Development and validation of a claims-based algorithm to identify patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum disorder.

INTRODUCTION: No validated algorithm exists to identify patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in healthcare claims data. We developed and tested the performance of a healthcare claims-based algorithm to identify patients with NMOSD. METHODS: Using medical record data of 101 adults with NMOSD, multiple sclerosis (MS), or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), we tested the sensitivity and specificity of claims-based algorithms developed through interviews with neurologists. We tested the best-performing algorithm's face validity using 2016-2019 data from IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Demographics and clinical characteristics were reported. RESULTS: Algorithm inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and (≥1 NMO diagnosis [or ≥ 1 transverse myelitis (TM) and ≥ 1 optic neuritis (ON) diagnosis] and ≥ 1 NMOSD drug) or (≥2 NMO diagnoses ≥90 days apart). Exclusion criteria were MS diagnosis or use of MS-specific drug after last NMO diagnosis or NMOSD drug; sarcoidosis diagnosis after last NMO diagnosis; or use of ≥1 immune checkpoint inhibitor. In medical record billing data of 50 patients with NMOSD, 30 with MS, and 21 with MOGAD, the algorithm had 82.0% sensitivity and 70.6% specificity. When applied to healthcare claims data, demographic and clinical features of the identified cohort were similar to known demographics of NMOSD. CONCLUSIONS: This clinically derived algorithm performed well in medical records. When tested in healthcare claims, demographics and clinical characteristics were consistent with previous clinical findings. This algorithm will enable a more accurate estimation of NMOSD disease burden using insurance claims datasets.

Apremilast Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in the Telehealth Setting Versus the In-person Setting During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Limited access to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic prompted patients to seek care using telehealth. In this study, we assessed whether treatment patterns differed for patients with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating apremilast by either a telehealth or an in-person visit. METHODS: We estimated adherence and persistence among US patients in the Merative© MarketScan© Commercial and Supplemental Medicare Databases who newly initiated apremilast between April and June 2020, categorized by the type of visit (telehealth or in-person) when apremilast was first prescribed. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC), with PDC ≥ 0.80 considered to indicate high adherence. Persistence was defined as having apremilast available to take without a 60-day gap during follow-up. Factors associated with high adherence and persistence were estimated with logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS: Among apremilast initiators (n = 505), the mean age was 47.6 years, 57.8% were female, and the majority had PsO (79.6%). Telehealth index visits were more likely among patients residing in Northeast USA (odds ratio [OR] 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-6.71) and Western USA (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.07-5.93]), those with a prescribing rheumatologist (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.10-4.68), and those with any baseline telehealth visit (OR 1.91, 85% CI 1.20-3.04). Those initiating apremilast with a telehealth visit (n = 141) had similar mean PDC to those initiating apremilast with an in-person visit (n = 364) (0.695 vs. 0.728; p = 0.272). At the end of the 6-month follow-up, 54.3% of the overall population had high adherence (PDC ≥ 0.80) and 65.1% were persistent. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients initiating apremilast via telehealth had similar full adherence (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.52-1.21) and persistence as those initiating apremilast in-person. CONCLUSION: Patients with PsO and patients with PsA initiating apremilast via telehealth or in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic had similar medication adherence and persistence during the 6-month follow-up period. These data suggest that patients initiating apremilast can be as effectively managed with telehealth visits as with in-person visits.

Healthcare utilization and direct medical costs of Huntington's disease among Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States.

AIMS: To provide more recent estimates of healthcare utilization and costs in Huntington's disease (HD) in the Medicaid population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used administrative claims data for HD beneficiaries (≥1 HD claim; ICD-9-CM 333.4) from Medicaid Analytic eXtract data files from 1 January 2010-31 December 2014. The date of the first HD claim during the identification period (1 January 2011-31 December 2013) was assigned as the index date. If a beneficiary had multiple HD claims during the identification period, one was randomly chosen as the index date. Beneficiaries were required to be continuously enrolled in fee-for-service plans during the 1-year pre-index and post-index periods. Medicaid beneficiaries without HD were drawn from a 100% random sample and matched (3:1) to those with HD. Beneficiaries were classified by disease stage (early/middle/late). All-cause and HD-related (any utilization related to HD diagnosis or symptoms associated with HD) healthcare utilization and costs were reported. RESULTS: A total of 1,785 beneficiaries without HD were matched to 595 beneficiaries with HD (139 early-, 78 middle-, and 378 late-stage). The mean (SD) annual total costs were higher for beneficiaries with HD than beneficiaries without HD ($73,087 [$75,140] vs. $26,834 [$47,659], p <.001) and driven by inpatient costs ($45,190 [$48,185] vs. $13,808 [$39,596], p <.001). Total healthcare costs were highest among beneficiaries with late-stage HD (mean [SD] cost: $22,797 [$31,683] for early-stage HD vs. $55,294 [$129,290] for middle-stage HD vs. $95,251 [$60,197] for late-stage HD; p <.001). LIMITATIONS: Administrative claims are intended for billing purposes and subject to coding errors. This study did not address functional status, which may provide further insight to late-stage and end-of-life burden of HD, and indirect costs. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid beneficiaries with HD have higher acute healthcare utilization and costs compared to beneficiaries without HD, which tend to increase with disease progression, indicating that HD beneficiaries at later disease stages have greater burden.

