VAS pain level after surgery than after internal screws stabilization. Rate of complications, FAAM functional score and period of hospitalization were not statistically significant between group 1 and 2. Clinical outcome was satisfactory in group 1 and 2, but outcomes in Ilizarov group were slightly better than after internal stabilization.

Sport and physical activity after ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: Severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle joint constitutes an important social problem. OBJECTIVES: We used (1) the GRIMBY scale, (2) the LOWER LIMB Activity scale, (3) the UCLA (University of California Los Angeles) activity scale, (4) the VAS (visual analogue scale) ACTIVITY scale, and (5) the FAAM (foot and ankle ability measure) SPORT scale to verify whether the type of ankle joint arthrodesis stabilization affected sports and physical activity levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective clinical study of 47 patients who had undergone ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov external fixator stabilization (Group 1, n = 21) or internal stabilization with screws (Group 2, n = 26) at Orthopaedic Clinic at the Wroclaw Medical University, Poland, from 2007 to 2015. Sports and physical activity levels were measured by (1) the GRIMBY scale, (2) the LOWER LIMB Activity scale, (3) the UCLA activity scale, (4) the VAS ACTIVITY scale, and (5) the FAAM SPORT scale. RESULTS: A comparison between the average results of Group 1 and Group 2 on the LOWER LIMB Activity scale and the GRIMBY scale before and after surgery revealed no significant differences. In Group 1, the mean scores on the VAS ACTIVITY scale and the UCLA activity scale after treatment were higher than in Group 2. In Group 1, the mean outcome in the SPORT FAAM scale after treatment was 40; in Group 2 it was 30.06. CONCLUSIONS: Ilizarov fixation of ankle arthrodesis is associated with better scores on the FAAM SPORT, UCLA activity and VAS ACTIVITY scales after treatment than internal fixation. The scores on the GRIMBY scale and the UCLA activity scale were significantly higher after treatment than before treatment in both groups. In this study, ankle fusion with Ilizarov fixation and internal fixation was found to be effective in the treatment of ankle arthritis. The levels of sport and physical activity were satisfactory in both groups, but the outcomes after fixation with the Ilizarov apparatus were better than after internal stabilization.

Pedobarographic analysis of body weight distribution on the lower limbs and balance after ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: A number of various techniques were proposed to stabilized ankle arthrodesis, among them external and internal fixation. Appropriate balance and adequate distribution of lower limb loads determine normal biomechanics of the locomotor system. We hypothesized that various techniques used to stabilize ankle arthrodesis may exert different effects on (1) balance and (2) distribution of lower limb loads. METHODS: Retrospective analysis included 47 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis with external stabilization with Ilizarov fixator (group 1, n = 21) or internal stabilization with screws (group 2, n = 26) between 2007 and 2015. Balance and distribution of lower limb loads were determined with a pedobarographic platform. RESULTS: In group 1, average load of the operated and non-operated limb amounted to 48.8% and 51.2%, respectively, and in group subjected to internal stabilization to 48.4% and 51.6%, respectively. Neither the intragroup nor the intergroup differences in the distribution of lower limb loads were statistically significant. Mean length of the center of gravity (COG) path was 137.9 cm for group 1 and 134 cm for group 2, and mean COG area amounted to 7.41 cm2 and 6.16 cm2, respectively. The latter intergroup difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Balance after ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation is worse than after the same procedure with internal stabilization. Despite correction of ankle deformity, musculoskeletal biomechanics still remains impaired. While ankle fusion with either Ilizarov or internal fixation provide appropriate distribution of lower limb loads, none of these procedures normalize patients' balance.

Assessment of the distribution of load on the lower limbs and balance before and after ankle arthrodesis with the Ilizarov method.

Ankle arthrodesis with the Ilizarov method is an accepted form of treatment of advanced degenerative changes of the ankle joint. Incorrect balance and load distribution on the lower limbs may result in pain and dysfunction. The aim of the study was to assess the change of balance and load distribution in lower extremities in patients before and after ankle arthrodesis with the Ilizarov method. Between 2013 and 2016, ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method was performed on 21 patients. The evaluation of balance and percentage of load in each lower limb was performed before the surgery and during the follow-ups. The evaluation was performed using a Zebris pedobarographic platform. Before the surgery, the patients exhibited an average load of 41.9% of body weight in the affected limb, whereas the load in the healthy limb was 58.1%. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0,000031). In two years follow-up, the average load in the treated limbs was 48.19%, whereas the healthy limbs were subjected to an average load of 51.81%. In preoperative tests, the average path length of the center of gravity was 161.55 cm; postoperatively, the average path length of the center of gravity was 129.7 cm (p = 0.00003206). Preoperatively, the average area of the center of gravity was 18.85 cm2; it decreased to 6.19 cm2 (p = 0.000032) postoperatively. Arthrodesis of the ankle with the Ilizarov method improved the statics of the musculoskeletal system by improving the distribution of loads in the lower limbs as well as balance. However, it failed to restore the parameters of a healthy person. Advanced degenerative changes of the ankle disturb the biomechanics of the entire lower limb.

Balance and lower limb loads distribution after Ilizarov corticotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Normal balance and symmetric distribution of lower limb loads are associated with adequate muscle strength, joint mobility and proprioception. The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution of lower limb loads and balance prior to and after axis correction and lengthening with Ilizarov method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective analysis included 20 patients from our clinic, who have been subjected to distraction-corrective lower limb corticotomies with the Ilizarov method in 2014-2015. Balance and distribution of lower limb loads were determined with a pedobarographic platform. RESULTS: Prior to the surgery, mean loads on affected and non-affected limbs corresponded to42%and58%of body weight, respectively. Mean loads on affected and non-affected limbs during the postoperative examination did not differ significantly. Mean path length of the center of gravity prior to and after the surgery amounted to143.27 cm and 125.11 cm, respectively. Mean area of the center of gravity was 7.81 cm2prior to the surgery and 5.81 cm2after the procedure. DISCUSSION: Our present study showed that distraction-corrective Ilizarov corticotomy may provide more symmetric distribution of lower limb loads and improvement of balance. This outcome should be considered satisfactory from the perspective of the locomotor system statics. Corticotomies with Ilizarov method provide symmetric distribution of loads between non-affected and operated limb.

Pedobarographic analysis of body weight distribution on the lower limbs and balance after Ilizarov corticotomies.

BACKGROUND: Symmetrical distribution of the load of the lower limbs and balance are among the determinants of proper biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. So far, it has not been elucidated whether the correction of the axis and the equalization of the length of the lower limbs allow for achieving proper balance and load distribution. The aim of the present study was to compare load distribution and balance of patients who underwent Ilizarov method corticotomies with healthy controls. METHODS: The clinical studies evaluated 57 patients, who underwent corticotomy with the Ilizarov method. The control group consisted of 59 healthy volunteers. The evaluation assessed the distribution of the load of the lower limbs and balance using pedobarographic platform. FINDINGS: In the study group operated limb bore 48.02% of the load on average, while the healthy limb 51.98%. These differences were not statistically significant. The average percentage of load in limbs in treated and control groups did not differ significantly. In the study group, the average length of path of the center of gravity was 145.47cm. In the control group, the average length of path of the center of gravity was 112.69cm. In the study group, the average area of the center of gravity was 7.54cm(2), while in the control group it was 5.19cm(2). INTERPRETATION: Ilizarov method corticotomy allows for the obtainment value of the load distribution of the lower limbs in the study group not significantly different from those in a control group, but does not ensure the achievement of completely normal balance.

Sport and physical activity in patients after derotational corticotomies with the Ilizarov method.

BACKGROUND: Torsional distortion causes numerous musculoskeletal pathologies. Effective treatment allows restoring limb function and return to sport activity. Objectives was to assess the sport activity in patients with derotational corticotomies using the Ilizarov method. METHODS: It was case series retrospective study. The study examined 56 patients. The control group consisted of 54 patients. A mean follow-up time was 5 years and 6 months. A mean age at the start of treatment was 19 years and 10 months. Patients underwent derotational corticotomies of distal epiphysis of the femur or proximal epiphysis of the tibia using the Ilizarov method. The effect of etiology, type of treatment strategy, and rate, size, and level of derotation on the scores of four activity scales was evaluated; additionally, the activity was compared with the control group. RESULTS: There were no differences in the scales of activity before and after treatment in the study and control groups. In the study group, higher activity after treatment was reported in the level of GRIMBY activity. Patients with internal torsion had a higher VAS activity level after treatment as compared to patients with external torsion. CONCLUSIONS: Derotational corticotomies allow returning to or increasing physical and sport activity: they do not have a negative influence on physical activity after treatment as compared to the control group.

Results and biomechanical consideration of treatment of congenital lower limb shortening and deformity using the Ilizarov method.

One of the applications of the Ilizarov apparatus is the correction of congenital shortening and deformities. Ilizarov external fixator produces biomechanical structure with surrounding tissue, which is the reason why very important is correct stability of fixator. Large distraction in the case of high value of lengthening, and large deformity corection result in shear stresses that occur additionally in the regenerate, which can potentially lead to damage of the regenerating nutritive microcirculation of bone tissue and bone fragment displacements. Our objective was to assess the results of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of congenital shortening taking into account treatment strategy and the size of the axis of lengthening and correction. Our research problems include presenting the effects of biomechanics of musculoskeletal deformations on treatment results, presenting complications and their treatment. Between 1989 and 2009, 62 patients underwent surgery to correct congenital lower limb deficiencies at our Clinic; 33 patients were followed-up. In total, there were 70 surgeries (2.12/patient). Axial correction was performed in 26 patients (78.79%). Average age at the start of the treatment was 15.58 years. Mean follow-up was 8.58 years. Mean lengthening per surgery was 3.17 cm with the lengthening index of 50.7 day/cm. Results were very good for 23 patients, good for 7 patients, satisfactory for 3 patients. Complications appeared in 24 patients, problems occurred in 74.42% of the cases, obstacles in 4.65% of cases, and true complications in 20.93% of the cases. The best results were achieved in the treatment of patients with two-stage and two-segment lengthening with a total elongation of less than 7 cm, and without correction of the axis. Congenital shortening of the lower limb should be treated comprehensively because the shortening applies to all segments, and disturbs biomechanics of all lower limb. In the case of axial correction and large amount of elongation high soft tissue forces counteract the distraction forces. Hybrid construction may help to shorten treatment time, increase fixator stability and decrease rate of complications. We suggest use of hybrid Ilizarov fixator, especially when large elongation and axis corection are planned.