Huntington's disease (HD) is a degenerative genetic disorder marked by progressive decline in cognitive and motor functions, leading to severe disability and loss of independence. The median and mean survival time after a diagnosis of HD is 15 years. Little is known about the kinds of health services used or costs associated with HD in the United States (US) in the Medicaid population. The study objective was to estimate healthcare utilization and direct medical spending among Medicaid beneficiaries with HD. The mean annual total costs were higher for beneficiaries with HD than beneficiaries without HD ($73,087 vs. $26,834). Mean total healthcare costs were highest among beneficiaries with late-stage HD ($22,797 for early-stage HD vs. $55,294 for middle-stage HD vs. $95,251 for late-stage HD). Medicaid beneficiaries with HD have higher acute healthcare utilization and costs compared to beneficiaries without HD, with utilization and costs increasing with disease progression, indicating that HD beneficiaries at later disease stages have greater burden.

Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database.

Purpose: To compare the rate of biologic initiation after commencing treatment with apremilast (APR) vs methotrexate (MTX), in systemic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Patients and Methods: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA who started treatment with either APR or MTX between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018 were analyzed using claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2014-2019). PsA patients were identified via diagnosis codes; the first prescription date for APR or MTX was the index date. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization during the year pre-index (baseline) and the year post-index (follow-up), and median time to biologic initiation were reported descriptively. The rates and risk of biologic initiation during follow-up were compared between APR and MTX users by logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical and utilization measures during the baseline period. Results: A total of 2116 patients with PsA newly treated with APR (n = 534) or MTX (n = 1582) were identified. Mean age was similar (50.5 vs 50.4; P = 0.938), and proportion of females was higher for APR vs MTX users (59.4% vs 54.0%; P = 0.031). Mean time to biologic initiation among patients who initiated during follow-up was 194.1 vs 138.7 days between APR vs MTX users (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the likelihood of biologic initiation was 58% lower (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32-0.54]; P < 0.001) with APR, with a significantly lower predicted rate of biologic initiation among APR users when compared to MTX users during follow-up (20.0% [95% CI, 16.6-23.9%] vs 37.5% [95% CI, 35.0-40.1%]). Additionally, APR users had a lower risk of biologic initiation than MTX users (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37-0.57]; P < 0.001) during the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA have a lower rate of, and longer time to, biologic initiation over one-year following APR initiation, compared to those initiating MTX.

Biologic initiation rates in systemic-naive psoriasis patients after first-line apremilast versus methotrexate use.

Aim: To compare rates of biologic initiation after commencing treatment with apremilast (APR) versus methotrexate (MTX) in systemic-naive patients with psoriasis (PsO). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of systemic-naive patients with PsO who initiated treatment with APR or MTX between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2018. Outcomes: Adjusted rates of biologic initiation during follow-up were compared by logistic and Cox regressions. Results: APR initiators had 58% lower likelihood of biologic initiation (odds ratio: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.37-0.48; p < 0.001), lower adjusted biologic initiation rate (14.4% [95% CI: 13.2-15.7%] vs 28.6% [95% CI: 26.8-30.5%]), lower risk of biologic initiation (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.40-0.51; p < 0.001) compared with MTX initiators. Conclusion: Systemic-naive patients with PsO have a lower rate of biologic initiation over 1 year following APR initiation.

Epidemiology of Huntington's Disease in the United States Medicare and Medicaid Populations.

INTRODUCTION: Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare, genetic, and ultimately fatal neurodegenerative disease, with a devastating impact on individuals and families across generations. Few estimates of HD epidemiology in the United States (US) exist. METHODS: This study employed a retrospective cross-sectional design to examine the epidemiology of HD in the US Medicare and Medicaid beneficiary populations using 2016-2017 claims data from the Medicare 100% Research Identifiable Files (RIFs) and 2014 claims data from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) files for 17 states. Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years with a diagnosis of HD (≥1 claim with ICD-10-CM code G10) in 2017 and Medicaid beneficiaries <65 years with a diagnosis of HD (≥1 claim with ICD-9-CM code 333.4) in 2014 were identified. The study outcomes included the 2017 prevalence proportion and incidence rate of HD in the Medicare population and the 2014 prevalence proportion of HD in the Medicaid population. RESULTS: In the Medicare population, 1,941 prevalent and 819 incident cases of HD were identified in 2017, corresponding to a prevalence proportion of 13.1 per 100,000 persons and incidence rate of 6.1 per 100,000 person-years. In the Medicaid population, 353 prevalent cases of HD were identified in 2014, corresponding to a prevalence proportion of 15.2 per 100,000 persons. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that prevalence and incidence of HD in the US may be higher than previously estimated. This has important implications in raising awareness of HD among providers and payers and ensuring availability of and access to services for HD patients and care partners in the Medicare and Medicaid populations.

Cost of cancer management by stage at diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Estimate the annual cost of care in the 5 years following a cancer diagnosis for 17 invasive cancer types, by stage at diagnosis. METHODS: We used 2012-2016 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry-Medicare claims database to examine cost of care among Medicare beneficiaries with a confirmed cancer diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition histology codes reported in SEER. Beneficiaries contributed to the annual cost calculations (Years 1-5) using their observed time after diagnosis. Beneficiaries were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare Parts A/B and Part D during follow-up. Total, inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy cancer-related service costs were calculated. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, we identified 597,778 Medicare beneficiaries with incident cancer diagnosis within 5 years (Stage I, II, III, and IV: 32.6%, 33.4%, 15.9%, and 18.0%, respectively). In Year 1, mean (standard deviation) total costs for Stage I diagnoses varied from $7640 ($17,378) (prostate) to $94,636 ($117,636) (pancreas). Total costs increased by stage and reached $58,783 ($92,344) (prostate) to $156,982 ($175,009) (stomach) for Stage IV diagnoses in Year 1. Costs in Year 1 were significantly higher for Stage IV diagnoses than for earlier stages across all cancer types. In Years 2-5, total costs were lower than in Year 1 but continued to increase by stage. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficiaries diagnosed at later stages of cancer have higher costs of care (up to 7 times as much) than those diagnosed at earlier stages. Earlier cancer diagnosis may lead to more efficient treatment and decreased management cost.

Healthcare utilization and cost burden of Huntington's disease among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.

AIMS: To examine healthcare utilization and costs in a US Medicare population diagnosed with Huntington's disease (HD). METHODS: This was a retrospective matched cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data using 2013-2017 Research Identifiable Files. Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with HD based on the presence of at least one medical claim with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9/10-CM) diagnosis code for HD (ICD-9-CM: 333.4; ICD-10-CM: G10) during the identification period (2014-2016). Beneficiaries without HD were drawn from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries and 1:1 matched to those with HD for comparison. All-cause and HD-related (any utilization related to HD diagnosis or symptoms associated with HD) healthcare utilization and costs were reported. RESULTS: We identified 3,688 matched pairs of beneficiaries with and without HD. Of those with HD, 1,922 (52.1%) were late-stage, 916 (24.8%) were middle-stage, and 850 (23.1%) were early-stage. Mean [SD] annual total healthcare costs were higher for HD beneficiaries than beneficiaries without HD ($41,631 [57,393] vs. $17,222 [31,218], p < .001) and were primarily driven by outpatient pharmacy costs ($19,182 [45,469] vs. $4,318 [11,553], p < .001). In the stratified analysis, total healthcare costs were highest among beneficiaries with late-stage HD (mean [SD] cost: $20,475 [$41,122] for early-stage vs. $29,733 [$44,977] for middle-stage vs. $56,657 [$64,185] for late-stage; p < .001). LIMITATIONS: Results are not generalizable to beneficiaries enrolled in other non-FFS Medicare plans. Administrative claims are intended for billing purposes, not research, and may not capture all symptoms, comorbidities, and other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This original, comprehensive analysis of healthcare utilization and economic burden among Medicare beneficiaries with HD found that healthcare needs and associated costs are substantially higher among Medicare beneficiaries who are diagnosed with HD compared to beneficiaries without HD.